Meeting Name Date. Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.

Advertisements

Director Francis Ziegler North Dakota Department of Transportation Sunday, October 25, 2009.

Meeting Name Date. Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications.

2014 AVIATION CAPITAL GRANT PROGRAM WEBINAR MAY 8, 2014

Paul F Mullen August  Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)  5 Year plan for transportation improvement activities inside the MAPA Transportation.

Complete & Connected: Tools for Planning a Balanced Transportation System Technical Workshop.

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION August 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.

Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.

Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.

Meeting Name Date. Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications.

California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,

PROPOSITION 1 AND SELECTED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN TARRANT COUNTY SOUTHEAST TARRANT TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP OCTOBER 8, 2014.

April 1, UPDATE Texas Business Leadership Council John A. Barton, P.E. – Deputy Executive Director.

Maner Costerisan  There are 882 Public School Districts within the State of Michigan as of ◦ Intermediate School Districts – 56 ◦ Local Education.

92 ND ANNUAL COUNTY JUDGES & COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS STATE CONFERENCE-LUBBOCK, TEXAS 9/29/14-10/2/14 Funding County Roads.

COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.

State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.

California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW PURPOSE DISCUSS POSSIBILITY OF COMPLETING REMAINING ROAD UPGRADE PROVIDE FACTS TO INFORM COMMUNITY TO MAKE DECISION.

NDACo Legislative Wrap-up Funding for Non-Oil Producing County Highways and Bridges Jason Benson Cass County Engineer.

Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.

Fridley Public Schools ISD #14 Public Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2012.

ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR LOW INCOME SENIORS October 22, 2013.

The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.

Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.

Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.

Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.

COLLIN COUNTY A County Government and Transportation Overview Ruben E. Delgado, PE Director of Engineering A County Government and Transportation Overview.

A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing and Infrastructure Quality.

Dane County Department of Public Works, Highway & Transportation Jerry Mandli, P.E. Commissioner/ Director.

Is Transportation Sustainable?. Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: 1.Examine and prioritize transportation project impacts.

3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC

Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.

Highways and Transit We Need Each Other! Examples of Successful Coordination in Pima County 2012 AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference – Flagstaff, AZ.

GDOT’s Funding Issues 1. GDOT Fund Sources Federal Funds (FHWA, FTA, FAA) State Motor Fuel Taxes (restricted to roads/bridges) State General Funds (we.

Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.

June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.

1 Destination 2030 Kern Regional Transportation Needs * Information provided by Kern Council of Governments.

Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.

Texas Transportation Funding State Senator Robert Nichols.

1 Homestead Exemption Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer January 21, 2010.

City of Rosenberg Property Taxes & Tax Rates July 28, 2015July 28,

AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.

CITY OF MENIFEE, CA. FY General Fund Mid-year Review Other Funds Mid-year Review National, State and Local economic conditions FY Budget Planning.

Get Out the Vote 2015 Campaign in support of Transportation Funding Bill - Texas Proposition 7 on the November 3, 2015 Ballot.

IMPACTS OF PROPERTY TAX REFORM January 30, Introduction Randy Singh, Office of Management & Budget –Opening Remarks Bill Donegan, Orange County.

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.

Williamsville Central School District

Secor Road Reconstruction Project Public Meeting #2

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Funding and Support Subcommittee September 25, 2013

Minnesota’s Municipal Transportation System

Commuter Transportation Benefits Plan

21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee

Summit County – Canyons Employee Housing

2018 BUDGET PRESENTATION -Tax History-

1888PressRelease - Roland Peterson, an expert in logistics and transportation, expresses his views on the current state of the Latvian roads

Fairfax County Fire and Rescue

Meeting Name Date.

US 75 Improvement Study Thanks for attending the Texas Department of Transportation’s first Grayson County open house for the US 75 Project from FM 1417.

Meeting Name Date.

Engineered Scoring System for Bicycle Lane Mapping Development Pedro Zavagna, Mena Souliman The University of Texas at Tyler, Departments of Civil Engineering.

Independent School District No. 318 December 3, 2018

Texas Transportation Funding

CMAQ/STBG* FUNDING: STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS (ROUND 2)

Town Council Strategic Planning Session

Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan

Budget office overview

Presentation transcript:

Meeting Name Date

Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications Public Information

Transportation – The Big Picture The Texas Transportation Institute found that Texas needs: $6B annually to slow deteriorating pavement conditions and congestion $10B annually to keep 2010 conditions stable Currently there is $2.8B available budget for 2014 and

Why Such a Shortfall? There are many reasons Population – Increased congestion and maintenance Increased cost of resources and construction Vehicle fuel efficiency and Inflation affecting the tax rate

Kaufman County Kaufman County is the 9 th fastest growing County in Texas and the 40 th fastest growing county in the U.S. NCTCOG Population Projection Year 2013 = 110,000 people Year 2030 =277,000 people

Process – Data Collection Sources for candidate project solicitation County Judge & Commissioners All Cities Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) NCTCOG ISD Superintendents A total of 80 projects were submitted for consideration in the bond program, totaling over $400M

Process – Project Evaluation Project Considerations Safety Improvements Congestion Alleviation Proximity to Schools & High Traffic Generators Air Quality Improvement Economic Development Significant Alternate Route Creation External Funding Availability Fast Start Project / Bond Term Viability A Total of 26 projects were included totaling an estimated cost of $56M

Projects

*Project costs are estimates

Precinct 1 - Project Facts

Precinct 2 - Project Facts

Precinct 3 - Project Facts

Precinct 4 - Project Facts

Precinct 1 - Project Facts

Precinct 2 - Project Facts

Precinct 3 - Project Facts

Precinct 4 - Project Facts

Precinct 2 - Project Facts

Precinct 1 - Project Facts

Program Project Summary $4M - Funding County Road Materials $19.2M - Pass Through Projects $2.6M – Intersection Safety Improvements $6.9M - Advanced Planning (Env. & Schematic Design) $2M – Countywide Transportation Studies $3M – Strategic Project Funding $18.3M – General Roadway Design and Construction

Strategic Funding Program Funding Sources County Local City Participation TxDOT and Federal Funds

Tax Rate Implications $0.036 (3.6¢) per $100 taxable value Average home value=$122,000 $43.92 per year $3.66 per month * Important - The amount of taxes on residential homesteads of persons 65 and older will not increase above the amount of taxes when they qualified to receive the freeze exemption.

Public Information Website

Public Information Bond Program Educational Presentations Voters Educational Brochure Website

QUESTIONS?? Thank You!