Measurement, Reporting, and Verification Working Group Birdsey, Richard (WG Lead)USDA Forest Service Delgado Arias, SabrinaSigma Space Domke, GrantUSDA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
Advertisements

Vision for the GFOI R&D Brice Mora, Frank Martin Seifert, Pontus Olofsson, Martin Herold in coordination with Ake Rosenqvist, Anthea Mitchell, and Alex.
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Ideas on NAMA development and implementation Carolyn Neufeld KfW Carbon Fund.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
NACP Breakout Session: North American Terrestrial Carbon Monitoring and Decision Support Capabilities (combined from CMS and CarboNA proposals) Organized.
Presented at the IISD and ASB Regional Workshop Hanoi, 19 th May 2011.
MRV and forest monitoring for REDD+ in Bangladesh Key-issues in forest monitoring and MRV for REDD+ (based on principles and provisions of Article 4 of.
COP-21 WGClimate and SIT Team SIT-30 Agenda Item #4 CEOS Action / Work Plan Reference – N/A 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters, Paris, France 31.
Observational Approaches for Climate Treaty Verification: Atmospheric observations provide the only source of independent information through which treaty.
WMO UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES PROGRAMME WMO UNEP IPCC Good Practice Guidance Simon Eggleston Technical.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
External Communications Working Group Kevin Bowman, Peter Griffith, Kevin Gurney, Elizabeth Nelson, Ariane Verdy Interns: Maya Hutchins, Adam Norris 2013:
Module 1.1 UNFCCC context and requirements and introduction to IPCC guidelines REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank.
An introduction to the monitoring of forestry carbon sequestration projects Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Ecuador March, 2004 Igino.
GEO Forest Carbon -Ongoing Activities and Work Plan- Alex Held (CSIRO), CEOS-Plenary, Lucca, Italy.
Discussion of Draft CEQ Guidelines for Addressing Climate Change in NEPA Projects Tim Stroope, NEPA Coordinator, GMUG National Forest
World Bank - Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: REDD+ Readiness and Country Needs Alexander Lotsch Forest Carbon Partnership Facility The World Bank
Partnering to Measure Forest Carbon March, Harnessing the Technical Capacities of the United States U.S. Agency for International Development U.S.
GEO Strategic Target on Climate (Carbon) Facilitate a comprehensive global carbon observation and analysis system in support of decision-making, including.
Atmospheric Validation Working Group Members (23): Heather Graven, Manvendra Dubey, Arlyn Andrews, David Baker, Kevin Bowman, Martha Butler, Jim Collatz,
Update from the International Blue Carbon Policy Working Group 1 st workshop July, 2011 J. Tamelander.
Participant NameOrganization Collatz, George (Jim) (WG Lead)NASA GSFC Brown, MollyNASA GSFC Denning, ScottColorado State University Escobar, VanessaSigma.
Critical issues facing REDD+ CPA Conference. Global Mechanisms: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), July 2010.
National Forest Monitoring Systems: M & MRV in the context of REDD+ Activities MJ Sanz, FAO REDD MRV Workshop for developing a roadmap to establish an.
Consultation meetings: Jan 2005, Brussels, consultation meeting on topics for FP7 2-3 Feb 06, Brussels, Symposium in memoriam Anver Ghazi 17 Feb 06, Text.
September 2014 Armenia Colombia GEO Global Forest Observation Initiative Capacity Building Evan Notman United States Agency for International Development.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
2008 US CLIVAR Summit Phenomena Observations and Synthesis.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: The NASA HQ Perspective November 13, 2014.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
International workshop on Asian Greenhouse Gases Budgets Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India September 2011 Pep Canadell*, Prabir Patra.
Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe Regional Workshop on NAMAs Domestic Measuring Reporting and Verification Allison Towle & Daniela Carrington 13 June 2015.
Towards REDD: the Papua New Guinea National System to monitor and report GHGs emission from forest land UN-REDD II Policy Board Meeting Switzerland
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
Integrated Assessment and IPCC: Links between climate change and sub-global environmental issues presentation at Task Force Integrated Assessment Modelling,
Global Forest Observations Initiative Simon Eggleston GFOI SDCG 5, Rome, Italy, 25 Feb 2014,
Critical Decisions and Key Components Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International Measuring.
CMS and Decision Support: Economic and Policy Decision Support Analysis in the Context of North American Carbon Cycle Research Conveners: Allison Thomson,
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.
Potential of regulatory and voluntary carbon markets to support carbon credits for blue carbon restoration and conservation projects Steve Emmett-Mattox,
Towards a comprehensive Monitoring Framework for REDD+ Peter Holmgren FAO 5 December 2010.
NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.
Climate Change Information Seminar Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) – the relevance to FAO’s activities Claudia.
KfW Carbon Fund From PoA to NAMA Barcelona 31th of May 2011.
Surprises in the anthropogenic carbon budget Why OCB is so important! Jorge Sarmiento Princeton University Co-lead author of the US Carbon Cycle Science.
The Role of Climate Observations and Services After COP-21 WGClimate SIT-31 Agenda Item 7 CEOS Strategic Implementation Team ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy.
| Paul Lucas 1 Future energy system challenges for Africa: Insights from Integrated Assessment Models 1 st Africa Sustainable Development Forum.
Integrative Research Group
Daniel Deybe – Ewald Pertlik DG RTD – I-1 Brussels – Jan 20, 2005
Flagship: Inventories – Making it Count
Implementing REDD+ Sarah Marlay, US Forest Service, May 9, 2016.
Inventories and trends
Global Forest Observations Initiative - GFOI
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
Bradley Reed USGS Climate and Land Use Change
Capacity Building GFOI SilvaCarbon
Science-Policy Interface
Cambodia National REDD+ Strategy Development: Progress and Challenges
Cameroon National Monitoring Forest designing process
GFOI Overview and Plenary priorities
Peer Consultation Workgroups
Moses Jackson, US Forest Service International Programs
REDD+ Policy Overview Climate Protection Through Forest Conservation in the Pacific Islands Inception Workshop, November 2010 Suva, Fiji Dr Sean.
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Climate Change Statistics for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Forest & Biomass (inc GFOI)
Presentation transcript:

Measurement, Reporting, and Verification Working Group Birdsey, Richard (WG Lead)USDA Forest Service Delgado Arias, SabrinaSigma Space Domke, GrantUSDA Forest Service Escobar, VanessaSigma Space Corp. Hagen, Stephen (Steve)Applied Geosolutions Houghton, RichardWoods Hole Research Center Hurtt, GeorgeUniversity of Maryland Kang, ChristineUMD Keller, MichaelUSDA Forest Service Kellndorfer, JosefWoods Hole Research Center Oda, Tomohiro (Tom)USRA at NASA/GSFC Stehman, Stephen (Steve)SUNY College of Environ Sci & Forestry Vargas, RodrigoUniversity of Delaware Williams, ChristopherClark University

Goal of the MRV Working Group To develop guidance for the NASA CMS program on how to integrate the different program elements, which are represented by many individual projects, into a cohesive program that addresses the most urgent Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) applications. Or is it MRVV – Measurement, Reporting, Verification, and validation? Or is it “monitoring” instead of “measurement”? Both? Maybe it should be MMRVV for the CMS program?

There is a need for more attention to the “R” of MRV What are the targets for reducing GHGs? What are the reporting requirements globally or for different countries or regions? What are the appropriate monitoring technologies? IPCC Approach CMS Approach

There is a need for more attention to the “V” of MRV Essential for assessing progress and assuring compliance This is a very complex topic politically at the national scale May not be very practical at the project scale Which of the CMS technologies are appropriate for verification in different contexts? What about the second “V” – validation? Verification: an independent framework for verifying the long-term effectiveness of REDD+ actions at different levels and by different actors (from Herold and Skutch 2009).

How will analysis and integration of data fit into CMS? To date, most funded projects are focused on specific monitoring technologies (but see some new 2014 projects) MRV requires integration of different monitoring data often by using models or model-data integration How can CMS evolve to enhance synthesis of data for MRV applications?

What combinations of technologies are appropriate for different countries or scales (e.g., projects or nations)? Different combinations are possible to deploy and are not likely to be the same in different contexts Yet there is a need for consistency in reporting. This could be a good link with the SilvaCarbon program, in the IPCC context Should we develop one or a few case studies to illustrate the use of CMS monitoring technology for different MRV applications?

How can CMS technologies help attribute observed GHG changes to anthropogenic vs. natural causes? This is one of the most important but difficult issues to address in operational MRV systems The IPCC has not yet been able to provide guidance to countries about how to do this, other than to divide the world’s land using a proxy of “managed” and “unmanaged” land.

Results of MRV Survey – What is the Project Link to M, R, and/or V? MRVM,RM,VM,R,V Significantly more V in 2013 Significantly more M,R,V in 2014

Results of MRV Survey -- Technology Principal technologyNumber CO2 monitoring3 CO2 monitoring + inverse modeling3 Remote sensing4 Remote sensing + modeling3 Remote sensing + measurement7 Remote sensing + modeling + measurement 2 Modeling + measurement4 Statistical analysis2

Results of MRV Survey -- Geography Principal domainNumber Global3 Global ocean (includes coastal)4 Global terrestrial1 North America3 USA2 USA regional9 Tropics regional4

Results of MRV Survey -- Policy Principal domainNumber International4 National GHG Inventories13 Land managers9 States5 Air quality agencies6 Project (markets)2+ National climate assessment2 Note: many projects listed multiple domains – these were counted separately

What the New MRV Working Group Hopes to Achieve at this Meeting Review the CMS projects and their potential contribution to resolving some of the difficult issues that are encountered when designing MRV systems in various contexts around the world. Identify a focused activity on one or a few of the most useful MRV-related tasks to support CMS.