The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Results from simulations of the production of secondary particles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

NUCLEAR REACTION MODELS FOR SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FAST NEUTRON INDUCED (n,p) REACTION CROSS SECTIONS M.Odsuren, J.Badamsambuu, G.Khuukhenkhuu Nuclear.
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov,
Computational Analysis and Simulation (X-3) mcnpmcnp 1 HSS06, FNAL, Batavia, IL, USA, September 6-8, 2006 Overview and Validation of the CEM03.01 and LAQGSM03.01.
New experimental and simulated results on nuclear media effects in meson photoproduction off nuclei A.Ignatov, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov for the GRAAL.
Phase transition of hadronic matter in a non-equilibrium approach Graduate Days, Frankfurt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR Определение центральности столкновения ядер с использованием калориметра cпектаторов в эксперименте A.Litvinenko,
A MODEL FOR PROJECTILE FRAGMENTATION Collaborators: S. Mallik, VECC, India S. Das Gupta, McGill University, Canada 1 Gargi Chaudhuri.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
Applications of neutron spectrometry Neutron sources: 1) Reactors 2) Usage of reactions 3) Spallation sources Neutron show: 1) Where atoms are (structure)
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
Centrality Determination and Reaction plane reconstruction with MPD D.Dryablov, V. Zhezher, M.Kapishin, G.Musulmanbekov XIV GDRE Workshop, Dubna
Longitudinal de-correlation of anisotropic flow in Pb+Pb collisions Victor Roy ITP Goethe University Frankfurt In collaboration with L-G Pang, G-Y Qin,
Investigation of GeV proton-induced spallation reactions
FLUKA Rechnungen für das CBM Experiment an FAIR
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
M. Deveaux, CBM collaboration meeting, Oct. 2008, Dubna, Russia A revision of the concept of the CBM – MVD Or: Do we need an intermediate pixel.
Nuclear Reactions - II A. Nucleon-Nucleus Reactions A.1 Spallation
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
G. Musulmanbekov, K. Gudima, D.Dryablov, V.Geger, E.Litvinenko, V.Voronyuk, M.Kapishin, A.Zinchenko, V.Vasendina Physics Priorities at NICA/MPD.
S. Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting, Split, CBM beam pipe and integration inside the Magnet Status report Sergey Belogurov,
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
Effects of Surrounding Materials on Proton-Induced Energy Deposition in Large Silicon Diode Arrays Christina L. Howe 1, Robert A. Weller 1, Robert A. Reed.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
Charged Kaon Production Yield Studies with Stretcher Sergei Striganov Fermilab Future of Kaon Physics at Fermilab August 21, Fermilab.
Modeling of the set-up for the Project experimental tasks and study of radiation hazard due to lost beam particles in the GSI Future Facilities INTAS-3588.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
RPC Design Studies Gabriel Stoicea, NIPNE-HH, Bucharest CBM Software Week GSI-Darmstadt May 10, 2004.
Experimental search for the nuclear analog of the Prandtl- Glauert singularity effect at SIS100 A good reason to look back to a possibility of shock wave.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
STS Radiation Environment 11 th CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, February 2008 Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Dual Target Design for CLAS12 Omair Alam and Gerard Gilfoyle Department of Physics, University of Richmond Introduction One of the fundamental goals of.
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Results from an Integrated Boltzmann+Hydrodynamics Approach WPCF 2008, Krakau, Jan Steinheimer-Froschauer, Universität Frankfurt.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
05/03/20161 Cumulative proton production in Cumulative proton production in nuclei-nuclei collisions Elena Litvinenko Anatoly Litvinenko
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
June 2009 H. Ströbele, Uni. Frankfurt Matter Effects at SPS energies What we can learn about stopping from the system size dependence of net.
The experimental evidence of t+t configuration for 6 He School of Physics, Peking University G.L.Zhang Y.L.Ye.
© 2003 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 JINR SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL 102 nd Session, September 2007, Dubna.
7 th session of the AER Working Group “f “ - Spent Fuel Transmutations Simulations of experimental “ADT systems” Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute.
 1) Introduction  2) GEANT simulations  3) NEW DESIGN : Technology and Assembly  4) Conclusions Reported by G.Feofilov, CBM meetings, Dubna.
SP- 41 magnet ZDC RPC (TOF) DC ST Target T0 detector MPD / NICA and / Nuclotron Experiments Picosecond Cherenkov detectors for heavy ion experiments.
Status of PSD simulation in Shine Oleg Petukhov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow NA61 Analysis/Software/Calibration meeting , Warsaw.
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Validation of GEANT4 versus EGSnrc Yann PERROT LPC, CNRS/IN2P3
Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to MeV Umm Al-Qura University and King.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
1 The Fritiof (FTF) Model in Geant4 V. Uzhinsky, B. Andersson et al., Nucl. Phys. B281 (1987) 289; B. Nilsson-Almquist and E. Stenlund, Comp.
Simulation / reconstruction with GEMs at DAC A.Zinchenko, A.Kapishin, V.Vasendina for the collaboration VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna,
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
M.Baznat1, K.K.Gudima1, A.G.Litvinenko2, E.I.Litvinenko2
First results from technical run with deuteron beam
Characterizing eA collision geometry with forward neutrons at an EIC
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
MINOS: a new vertex tracker for in-flight γ-ray spectroscopy
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
LAHET code simulations in comparison with bare Pb spallation target experiment Daniela Henzlova.
The Geant4 Hadrontherapy Advanced Example
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Results from simulations of the production of secondary particles at the pipe walls M.Baznat 1, K.K.Gudima 1, E.I.Litvinenko 2, Yu.Murin 2 1 Institute of Applied Physics, Academy of Science of Moldova, Moldova 2 JINR Dubna, Russia

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Outline Motivation of this study for CBM LAQGSM generator Rapidity Transport of the spectators – nuclear fragments Testing configurations of the beam pipe at the STS region Secondary particles and the pipe walls Conclusion

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia LAQGSM high-energy event generator LAQGSM describes reactions induced by both particles and nuclei at incident energies up to about 1 TeV/nucleon, generally, as a three-stage process: IntraNuclear Cascade (INC), followed by pre-equilibrium emission of particles during the equilibration of the excited residual nuclei formed after the INC, followed by evaporation of particles from and/or fission of the compound nuclei.

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia LAQGSM related publicaitons LAQGSM03.03: a) “CEM03.03 and LAQGSM03.03 Event Generators for the MCNP6, MCNPX, and MARS15 Transport Codes” S. G. Mashnik, K. K. Gudima, R. E. Prael, A. J. Sierk, M. I. Baznat, and N. V. Mokhov, LANL Report LA- UR ; E-print: arXiv: v2 [nucl-th] 12 May 2008 b) S. G. Mashnik et al., LANL Report LA-UR ; E-print: arXiv: v1 [nucl-th] 12 Sep c) K. K. Gudima and S. G. Mashnik, Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, Varenna, Italy, June 12–16, 2006, edited by E. Gadioli (2006) pp. 525–534; E-print: nucl-th/ LAQGSM03.01: S. G. Mashnik et al., LANL Report LA-UR , Los Alamos (2005). LAQGSM: K. K. Gudima, S. G. Mashnik, A. J. Sierk, LANL Report LA-UR , Los Alamos, Quark-Gluon String Model (QGSM): N. S. Amelin, K. K. Gudima, V. D. Toneev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51 (1990) 327–333; [Yad. Fiz. 51 (1990) 512–523]. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51 (1990) 1093–1101; [Yad. Fiz. 51 (1990) 1730–1743]. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 52 (1990) 1722–178, [Yad. Fiz. 52 (1990) 272–282]

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia LAQGSM Au-Au sqrt(S)=5AGeV rapidity (5000 events)

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Interface to LAQGSM data Class constructor: MpdLAQGSMGenerator (const char* fileName, const Bool_t use_collider_system=kTRUE); Class usage in simulation macro: fRun->SetName("TGeant4"); MpdLAQGSMGenerator* guGen= new MpdLAQGSMGenerator(filename); primGen->AddGenerator(guGen);

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Geometry: Muon Magnet + 30 silicon planes: 0.3mm 0.004mm Event generator: LAQGSM Input: a) “beam”, b) Au-Au, c) Au-p; Sqrt(S)=5 AGeV Transport: Geant4 The special testing configuration A:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia A:Transport of “the beam” with this configuration

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia A: LAQGSM Au-Au sqrt(S)=5 AGeV 5000 events transported fragments

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia A: LAQGSM p-Au sqrt(S)=5 AGeV 5000 events transported fragments

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia A: Primary protons and fragments at z=50 and z=100 cm Protons, z=50cmProtons, z=100cmFragments, z=100cm AuAu: pAu:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Geometry: Muon Magnet + 8 silicon planes: 0.08mm Event generator: LAQGSM Pipe: conical tube from Be or Al (with wall 2mm, and in B case 1mm Be) STS: 8 plane silicon stations 0.08mm, 10cm around the pipe, standard positions Collision: Au-Au Sqrt(S)=5 GeV/u Transport: Geant4 The special testing configurations B and C: B: Be–1mm 1.6 º, Al -2mm 2.9º inside pipe: vacuum C: Be–2mm 2.5º, Al -2mm 2.5º, inside pipe: vacuum, or helium

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia B: Vertexes (r,z) of secondary particles, which came to STS planes (2200 LAQGSM events) 100%114% [100%] Be 1mm: Al 2mm:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia B: Vertexes (r,z) of secondary electrons, which came to STS planes (2200 LAQGSM events) 76% (100%)80% [70%] (104%) Be 1mm: Al 2mm:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia B: Vertexes (r,z) of the secondary particles, which came to STS planes, that belong to the pipe wall 53% {100%}70% [61%] {131%} Be 1mm: Al 2mm:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia C: Secondary particles born in the pipe wall (1000events) 2mm Be+vacuum: 2mm Al+vacuum: 2mm Be+helium: 2mm Al+helium: 100% 111% 100.5% 114% B: Be 1mm - 78% ; Al 2mm – 102%

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Maximal hit densities (per cm 2 per event) Allb allt allp z302.7 Allb allt allp z352.3 Allb allt allp z401.8 Allb allt allp z Allb allt allp z Allb allt allp z Allb allt allp z Allb allt allp z b<10 allt allp z302.4 b<10 allt allp z352.1 b<10 allt allp z401.6 b<10 allt allp z b<10 allt allp z b<10 allt allp z b<10 allt allp z950.3 b<10 allt allp z b<10 prim allp z302.2 b<10 prim allp z351.9 b<10 prim allp z401.4 b<10 prim allp z b<10 prim allp z600.6 b<10 prim allp z700.4 b<10 prim allp z b<10 prim allp z Be+vacBe+helAl+vacAl+hel all b<10 b<10 prim Al 2mmBe 1mm C: B:

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia C: Secondary particles – hit density per cm 2 per event Be+vac Al +vac z=30cm z=50cm Max=0.23 Max=0.18 z=100cm Max=0.26 Max=0.2 Max=0.07 Max=0.21

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia C: Secondary electrons – hit density per cm 2 per event Be+vac Al +vac z=30cm z=50cm Max=0.25 Max=0.18 Max=0.14 Max=0.21

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia C: Secondary electrons for different b ranges Be+vac Al +vac z=30cm z=50cm z=100cm

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia B: Secondary electrons for different b ranges Be+vac Al +vac z=30cm z=50cm z=100cm

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Conclusion The pipe walls made from aluminium and berillium are very similar in respect to the secondary particle production (only 10% difference, but Al is much cheaper). The pipe cone angle less than 2.5° has the following disadvantages: -- big part of the spectator particles, which should be measured to define the centrality of the event, can not be registered by PSD; -- these spectator particles create a lot of secondary particles when pass through the pipe walls and when pass through the STS parts made from silicon.

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia BACKUP SLIDES

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia

LAQGSM intranuclear cascade model

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia The latest improvements of LAQGSM code

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia B: Vertexes (r,z) of secondary particles, which came to STS planes

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia

B: All particles – hit distributions (arb.scale) Be 1mm: Al 2mm: z=30cm z=50cm

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia Magnetic field behaviour near x=0 z=100cm

The 3rd Work Meeting of the CBM-MPD STS Consortium, 1–4 June 2009, Sortavala, Karelia, Russia At large impact parameters the most of spectator nucleons are bound in fragments. The NA49 collaboration. Eur. Phys. J., A2, 383, (1998) Experimental data : the deposited energy for different types of spectators in dependence of the centrality