A High Throughput Zebrafish Embryo Gene Expression System for Screening Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals G. Callard A. Novillo, S. Sawyer Biology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drug Discovery Process
Advertisements

Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Virtual Workshop for Alliance for Cancer Prevention Endocrine Disrupters and Human Health Professor Susan Jobling Institute for the Environment Brunel.
ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION DOES THIS POSE SPECIAL DIFFICULTIES WHEN ASSESSING RISK? Sue Barlow Independent Consultant in Toxicology.
The post-genomic challenge Exploring function across protein families using chemical probes  The CPFM is in early stages of development  Projects focus.
Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Ralph L. Cooper Endocrinology Branch Reproductive Toxicology Division NHEERL, U.S. EPA Male and Female Pubertal.
Reviewers Presentation on US Environmental Protection Agency " White Paper on Species/Stock/Strain on Endocrine Disruptor Assays" Reviewed by but not in.
Evaluating Existing in vitro Endocrine Data Jeff Pregenzer, Director of Endocrine Studies, CeeTox.
Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors.
Monitoring of endocrine disruption in different milieu matrices W. Dhooge , F.H. Comhaire, A. Mahmoud, F. Eertmans, J.M. Kaufman Endocrinology/Andrology,
UNEP Advisory Group Meeting Geneva, Switzerland December 12, 2014
An Evaluation of Models to Predict the Activity of Environmental Estrogens Candice M. Johnson and Rominder Suri, Ph.D.,P.E. NSF Water and Environmental.
Richard A. Becker, Ph.D., D.A.B.T American Chemistry Council Arlington, Virginia Comments on “Dose Setting” EDMVS Meeting July 23-24, 2002.
Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.
Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) as a Marker of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Function in Developing Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Carolyn J. Mattingly et al.
June 2010 LANDSIEDEL 1 Chemical Industries Role in Tomorrows Toxicity Testing Robert Landsiedel, Susanne Kolle, Tzutzuy Ramirez, Hennicke Kamp and Ben.
Paracelsus “The dose makes the poison ”. MSDS Environmental Hazards and Human Health Chapter 17.
Priority-setting for the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Pesticide Active Ingredients Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp Office of Pesticide Programs U.S.
National Pesticide Program A New Toxicology Testing Paradigm: Meeting Common Needs Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office.
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute The International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (ISRTP)
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
EDSP Validation Gary E.Timm Senior Technical Advisor Office of Science Coordination and Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Section 3: Chemical Hazards What are toxic and hazardous chemicals? What are some possible impacts from chemical hazards? Are hormonally active agents.
Mechanistic modeling of zebrafish metabolism in relationship to food level and the presence of a toxicant (uranium) S. Augustine B.Gagnaire C. Adam-Guillermin.
Current and Emerging Paradigms in Environmental Toxicology Lecture 2.
Xenoestrogen-Induced ERK-1 and ERK-2 Activation via Multiple Membrane-Initiated Signaling Pathways Nataliya N. Bulayeva and Cheryl S. Watson, Department.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Paul Duckett Brixham Environmental Laboratory Site Manager.
Criteria for Screens— Review of the EDSTAC Recommendations Presentation to the EDMVS July 23, 2002.
What Information Fulfills EDSP Screening Requirements?
Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) September
Office of Pesticide Programs 21st Century Screening Assessment of Pesticides – A Regulatory View Vicki Dellarco, Ph.D. Senior Science Advisor Office of.
Synergistic Action of 17-  estradiol and Bisphenol A in a Pituitary Cell Line Sarah Korb and Winnifred Bryant, Ph. D. Department of Biology University.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Quill Law Group LLC1 Endocrine Disruption and Personal Care Products --- Legislative Developments Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington,
Laboratory induced estradiol exposure stimulates transcriptional responses in the sea anemone Exaiptasia pallida Michael B. Morgan, PhD Berry College Mount.
Luděk Bláha, PřF MU, RECETOX BIOMARKERS AND TOXICITY MECHANISMS 01 - INTRODUCTION.
Kevin M. Crofton, PhD US Environmental Protection Agency McKim Conference Duluth MN September 17, 2008 Thyroid Mediated CNS Dysfunction How to use what.
Endocrine disrupters. Endocrine disruption Endocrine disrupters (ED) or endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC) are exogenous chemical agents that interfere.
1 Tier 1 EDSP: Other Scientifically Relevant Information Barbara Neal Exponent December 13, 2010.
ELLEN MIHAICH, PH.D., DABT ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY RESOURCES ISRTP WORKSHOP DECEMBER 13, 2010 EDSP Test Guidelines and Guideline Modifications 1.
Environmental Estrogens Stimulate Gene Transcription in the Prolactin Promoter Danae Fitzmaurice and Winnifred Bryant Ph. D. Department of Biology University.
Cell communication & regulation: a target for toxicants Any sensitively regulated process is susceptible to toxicants ! REGULATIONS & SIGNALLING Hierarchy.
0 Focusing on the Adverse Outcomes of ER-mediated Pathways Rodney Johnson ORD/MED McKim Conference September 16-18, 2008.
Biomarkers and mechanisms of toxicity Course summary 1) Introduction - Overview of toxicity mechanisms (with special respect to environmental contaminants)
Communications and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program ISRTP Workshop December 13, 2010.
MECHANISTIC MODEL OF STEROIDOGENESIS IN FISH OVARIES TO PREDICT BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSE TO ENDOCRINE ACTIVE CHEMICALS Michael S. Breen, 1 Miyuki Breen, 2.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Implementation Business and Legal Considerations Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Comparative Hepatic Gene Expression Elicited by o,p’-DDT in the Rat and Mouse INTRODUCTION Technical grade dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), a mixture.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
CONCLUSIONS TCDD responsiveness of HL1-1 cell was confirmed with CYP1A1 mRNA expression induction by QRT- PCR TCDD-elicited temporal and dose response.
POLLUTION BY XENOBIOTICS : BIOMARKERS FOR EARLY DETECTION OF POLLUTION EFFECTS Ibon Cancio EUSKALHERRIKOUNIBERTSITATEA UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY.
OECD’s work on Adverse outcome pathways
Models, Markers and Mechanisms: Understanding Endocrine Disruptor Effects Brent D. Palmer, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Environmental Biology Department.
McKim Workshop on Strategic Approaches for Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment Duluth, MN, USA 19 May, 2010.
The Future of Chemical Toxicity Testing in the U.S.
EDSP Implementation: Concerns for the Pesticide Industry ISRTP 2009 Endocrine Workshop: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
Natural and environmental estrogens
신기술 접목에 의한 신약개발의 발전전망과 전략 LGCI 생명과학 기술원. Confidential LGCI Life Science R&D 새 시대 – Post Genomic Era Genome count ‘The genomes of various species including.
09 –Intercellular communication & regulation
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs
FIFRA SAP Meeting February 2, 2010
OAK CREEK Toxicology & Risk Assessment Consulting
Endocrine disruptors and animal-free toxicology
Selective estrogen receptor modulation
Presentation transcript:

A High Throughput Zebrafish Embryo Gene Expression System for Screening Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals G. Callard A. Novillo, S. Sawyer Biology Department, Boston University, 5 Cummington St, Boston, MA Supported by EPA STAR RD ( to ) ABSTRACTSCIENTIFIC APPROACH Reproduction and development in man and animals are essential for survival of species, species diversity, maintenance of ecosystems, and commercial activities. Thus, there is an urgent need for regulators to develop methods to better predict which of the estimated 87,000 chemicals in the environment have the potential to disrupt hormone-dependent processes of development, physiology and reproduction (EDC, endocrine disrupting chemicals). We propose development of an assay using living zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos as a whole animal in vitro screening system for simultaneous detection of multiple subsets of EDC: (a) EDC that act via estrogen receptors (ER) to induce brain P450 aromatase (P450aromB) and hepatic vitellogenin (vtg) expression; (b) EDC that act via arylhydrocarbon receptors (AhR) to reduce gonadal aromatase (P450aromA) and increase P4501A1 expression; (c) EDC that interact directly with preformed aromatase enzyme to block aromatization; and (d) EDC that perturb ER and AhR expression per se. An automated real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) approach will be used to measure targeted mRNAs in single and multiplex assays. The proposed zebrafish embryo system is a novel alternative to, and extension of, the current EDSP Tier 1 Screening Battery, which includes a mandate for ER binding and reporter assays and an alternative placental aromatase (enzyme) assay, but does not presently include an assay for chemicals that disrupt endogenous estrogen signaling by altering aromatase or ER expression, nor does it include an assay that can detect possible AhR mediated effects on reproductively relevant gene targets, or a screening assay that can simultaneously compare sensitivity and responsiveness of multiple genes to a given chemical. Although the proposed in vitro assay minimizes animal and chemical use, it has the advantages of an in vivo system for predicting agonist vs. antagonist properties of a chemical without a priori knowledge of uptake and accumulation, activating or metabolizing pathways, access to targets, receptor binding and activation, or required coregulators. Resultant data will provide biologically relevant criteria for prioritizing chemicals for further testing and will help to interpret reports of reproductive and developmental effects in wildlife and humans. Validation of a zebrafish embryo gene expression assay for detecting known and suspected ER- and AhR-acting EDC will have immediate applicability for routine chemical screening, and will demonstrate the feasibility of the same approach to detect chemicals that interact with other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Figure A. Examples of adverse effects linked to EDC (McLachlan, 2001; Fox et al., 2001, 2004) IMPACT AND OUTPUTS PARTNERSHIPS Superfund Basic Research Program (Boston University) Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute NIEHS Aquatic Toxicology Center (Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory (ME) ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING CHEMICALS (EDC): AN URGENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC) are hormonally active agents: that mimic or block diverse hormone signaling systems essential for normal development, reproduction, growth, metabolism, homeostasis, etc.); are widely distributed in the environment; derive from many different human activities (pesticides, industrial byproducts, cancer drugs, fattening agents) & are also found as natural products (human & animal waste; phytoestrogens); adversely effect cells, tissues, organs, the organism, its progeny, species fitness & survival, and ecosystems, even at low doses and transient exposures (see Fig. A); endocrine disrupting effects cannot be predicted on the basis of chemical structure alone (see Fig. B); few of the >87,000 chemicals added to the environment have been tested for endocrine disrupting effects. Fig. D. The zebrafish embryo is an advantageous animal model for high throughput screening of EDC by gene expression analysis. Typical vertebrate hormone systems & development 1000’s of small, transparent embryos per mating Rapid ex utero development facilitates in vitro testing with the added value of a whole organism Genome sequence available INITIAL RESULTS Figure B. Known EDC are structurally diverse; effects cannot be predicted on the basis of structure alone. Figure C. Many EDC interact with estrogen- and arylhydrocarbon-receptors (ER, AhR) to disrupt gene expression. P450aromB Vtg ERs P450aromA Cyp1A1 AhRs AhR responsive genes ER responsive genes Dioxin-like EDC Estrogen-like EDC ER AhR Target cell Human sperm counts The “endocrine disruptor hypothesis” is based on scientific principles; data from laboratory, wildlife and epidemiological studies; weight-of-evidence; and the precautionary principle (See EDSTAC 1998; Fox et al. 2004). HYPOTHESIS: Altered expression of hormone responsive genes can be used as an endpoint to identify EDC. TCDD PCBs NonaclorCadmium DDT Lindane Vinclozolin Dieldrin Estradiol DES Zearalenone Chalcone Genistein Chrysin BPA Nonylphenol Atrazine 2,4-D Microsoft Excel-based software (Q-Gene) Computational Biology Identify hormone responsive genes Determine gene organization/ sequence Design, validate & optimize PCR primers Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis Developmental & Molecular Biology Optimize embryo treatment protocols Test chemicals, mixtures, doses, exposures Isolate/reverse transcribe embryo RNA WORKFLOW controltest Amplification plots Fig. E. Both estrogen-responsive (cyp19B) and non-responsive (cyp19A) genes are developmentally programmed. Results show a dramatic dose- and time-related induction (up to 115-fold) of expression of the estrogen-responsive target gene (AromB; left figure) with estrogen exposure. By contrast, estrogen exposure has no effect on expression of a closely related control (estrogen unresponsive) gene (AromA; right figure). Numbers above bars show fold-increase with estrogen relative to corresponding control. EAWAG (Swiss EPA) Zurich EPA Atlantic Ecology Center (Narragansett RI) Addresses an important problem in environmental sciences: namely, identification of chemicals with endocrine disrupting activity and the need to assess the extent of the impact of these contaminants on the health of man, animals, ecology and ecosystems. Uses a mechanistic approach, and methods of computational, developmental and molecular biology, to develop a new tool for routine chemical screening of, and identification of EDC among, the >87,000 chemicals added to the environment. Focuses on EDC that act on ER and AhR responsive genes, but designed as a proof-of-principle study with applicability to chemicals that act via any other nuclear receptor-mediated hormone regulatory pathway. 1.0E E E E E-01 Normalized gene expression 1.0E E E E E E Hpf Normalized Expression 1.0uM Estradiol Control 0.1uM Estradiol Cyp19a (AromA) expression +/- Estrogen Hpf 1.0uM Estradiol Control 0.1uM Estradiol Cyp19b (AromB) Expression +/- Estrogen