Surviving FlightSurviving Flight  28zn0&NR=1 28zn0&NR=1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Module: Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture.
Advertisements

Mission Success Starts With Safety GSFC Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Control Program Are you plugged in? Jeannette Plante, Program Manager, Code 300.
Innovation You Can Count On™ 1 Payload Integration Wendi Otto Systems Engineer, Pegasus and Taurus Launch Vehicles October 4, 2007 All Information Approved.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
USING NASA QUALITY STANDARDS NASA Academy of Aerospace (AAQ) Quality Mini-Workshop Ken Crane Quality Engineering Technical Discipline Team Lead NASA SAFETY.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
May 14th, 2010 FMSTR. The Problem and Proposed Solution No current, acceptable solution exists to determine liquid volume in a tank exposed to microgravity,
Rock it rocke Temple University
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
P09651 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System Lead: Dave Lewis Brian Russell Aditi Khare.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM &TEM-PS Manufacturing Readiness Review – September 16, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Pat Lujan TEM.
Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Systems Engineering for Space Vehicles Bryan Palaszewski with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH.
Continuing Embry- Riddle’s CubeSat Satellite Development Program Presented by Clayton G. Jacobs Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott EagleSat.
FIELDS iCDR Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Introduction 1Peter Harvey.
Section 20.0 Mission Assurance Roger Counts Systems Assurance Manager ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today”
IMPRS June Space Research, in praxis, illustrated by a ground-based example The „Ozonometer“ as a student project.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
From Research Prototype to Production
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
The Final Project Flight Hardware and all that Jazz Prepared by Prof. Spjut Parroted by Prof. Duron.
Infinity-project.org The Institute for Engineering Education Engineering Education for today’s classroom. 1 Infinity Project Laboratory Setup.
AAQ Workshop Demonstration March 22, This short pamphlet takes the participant(s) through a realistic scenario where a student, Erika, needs to.
PDR Presentation Team JHK Experiment TIC February 27, 2003.
High Altitude Imaging and Atmospheric Data Collection Experiment by SABRE (Scientific Aerospace and Balloon Research Engineers) Team Advisor:Atin Sinha.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 General List of Tasks by Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
Rocket Flight Dynamics Section 1, Team 4 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 May 5, 2008.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Random Vibration Testing of Hardware Tutorial 1 Fatigue Life Assessment William O. Hughes/7735 Mark E. McNelis/7735.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Idaho RISE System Reliability and Designing to Reduce Failure ENGR Sept 2005.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.
College of Engineering Solar Energy Meter Lab 4 Engineering Education Innovation Center ENGR 1181.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Student Made Ultraviolet Radiation Detector Presented for your approval by: THE LATE BALLOONERS StuMURD.
Instrument Status GLM Science Team Meeting 9 September 2016 Marc Rafal/GSFC GLM Instrument Manager.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Analysis of Rocket Flights E80 Spring 2008 Section 2, Team 2 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, and Student 4.
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy Array May1005 Alex Apel Stephen Rashid Justin Robinson.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
FM2/FM3 PSR FM4/FM5 PERSCM - 1UCB, November 10, 2005 THEMIS FM2/FM3 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) THEMIS FM4/FM5 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE- ENVIRONMENTAL.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 Survey & Process Review conducted at Teledyne on Nov. 14, 2003.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly November 21, 2014 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Digital Fields Board (DFB) 1.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Arizona Space Grant Symposium
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Taking off in 10, 9, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1…. Space Exploration
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
Agenda. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER Agenda Feb 2, 2017.
THEMIS Mission Assurance
ISUAL Product Assurance
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
Circuits Lab Introduction
Thermal Vacuum Test: Plans and Procedures
Integration and Test Organization Chart
HALT: Notebook Computer Case Study
Composition of eXTP mission
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Surviving FlightSurviving Flight  28zn0&NR=1 28zn0&NR=1

Practice and BenefitPractice and Benefit  Acoustic and random vibration testing sine vibration testing demonstrate acceptable workmanship  Acoustic and random vibration testing supplemented with additional sine vibration testing is performed to qualify payload hardware to the vibroacoustic environments of the mission, and to demonstrate acceptable workmanship. structural stress and fatigue, unacceptable workmanship, and performance degradation  Testing alleviates vibroacoustic-induced failures of structural stress and fatigue, unacceptable workmanship, and performance degradation of sensitive subsystems including instruments and components. degradation of "design reliability" has occurred during prior fabrication, integration and test activities  Implementation of this practice assures that minimal degradation of "design reliability" has occurred during prior fabrication, integration and test activities

NASA Standards Ref: Hughes, McNelis, “Random Vibration Testing Tutorial,” Glenn Research Center,

NASA StandardsNASA Standards

Other Test Standards

Workmanship TestingWorkmanship Testing

Random Vib Testing

Value Based TestingValue Based Testing

Flight Readiness - SensorsFlight Readiness - Sensors  Define your engineering or science objectives.  What measurements do you need?  Requirement  At least two different sensors must be used  You are limited to 8 channels of data acquisition

Flight Readiness - RangingFlight Readiness - Ranging  Determine proper ranging for your data acquisition channels.  Requirement  Your dynamic range for all channels must fit within 0-3.3V ADC.  Response times must be sufficient for each measurement.  Sample rates must also be considered.  You must document the design of your flight hardware circuitry.

Flight Readiness - PowerFlight Readiness - Power  You are required to power your instrumentation (circuitry and sensors) according to their specifications.  You may use any supply source you wish.  9V batteries with regulators (#7805) are available.  Caution  Certain components can be damaged if not properly powered (e.g. Data Logger –  Connecting 8V directly to the DL will blow it.

Flight Readiness - DocsFlight Readiness - Docs  You are required to enter documentation into your lab notebook regarding the steps you took leading to your design. Include instrumentation objectives, specifications, parts lists, and schematics of your designs.  Requirement  Your documentation must be approved by your section instructor and Prof. Spjut by the end of your Lab 1.

Breadboard (ing)Breadboard (ing)  You are required to breadboard your circuitry on your personal breadboards.  Power and data loggers can be left off your breadboards, but everything else in your design should fit onto your breadboards.  Requirement  You must demonstrate operation to your section instructor and Prof. Spjut by the end of Lab 2 or 3 at the latest.

PC Board (ing)PC Board (ing)  Transfer your working breadboard circuitry to your PC boards.  Considerations  Be careful when soldering components onto your PC boards.  Calibrate your sensors at some point before flight.  Requirement  You must demonstrate operation to your section instructor and Prof. Spjut by the end of Lab 3 or 4 at the latest.

Assembly  Assemble your rocket  Make sure you know how to “introduce” or mount your instrumentation into your rocket.  Develop an experimental plan with objectives for each flight. Enter these into your notebooks and have them reviewed by your section instructor.  Be flight ready by the end of Lab 4.

Labs 5 and 6 and more…Labs 5 and 6 and more…  Lab 5  For fixing and getting ready to re-fly.  Lab 6  Write-up and Technical Presentation preparation.  Team Access  $50 budget  Your regular lab time is prioritized, other times as available.  Equipment lists will be posted.