California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.

Advertisements

The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

DSpace: the MIT Libraries Institutional Repository MacKenzie Smith, MIT EDUCAUSE 2003, November 5 th Copyright MacKenzie Smith, This work is the.

EScholarship: Publishing the work of UC Catherine Mitchell Director, eScholarship Publishing Services California Digital Library University of California.

Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.

Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives California Digital Library Scholarly Publishing at University of California ———— An.

Faculty Copyright Management: University of California Strategies Presented to AAU/ARL/CNI/NASULGC/SPARC forum on Improving Access to Publicly Funded Research.

Ensuring a Journal’s Economic Sustainability, While Increasing Access to Knowledge.

SIX THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT THE UC OPEN ACCESS POLICY Christopher Kelty, Associate Professor Institute for Society and Genetics, Dept. of Anthropology, Dept.

The Library as Publisher: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing.

California Digital Library eScholarship Repository ASIST DASER Summit November 2003 Suzanne Samuel California Digital Library.

Open Access and Scholarly Communications Tyler Walters Julie G. Speer Library Faculty Advisory Board November 20, 2009.

Building Institutional Repository Communities Through Collaborative Strategies An exploration of collaboration in the context.

Publishing through UC’s eScholarship Insert Name/Title date The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA Library Scholarly Communications Steering.

ScholarWorks at WMU Western’s Scholarly Repository Faculty Senate Maira Bundza November 10, 2011.

California Digital Library eScholarship Update Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly Communication University.

Proquest. Digital Commons/Institutional Repository at Pace.

Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.

HELIN DIGITAL COMMONS: A CONSORTIUM OF INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES Martha Rice Sanders HELIN Knowledge Management Librarian.

UCSF Library and The Center for Knowledge Management November 2005 THE COST OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION Karen Butter University Librarian Presentation to.

Scholarly Communication: Responses at the University of California A “Systemwide” Overview This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs.

9/13/2006 UCLA Library--Scholarly Communication Steering Committee Update What’s going on with SC in UC(LA)? A set of white papers widely discussed by.

California Digital Library eScholarship Repository Int’l Conference on Digital Institutional Repositories 9-10 December 2004, Hong Kong Catherine H.Candee.

Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner Sarah E. Thomas University Librarian Cornell University Ithaca, NY.

E-journal Publishing Strategies at Pitt Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.

From Berlin back to Business OPEN Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service Mimi Seyffert Manager: Digitisation and Digital Services.

Institutional Repositories and Scholarly Communication H. Thomas Hickerson Marcy E. Rosenkrantz David Ruddy Cornell University Library.

Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). Bepress history Started 10 years ago by University of California at Berkeley faculty to publish scholarly journals.

Geoff Payne ARROW Project Manager 1 April Genesis Monash University information management perspective Desire to integrate initiatives such as electronic.

Free e-journal publishing services Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.

UPSpace An institutional research repository for the University of Pretoria Presented by Ina Smith to the School of Public Management and Administration.

Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.

UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco October 2004 Scholarly Communication – Impact on Libraries.

DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.

UCL LIBRARY SERVICES New models for scholarly publishing Dr Paul Ayris Director of UCL Library Services and UCL Copyright Officer President of LIBER (Association.

UPSpace An institutional research repository for the University of Pretoria Presented by Ina Smith to the Service Unit for Health Sciences Academic Information.

California Digital Library Stewardship of Scholarly and Cultural Assets at the University of California Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic.

California Digital Library eScholarship Publishing Services CDL Users Council Meeting, May 9, 2008 Catherine Mitchell Acting Director, Publishing Group.

Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 What are publishers doing to support research needs? Martin Richardson.

Justin Gonder eScholarship Operations Coordinator California Digital Library University of California Office of the President Sustaining.

Radical Change by Traditional Means: Deep Resource Sharing by the University of California Libraries Presentation to the UK Serials Group Conference 2004.

CBSOR,Indian Statistical Institute 30th March 07, ISI,Kokata 1 Digital Repository support for Consortium Dr. Devika P. Madalli Documentation Research &

Getting Your Publications to the Masses: Using W&L’s Institutional Repository to Enhance Scholarly Communication Elizabeth Anne Teaff, MLIS August 31,

Digital Commons, Institutional Repositories, ResearchNow, The Berkeley Electronic Press, and ICOLC (in a nut shell) Sean O’Doherty Vice-President, Sales.

Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Vicki Tobias Introduction to and Institutional Repositories.

Research and Scholarly Communication in the Humanities New Partnerships Between Librarians and Scholars Presented to the Humanities Research Institute.

California Digital Library Managing and Federating e-Print Repositories: UC’s eScholarship Initiatives CNI Fall Task Force Meeting December 1999 John Ober.

California Digital Library Whither Open Access Publishing? Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives University of California,

Lisa Spiro December 3,  “make published articles written by faculty members available for open dissemination” (post-policy)  Author’s final version.

Using Open Access Publishing for the Effective Dissemination of African Research PKP PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE PROJECT Ensuring a Journal’s Economic Sustainability,

Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.

Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.

BENEFITS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY THE REPOSITORY AT ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY.

Making the Case for Curation: The Practical Experiment of DSpace Managing Digital Assets February 5-6, 2005 Charleston, SC Ann J. Wolpert, Director of.

Just in Time Digital Southern Offers a Suite of Services for the Entire Campus Zach S. Henderson Library.

Developing Effective Scholarly Communication Advocates: The Experience at Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia XXVII Annual Charleston ConferenceNovember.

Hosting of Open Access Titles: Why and How for Libraries Wendy Robertson The University of Iowa Libraries ILA/ACRL Spring.

Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.

Jefferson Digital Commons: An Institutional Repository for TJU February 2005.

Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.

The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.

Visibility Matters Dave Stout, Sales Director Open Access Week Wayne State University October, 2011.

A Scholarly Communication Tool For the 21 st Century.

OceanDocs Digital Repository of Marine Science Research Outputs

VI-SEEM Data Repository

Copyright Policy & Education Officer

What Are Institutional Repositories?

Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner Sarah E. Thomas University Librarian Cornell University Ithaca, NY.

Presentation transcript:

California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly Communication University of California

Why UC? Why eScholarship? 32 million items held by UC; Shared CD strategies constrained; redundant print collections undermine devel of collections needed for research & teaching UC serials expenditures > $20 million, even with economies of scale 50% of UC’s online materials budget for journals receive only 25% of the use. UC faculty > 13% of senior editors at top 2,000 journals and a significant % of authors

UC efforts to safeguard the flow of scholarly output System wide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee (SLASIAC): leads university- wide effort to improve scholarly communication system to meet research & teaching mission UC-wide Faculty Senate Advisory Committee on Scholarly Communication (SASC): leads senate actions to address issues of copyright management and tenure rewards Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC): seeks to develop financially sustainable models and improve all areas of scholarly communication

eScholarship Program Publishing and investigative tool in UC’s search for sustainable, alternative models eScholarship Repository: Library/faculty partnership; enables greater faculty control over publishing & dissemination eScholarship Editions: CDL/University Press partnership to extend publishing capabilities and experiment w/new roles

eScholarship Repository Full spectrum of publishing activity: pre-prints and reports, peer-reviewed articles, edited volumes and peer-reviewed journals Existing university structure: research units and departments are gatekeepers; editorial and administrative functions distributed High adoption rate: 165+ UC units/depts. on 10 campuses, labs and the Office of the President, >5,250 papers High usage rate: 782,302 full-text downloads to date; >18,000 per week as of Nov 5, 2004

Benefits of eScholarship Repository Dissemination quick and efficient; administrative time savings for unit/dept Allows federation and institute branding CDL commitment to persistent access Multiple discovery methods:  Centrally for all UC at repositories.cdlib.org  Google and other web-crawled search services  Open Archives Initiative (OAI) harvesting services

PostPrints; PostRef? Response to faculty desire for greater control over management and use of creative output Takes advantage of liberalized “reprint” (postprint) policies by publishers Allows universities to capture and manage pools of content; allows development of new third-party value-added services A possible future “PostRef” service?

Publishing Partners: Faculty, Presses, & Societies Productive, dynamic CDL-UCP partnership: nearly 2,000 XML schol monographs + new monographic series + UCIAS = new models for publication of book length scholarly works Editorial: Enhance university press’ capacity (edit and tech) for publishing; use existing mechanisms to share editorial load; UCP “reviews the reviewers” Technical: Redesigned workflow; extend structured text infrastructure, streamline inputs and enhance outputs, e.g., MTDP