IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | 14-18 December.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)

Advertisements

Presentation on recent IAEA activities on RWM Y. Kumano WES / NSRW

1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.

Role of Independent Regulatory Body for Safe Operation of NPPs Zia Hussain Shah Director, Centre for Nuclear Safety Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority.

Protection Against Occupational Exposure

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.

IAEAs Approach to Safety Culture

Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.

1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.

Safety Driven Performance Conference 2013 The future of managing asset-intensive businesses John Keefe APM/RBMI Technical Manager Asset Integrity Services.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.

IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security

08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.

IAEA activities and documents related to CM C. Toth February 2007 Slide No. 1/ IAEA INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY IAEA activities and documents related.

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

LESSONS LEARNED IN DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE FOR REGULATORY BODIES

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.

Summary of Session 4: Operating Experience 1 Abdul Hamid Akbar IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna International Centre June.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.

Presented by Dr. Kristóf Horváth Deputy Director General Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority Based on the Guideline developed by the WG on Computer Protection.

1 NRC Assistance for Emerging Nuclear Power Programs Jack Ramsey, Senior Level Advisor Office of International Programs March 11, 2009.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,

Maria J Moracho Ramirez Regulatory Activities Section

Nuclear Security Culture William Tobey Workshop on Strengthening the Culture of Nuclear Safety and Security, Sao Paulo, Brazil August 25-26, 2014.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 3B Developing a Capable NEPIO Difficulties and Solutions (solutions will follow difficulties)

International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop feedback “ Roles & Responsibilities of Vendor Countries and Countries Embarking on Nuclear Power Programmes.

International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.

0 Safety Infrastructure Development for Introduction of Nuclear Power S.K. Sharma Chairman, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, India IAEA Workshop on Evaluation.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety and Regulatory Functions William Kennedy Research Reactor.

International Atomic Energy Agency M. El-Shanawany IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany Department of Nuclear Safety &

International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.

4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.

International Atomic Energy Agency School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096 Vienna, 3 May, 2010 Adriana Nicic, Regulatory Activities.

23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.

International Atomic Energy Agency Meeting Summary Technical meeting of the International Project on Demonstration of Operational and Long-Term Safety.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.

The CNCAN Knowledge Portal TM on the Use of GSAN and SAET Programme November 2015 ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control.

Purpose and objectives of the Workshop School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The Human and Organizational Part of Nuclear Safety Monica Haage – International Specialist on.

Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.

Practice of HOF regulatory oversight E.G. Kudryavtsev Department of Safety Regulation of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Marine Nuclear Power Installations.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Safety Assessment Process. Plant Modification.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.

Oversight of Licensees Human & Organizational Factors in Bulgaria Oversight of Licensees’ Human & Organizational Factors in Bulgaria Technical Meeting.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Issue: Management C.R.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RCA Project on Sustainability of Regional Radiation Protection Infrastructure Project Concepts and the Programme.

(3.6) General requirements on resources for the establishment of IMS

MALAYSIA Training and Tutoring Feedback

Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December 2015 Breakout sessions.

Assist. Prof. Magy Mohamed Kandil

Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December 2015 Breakout sessions.

Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB

Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.

Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop

Leadership and Management for Safety

Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland

Training and Tutoring Approaches in the Field of Radiation Safety

IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany

National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control

Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December 2015 Breakout sessions 2.

IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security

Presentation transcript:

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December 2015 Breakout sessions

IAEA Two breakout sessions To facilitate discussions and interaction among the participants in a smaller group: HOF concept and what areas need for oversight on HOF Content of a HOF regulatory oversight programme Every group will be requested to share their results and conclusions in plenum December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF2

IAEA Group Composition Group 1 (M7) Vanik Nersesyan (Armenia) Ivan Raukach (Belarus) Marco Alvarenga (Brazil) Hristo Botsoev (Bulgaria) Alice Salway (Canada) Radim Dolezal (Czech R.) Lusiana Waqualezu (Fiji) Group 4 (M7) Aude Geniaux (France) Werner Fassmann (Germany) Ram Gupta (India) Anri Ridwan (Indonesia) Takaya Hata (Japan) Mohammad Rababah (Jordan) Dong-Hoon Lee (Korea R.) December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF3

IAEA Group Composition Group 3 (MOE13) Amer Mahmood (Pakistan) Mari Nykanen (Finland) Viktor Szabó (Slovakia) Gladys Motlhabane (South Africa) Oleksandr Pecherytsia (Ukraine) Minh Le (Vietnam) December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF4

IAEA HOF concept and what areas need for oversight on HOF Scope: To (further) develop a common understanding on HOF and the importance to deal with HOF Principle 3 of the Fundamental Safety Principle SF-1 states that, among other aspects An important factor in a management system is the recognition of the entire range of interactions of individuals at all levels with technology and with organizations. To prevent human and organizational failures, human factors have to be taken into account and good performance and good practices have to be supported December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF5

IAEA HOF concept and what areas need for oversight on HOF From GS-G-3.5 | Human factors and the interaction between individuals, technology and the organization (2.35) In a given situation, individuals have various types of resource at their disposal to enable them to carry out a task successfully Intrinsic to the individual: competence, motivation, cognitive abilities… Physical resources: Instrumentation, procedures or computer aids… Residing in the working environment: through teamwork, communication and leadership, in the management system and culture... All the resources (and their combination) help in preventing human error by providing barriers to error When the content, design and organization of a task correspond to the individual’s needs and capabilities, the conditions prevail for the individual to perform in a way that promotes safety December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF6

IAEA HOF concept and what areas need for oversight on HOF Groups 3 How HOF can be considered to contribute positively to safety? How can HOF management prevent from human errors? What should be addressed to prevent organization failures? What are the key attributes for managing organizational changes? Should HOF permeate all activities? Should not be too cumbersome? How to manage HOF? Role of the management system What are the difficulties to oversee HOF? December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF7

IAEA WG 3 Outputs (1) Should HOF permeate all activities? Question is wrong Taking into account the scope of this meeting, HOF permeates all activities during the lifetime of nuclear installations as : Design, Construction, Commission, Operation (Maintenance, Human Resource Management, Engineering and Technical support, Waste Management, Change Management) Decommissioning December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF8

IAEA WG 3 Outputs (2) Should not be too cumbersome? Yes, because RB need to find the right way between too descriptive or too general. RB uses graded approach for assessment and evaluation of requirements. HOF are intangible. December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF9

IAEA WG 3 Outputs (3) How to manage HOF? Role of the management system RB doesn't manage HOF as separate objectives, but earlier is identifying in all objectives of regulatory activities as follows: Authorization, Inspection or Assessment. LH should focus attention in documentation of integrated management systems for all aspects of HOF. December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF10

IAEA WG 3 Outputs (4) What are the difficulties to oversee HOF? Deficiencies and gaps in regulations and guidelines where HOF issues should be addressed (proactive requirements). It is not so easy to ensure validity of input data to support the oversight of HOF issues. Different analytical tools and methods (i.e. set of safety indicators with defined thresholds and respective actions; different RCA methods for the events’ analysis; etc.) should be used to oversee HOF properly. Respective amount of resources and expertise should be allocated at RB for that purposes. December 2015TM on Regulatory Oversight of HOF11

IAEA 12 THANK YOU