A20121 Parton Distribution Functions, Part 1 Daniel Stump Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University A.Introduction B.Properties of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Energy neutrino cross-sections HERA-LHC working week Oct 2007 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford Updated predictions of high energy ν and ν CC cross-sections.
Advertisements

Low x meeting, Sinai Alice Valkárová on behalf of H1 collaboration LOW x meeting 2005, Sinaia H1 measurements of the structure of diffraction.
1cteq ss 11 B. Properties of the PDFs -- Definitions First, what are the Parton Distribution Functions? (PDFs) The PDFs are a set of 11 functions, f i.
Structure of the Proton CTEQ Parton Distribution Functions CTEQ6.6 P. M. Nadolsky, H.-L. Lai, Q.-H. Cao, J. Huston, J. Pumplin, D. Stump, W.-K. Tung, C.-P.
XXXIII International Conference of Theoretical Physics MATTER TO THE DEEPEST: Recent Developments in Physics of Fundamental Interactions, USTROŃ'09 Ustron,
1 CT10, CT14 parton distributions and beyond Parton distributions for the LHC, Benasque, Pavel Nadolsky Southern Methodist University On behalf.
QCD-2004 Lesson 1 : Field Theory and Perturbative QCD I 1)Preliminaries: Basic quantities in field theory 2)Preliminaries: COLOUR 3) The QCD Lagrangian.
May 2005CTEQ Summer School1 Global Analysis of QCD and Parton Distribution Functions Dan Stump Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University.
Sept 2003PHYSTAT11 … of short-distance processes using perturbative QCD (NLO) The challenge of Global Analysis is to construct a set of PDF’s with good.
October 2004CTEQ Meeting1 Parton distribution uncertainty and W and Z production at hadron colliders Dan Stump Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan.
Lecture I: pQCD and spectra. 2 What is QCD? From: T. Schaefer, QM08 student talk.
SF summary (theory)DIS2008 J. Pumplin1 SF working group – theory summary Jon Pumplin – 10 April 2008 Even if you went to a talk during every parallel session.
Current: –Experiment: Extensive Drell-Yan p-p and p-d Expt. (E866) ; Charm production in Neutrino Scattering (CCFR, NuTeV) … etc. –Expected Advances in.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
May 2005CTEQ Summer School25 4/ Examples of PDF Uncertainty.
Resummation of Large Logs in DIS at x->1 Xiangdong Ji University of Maryland SCET workshop, University of Arizona, March 2-4, 2006.
April 15-19, 2007M. Block, Aspen Workshop Cosmic Ray Physics Imposing the Froissart Bound on Hadronic Interactions: Part II, Deep Inelastic Scattering.
Sept 2003PHYSTAT1 Uncertainties of Parton Distribution Functions Daniel Stump Michigan State University & CTEQ.
Sept 2003PHYSTAT11 … of short-distance processes using perturbative QCD (NLO) The challenge of Global Analysis is to construct a set of PDF’s with good.
Preliminary results in collaboration with Pavel Nadolsky Les Houches /6/5.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #14.
 s determination at LEP Thorsten Wengler University of Manchester DIS’06, Tsukuba, Japan.
Glauber shadowing at particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions within the framework of pQCD. Alexey Svyatkovskiy scientific advisor: M.A.Braun.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
As one evolves the gluon density, the density of gluons becomes large: Gluons are described by a stochastic ensemble of classical fields, and JKMMW argue.
Global QCD Analysis of Nucleon Structure: Progress and Prospects–CTEQ Background: –Advances in experiment and theory in global QCD analysis in recent years.
P Spring 2003 L9Richard Kass Inelastic ep Scattering and Quarks Elastic vs Inelastic electron-proton scattering: In the previous lecture we saw that.
Monday, Jan. 27, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino-Nucleon DIS 2.Formalism of -N DIS.
Jan., 2010Aspen Winter Physics Conference XXVI M. Block 1 Analytic LO Gluon Distributions from the proton structure function F 2 (x,Q 2 ) > New PDF's.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
QCD analysis of the nucleon spin structure function data in next to leading order in α S The polarized gluon distribution in the nucleon Jechiel Lichtenstadt.
Predictions for high energy neutrino cross-sections from ZEUS-S Global fit analysis S Chekanov et al, Phys Rev D67, (2002) The ZEUS PDFs are sets.
PROTON STRUCTURE AND HARD P-P COLLISIONS PROTON STRUCTURE AND HARD P-P COLLISIONS AT HIGH ENERGIES AT HIGH ENERGIES 1 Gennady Lykasov in collaboration.
QCD-2004 Lesson 2 :Perturbative QCD II 1)Preliminaries: Basic quantities in field theory 2)Preliminaries: COLOUR 3) The QCD Lagrangian and Feynman rules.
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
Threshold Resummation for Top- Quark Pair Production at ILC J.P. Ma ITP, CAS, Beijing 2005 年直线对撞机国际研讨会, Tsinghua Univ.
Status of Recent Parton Distribution Analyses Hung-Liang Lai Department of Science Education Taipei Municipal Teachers College Introduction Time evolution.
HERMES による パートン helicity 分布関数の QCD 解析 Tokyo Inst. of Tech. 1. Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD) 2. Parton Helicity Distribution and Nucleon Spin Problem 3.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
SWADHIN TANEJA (STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY) K. BOYLE, A. DESHPANDE, C. GAL, DSSV COLLABORATION 2/4/2016 S. Taneja- DIS 2011 Workshop 1 Uncertainty determination.
Global QCD Analysis and Hadron Collider Physics What is the role of QCD and global QCD analysis in Hadron Collider Physics? Review of global QCD analysis:
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann DIS 2007 Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Isabell-Alissandra.
Implications for LHC pA Run from RHIC Results CGC Glasma Initial Singularity Thermalized sQGP Hadron Gas sQGP Asymptotic.
H1 QCD analysis of inclusive cross section data DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, April 2004 Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the H1 Collaboration.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
Tensor and Flavor-singlet Axial Charges and Their Scale Dependencies Hanxin He China Institute of Atomic Energy.
1. How to probe the quarks? Scatter high-energy electron off a proton: Deep-Inelastic Scattering (DIS) Highest energy e-p collider: HERA at DESY in Hamburg:
Excited QCD 2014 Bjelasnica Mountain, Sarajevo. Outline Sara Taheri Monfared (IPM) 2.
D Parton Distribution Functions, Part 2. D CT10-NNLO Parton Distribution Functions.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Outline Motivation DDIS kinematics Introduction of different diffractive data sets Global fit procedure Results and conclusion Sara Taheri Monfared (Semnan.
Parton showers as a source of energy-momentum deposition and the implications for jet observables Bryon Neufeld, LANL 1Neufeld Based on the preprint R.B.
Perturbative QCD in Nuclear Environment Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University Student Lecture at Quark Matter 2004 Oakland – January 11, 2004 Table of Contents:
SF working group – theory summary Jon Pumplin – 10 April 2008 Even if you went to a talk during every parallel session (as I did in role as convenor) you.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
1 A M Cooper-Sarkar University of Oxford ICHEP 2014, Valencia.
From Lagrangian Density to Observable
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
into a quark-antiquark pair self-coupling of gluons
Michigan State University
Lecture 2 Evolution and resummation
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Polarized Structure Function of Nucleon and Orbital Angular Momentum
Kinematic Map in x,Q for CTEQ4
Adnan Bashir, UMSNH, Mexico
Parton Uncertainties and the Stability of NLO Global Analysis
Proton structure at low Q2
An Introduction to HERA Physics
Uncertainties of Parton Distribution Functions
Y.Kitadono (Hiroshima ),
Presentation transcript:

A20121 Parton Distribution Functions, Part 1 Daniel Stump Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University A.Introduction B.Properties of the PDFs C.Results of CT10-NNLO Global Analysis D.Uncertainties of the PDFs E. Applications to LHC Physics

A20122 A. Introduction. QCD and High-Energy Physics QCD is an elegant theory of the strong interactions – the gauge theory of color transformations. It has a simple Lagrangian (sums over flavor and color are implied) Parameters: g; m 1, m 2, m 3, …, m 6 Introduction

A20123 However, the calculation of experimental observables is quite difficult, for 2 reasons: (i) there are divergent renormalizations; the theory requires  regularization  perturbation theory  a singular limit    (GeV) or, a  0 (fm) or, n  4 (ii) quark confinement; the asymptotic states are color singlets, whereas the fundamental fields are color triplets. Introduction

A20124 Nevertheless, certain cross sections can be calculated reliably inclusive processes with large momentum transfer (i.e., short-distance interactions) The reasons that QCD can provide accurate predictions for short-distance interactions are  asymptotic freedom  s (Q 2 ) ~ const./ln(Q 2 /  2 ) as Q 2    the factorization theorem d  hadron ~ PDFs  C where C is calculable in perturbation theory. The PDFs provide a connection between quarks and gluons (the partons) and the nucleon (a bound state). Introduction

A20125 Global Analysis of QCD and Parton Distribution Functions d  hadron ~ PDFs  C (sum over flavors implied) The symbol ~ means “asymptotically equal as Q   ”; the error is O(m 2 /Q 2 ) where Q is an appropriate (high) momentum scale. The C’s are calculable in perturbation theory. The PDFs are not calculable today, given our lack of understanding of the nonperturbative aspect of QCD (binding and confinement). But we can determine the PDFs from Global Analysis, with some accuracy. Introduction

A20126 next …

B B. Properties of the PDFs -- Definitions First, what are the Parton Distribution Functions? (PDFs) The PDFs are a set of 11 functions, f i (x,Q 2 ) where longitudinal momentum fraction momentum scale f 0 = g(x,Q 2 ) the gluon PDF f 1 = u(x,Q 2 ) the up-quark PDF f -1 = u(x,Q 2 ) the up-antiquark PDF f 2 = d and f -2 = d f 3 = s and f -3 = s etc parton index Exercise: What about the top quark? Properties of the PDFs

B Second, what is the meaning of a PDF? We tend to think and speak in terms of “Proton Structure” u(x,Q 2 ) dx = the mean number of up quarks with longitudinal momentum fraction from x to x + dx, appropriate to a scattering experiment with momentum transfer Q. u(x,Q 2 ) = the up-quark density in momentum fraction This heuristic interpretation makes sense from the LO parton model. More precisely, taking account of QCD interactions, d  proton = PDFs  C. Properties of the PDFs

B f i (x,Q 2 ) = the density of parton type i w.r.t. longitudinal momentum fraction x valence up quark integral, valence down quark integral, valence strange quark integral Properties of the PDFs longitudinal momentum fraction, carried by parton type i Momentum Sum Rule Flavor Number Sum Rules

B Example. DIS of electrons by protons; e.g., HERA experiments (summed over flavors!) in lowest order of QCD Properties of the PDFs

B But QCD radiative corrections must be included to get a sufficiently accurate prediction. The NLO approximation will involve these interactions … From these perturbative calculations, we determine the coefficient functions C i (NLO), and hence write Approximations available today: LO, NLO, NNLO Properties of the PDFs

B The Factorization Theorem For short-distance interactions, and the PDFs are universal ! We can write a formal, field-theoretic expression, although we can’t evaluate it because we don’t know the bound state |p>. Properties of the PDFs Correlator function

B Exercise. Suppose the parton densities for the proton are known, (A) In terms of the f i (x,Q 2 ), write the 11 parton densities for the neutron, say, g i (x,Q 2 ). (B) In terms of the f i (x,Q 2 ), write the 11 parton densities for the deuteron, say, h i (x,Q 2 ). Properties of the PDFs

B next …

B B. Properties of the PDFs – Q 2 evolution Evolution in Q The PDFs are a set of 11 functions, f i (x,Q 2 ) where longitudinal momentum fraction momentum scale f i (x,Q 2 ) = the density of partons of type i, carrying a fraction x of the longitudinal momentum of a proton, when resolved at a momentum scale Q. The DGLAP Evolution Equations  We know how the f i vary with Q.  That follows from the renormalization group.  It’s calculable in perturbation theory. Q 2 evolution

B The DGLAP Evolution Equations V.N. Gribov and L.N. Lipatov, Sov J Nucl Phys 15, 438 (1972); G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl Phys B126, 298 (1977); Yu.L. Dokshitzer, Sov Phys JETP 46, 641 (1977). Solve the 11 coupled equations numerically. For example, you could download the program HOPPET. G. P. Salam and J. Rojo, A Higher Order Perturbative Parton Evolution Toolkit; download from … a library of programs written in Fortran 90. Q 2 evolution

B Q 2 evolution

B Some informative results obtained using HOPPET Starting from a set of “benchmark input PDFs”, let’s use HOPPET to calculate the evolved PDFs at selected values of Q. For the input (not realistic but used here to study the evolution qualitatively): Output tables Q 2 evolution

B The Running Coupling of QCD Q 2 evolution  S (Q 2 ) Q 2 evolution

B The QCD Running Coupling Constant For Global Analysis, we need an accurate  S (Q 2 ). Q 2 evolution (approx. : N F = 5 massless)

 S (M Z ) =  S. Bethke, G. Dissertori and G.P. Salam; Particle Data Group 2012 B The QCD Running Coupling Constant Evolution of  S as a function of Q, using the 1-loop beta function (red) the 2-loop beta function (green) the 3-loop beta function (blue) For Global Analysis, we need an accurate  S (Q 2 ). Q 2 evolution

B The QCD Running Coupling Constant How large are the 2-loop and 3-loop corrections for  S (Q 2 )? Q 2 evolution

B Comments on  S (Q 2 )  An important improvement is to include the quark masses.  The central fit has  S (M Z ) = (Bethke)  CTEQ also provides alternative PDFs with a range of value of  S (M Z ); these are called the  S -series.  Another approach is to use the Global Analysis to “determine” the value of  S (M Z ).  Asymptotic freedom Q 2 evolution

B Examples from HOPPET U-quark PDF evolution : Black : Q = Q 0 = GeV Blue : Q = 3.16 GeV (1-loop, 2-loop, 3-loop) Red : Q = GeV (1-loop, 2-loop, 3-loop) How does the u-quark PDF evolve in Q? Q 2 evolution

B Gluon PDF evolution : Black : Q = Q0 = GeV Blue : Q = 3.16 GeV (1-loop, 2-loop, 3-loop) Red : Q = GeV (1-loop, 2-loop, 3-loop) Examples from HOPPET How does the gluon PDF evolve in Q? Q 2 evolution

B DGLAP evolution of PDFs  The “structure of the proton” depends on the resolving power of the scattering process. As Q increases … PDFs decrease at large x PDFs increase at small x as we resolve the gluon radiation and quark pair production.  The momentum sum rule and the flavor sum rules hold for all Q.  These graphs show the DGLAP evolution for LO, NLO, NNLO Global Analysis. Q 2 evolution

B How large are the NLO and NNLO corrections? … a good exercise using HOPPET Q 2 evolution

B Q 2 evolution next …

B Structure of the Proton CTEQ Parton Distribution Functions CTEQ6.6 P. M. Nadolsky, H.-L. Lai, Q.-H. Cao, J. Huston, J. Pumplin, D. Stump, W.-K. Tung, C.-P. Yuan, Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys.Rev.D78: (2008) ; arXiv: [hep-ph] CT10 Hung-Liang Lai, Marco Guzzi, Joey Huston, Zhao Li, Pavel M. Nadolsky, Jon Pumplin, C.-P. Yuan, New parton distributions for collider physics, Phys.Rev.D82: (2010) ; arXiv: [hep-ph] CT10-NNLO (2012) The results shown below are for CT10-NNLO. CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The U Quark (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Red: u(x,Q 2 ) Dashed Red: ū(x,Q 2 ) Gray: u valence (x,Q 2 ) This log-log plot shows … … for x ≳ 0.1 the valence structure dominates … for x ≲ 0.01 ū approaches u CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The U Quark (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Red: x u(x,Q 2 ) Dashed Red: x ū(x,Q 2 ) Gray: x u valence (x,Q 2 ) This linear plot shows the momentum fraction for Q = 3.16 GeV (= area under the curve) integral ≈ 0.32, 0.05, 0.27 CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The U Quark (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Red: u valence (x,Q 2 ) This linear plot demonstrates the flavor sum rule: integral = 2 CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The D Quark (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Blue: d(x,Q 2 ) Dashed Blue: đ(x,Q 2 ) Gray: d valence (x,Q 2 ) This log-log plot shows … … for x ≳ 0.1 the valence structure dominates … for x ≲ 0.01 đ approaches d CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The D Quark (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Blue: d(x,Q 2 ) Dashed Blue: đ(x,Q 2 ) Gray: d valence (x,Q 2 ) This linear plot shows the momentum fraction for Q = 3.16 GeV (= area under the curve) integral ≈ 0.15, 0.06, 0.10 CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The D Quark (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) d valence = d – đ (x,Q 2 ) This linear plot demonstrates the flavor sum rule: integral = 1 CT10-NNLO PDFs

B This linear plot compares U and D -- quarks and antiquarks; naively, d = 0.5 u, but it’s not that simple. Structure of the Proton The D and U Quarks (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Blue: d(x,Q 2 ) Dashed Blue: đ(x,Q 2 ) Gray: d valence (x,Q 2 ) Red: u(x,Q 2 ) Dashed Red: ū(x,Q 2 ) Gray: u valence (x,Q 2 ) CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton The D and U Quarks (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) d(x,Q 2 ) / u(x,Q 2 ) v x d(x,Q 2 ) / u(x,Q 2 ) is interesting. Exercise: What scattering processes could provide information on this ratio? CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton Gluons (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) black : g(x,Q 2 ) red : u(x,Q 2 ) The gluon dominates at small x. The valence quarks dominate at large x. CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton Gluons (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) black : g(x,Q 2 ) red : u(x,Q 2 ) blue: d(x,Q 2 ) The gluon dominates at small x. The valence quarks dominate at large x. CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton Sea Quarks and Gluons (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) sea(x,Q 2 ) and g(x,Q 2 ) vs x black: g(x,Q 2 ) brown: sea(x,Q 2 ) sea = 2 (db + ub + sb) CT10-NNLO PDFs

B Structure of the Proton (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) Ratios : (db, ub, sb)/g CT10-NNLO PDFs Exercises: (1) Identify db, ub, sb. (2) Why are they all equal at small x?

B Structure of the Proton (Q 2 = 10 GeV 2 ; Q = 3.16 GeV) All in One Plot u_valence d valence sea * 0.05 gluon * 0.05 CT10-NNLO PDFs Sea = 2 (db + ub + sb) u_valence = u – ub ; u = u_valence + u_sea ub = u_sea

B Structure of the Proton … as a function of Q All in One Plot u_valence d valence sea * 0.05 gluon * 0.05 CT10-NNLO PDFs Sea = 2 (db + ub + sb) u_valence = u – ub ; u = u_valence + u_sea ub = u_sea

B Exercise: (A) Use the Durham Parton Distribution Generator (online PDF calculator) to reproduce these graphs. (B) Show the Q 2 evolution. CT10-NNLO PDFs

B next …