Brian Kary – Freeway Operations Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Incident Response in Washington State
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
The Traffic Management Center (TMC) of the Future.
SV-ITS PROGRAM: Silicon Valley Smart Corridor Project Overview
ITS Application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics, and communications technologies and management strategies in an integrated manner providing.
Brian Kary and Terry Haukom - RTMC.  Provide Delay Information To Motorists  Potential for Diversion  Perception Tracking Survey Results.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Traffic Signals, Signs and Pavement Markings  are used for traffic control to provide a smooth, orderly flow of traffic Remember: Obey all signs and signals.
Use of Traffic Incident Management in Intelligent Traffic Systems Mark Meints Emergency Program Specialist Nebraska Department of Roads.
Presented by: SAGE KAMIYA, P.E., PTOE
Integrated Incident Management System (IIMS) New York State New York City Providing interagency data communication to improve incident response.
Caltrans IRIS – T3 Webinar T3 Webinars are brought to you by the ITS Professional Capacity Building Program (ITS PCB) at the U.S. Department of Transportation’s.
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
San Jose Traffic Signal Communications and Synchronization Project Presented by Ho Nguyen City of San Jose, Department of Transportation May 12, 2009.
MAINTENANCE & TRAFFIC OPERATION INCIDENT MANAGEMENT.
AMERICAN SIGNAL COMPANY. Intelligent Transportation System Technology AMERICAN SIGNAL COMPANY.
Houston Trainwatch Working together to keep our city safe and moving Jack C. Hanagriff Houston Police Department Federal Railroad Administration Law Enforcement.
Florida Department of Transportation District 4 TSM&O Program Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Installation in South Broward County ATMS.
ICM Minnesota – Interstate 394 Brian Kary, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
Highway Incident Safety For Emergency Responders
Atlas Pitu Mirchandani Professor and Director, ATLAS Research Center Systems and Industrial Engineering Department The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Illinois Department of Transportation Emergency Management I-74 Reconstruction Project Peoria, Illinois ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006.
1 Presented at 2008 North American Paramics User Group Meeting 1 TMC Operator Training Using Microscopic Simulation Lianyu Chu CLR Analytics Inc July 14,
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
2 Background Lake County –24 x 20 mi area –Population 690,000 –52 municipalities Congestion –No freeways –Limited 4-lane arterials –Transportation controversies.
1 Dixie ITS Architecture Study Section ? Utah ITS History.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Minnesota I-394 ICM Corridor. What is Integrated Corridor Management? Independent Network of Transportation Systems –Freeways, including managed lanes.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
Traffic Incident Management F/Lt. Monica Yesh Post Commander, Metro South Michigan State Police.
MODULE 4 Traffic Incident Management and The Road Ranger/TMC Operator
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Planes, Trains, Automobiles and More Ardrey Kell High School February 23, 2012.
Application of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for Statewide Traffic and Evacuation Monitoring and Management in Louisiana April 16, 1999.
Signs, Signals, and Lane Markings. Three types of traffic control devices. Signs Signals Lane Markings.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Working Together to Improve Regional Operations through Traffic Incident Management Working Together to Improve.
Georgia’s Intelligent Transportation System
1 Arterial AMS Deployment Case Study By Joseph Brahm (847)
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Road Signs & Signals. RED= DO NOT ENTER YELLOW= RIGHT OF WAY IS EXPIRING GREEN= YOU MAY ENTER THE INTERSECTION Flashing Red: Stop, Yield to traffic and.
Control the movement of traffic Give commands or set limits No U-Turn.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Corridor Congestion Management Innovation for better mobility sm.
Understanding Work Zones
Technology and Resources In “Quick Clearance” Incident Management.
NRO Incident Management (IM) Activities FAMPO Policy Committee Meeting February 22, 2010.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – Mn/DOT Traffic Operations – Mn/DOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400.
(is it necessary?) By: Tim Torrini per. two Ramp meters are the “stop and go signals located at the entrance ramps of freeways to regulate the amount.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
The MnDOT Metro District Microsimulation Experience Kevin Sommers, PE Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Real-Time Information and Response Jon Nelson, P.E. MoDOT.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
Brian Kary Freeway Operations Engineer. Active Traffic Management.
Intelligent Transportation System
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
Using iPeMS Performance Management Data
NEVADA TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE March , 2011 Reno, Nevada
SIGNS, SIGNALS, and MARKINGS
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Brian Kary – Freeway Operations Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation

 400 miles of freeway management system ◦ Cameras ◦ Dynamic Message Signs ◦ Lane Control Signals ◦ Ramp Meters ◦ Traffic Detection

 550 Cameras  Shared Control with Minnesota State Patrol  Video Recording ◦ Buffered Video 3-5 days ◦ Responder Training ◦ State Patrol Use ◦ External Requests

Over 140 Changeable Message Signs Used for Incident Management, Traveler Information, AMBER Alerts and Travel Times

 Intelligent Lane Control Signals (ILCS) located every ½ mile over every lane.  A total of 187 ILCS on I- 35W and 110 on I-94  ILCS are a 4ft x 5ft full color matrix signs.  Use of the ILCS is for incident management, variable speeds and priced dynamic shoulder lane. I-35W Smart Lanes

ILCS Sign Options Blank – default Green – Lane Open Flashing Yellow – Caution Red X – Closed Yellow X – Closed Ahead Merge Speed Limit White Diamond

◊ 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH X 1 MI  X   Congested Traffic

Human factors study and survey showed that overall, the messages are well understood. Further study needed to determine how motorists use this information in the real world with other factors at play –Gap acceptance in traffic –Queue jumping –Disbelief in sign message

8-11 routes 250 freeway miles * Primary Coverage Secondary Coverage Future Expansion Freeway Incident Response Safety Team

 Shared Operations Center ◦ MnDOT Traffic Operations ◦ MnDOT Maintenance Dispatch ◦ State Patrol Dispatch

 Originally purchased for State Patrol through MnDOT ITS Funds  MnDOT had one read- only CAD terminal  Now MnDOT FIRST Program on same CAD system  MnDOT Maintenance coming soon

 Trunked Radio System  Shared Radio Channels  Redundant Communications on RTMC Fiber Network

 Direct Dial Lines between State Patrol, Maintenance, and Freeway Operations  Radio Scanners ◦ Monitoring of Local Police and Fire Channels ◦ Exploring systems that collect incident data from multiple CAD systems

Brian Kary – Freeway Operations Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation