1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Advertisements

Board Of Appeals Documents
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
Presented by Jennifer Coughlin Eugene, Oregon April 10, 2013.
WHAT IS HIPAA? The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) provides certain protections for any of your health information.
National Healthcare Compliance Audioconference RAC Audit Appeals: Strategies and Defenses for Overturning Hospital RAC Denials The Medicare Appeals Process.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
HIPAA Enforcement NPRM HIPAA SUMMIT XI September, 2005 Susan A. Miller, JD COO, CPO HealthTransactions.com Susan A. Miller, JD COO, CPO HealthTransactions.com.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
OCR HITECH Enforcement Tips: Prevent, Detect and Quickly Correct HIPAA COW 2010 Spring Conference Privacy/Security Session 1 HIPAA Privacy Best Practices:
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
SA Judicial Council 2008/2009 Explanation of Duties, Powers, and Processes.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
Fair Hearings Training Presented by University of Miami School of Law, Children & Youth Law Clinic, Caitlin Currie, Shana Schoem and Seida Wood.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
Implementing and Enforcing the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Enforcing HIPAA Lorman Education Service August 22, 2007 Tacoma, Washington Stephen D. Rose, J.D., M.B.A. K&L Gates 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle,
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Confidentiality, Consents and Disclosure Recent Legal Changes and Current Issues Presented by Pam Beach, Attorney at Law.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Compliance and Enforcement of the Privacy Rule. HHS/OCR February/March Compliance Date  April 14, 2003 – Compliance for all but small health plans.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
EPA’s ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION SYSTEM Environmental Appeals Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kathie A. Stein, Judge.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Starring: Ofelia Calderón, Esq. – Calderón Seguin, as Immigration Judge Ivan Yacub, Esq. – Yacub Law Offices, LLC as Private Immigration Counsel Edward.
Chapter 11 Trial Preparation.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
THE REVIEW PROCESS. 2 OVERVIEW Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Request Departmental Review Review Process Documentation Conference Final Determination Other.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION APPEALS.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
1 Privacy and Security Enforcement: An In-Depth Exploration of Federal Civil Enforcement Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss Krahmer & Bishop, P.A. Fairmont, MN.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Appealing Katie Beckett Medicaid Terminations The Georgia Legal Services Program, Inc. October, 2008.
The Hearing Process 1. 2 Notice of Claim Status Issued by Carrier Legally Binding Triggers Protest Period (usually 90 days)
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Do now pg 57 1.Which situation is an example of civil law? Murder or Divorce? 2.Give me 2 examples of civil cases.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
Mason County School District
Prosecution Process.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Compliance and Enforcement of the Privacy Rule
Civil Pretrial Practice
DFS Contested Case Hearing Process
Presentation transcript:

1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.

2 Process and Procedure The Investigation Process Informal Resolution Notice of Proposed Determination Administrative Hearing Appeal Judicial Review

3 Investigation Secretary of HHS Commences Upon Receipt of Complaint [§ (c)] –Contact Complainant to Determine Whether Investigation Necessary –Secretary May Resolve Without Even Contacting Covered Entity Secretary May Conduct Compliance Reviews [§ ] –No Complaint Necessary

4 Investigation Secretary May Issue Subpoenas [§ (a)] –Attendance of Witnesses –Production of Evidence Investigational Inquiries [§ (b)] –Non-public –Testimony Under Oath –Legal Representation and Objections Allowed

5 Investigation Note: Any Information Obtained by Secretary During an Investigational Inquiry, May be Used in Any HHS Activities and May be Offered Into Evidence in Any Proceeding [§ (c)] –Could be Used in Later, Separate Proceedings Important When Negotiating Informal Resolution –Is Not Expressly Limited to HIPAA Enforcement

6 Investigation If Evidence Indicates Noncompliance [§ (a)] –Secretary Will Attempt to Resolve via Informal Means Review of Demonstrated Compliance by Covered Entity Corrective Action Plan in Place –Secretary Has Authority to Settle at Any Time [§ ] –Secretary Has Authority to Compromise CMP at Any Time [§ ]

7 Mitigating Factors & Affirmative Defenses If Matter Not Resolved Informally, CE May Submit Written Evidence of Mitigating Factors and Affirmative Defenses [§ (a)(3)] –Party Must Submit Within 30 Days –If Following Review, Secretary Finds CMP Should be Imposed, Then Issues Notice of Proposed Determination

8 Mitigating Factors Factors Which are Utilized in Determining Amount of CMP [§ ] –Nature of Violation, in Light of Purpose of Rule –Circumstances, Such as Time Period During Violation Occurred Whether Violation Caused Physical Harm Whether Violation Hindered Health Care Whether Violation Resulted in Financial Harm –Degree of Culpability (Intentional, Beyond Control) –History of Prior Offenses (Similar, Corrections) –Financial Condition of Covered Entity (Size) –Other Matters as Justice Requires

9 Affirmative Defenses Affirmative Defenses [§ ]: –Act is Punishable Criminally –Covered Entity Had No Knowledge –Covered Entity Would Not Have Known Using Reasonable Diligence –Violation Result of Reasonable Cause, Not Willful Neglect and Corrected Within 30 Days or Such Additional Time as Secretary Determines

10 Notice of Proposed Determination If Secretary Finds Basis for Action, Issues Notice of Proposed Determination to Covered Entity [§ ] –Statutory Basis for Penalty –Findings of Fact –Reasons Why Violation Subjected Covered Entity to Penalty –Factors in Determining Amount of Penalty –Instructions for Responding

11 Covered Entity Response Upon Receipt of Notice of Proposed Determination, Covered Entity Must Request Hearing [§ (a)] –Request Mailed Within 60 Days of NPD –Hearing Before Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) –Must Admit, Deny, or Explain Findings of Fact –Must Set Forth Defenses [§ (c)] –Failure to Request Results in CMP and Loss of Appeal Rights [§ ]

12 Discovery Process Limited Discovery Allowed [§ ] –Request for Production of Documents –No Other Discovery Specifically Allowed Work Product of Attorney is Protected Discovery Motions are Permitted Pre-Hearing (Not More Than 60 and Not Less Than 15 Days Before Hearing) [§ ] : –Exchange Witness Lists, Prior Statements, and Proposed Exhibits

13 ALJ Hearing ALJ Must Dismiss a Request for Hearing [§ (d)] : –If Not Properly Filed –Upon Withdrawal –Upon Abandonment –Covered Entity’s Failure to Raise an Issue that ALJ May Properly Address –Secretary May Settle Without ALJ Involvement or Consent [§ ]

14 Hearing ALJ Conducts Hearing [§ ] –Fair and Impartial –Schedules Date, Time, and Place –May Conduct: Conferences Motion Hearings Examination of Witnesses Issuance of Subpoenas –Hearing Must be Public, Unless Good Cause Shown [§ ]

15 Limitations on ALJ ALJ May Not [§ (c)] : –Ignore or Invalidate Federal Law or Secretarial Delegations of Authority –Issue a Directed Verdict –Compel Settlement –Enjoin the Secretary –Review an Exercise of Secretary Discretion

16 Rights of Parties Parties Have Right to [§ ] : –Legal Representation With No Limitation on Attorneys’ Fees –Conduct Discovery (Limited) –Stipulate as to Fact or Law –Examine and Cross-Examine Witnesses –Present Oral Arguments –Submit Written Briefs (Within 60 Days) No Right to Retaliate Against Complainants or Witnesses [§ ]

17 Burden of Proof Respondent has Burden of Going Forward and of Persuasion as to [§ (b)(1)] : –Affirmative Defenses –Challenges to Amount of CMP –Claims for Reduction or Waiver of CMP Secretary has Burden as to All Other Issues [§ (b)(2)]

18 Witnesses Oral Testimony Allowed [§ (a)] In Discretion of ALJ Testimony, Other Than Expert Testimony, May be Submitted in Written Form [§ (b)] Prior Sworn Testimony, Subject to Cross, May be Admitted by ALJ Exclusion of Witnesses [§ (e)] –Not Natural Persons Who are Parties –Not Officer/Employee of Entity Which is Party –Not Other Essential Natural Person

19 ALJ Decision ALJ Issues Decision Within 60 Days After Hearing or Submission of Post-Hearing Briefs [§ ] –If Misses Deadline, Must Simply Explain and Set New Date –Decision Based Solely on Record –Sets Forth Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law –Unless Appealed, Becomes Final 60 Days From Date of Service

20 Appeal Party Must File Notice of Appeal Within 30 Days of ALJ Decision [§ (a)] Appeal is to HHS Departmental Appeals Board –For Good Cause Shown, May Extend Additional 30 Days –ALJ Must Forward Copy of Record [§ (b)] –Must be Accompanied by Brief Specifying Objections [§ (b)] –Opposition Brief May be Filed Within 30 Days of Notice and Brief [§ (c)]

21 Appeal Party Has No Right to Appear Personally Before Board [§ (d)] Board May Not Consider Any Issue Not Briefed, Nor Issue Not Raised Before ALJ [§ (e)] Board May Remand to ALJ [§ (f)] Board’s Decision: –Decline to Review –Affirm –Increase or Reduce Penalty –Reverse or Remand [§ (g)]

22 Appeal Board’s Standard of Review –Issue of Fact: ALJ Decision Supported by Substantial Evidence on Whole Record [§ (h)] –Issue of Law: ALJ Decision Erroneous [§ (h)] –Harmless Error Rule Applies as Well [§ ] Board Must Issue Decision Within 60 Days of Briefing [§ (i)] Decision of Board is Final 60 Days After Service, Except if Remanded or if Reconsideration Requested [§ (j)]

23 Reconsideration Party May File Motion for Reconsideration –Prior to Decision of Board Becoming Final [§ (j)(3)] –Must be Accompanied by Brief –Opposition Brief May be Filed Within 15 Days of Receipt Board to Reconsider Only if Clear Error of Fact or Error of Law [§ (j)(2)] –New Evidence Not Basis Unless Not Previously Available –Must Rule on Motion within 30 Days –Decision Becomes Final Unless Petition for Judicial Review [§ (j)(4)]

24 Judicial Review Respondent Must File Petition Within 60 Days of Board’s Final Decision [§ (k)] Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals Copy Must be Served on HHS General Counsel Decision May be Stayed Pending Review [§ (a)] –Respondent May Request Stay of Penalty –Automatically Stays Until ALJ Rules ALJ Must Rule Within 10 Days

25 Questions? Please feel free to ask questions now, after the session, or contact me directly Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A. Phone (507) ext Fax (507)