Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 1 Recent Results in Rare Heavy Flavor Decays at CDF Hans Wenzel for the CDF Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Advertisements

August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
1 Rare Decays At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) BEAUTY 2006 OXFORD 28 September 2006.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
B s and Λ b Lifetimes and BRs at the Tevatron Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 25 th September 2006 Beauty 2006,
Radiative and Rare B-Decays at BaBar All results are preliminary unless journal ref. is given limit values are 90% CL unless otherwise specified Carsten.
Sergio Grancagnolo Activity Summary 9 Jan work in BaBar The apparatus Physics with BaBar Data analysis.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
Lepton/Photon 2003, Batavia, IL, USA August 11 th – 16 th Measurement of  b Branching Ratios in Modes Containing a  c Why are the  b branching fractions.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Searching for Higgs Triplets at CDF Chris Hays, Duke University CERN Non-SM Higgs Workshop Dec 1-2, 2004 ( ) H ++ H + H 0 Recent results Future analyses.
February 28, 2008Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d'Aoste, B States at the Tevatron Matthew Jones Purdue UniversityPurdue University/CDFCDF.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
1 Search for FCNC Decays B s(d) → μ  μ - Motivation Analysis Method Results Conclusion Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin For Doug Glenzinski, Hauke.
Search for B s →  +  - and B d →  +  - Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju Lin (Fermilab) Representing CDF Collaboration SUSY 2004 Tsukuba, Japan June 17, 2004.
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
B   and B  D ( * )   decays at BaBar Guglielmo De Nardo University of Napoli “Federico II” and INFN Representing the BaBar collaboration 36 th International.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1 Sinéad M. Farrington University of Oxford for the CDF Collaboration HQL 15 th October 2010 Rare B and D Decays at CDF.
Matthew Martin Johns Hopkins University for the CDF collaboration andBranching Ratios from Flavor Physics & CP Violation Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Michael Milnik (University of Karlsruhe) for the CDF Collaboration Search for Rare b-Hadron Decays at CDF II HEP 2007, Manchester.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
Guoliang TONGICHEP04,Beijing,August 17,20041 Searching for Lepton Flavor Violation and Other Rare Decays at BES Guoliang Tong ( BES Collaboration) IHEP.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Search for Anomalous Production of Multi-lepton Events at CDF Alon Attal Outline  Motivation  R p V SUSY  CDF & lepton detection  Analysis  Results.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Light particle searches at Belle
B Physics at the Hadron Colliders: Bs Meson and New B Hadrons
W. Wester, CDF, Fermilab, Beauty 2005, Assisi
B Physics at the Hadron Colliders: Bs Meson and New B Hadrons
University of Tsukuba, Japan Particle Physics Phenomenology,
B Physics at In relation to SUSY ? 4th Workshop on Mass Origins
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Rare and Forbidden Decays in the Standard Model
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Recent Results in Rare Heavy Flavor Decays at CDF Hans Wenzel for the CDF Collaboration ( Fermilab) Motivation: The decays B s,d  e  B sd  e + e - and D 0   +  - The Measurements: B sd  e +    Measurement B sd  e + e - Measurement D 0   +  - Measurement Summary

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Thanks Thanks to the accelerator division for keeping the data coming! Thanks to the CDF collaboration for operating such a complex detector and providing many excellent studies to build upon.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Motivation Why do we search for rare decays? Rare particle decays could provide a unique glimpse of subatomic processes that elude the direct reach of even the most powerful particle colliders on Earth. Their observation could answer questions about the nature of matter and energy, shine light on the evolution of the early universe, and explain the subtle differences between matter and antimatter. …….. Robert Tschirrhart Symmetry mar/apr 08 Sounds pretty exciting  Let’s do it

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th The decays B s,d  e +  - B s,d  e +   decays are forbidden within the “original” SM org. But the observation of neutrino oscillations has shown that lepton flavour changes actually occur in nature  standard model needed to be modified to incorporate this. Still SM NG prediction very small < 1.0 x The decays are possible in some theoretic models containing lepton-flavour violating tree-level couplings mediated by leptoquarks. R-parity violating SUSY or ED models can give contributions.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th One example model: Pati-Salam Leptoquarks Grand Unification Theory (GUT) by J. Pati and A. Salam predicts spin 1 gauge bosons the so called “Pati Salam Leptoquarks”, PS LQ, that carry both colour and lepton quantum numbers [PRD 10,275 (1974)] It is the simplest model based on SU(4) c where the lepton number is the fourth “colour”

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Br( B s  e +    and LQ Mass 

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Current Status CDF Run I published 90 (95) % C.L. [PRL (81) 1998] B-factories (90% CL): MLQ (Bd) > 53.1 TeV/c2 (BABAR 2007)‏ LQ from Kaon decays: Br(K L →  e) 100 TeV/c 2 Most of direct searches for LQ (different properties) set limits in the order of : M LQ > GeV/c 2

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th The decays B s,d  e + e - While B s,d       starts to put serious constraints on various models there is plenty of wiggle room left in case of B s,d  e + e -

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th The FCNC decay D 0  +  - R-parity violating SUSY allows enhancements up to 3.5 x Previous CDF run II measurement based on 69 pb -1 : Br(D 0   +  - ) < 2.1(3.1) x 10 90(95) % C.L.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 The CDF detector Muon Chambers Calorimeters Central Drift Chamber dE/dx, XFT Trigger Silicon Vertex Detector SVT: Silicon Vertex Trigger

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Things in Common All searches presented here have the following in common: Based on two track data samples triggered by the Silicon Vertex Trigger, using the long lifetimes of B and D–mesons to reject prompt events. Leptonic final states (e  ). All measurements are relative measurements normalizing to a well known similar hadronic decay mode.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Who is looking for an emu? Kaori Maeshima, Ting Miao, Hans Wenzel The decay B sd  e +  

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Run-II Search Strategy SVT two-track-trigger (TTT sample) Relative to B  hh: B 0  Kπ / Bs  K K 66% of the sample

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Run-II Search Strategy (ingredients)‏ The Result Relative efficiency: MC for kinematics and mass window efficiency CDF measurements (J/Psi,photon conversions) for lepton ID efficiency and acceptance Events (or limit) surviving all selection criteria (incl. Lepton ID)‏ World average Bs only: biggest contribution to systematic uncertainty Fit to B->hh spectrum of evts. surviving all but lepton ID selection

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Event Selection SVT Trigger sample –Use only tracks which actually fired the trigger Standard selections as B→hh analysis –Two good tracks with pT>2GeV –100  m<d0<1mm –d0_B<140  m,  2 3D (B vertex)<5 –L xy (B)>200  m –Isolation = pT_B/ (pT_B+∑pT_i in R 0.4 –Pointing angle d  < 0.2 The last three are optimized for this analysis dd Beam spot P T (e  )‏ P T (  )‏ P T (e)‏ Decay Vertex

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Cut Optimization Giovanni Punzi: physics/ ( FOM :Figure of Merit )

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th B  hh with Optimized Cuts (Lxy>375  m, Iso>0.675 and d  <0.11)‏ / B->hh / B d ->K +   ‏ Three body B decays Combinatorial backg. B  hh ~66%

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Monte Carlo Data Monte Carlo Detailed Simulation of the CDF detector including: Trigger simulation Detector response Event reconstruction Used to model kinematics and mass window efficiency. B  hh Signal only!

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Monte Carlo (kinematical variables)‏ pT of B Pointing Angle transverse decay length pT of Kaon

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Signature of B→e  Long tail due to Bremsstrahlung Search window for B s (0) →e  as 3σ around B s (0) mass Signal Events: full simulation

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Muon Identification Used the standard algorithm: –Extrapolate track into the muon chambers select on matching –Energy deposit in calorimeter required to be consistent with minimum ionizing particle Acceptance and efficiency estimated with J/Psi- events.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Electron Identification Electron ID combines Tracker (dE/dx and momentum) and calorimeter Information Requires match of track with shower in calorimeter. E/P > 0.7. E had /E em < Requires shower profile is consistent with electron. dE/dx and calorimeter efficiency from photon conversions:   e + e 

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Relative efficiency:  (B  e  )/e(B  K  ) Includes: Muon acceptance and identification efficiency Electron acceptance and identification efficiency dE/dx efficiency Mass window selection efficiency Kinematics ….

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Background from double fakes expected: /

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th M(e-  ): after all selections Excellent mass resolution allows for tight search windows

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Systematic Uncertainties CDF CDF Run II preliminary (2fb -1 )

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Limit Calculation for Br(B sd →e  ) Br(B 0 →Kπ)=(19.4±0.6) x (world average )‏ N(B 0 →Kπ)= / ε Rel (B s ) = ±0.0003± f Bd /f Bs = (39.8±1.2)%/(10.3±1.4)% =3.86 ±0.59 N limit (B s →e  ) = (95) % C.L. N Bgr (B s →e  ) = / ε Rel (B d ) = ±0.0023± N Bgr (Bd→e  ) = / N limit (B d →e  ) = (95) % C.L.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Limits for different scenarios

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th B s →e +    with 2fb -1

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th B 0 →e +    with 2 fb -1

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th B sd →e + e - with 2 fb -1  Identical to B sd  e +  - now both tracks have to be identified as electron candidates. To compensate for the large Bremstrahlungs tail we use asymmetric mass windows (-6 ,3  ) B  e + e - Signal Events: full simulation

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th B sd →e + e - with 2 fb -1 

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Systematic uncertainties CDF Run II preliminary (2fb -1 )

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Limit Calculation for Br(B sd →e + e - ) Br(B 0 →Kπ)=(19.4±0.6) x (world average )‏ N(B 0 →Kπ)= / ε Rel (B s ) = ±0.0002±0.011 f Bd /f Bs = (39.8±1.2)%/(10.3±1.4)% =3.86 ±0.59 N limit (B s →ee) = (95) % C.L. N Bgr (B s →ee) = / ε Rel (B d ) = ±0.0017±0.011 for B0 N Bgr (Bd→ee) = / N limit (B d →ee) = (95) % C.L. Run II Preliminary (L= 2fb -1 ): Br(B s →e + e - ) < 2.8 (3.7) x Br(B d →e + e - ) < 8.3(10.6) x 10 -8

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Search for the decay D 0   +  - E. Berry, I.K. Furic, R.F. Harr, Y.K. Kim

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Search for the decay D 0   +  - B(D 0 →  +  - )=(1.364 ± 0.032) x (world average )‏ D 0 →K +  - : Control sample

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Search for the decay D 0   +  - ~ Events, D 0   +  - is the reference mode but can also fake D 0   +  - if both  ‘s are misidentified as  ’s. To minimize the misidentification rate a likelihood function is used to identify  ’s: The function combines: dE/dx (tracker), calorimeter information (EM and Had) and  detector information. Maintains high efficiency and achieves additional hadron suppression!!

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Fake Rate The probabilities for pions and kaons to be misidentified as muons is estimated for the D * tagged D0→K +  - : control sample

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Background from B-decays Background is dominated by cascade semimuonic B-decays.To reduce this Bgr.: Use Probability ratio: - maintains 85 % of signal - reduces Background by 60%,.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 Observed events and expected Bgr. dominant Background

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008 D 0   +  - Result This limit is a multichannel, Bayesian calculation. Credibility levelFrequentist: Confidence level this translates into a limit on the R parity violating couplings λ 21k λ 22k = 1.5 √ B(D 0 → μ + μ - ) < 9.8 × 10 -4

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Summary & Conclusion All measurements represent the current world best limits!

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Backup slides

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Limit Calculation for Br(D0→e  ) Br(D 0 →     )=(1.364±0.032) x (world average )‏ N(D 0 →     )= / ε Rel (B s ) = ±0.0003± f Bd /f Bs = (39.8±1.2)%/(10.3±1.4)% =3.86 ±0.59 N limit (B s →e  ) = (95) % C.L. N Bgr (B s →e  ) = / ε Rel (B d ) = ±0.0023± N Bgr (Bd→e  ) = / N limit (B d →e  ) = (95) % C.L.

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Selection Variables Signal (B->hh sb-subtracted)‏ background (B-> sidebands)‏ L xy ( B )‏ Pointing angle d  IsoIso

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Pati-Salam Leptoquarks (cont.)‏ The Pati-Salam model allows for cross-generation couplings Bs  e  decay probes two Types of LQ: –e  b-quark coupling –   s-quark coupling Bd  e  probes –e  b and   d

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Cut Optimization (cont.) Lxy iso dd

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th Summary With 2fb -1 CDF data % C.L.)‏ –Br(Bs→e  ) < 2.0 (2.6) x –M LQ (Bs) > 47.7(44.6) TeV –Br(B 0 →e  ) < 6.4(7.9) x –M LQ (B 0 ) > 58.6 TeV –Br(Bs→ee) < 2.77x –Br(B 0 →ee) < 8.32x Improvements over current limits –Br(Bs→e  ) < 6.1 x (CDF Run I)‏ –M LQ (Bs) > 21.7 TeV (CDF Run I)‏ –Br(B 0 →e  ) < 9.2 x (BABAR 2007)‏ –M LQ (B 0 ) > 53.1TeV (BABAR 2007)‏ –Br(B 0 →ee) <1.13 x (BABAR 2007)‏

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th  Rel Systematic uncertainties

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th M(e-  ): Closed Box Lxy > 375  m, iso>0.675,d  <0.11 but before e/  ID  After  -ID   After e/  ID ↓-----blocked-----↓

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th I wish we were so lucky! Some things never change!

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th ee - Limits for different scenarios

Hans Wenzel, Joint Experimental-Theoretical Seminar June 20 th 2008

54 Electron Identification Electron ID uses dE/dx and CEM/CES/CPR –CEM/CES coverage: 80.28±0.78 % –Track-based algorithm for low pT electrons –pT>2GeV, |  |<1.0 dE/dx and calorimeter efficiency from   e + e  –dE/dx: ~90% –CEM/CES/CPR: ~70%