 Credit Demonstrated by Mastery Principals’ Meeting September 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Advertisements

Graduate Project Advisor Training. Project Basics What do you already know about the Graduate Project? –List everything you think you know about the project.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Credit for Demonstrated Mastery (CDM): Policy Overview & Conversation WS/FCS Board of Education Meeting Paula B. Wilkins & Kenneth Simington January 28,
A-G Updates and the New Piece of the Puzzle: Common Core Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California |
Wilkes County Schools.  Credit by Demonstrated Mastery offers NC students the opportunity to earn course credit through a demonstration of mastery of.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM). What is CDM?  CDM offers North Carolina students the opportunity to personalize and accelerate their learning by.
Pupil Accommodation Reviews 2011 An Overview Of The Process.
Project Based Assessments 1 An Alternative Pathway to Proficiency 2013 Field Test Training for PBA Tutors.
Learn More from UC about A-G
Teacher Evaluation Update
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Implemented: November Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM) is the process where Buncombe County Schools shall, based on a body-of-evidence, award.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Course Outline Process Overview for Course Convenors.
1 Dissertation & Comprehensive Exam Process Dissertation Process Comprehensive Exam.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Supplemental Salaries. History School Board ask Personnel Policy Committee to look into supplemental pay Personnel Policy Committee formed a Supplemental.
CREDIT BY DEMONSTRATED MASTERY (CDM) ENSURING GROWTH FOR NC’S STUDENTS Overview & Implementation Process.
Sneha Shah-Coltrane Director of Gifted Education and Advanced Programs OVERVIEW Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM): Ensuring.
Credit By Demonstrated Mastery Policy Overview
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
National Board Certification: What is the Same, Different, and New? North Carolina District Coordinators Meeting September 12, 2014 Prepared by: Amber.
© 2012 Providence Public School District 1 Raising the Achievement of English Language Learners in the Providence Schools: Report of the Strategic Support.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
New Directions: Online Learning & the University of California’s A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate.
Intern 2 Learn Program Overview. Intern 2 Learn What is Intern 2 Learn ? Intern 2 Learn is an undergraduate, student employment program designed to: Provide.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
Orientation Winthrop University-School Partnership Network Orientation.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Welcome Richard Montgomery Parents! Richard Montgomery PTSA Information Session on the MYP.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Dearborn Public Schools Building and Teacher Blog Initiative Co-chairs: Shannon Peterson and Robert Attee Members: Troy Patterson, Andy Denison, Nada Alamaddine,
 hsprograms.pbworks.com Agenda at hsprograms.pbworks.com, click Principal tab.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Project Based Assessments 1 An Alternative Pathway to Proficiency 2013 Field Test.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
New Hanover County Schools Test Administration Training Credit by Demonstrated Mastery Non EOC/CTE/NCFE Courses
Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM) An Overview for School Counselors December 10, 2013.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
COLLEGE CREDIT PLUS Blanchester H.S. February, 2016.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.
Credit by Demonstrated Mastery ABSS Parent and Student Information Night December 2, :00 pm.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Credit By Demonstrated Mastery
Credit by Demonstrated Mastery
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Aspiring School Leaders Information Session
New Jersey Department of Education
COLLEGE-AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS: STATE RESOURCES
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Roles and Responsibilities
Credit by Demonstrated Mastery
Roles and Responsibilities
Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM)
Fort Valley State University
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

 Credit Demonstrated by Mastery Principals’ Meeting September 2014

 Question Protocol

  Purpose and description  Allows students to prove mastery of course content and receive credit without the seat hours.  Students will then be able to move on to more rigorous courses.  Does not factor into GPA/class rank  AP/Honors classes are ineligible for CDM  Phase 1—written test—students must earn 94% to move forward  Phase 2—performance task/authentic assessment evaluated by a school-based team Credit Demonstrated by Mastery

  Link for Parents (should be posted on school’s website): demonstrated-mastery/ demonstrated-mastery/  Link for School-Based Administrators: 0/Credit%20By%20Demonstrated%20Mastery 0/Credit%20By%20Demonstrated%20Mastery CDM Resources Overview

 CDM Committee & Review Panel CDM Committee  Purpose: Leads overall process, communicates with school community regarding CDM, schedules times for Phase One and Phase Two assessments, informs outcomes of multi-phase process to students/families  3-5 Members  Should reflect diversity of school population  Should represent various interests of the school  Committee members: administrator, counselor, teachers, AIG or curriculum specialist (if available) Review Panel  Purpose: Works with CDM Committee to facilitate Phase One and Phase Two, reviews student submissions for Phase Two, provides documentation to CDM Committee regarding outcome of Phase Two  3-5 Members  Suggested members: two content-area experts related to subject presented for CDM, department chair, AIG or curriculum specialist (if available)

  Information regarding CDM shared with students/families and teachers in August/September The school’s CDM committee guides the communication process. Announcement from district office about timelines District website maintained with timely information PA announcement at the building site Opportunity presented in school registration materials Other school-based means of parent/student communication Information shared with faculty  Regional information meetings held to provide details regarding process. Implementation: Informing Students/Families

  Student/Family completes and submits application which will remain with student’s records at the school –Due by October 1  School CDM Committee reviews applications  API or Dean uses Google Form to report the course names that students have requested for CDM —Due by October 2  Counselors meet with applicants to advise and answer questions. Implementation: Application Process

  Student completes Phase One assessment—Testing window from February  Testing at school/during school day  Tests are scanned and scores are reported to the school by mid-March  Review Panel meets to review scores and notifies students/families if score meets minimum criteria to move on to Phase Two Implementation: Phase One Assessment

  The district will develop Phase Two assessments and scoring guidelines  Mid-March: Review Panel schedules Phase Two assessments  Completed at school/during school day  Mid-April: Student completes/submits Phase Two assessments for review  Review Panel reviews/scores Phase Two submissions and determines if student has earned credit based on results of Phase One and Phase Two  Review Panel sends documentation to CDM Committee  CDM Committee provides results to student/family and informs them of appeals process  Conduct schedule changes as necessary Implementation: Phase Two

  Ten-calendar-day window for submission of appeals  Appeal must be in writing and must be based on a belief that the school misapplied DPI guidelines or policies  First week of May—CDM Committee conducts appeal reviews  Second week of May—CDM Committee finalizes appeal decisions and shares results Implementation: Appeals

  How will schools accommodate schedule changes made necessary by successful completion of CDM?  Will schools guarantee access to rigorous courses once a student successfully completes CDM?  Will the school/district provide materials to help students prepare for Phase One/Phase Two assessments?  What is an example of a Phase Two assessment? FAQs from Parent Sessions

 Question Protocol