B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 B Factory D&D: Strategy Overview S. Kahn Director, PPA

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 2 B Factory D&D planning status *BABAR D&D and PEP-II D&D are very different projects at very different stages of planning and maturity *BABAR D&D has been in preparation for more than a year and is relatively mature –Funding is in place or planned for project execution FY08-FY12 –Project team is identified, preparatory work has begun in IR-2, and first major D&D steps are about to get underway –BABAR D&D consists of many one-time dismantling steps, with unique tooling and unique in-house expertise required Necessitates early dismantling to take advantage of existing knowledge base before this disappears –Re-use case for components is uncertain, but temporary storage of these components while issues are resolved is also straightforward

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 3 B Factory D&D planning status *Planning for PEP-II D&D is just getting underway in FY09 at minimal budget levels –Project team is not yet identified and limited funding exists for project planning in PPA budget projections for FY10-FY11 –Once PEP-II is brought to a minimal maintenance state, valuable components can be safely stored in the present location No immediate demand for tunnels before PEP-X Project Re-use cases do not require components before 2013 –Dismantling is largely an industrial operation, probably best executed with an outside contractor Large number of repeated operations, with existing and routine procedures for handling accelerator components In-house knowledge continues to reside within Accelerator Systems and ETS Divisions Storing components on-site in light of the metals suspension requires significant planning and preparation –We are defining PEP-II D&D scope as technical components, leaving buildings and tunnels intact including utilities, lighting and cable ways

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 4 Baseline plan for PEP-II D&D *FY09-FY10: PPA manages initial planning effort while re-use cases are resolved –Develop refined budget and planning baseline, including offsite engineering participation in D&D effort, packing and transportation costs, contractor costs for removal of components, and costs for new building as an on-site storage solution –Negotiate with potential recipients of PEP-II components for re- use to understand required interfaces and schedules, and shared funding scenarios –Manage development of possible protocol for exemptions to metals suspension in connection with BABAR D&D project, with evaluation of implications for PEP-II component disposal scenario –Evaluate project options with CD-1 review at the end of FY2010 Will have firmer understanding of re-use needs, cost implications, and on-site space requirements for new storage building

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 5 Baseline plan for PEP-II D&D *FY11-FY12: Develop project team and detailed project execution planning –If there is significant re-use of components for HEP-related projects, continue PPA management of project development –If there is no significant re-use planned, turn over management of the PEP-II D&D project to ETS or equivalent lab technical services division –Plan for CD-2 review at the end of FY11 and CD-3 in FY12 –Begin construction of storage building in FY12 *FY13-FY14 –Execute PEP-II D&D project under PPA (re-use scenario) or lab- operations (no re-use scenario) management –Complete storage building in FY13 –Use contractor to remove components from tunnel, dispose radioactive waste & store suspension material in on-site building

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 6 B Factory MMS/D&D budget In a SuperB + Project-X re-use scenario, and assuming exemption from the metals suspension, BABAR + PEP-II D&D would be reduced by ~$15.5M

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 7 Structure of review talks *PEP-II introduction, MMS status, and initial estimates for D&D scenarios: Mike Sullivan, John Seeman *BABAR introduction, MMS status, D&D planning, materials handling, schedule and budget: Bill Wisniewski, Jim Krebs *Review of re-use requests: David MacFarlane, Umberto Dosselli (INFN) and Jim Kerby (Fermilab) *BABAR safety planning: Craig Ferguson, Frank O’Neill *BABAR materials disposition issues and metals suspension planning: Sayed Rokni, Joachim Vollaire, Amanda Sabourov, Olga Ligeti *Tour: Today from 1:00-2:00 including IR-8 and IR-2