Tasks and learning mathematics Anne Watson University of Oxford DfE 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Interacting with mathematics in Key Stage 3.
Advertisements

Welcome Teacher Development School 2012 Implementing the Australian Curriculum Mandurah Region Network Tuesday 14 th August 2012.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Educationeducation Improving Scottish Stirling Mathematics Conference.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Looking at learning activities
Developing, planning and assessing a mastery curriculum
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Problem Solving, Communication and Reasoning Success Criteria.
Helping your child make good progress in mathematics
Improving learning in mathematics PD2: Learning from mistakes and misconceptions.
Test Preparation Strategies
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Webinar facilitated by Angela Jones and Anne Lawrence Mathematics and the NCEA realignment Part three.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Mental Mathematics.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Phone: cell: Agenda Creating our Learning Community & Norms Setting Personal Goals and Identifying Themes Visualization through.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. C H A P T E R 9 Complex Cognitive Processes.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Supplementary materials
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
Shared reading in mathematics Castlemaine SC November, 2009.
NQT Spring Conference Thinking Skills in a Creative Curriculum Wednesday 6 th March 2013 Mark Higginbottom.
Welcome to ‘Maths at Barry ’ information evening.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER Use of Rich Tasks. What is a Rich Task? Accessible to all levels Provides an opportunity to explore mathematics Involves testing,
Welcome to Parent Math Night Haslet Elementary School.
Adolescence and secondary mathematics: shifts of perspective Anne Watson December 2008.
Teaching children to reason mathematically Anne Watson Ironbridge 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Yr 7.  Pupils use mathematics as an integral part of classroom activities. They represent their work with objects or pictures and discuss it. They recognise.
Anne Watson Hong Kong  grasp formal structure  think logically in spatial, numerical and symbolic relationships  generalise rapidly and broadly.
Reasoning in Maths Mike Cooper 29/01/16 Starter activity Which number does not belong?
Enacting variation theory in the design of task sequences in mathematics education Anne Watson VT SIG Oxford 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.
Drilling, filling, skilling, fulfilling: what practice can and cannot do for learners Professor Anne Watson Hong Kong January 2011.
What really matters for adolescents in mathematics lessons? Anne Watson University of Sussex CIRCLETS May 2011.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
What do we have to learn in order to learn mathematics? Anne Watson Stirling 2009.
Key understandings in mathematics: synthesis of research Anne Watson NAMA 2009 Research with Terezinha Nunes and Peter Bryant for the Nuffield Foundation.
What varies and what stays the same? Insights into mathematics teaching methods based on variation Anne Watson Middlesex March 2015 University of Oxford.
Algebra; ratio; functions Nuffield Secondary School Mathematics BSRLM March 12 th 2011.
Developing mathematical thinking in the core curriculum Anne Watson East London Maths Forum June 2008.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Researching how successful teachers structure the subject matter of mathematics Anne Watson BSRLM Nov 2008.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
A research and policy informed discussion of cross-curricular approaches to the teaching of mathematics and science with a focus on how scientific enquiry.
Integrating Quantitative Literacy into Your Course.
Year 3 and 4 Multiplication. National Curriculum Objectives YEAR 3 -recall and use multiplication and division facts for the 3, 4 and 8 multiplication.
Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Functions throughout School Years in Israel and England Michal Ayalon 1, Anne Watson 2 & Stephen Lerman 3 1&2.
Key Updates. What has changed? National Curriculum Early Years baseline assessment SATS Teacher Assessments Assessment without levels, expected standards.
Mathematical Practice Standards
Mastery for Maths Parent Workshop
Helping Students Learn
The Road Less Travelled
Teach meet Fluency and Reasoning.
OPErations Workshop.
Consultant’s Day, November 11th 2017
TSG: 34 Task design and analysis: a response to the first four papers
Developing Confidence in Mathematical Reasoning
Maths Teaching Course Day 2
Maths Workshops at Smallberry Green Primary School
Presentation transcript:

Tasks and learning mathematics Anne Watson University of Oxford DfE 2010

Nature of evidence Published research, usually comparative studies Review of research on pedagogy to Smith report Key Understandings in Mathematics Learning (Nuffield) 20 years of teaching and curriculum development with teachers, teacher educators worldwide Research into the practice of exceptional teachers working in the English context International knowledge about task design

Being careful with research findings Do evaluation strategies match curriculum aims? Innovation v. roll out Cultural context Research shows ‘what is good/possible’, not ‘what is best’ or ‘what will always work’

International Congress of Mathematics Education (ICME) task workshop Task types known to develop knowledge, understanding and application: –Draw on students’ perceptions and past experience, and offer extensions –Afford conjectures and feedback on effects of actions –Constrain choices to fit models, images & alternative representations of conventional mathematics –Exploit students’ search for familiarity, similarity/difference, and effect

Example £2500 is invested at 2% per annum. What is it worth after 2 years, 10 years, 7 years, 27 years?

Find the number mid-way between 28 and and and and and and and and 46

Example

You have a sheet of black card 150 cm. x 150 cm. You have to make a Hallowe’en witch hat. What possible heights can you make?

Concepts Puzzles, problems, situations which can be understood, but not resolved, using current knowledge Classifying mathematical objects - new classifications Interpreting multiple representations - new notations and new methods Evaluating mathematical statements - truth, usefulness, domain of applicability

Advantages Flexible, adaptable, knowledge Can construct and reconstruct meaning Misconceptions may arise for usual reasons, but are resolved through microtasks Mathematics with meaning Students do better in test questions that require adaptation than …

Shortcomings Takes time (coverage) Takes time to establish appropriate habits Memory maybe, and fluency Teacher knowledge is challenged (secondary)

Applying concepts problem to read and understand decide whether to use statistical, algebraic, logical or ad hoc methods identify and select variables coordinate mental, graphical, numerical, representations select facts, operations and functions to apply … and how to apply them apply appropriate knowledge of situations and operations to interpret

Advantages Realistic application of known mathematics Creates a need for new mathematical methods and knowledge Draws on everyday reasoning in mathematical contexts, so more students are included New opportunities with every new task - less chance for students to ‘lose track’ Habits of identifying variables and deciding methods Good preparation for workplace Students do better with unfamiliar test items and multistage problems than …

Shortcomings need to understand both context and maths need experience of making good and bad choices ad hoc, numerical or visual approaches dominate purpose can be confused: to understand the situation better, or the maths, or to learn new mathematical ideas?

Procedures for fluency: repetition and not much change for understanding: careful change of variables; reflect on outcomes for retention: layout, visual, representations, pattern and rhythm to challenge usual misconceptions/errors: special cases, comparing similar cases, focus on meaning, correction

Advantages Can anticipate answers and difficulties Can generalise and extend methods to more complex situations Can develop algorithmic understanding Automatisation of key procedures A page of ticks boosts confidence Can be automated (online worksheets with good quality feedback and adaptation) Understood by society (parents, outsiders etc.)

Shortcomings Misapplication of methods; repetition of errors; hard to adapt to unfamiliar situations; difficulty of multistage problems Hard to recognise when to apply methods Textbooks need research-based principles (China) Associated with dislike of subject and boredom It is what machines can do Need to reflect on answers in order to fully understand method Confusion between purpose: fluency or conceptual understanding or retained knowledge Does not prepare students for higher study Traditional use does not develop the potential advantages

Learning from effective teachers ( Microtasks more important than task-types: Exemplifying and specialising Completing, deleting, correcting Comparing, sorting, organising Varying, reversing Conjecturing, generalising Explaining, justifying, convincing, refuting, proving Representing Stop press GCSE results …

Examples of microtasks Is it always, sometimes, never true? What do you get if you change … to …? Make up three examples like this Make a connected chain from … What is the same and what is different about…? Provide the missing steps in … Can you swap the property and the definition and define the same objects? Of what is this a special case? Explain the role of … in … What is wrong with …? Verify that … means the same as … What cases does/doesn’t this work with? Provide missing steps in ‘if … then …because …’ arguments When is … a good notation for …? When is … a good method for …? What has to be included in … to make …? Find a relationship between … and …

Example