What Works And Is Hopeful Grover J. (Russ) Whitehurst, Ph.D. Director Institute of Education Sciences United States Department of Education About High.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Helping all students graduate ready for college, work and citizenship NCSL Annual Convention, Denver CO, 7/23/02 Helping all students graduate ready for.
What randomized trials have taught us about what works and doesn’t work in education Jon Baron Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy December 9, 2003.
Supporting Students for High School Graduation and Beyond Introduction Judy Delgado Indian Education Program California Department of Education Webinar.
Advancement Via Individual Determination. The Road to College Rigor, Readiness, and Retention.
Is College and Career Readiness an Internationally Competitive Standard? George Schlott Principal Consultant for Program Solutions - Illinois ACT, Inc.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Impacts of the Michigan Merit Curriculum on Student Outcomes: Preliminary Findings from the First Cohort.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
National High School Center’s Summer Institute Robert J. Ivry MDRC Transitions Out of High School June 19, 2008.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Reviewing National High School Improvement Strategies, Models, Characteristics and Potential Monica Martinez KnowledgeWorks Foundation (formerly of the.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
20 Years Later M.A.S.S. Executive Institute Mitchell D. Chester, Commissioner July 18, 2014.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
Accountability and Assessment: From “A Nation at Risk”  NCLB  Race to the Top.
High Schools That Work A school reform design that provides a framework of goals, key practices, and key conditions for setting higher standards and accelerating.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Promoting Collaborative Work in Schools and Districts presentation for Princeton University conference on High Schools Friday, April 27, 2009 Naomi Housman.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Let’s Get to the Core Presenter Info: Ron Jetty, Director, PK 16 Initiatives University of Wisconsin System.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Preparing America’s Future Future. No Child Left Behind Key Principles Increase accountability for student performanceIncrease accountability for student.
Bridging the Gap to Postsecondary Education Innovative School Solutions.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
Class Size Reduction vs. “Race to the Top” and corporate-style reforms What does the research say, who supports, and who benefits Presentation to SOS March.
A major shift in Alabama’s curriculum to better prepare our students for post-secondary life (i.e. life after school). 1.Beginning this school year ( )
MEASURES OF COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS AND SUCCESS July 16, 2013.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California.
College and Career Readiness: Measures/Aligning Instructional Materials Dublin Scioto High School March 2012.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
Adult Education: The Next Five Years Randy L. Whitfield, Ed.D. Basic Skills & Family Literacy Conference November 2009.
APRIL 2014 Nevada Advanced Placement 2014 Report 1.
High School Reform in Florida FCAN Conference 2008 Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
+ Voorheesville CSD Strategic Plan Community Forum September 30, 2015.
High School Reform: Learning From Rigorous Research Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education High School Initiative Regional High School Summit St.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
21st Century Skills Framework. CORE SUBJECTS AND 21st CENTURY THEMES Mastery of core subjects and 21st century themes is essential for all students in.
Trends in CTE Trends in CTE Dr. Patrick Ainsworth Rob Atterbury November 19, 2010.
Comprehensive Guidance & Counseling “The Oregon Framework”
Is College and Career Readiness an Internationally Competitive Standard? April Hansen Director of Program Services ACT Midwest Region – Educational Services.
DR. JOHN HUGHES DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE REGIONAL EDUCATION LABORATORY - SOUTHEAST College Readiness.
Title I Part C Migrant Education Program.  By end of school year 2015, 60% of migrant students are meeting standard in Reading.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Phase 2 Recommendations Recommendation 1  Increase the Graduation Requirements Require a 4 th year of math for all students Highest level of math attainment-strongest.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Is College and Career Readiness an Internationally Competitive Standard? April Hansen Director of Program Solutions Affirming the Goal.
©2008 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ® Ready or Not: College Readiness for All? MASSP Annual Summer Retreat June 23, 2008.
DSHS IMPROVING COLLEGE READINESS. COLLEGE READINESS ACROSS THE NATION Source: ACT, 2010, The Condition of College and Career Readiness : National.
Action Research Project Written By Mayra Zendejas March 25, 2014.
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Presentation transcript:

What Works And Is Hopeful Grover J. (Russ) Whitehurst, Ph.D. Director Institute of Education Sciences United States Department of Education About High School Improvement Archived Information

Historical Perspective 1957 Soviets launch Sputnik 1959 James Conant’s The American High School Today –decries localism and small size –Schools should serve the national interests and promote meritocracy 1983 A Nation at Risk (failure to teach math and science equivalent to disarmament) –High-school graduation requirements should be strengthened –Schools and colleges should adopt higher and measurable standards for academic performance. –The amount of time students devote to learning should be significantly increased. –The teaching profession should be strengthened by raising standards for training, entry, and professional growth 1994 Goals 2000, Educate America Act 2001 No Child Left Behind –By the year 2000, the high school graduation rate will increase to at least 90 percent. –By the year 2000, all students will leave grades 4, 8, and 12 having demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter including English, mathematics, science

How are we doing? Problems –Math and science –Dropouts (timely completion) –College preparation (ACT) Progress –College Enrollment –More rigorous standards

Problems

TIMSS Math 1995

NAEP Math 2000 Proficiency

Dropouts: event rate (NCES)

Timely Graduation

Students Ready for College (ACT)

Progress

College Enrollment

Trends in Math Course Taking

What Works: How do we know? The counterfactual –The outcomes participants would have experienced had they not participated in a program A comparison of 2 or more conditions –Small high schools work (counterfactual = what would have happened to students if they had gone to large HS) Selection Bias –Participants differ across conditions at the time of selection on outcome-related characteristics

Selection bias: School size

Selection bias: NAEP

Selection bias: Course Taking

Randomized Trials: The gold standard The essence –An education program or practice that is thought to work –Two or more conditions that differ in exposure to the program or practice –Random assignment to conditions –Tests for differences in outcomes Randomization eliminates selection bias

Rare Randomized Trials HS Career Academies Upward Bound Dropout prevention

Career Academies: Characteristics Small Learning Communities to promote interpersonal supports Career theme to combine academic curriculum with career-related courses Employer partnerships to support career awareness and development activities and work-based learning

Career Acad: Academic Outcomes

Career Acad: Employment

Career Acad: Male Employment

Career Acad: Implications Employer partnerships and career theme may be critical to employment outcomes Smaller learning communities do not enhance academic outcomes Males are better served by the program

Dropout Programs: Characteristics Counseling Smaller school settings –Alternative schools –Schools within schools Spend more Regular schools: Restructured vs. Targeted

Dropout Programs: Impacts GED programs increased percentage of students receiving GED or diploma from 24% (control) to 39% (prevention program) Alternative high schools had no effect on completion or dropout rate Restructured schools appeared to have no effects

Dropout Programs: Implications For high school students, the short path is best (GED) Restructured schools and alternative schools and schools within schools appear to be ineffective

Upward Bound Characteristics Upward Bound is ED program to help disadvantaged HS students prepare to enter and succeed in college. (44 thousand students in 563 projects around the country) Services include instruction, tutoring, and counseling during school year and a summer program

Upward Bound: Impacts Overall impacts were nonexistent or very small, e.g., no overall difference in high school graduation or college enrollment Large impact on enrollees with the lowest educational aspirations (and boys) –course-taking (17% increase in total credits) –high school graduation (13% difference) –college enrollment (12% difference in 4 yr college)

Upward Bound: Implications Focus on those with lowest aspirations Focus on boys Effects for highly at-risk high school students can be obtained without major restructuring of schools

Promising Programs & Influences Standards and accountability –California competency exams –MCAS Teacher preparation and professional development in math and science

CA Standards-Based Reforms

MA Competency Test

Evidence Still Out Comprehensive school reform models Smaller schools District-wide reform Remedial tutoring and instruction Vocational focus Charters and vouchers

Suggestions High school reform needs specificity and focus on problems and particular solutions –Dropouts –College preparation –College entry and success –Vocational success –Preparation for citizenship