1 EPA Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture at the U.S. EPA Wendy Blake-Coleman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

1 State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network December 2004 Molly O’Neill State Director, Network Steering Board Environmental Council of the.
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
1 The National Environmental Information Exchange Network History and Overview Office of Water National STORET/WQX User Meeting November 27, 2007.
HRC Identity Text Questions to HRC Members & Supporters.
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 384 sessions with 11,279 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 379 sessions with 11,183 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 362 sessions with 10,873 participants
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 394 sessions with 11,460 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 392 sessions with 11,432 participants
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 396 sessions with 11,504 participants
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 429 sessions with 12,141 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 436 sessions with 12,254 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Presentation transcript:

1 EPA Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture at the U.S. EPA Wendy Blake-Coleman

Enterprise Architecture at EPA2 Agenda  Context and History of EPA Enterprise Architecture  EPA’s Enterprise Architecture Framework  Geospatial Blueprint –Implementing the Goals

Enterprise Architecture at EPA3 National Environmental Information Exchange Network Integrated EPA Information Network l Position EPA as a Nat'l Network Node l Establish internal information network l Address emerging information needs l Build corporate information management Partner Support l Support States capacity to participate in network l Support collaborative State knowledge/ technology sharing l Work with other partners State/EPA Exchange Network l Help create, sustain, and grow the network l Establish interagency management function l Provide infrastructure support l Establish information exchange protocols EPA’s Information Integration Initiative Formalized the Need for an Enterprise Architecture

Enterprise Architecture at EPA4 Environmental Information Exchange Network An Internet and standards based method for exchanging environmental information between partners!  States – Data Stewards  EPA – Data User  Partnership & Collaboration between Governments

Enterprise Architecture at EPA5 State Node Implementation Process May 2005 CA OR WA ID MT WY CO NM TX AK HI OK KS SD ND MN IA WI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL NC WV PA NY DE CT NH RI IL MO AR LA NV UT AZ OR NM MS WV PA NJ MA NH MD DC VA MI NM SC NE VT ME In Development Operational FL Not Yet Started

Enterprise Architecture at EPA6 EPA’s Enterprise Architecture: FEAF-enhanced Framework

Enterprise Architecture at EPA7 Current EA Program Established Target and Sequencing Plan  Maturing governance processes, developing policy, procedures, and guidance materials  Technology Road Map  Developing Solutions Architecture  Customized Metis implementation –Architecture Repository Tool (ART)

Enterprise Architecture at EPA8 Sequencing Plan for Implementing the Architecture FY 2003 Exchange Network node development Limited infrastructure shared services available Central Data Exchange Geospatial Blueprint System of Registries (FRS, SRS) FY 2004 Application migration schedule Proof of Concept built for shared services (shared data dictionaries, portal, identity management, business warehouse environment, situational analysis, and capabilities tools) CPICs with specific costs and dates for migration PMO established FY 2005 Fully functional shared services with program pilot FY 2006 Begin Full Migration to Target

Enterprise Architecture at EPA9 EPA Metadata Architecture – Existing Structure 9

Enterprise Architecture at EPA10 Geospatial Blueprint: EPA’s Geospatial EA Component

Enterprise Architecture at EPA11 Business Services Requiring Geospatial Analysis National Program Managers  Protecting drinking water supplies  Conducting analyses to help manage urban/suburban growth  Responding to oil spills and other emergency situations  Identifying sources of pollution for source water protection  Examining and allocating regional acid precipitation allowances  Conducting risk assessments  Analyzing health conditions against pollutant distribution  Modeling the distributions of invasive species  Identifying priority sites for cleanup and enforcement actions Research and Science  Conducting habitat assessments and risk analyses  Detecting and evaluating landscape patterns and changes  Conducting real-time environmental monitoring and sharing the data with appropriate partners  Studying the effects of urbanization, at various scales  Developing accuracy assessment protocols  Creating 3-D visualizations of specific sites or larger geographic areas  Analyzing the relationship between health and environmental contaminants Regional Offices Developing Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) assessments for water bodies Tracking toxic substances Cleaning up and monitoring Superfund sites Monitoring water quality Assessing children’s health Analyzing environmental justice situations Cleaning up hazardous waste sites Conducting environmental justice assessments Evaluating air emissions and ambient air concentrations Modeling watersheds and storm water drainage systems

Enterprise Architecture at EPA12 Geospatial Requirements: Business Architecture Goal 1: Improve EPA decision making by incorporating location based approaches, data, tools and knowledge into EPA business processes. Current Efforts include :  Inserting Location-Based analysis into our business workflow  Outreach to Program Managers  Solutions Architecture Guidance to Map Geospatial Components

Enterprise Architecture at EPA13 Digitize Project Location

Enterprise Architecture at EPA14 Geospatial Requirements: Data Architecture Goal 2: Provide EPA, its partners, and the public with the geospatial data they need to carry out EPA business processes and make environmental decisions. Current Efforts include:  Establish EPA’s National Geospatial Data Policy (June 05)  EPA Geospatial Metadata “template”/Business Rules/Architecture –Builds on FGDC Metadata Standards  Enterprise Data Solutions  Markeplace/Collaboration on Dataset Production

Enterprise Architecture at EPA15 EPA Metadata Arch – Existing Flow 15

Enterprise Architecture at EPA16 Geospatial Requirements: Application Architecture Goal 3: Provide EPA staff, partners, and the public with applications and web-services to access, manage, use, analyze, present, and interpret geospatial data to conduct business and make environmental decisions. Current Efforts include :  Reusable open and interoperable tools –EnviroMapper –Portal Development Efforts  Developing Geospatial Web Services for Data Access  Enterprise Licensing/Hosting/GOS

Enterprise Architecture at EPA17 Geospatial Requirements: Technology Architecture Goal 4: Design and implement an enterprise wide technical infrastructure that supports access, use, management, and delivery of distributed geospatial data, applications, and Web services in a seamless manner. Current Efforts include :  Geospatial needs incorporated into the EA  IT Road Map  Geospatial Data via the EPA Exchange Network  Geospatial Tools used in Portal Development  Grants

Enterprise Architecture at EPA18 Geospatial Requirements: Governance  Goal 5: Establish an effective governance structure for setting priorities for geospatial investments, coordinating geospatial efforts, and communicating how geospatial data and technologies are used within the Agency. Current Efforts include :  Geospatial Information Officer  Geospatial needs incorporated into the EA – Still a challenge!  Quality Information Council –GIS Work Group/Steering Committee – Subject Matter Experts  CPIC/Budget/Strategic Planning linkage

Enterprise Architecture at EPA19  CIO’s/OMB Formally acknowledge that Geospatial is a MAINSTREAM requirement  Help organizations realize that location-based analysis is a BUSINESS approach and not JUST a “technology”  Improve our ROI/GPRA/PART through program-level activities  DRM/SRM/TRM will help us with Interoperability and Sharing of data  Focus grants on unified approach to building partner capabilities Benefits of Geospatial Enterprise Architecture

1 EPA Enterprise Architecture EPA Contacts Wendy Blake-Coleman: Brenda Smith, Geospatial Information Officer: