HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 25, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Georgia Rural HIT Forum January 26, 2012 W. Ed Brown Sr. VP and CIO Gwinnett Medical Center 1.
Advertisements

Consolidation Communicable Diseases User Stories: Meeting Agenda 1.News from other domains 2.Recap of a previous meeting 3.Consolidation of three more.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 5, 2013.
How To Get To The Winners Circle with Your Patient Portal; Our Challenges To Get To The Finish Line. Julie Patterson, Baptist Health Carey Ronan, MHA,
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup December 2, 2013.
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability 1 enabling healthcare interoperability 1 Standards Harmonization HITSP’s efforts to address HIT-related provisions.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
DRAFT Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup October 28, 2013.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families June 17, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Exchange: The Central Feature of Meaningful Use Stage Meaningful Use and Health Care Innovation Conference Craig Brammer Office of the National.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments February 15, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Patient Engagement Some of the events that will shape your definition. 1.Meaningful Use – strong emphasis on patient engagement w Stage 2 MU 2.Growth.
Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Meaningful Use Core and Menu Objectives.
HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments March 1, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
HITPC – Meaningful Use Workgroup Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Stage 3 Planning July 27, 2012.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
DRAFT Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup October 24, 2013.
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
IPATH 2014 Best Practices. Required steps for Attending Providers It is important that medication history is updated before Admission Medication Reconciliation.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 3 – Improving Care Coordination June 4, 2013 Charlene Underwood, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
IPATH 2014 Best Practices. Required steps for Attending Providers It is important that medication history is updated before Admission Medication Reconciliation.
Stage 3 Update Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup January 28, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care. Agenda Confirm Community Work Streams Use Case and Policy Whitepaper Approach Recommendation for Use Case scoping.
IE WG Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations August 7, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Information Exchange Workgroup Recommendations to HIT Policy Committee October 3, 2012 Micky Tripathi, Larry Garber.
HIT Standards Committee Consumer Technology Workgroup April 18, :00 AM– 10:00 AM Eastern.
HIT Policy Committee Care Coordination Tiger Team Summary Tim Ferris Partners Healthcare October 28, 2010.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Improving Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Charlene Underwood, Chair September 2012.
HL7 SDWG Topic October 29, 2015 David Tao.  HL7 Success! C-CDA 2.1 is cited, and Care Plan is in 2015 Edition Certification Final Rule  Common Clinical.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Information Exchange Workgroup June 14, IE WG Presentation to HITPC (draft) IE WG Workplan Query exchange recommendations Provider directory.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Meaningful Use Workgroup June 24, 2013 Paul Tang, chair George Hripcsak, co-chair 1.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 26, 2012.
 2014 Diagnotes, Inc. – Confidential & Proprietary Spring Into Quality Symposium March 14, 2014.
Provider Directories Tasking, Review and Mod Spec Presentation NwHIN Power Team April 17, 2014.
Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Use Case Scoping Discussion 3/19/2011.
Bronx Health Access: IT Requirements Gathering IT REQUIREMENTS GATHERING 1.
California Successes Engagement & Collaboration –Regional HIEs functioning and expanding for 25 years –25 organizations using Epic’s HIE solutions, many.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 25, 2012

Summary of Care (and Care Plan) Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3 MU WGProposed Phase 3 IE WG Paper “Summary of Care” 50% Paper “Summary of Care” 65% HIE “Summary of Care” 10% Paper “Summary of Care” 65% PHR “Summary of Care” 30% Some increased detail including Care Plan (mostly free text) to a single “Summary of Care” Paper “Summary of Care” 65% HIE “Summary of Care” 10% (PHR in Consumer Engagement) Expand “Summary of Care” to 3 datasets being defined by S&I (which include Care Plan): 1) Consultation Request (Referral to a consultant or the ED) 2) Shared Care Encounter Summary (Office Visit, Consultation Summary, Return from the ED to the referring facility, including referral ID#) 3) Transfer of Care (Permanent or long-term transfer to a different facility, different care team, or Home Health Agency)

MU WG’s SGRP 303 Stage 3 Care Coordination Objective (Revised Summary of Care) EP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another setting of care or refers their patient to another provider of care Provide a summary care record for each transition of care or referral when transition or referral occurs, at the time transition or referral occurs Measure: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care (including home) or provider of care provides a summary of care record* for 65% of transitions of care and referrals. At least 30% of all patients need to receive a summary of care record electronically. *Must include the following information: Concise narrative in support of care transitions (free text, to include key points from summary of care, including setting-specific goals and instructions for care during transition and for 48 hours afterwards) Setting-specific goals* Instructions for care during transition and for 48 hours afterwards* Care team members, including primary care provider and caregiver name, role and contact info (using DECAF)*

MU WG’s SGRP 304 Stage 3 Care Coordination Objective (New, CORE – Care Plan) EP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/ EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another setting or care or refers their patient to another provider of care For each transition of care, provide a care plan with the following elements as applicable: -Medical diagnoses and stages -Functional status, including ADLs* -Relevant social and financial information (free text) -Relevant environmental factors impacting patient’s health (free text) -Most likely course of illness or condition, in broad terms (free text) -Cross-setting care team member list, including the primary contact from each active provider setting, including primary care, relevant specialists, and caregiver -The patient’s long-term goal(s) for care, including time frame (not specific to setting) and initial steps toward meeting these goals -Specific advance care plan (POLST) and the care setting in which it was executed For each referral, provide a care plan if one exists Measure: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides the electronic care plan information for 10% of transitions of care to receiving provider and patient/caregiver. * = aligned with PE View/Download/Transmit and Report objective

Reconciliation Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3 MU WGProposed Phase 3 IE WG Transitions: Med Rec 50% Transitions: Med Rec 65% Transitions: Med Rec 50% Allergies 10% Problems 10% Transitions: Med Rec 50% Allergies 10% Problems 10% Plan of Care* 10% Immunizations 10% Significant Test Results** 10% *Plan of Care goes beyond “Problems” to include Goals and Interventions. Specific elements are being defined via the S&I Framework **Significant Test Results suggests that the results of studies like a brain MRI done during an ED visit will be recorded in the PCPs record. This will reduce the chance that it will be repeated again as an outpatient unnecessarily. Could also include A1C results exchanged between a PCP and an Endocrinologist in order to reduce unnecessary blood tests and the ability to view trends over time through coordinated care. These are limited to the extent that test results are sent in a Care Transition Dataset

MU WG’s SGRP 302 Stage 3 Care Coordination Objective (Revised – Med Rec) EP / EH / CAH Objective: The EP, eligible hospital or CAH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform reconciliation for: medications contraindications* and medication allergies problems EP / EH / CAH Measure: The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs reconciliation for medications for more than 50% of transitions of care, and it performs reconciliation for contraindications, medication allergies, and problems for more than 10% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital’s or CAH’s inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23). *A contraindication is defined as any medical reason for not performing a particular therapy; any condition, clinical symptom or circumstance indicating that the use of an otherwise advisable intervention in some particular line of treatment is improper, undesirable, or inappropriate. This must include specification of the particular contraindicated therapy, reason for contraindication, and severity of contraindication.

Collaborative Care Communication (New, Menu) Phase 3 MU WGProposed Phase 3 IE WG Referrals 10% Consult Reports 10% Care Summary 10% Lab results after transition (Already in proposed “Summary of Care”) Key “Clinical Activity Points” for messaging (10% of time): Test results finalized after transition (to receiver of patient) Placing order/referral (to performing and authorizing entities) Approval of order/referral (to referring provider and performer) Scheduling of test/procedure/visit (to ordering provider) Arrival for test/procedure/visit (includes arrival at ED) (to ordering provider or PCP if unplanned and permitted by pt.) Discharge instructions/disposition at completion of test/procedure/visit/stay (includes admission to hospital from ED, or discharge from a hospital) (to ordering/referring provider or next provider of care, and PCP with patient’s permission) Change of Primary Care Physician (PCP) – to all known members of care team including old and new PCP Health Care Proxy Activation – to all known members of care team including PCP Death notification – to all known members of care team including PCP

Collaborative Care Communication (New, Menu) - Stretch Phase 3 MU WGProposed Phase 3 IE WG Key “Clinical Activity Points” for messaging (10% of time): 1. Handoff of responsibility – this involves the assignment or transfer of a task, intervention, or responsibility for a health concern to another member of the care team. This includes tasks ranging from performing a home blood-draw to problems such as being responsible for following an abnormality (e.g. a pulmonary nodule) 2. Acknowledging acceptance of responsibility (to the sender of the “Handoff of responsibility”) 3. Change in Plan of Care– this includes changes not covered by the above messages, including changes to Goals, Patient/family preferences/wishes, patient instructions, other non-ordered interventions, etc… (to all relevant members of the care team, including PCP)

MU WG’s SGRP 305 Stage 3 Care Coordination Objective (New, Menu – Collaborative Care) EP / EH / CAH Objective (new): Acknowledgment of sending and receipt of external care management information. Must include (but not limited to): Referral Orders and Consult reports Lab results received after transition/referral Summary of care Measure: 2 Part measure: Provider acknowledges sending consult reports, lab results received after transition/referral and summary of care for 10% of patients referred or transitioned during the reporting period. (automation is OK; to be sent to origin of referral and patient/caregiver) [potential to remove]: Provider acknowledges receipt of consult reports, lab results and summary of care received after transition/referral for 10% of patients referred or transitioned during the reporting period. (automation not OK)

Request for Information (New, Menu) Proposed Phase 3 IE WG EP/EH OBJECTIVE: The EP/EH that receives a patient that is typically cared for by another provider of care but has not received a relevant care transition dataset from that provider should perform an electronic query* for patient information from that provider with the patient's consent. EP/EH MEASURE: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that receives a patient that is typically cared for by another provider of care but has not received a relevant care transition dataset from that provider, performs an electronic query for patient information from that provider with the patient's consent using certified EHR technology or documents the patient's refusal to authorize the query more than 10 % of the time. *Performing directed queries to specific organizations with standard authorization definitions is critical during unplanned visits. One workflow that must be supported by the certified EHR is to first, electronically request authorization template from releasing organization, and then electronically submit the completed authorization form if no authorization already exists. The advantages to this approach are that it: 1) supports interstate requests where release of information laws differ but need to follow the state that is releasing the data, 2) ensures that the releasing organization has the capability to satisfy the request in terms of data segmentation, and 3) could be done with both DIRECT as well as IHE.

Update Provider Directory (New, Menu) Proposed Phase 3 IE WG EP/EH OBJECTIVE: The EP/EH will update a community or regional Provider Directory with changes in provider name, credentials, contact information, or affiliation. EP/EH MEASURE: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH will update a community or regional Provider Directory with changes in provider name, credentials, contact information, or affiliation using certified EHR technology more than 10% of the time that changes take place. * This objective is important to facilitate keeping community and regional directories up to date which will rapidly become critical as the use of HIE expands. Need to specify a minimum supported protocol/standard for automatically updating a community/regional provider directory from EHR data, as well as querying that directory to obtain DIRECT addressing information. Need directory of directories to know where the source of truth (DNS?).

HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Patient/Family Engagement Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 25, 2012

Patient/Family Engagement – Guiding Principles As part of our work on Stage 3 idea formulation, we: - Assumed that existing/proposed patient and family engagement requirements would remain and would likely be refined (e.g. increasing percentages for measures) - Focused on a handful of objectives that not only build on providing patients with easy access to data, but enable those patients to easily supply data (a significant source of patient frustration today) - Focused on objectives that logically fit with existing or planned requirements - Embraced general MU criteria (support new models of care, address national health priorities, broad applicability, not already driven by market forces, mature standards)

Consume/Reconcile Patient Supplied Data (New, Menu) Proposed Phase 3 IE WG EP/EH OBJECTIVE: Use certified EHR technology to consume and reconcile patient- submitted data EP/EH MEASURE: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that receives patient-generated and/or patient-aggregated data in a standard electronic format (consolidated CDA) from a patient PHR, portal or other patient managed solution must be able to consume, compare and reconcile that data in a certified EHR for 25% of the patients who submit data *Notes: Patients express significant frustration at inability to easily submit electronic data to healthcare providers. Frustration ranges from necessity to use different patient portals with different providers to difficulty submitting data from portable, patient-managed solutions to provider inability/reluctance to accept patient-supplied data. -Stage 1 and 2 lay groundwork for this objective, with standards for transmission (Direct) and payload (consolidated CDA), and requirements for consumption and reconciliation between providers. -This complements/builds on Stage 2 NPRM around transmit – patient will likely have ability to request transmittal of data from one EHR to designated address(es), which may include other provider EHRs -IE Workgroup suggests that data provenance be included as part of payload, identifying source of data (patient-generated, clinical source, etc.)

Consume Patient Supplied Device Data (New, Menu) Proposed Phase 3 IE WG EP/EH OBJECTIVE: Use certified EHR technology to consume patient-submitted home- monitoring device data EP/EH MEASURE: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that receives device data from an authorized patient must be able to consume data from at least one device in a certified EHR for 10% of the patients who submit data *Notes: Patients are increasingly using devices (home monitoring, portable monitoring, mobile applications, etc.) to monitor and manage health information. -This objective fits with new models of care (ACO, PCMH) where patient management monitoring is a critical success factor -Objective should reflect standards committee work around patient ID/Auth/Match -Device data should include provenance and LOINC code (as an example, BP collected at home is viewed differently from BP taken in a clinical setting) -IE Workgroup suggests coordination with Continua Alliance around appropriate standards

Provide patients/families with care plans (New, Menu) Proposed Phase 3 IE WG EP/EH OBJECTIVE: Provide care plans to patients/families with each transition of care or referral EP/EH MEASURE: As the EP, eligible hospital, or CAH transitions their patient to another setting of care and/or refers their patient to another provider of care, care plans or updated care summaries should be made available within 24 hours for 25% of patients *Notes: As Stage 3 objectives are developed regarding transitions in care and care coordination, patients and families, documents that will be exchanged among/between providers should also be shared with patients and family members. -This objective is a logical extension of existing requirements to share clinical summaries -This objective is also a logical extension of Stage 2 NPRM giving patients the ability to view/download/transmit health information

Provide patients/families with care plans (New, Menu) Proposed Phase 3 IE WG EP/EH OBJECTIVE: Notify patients when they are due for preventive services, screenings, vaccinations or are out of compliance with quality of care guidelines EP/EH MEASURE: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH will use certified EHR technology to notify 10% of their patients when they are due for preventive services, screenings, vaccinations or are out of compliance with quality of care guidelines *Notes: Given the emphasis on preventive care and the already embedded quality guideline functionality in certified EHRs, this appears to be a logical extension of Stage 1 and 2 requirements. -Certified EHRs are already building in CDS to support quality measures -Notification can be achieved as an extension of secure messaging, view/download/transmit and other Stage 1 and 2 requirements -This objective could also be tied to Stage 3 work around transitions in care and care coordination, where care plans identify gaps in care, goals/objectives and tasks