Erin N. Bodine Co-authors: Suzanne Lenhart & Louis Gross The Institute for Environmental Modeling Grant # IIS-0427471.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamical System of a Two Dimensional Stoichiometric Discrete Producer-Grazer Model : Chaotic, Extinction and Noise Effects Yun Kang Work with Professor.
Advertisements

Josh Durham Jacob Swett. Dynamic Behaviors of a Harvesting Leslie-Gower Predator-Prey Model Na Zhang, 1 Fengde Chen, 1 Qianqian Su, 1 and Ting Wu 2 1.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم وقل ربِ زدني علماً صدق الله العظيم.
PCA + SVD.
Economic Growth and Dynamic Optimization - The Comeback - Rui Mota – Tel Ext April 2009.
The General Linear Model. The Simple Linear Model Linear Regression.
Early Research Presentation Optimal and Feasible Attitude Motions for Microspacecraft January 2013 Albert Caubet.
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering P-O Gutman Abstract When using the Pontryagin Maximum Principle in optimal control problems,
Lecture 11: Recursive Parameter Estimation
Forecasting JY Le Boudec 1. Contents 1.What is forecasting ? 2.Linear Regression 3.Avoiding Overfitting 4.Differencing 5.ARMA models 6.Sparse ARMA models.
Presented By Ashley Bell Dr. Thomas Pfaff Spring 2010 Whalen Symposium.
280 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The System Identification Problem is to estimate a model of a system based on input-output data. Basic Configuration continuous.
Maximum likelihood (ML) and likelihood ratio (LR) test
Prénom Nom Document Analysis: Data Analysis and Clustering Prof. Rolf Ingold, University of Fribourg Master course, spring semester 2008.
458 Lumped population dynamics models Fish 458; Lecture 2.
While there is a generally accepted precise definition for the term "first order differential equation'', this is not the case for the term "Bifurcation''.
In this chapter you will learn:
Finite Mathematics & Its Applications, 10/e by Goldstein/Schneider/SiegelCopyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 of 99 Chapter 4 The Simplex Method.
Modeling of Mel Frequency Features for Non Stationary Noise I.AndrianakisP.R.White Signal Processing and Control Group Institute of Sound and Vibration.
Dynamic Optimization Dr

Chapter 3 The Maximum Principle: Mixed Inequality Constraints Mixed inequality constraints: Inequality constraints involving control and possibly state.
Chapter 4 The Simplex Method
Properties of Quadratics Chapter 3. Martin-Gay, Developmental Mathematics 2 Introduction of Quadratic Relationships  The graph of a quadratic is called.
FW364 Ecological Problem Solving Lab 4: Blue Whale Population Variation [Ramas Lab]
AUTOMATIC CONTROL THEORY II Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Population Biology: Demographic Models Wed. Mar. 2.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University Robotic Interaction Learning Lab 1 The optimization of the application of fuzzy ant colony.
1 Optimal control for integrodifferencequa tions Andrew Whittle University of Tennessee Department of Mathematics Andrew Whittle University of Tennessee.
Population Ecology ES 100 8/21/07.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
Practical Dynamic Programming in Ljungqvist – Sargent (2004) Presented by Edson Silveira Sobrinho for Dynamic Macro class University of Houston Economics.
Population Growth – Chapter 11
Variational Data Assimilation - Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Yan Ding, Ph.D. National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering The University.
Lecture 19-20: Natural convection in a plane layer. Principles of linear theory of hydrodynamic stability 1 z x Governing equations: T=0T=0 T=AT=A h =1.
Harvesting and viability
61BL3313 Population and Community Ecology Lecture 01 Simple density independent growth Spring 2013 Dr Ed Harris.
Advanced Operations Research Models Instructor: Dr. A. Seifi Teaching Assistant: Golbarg Kazemi 1.
Lecture 7 and 8 The efficient and optimal use of natural resources.
Generalised method of moments approach to testing the CAPM Nimesh Mistry Filipp Levin.
Chapter 4 Ecosystems: How They Change. Population Dynamics: Population Growth curves (p83):  J-curves, also known as exponential growth, could result.
Håkon Dahl-Olsen, Sridharakumar Narasimhan and Sigurd Skogestad Optimal output selection for batch processes.
Healthy Ecosystems: BIODIVERSITY. Biodiversity variety of different species of micro-organisms, animals and plants all organisms must interact ecosystems.
Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species
Population Ecology- Continued
Modeling Logistic Growth and Extinction Sheldon P
Yanjmaa Jutmaan  Department of Applied mathematics Some mathematical models related to physics and biology.
ENVH 4387/53871 Principles of Microbial Ecology Lecture Topic Number 2 Population Dynamics ENVH 4387/5387 Biological Analysis.
Computational Biology, Part 14 Recursion Relations Robert F. Murphy Copyright  1996, 1999, 2000, All rights reserved.
Population Balance FLOW CHART Finish up yesterdays assignment Finish up yesterdays assignment Notes Notes.
Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vu, T. T.,
Review of PMP Derivation We want to find control u(t) which minimizes the function: x(t) = x*(t) +  x(t); u(t) = u*(t) +  u(t); (t) = *(t) +  (t);
Sporadic model building for efficiency enhancement of the hierarchical BOA Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines (2008) 9: Martin Pelikan, Kumara.
Genetic Algorithms. Underlying Concept  Charles Darwin outlined the principle of natural selection.  Natural Selection is the process by which evolution.
Optimal Path Planning on Matrix Lie Groups Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics Sung K. Koh U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a.
Announcements Topics: -Introduction to (review of) Differential Equations (Chapter 6) -Euler’s Method for Solving DEs (introduced in 6.1) -Analysis of.
Unified Adaptivity Optimization of Clock and Logic Signals Shiyan Hu and Jiang Hu Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University.
Operations Research Chapter one.
Task: It is necessary to choose the most suitable variant from some set of objects by those or other criteria.
Kabanikhin S. I., Krivorotko O. I.
Maximum Sustainable Yield & Maximum Economic Yield
ME 521 Computer Aided Design 15-Optimization
FW364 Ecological Problem Solving Lab 5: Density Dependence and
Dr. Arslan Ornek IMPROVING SEARCH
THEORY OF LIFE TABLES N. JAYAKUMAR Assistant professor
Instructor :Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti
Dynamic Programming and Applications
Non-Linear Regression
Optimal Control of Systems
Presentation transcript:

Erin N. Bodine Co-authors: Suzanne Lenhart & Louis Gross The Institute for Environmental Modeling Grant # IIS

Outline Introduction to Species Augmentation Formulating the Optimal Control Model Numerical Simulations & Results Work in Progress – A Discrete Time Version Questions

Species Augmentation Species augmentation is a method of reducing species loss by augmenting a declining or threatened population with individuals from captive-bred or stable, wild populations. Endangered Species Population Stable Wild Population Captive-Bred Population

Where has species augmentation already been used? 1995 Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) augmentation Eight female Texas panthers (another panther subspecies) were placed in the Southern Florida panther ranger in an effort to raise the population size and increase genetic diversity 30 – 50 panthers in – 100 panthers in 2007

Where are the models? There currently do not exist general mathematical species augmentation models to address questions concerning the dynamics of augmented populations and communities. My dissertation research aim is to begin developing a mathematical framework to address the biological questions surrounding species augmentation. As a general augmentation theory is developed, the results can be readily adapted to a variety of specific cases.

Our Model The first model we have developed a continuous time model that addresses the question At what rate does the target population need to be augmented to meet certain objectives? Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering 2008, 5(4):

Simple Two-Population Model Start with two populations x the target/endangered population y the reserve population Assume both populations grow according to a simple population growth model with Allee effect in the absence of human intervention.

Allee Effect Model x(t)x(t)Population size at time t rIntrinsic growth rate aMinimum population density for growth Normalized Allee Equation

Model Assumptions We wish to move individuals from y to x over a period [t 0,t 1 ] of time such that x is as large as possible by the end of the time period. Reserve Population Target Population u(t)u(t) rate of movement x(t)x(t) y(t)y(t)

Model Assumptions Target population starts below minimum threshold for growth, 0 ≤ x(t 0 ) < a, so population is declining Reserve population starts above minimum threshold for growth, b ≤ y(t 0 ) < 1, so population is growing In addition to maximizing x by the final time, do not want to completely deplete y Minimize cost of harvesting/augmenting

Optimal Control Formulation The optimal control formulation of this problem is: The parameter p is the ratio of the reserve population carrying capacity to the target population carrying capacity.

Using Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle provides necessary conditions for a control to be optimal applying Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle we obtain a characterization of the optimal control Pontryagin ’ s Maximum Principle

Characterization of Optimal Control Construct the Hamiltonian H and the adjoint functions λ x and λ y corresponding to the states x and y Maximize H with respect to u to get the optimal control u*(t)

Numerical Simulations Make an initial guess for u*(t) Solve state equations (with initial conditions) using Runge-Kutta 4 method Solve adjoint equations (with terminal conditions) using Runge-Kutta 4 method Update u*(t) using the characterization of the optimal control Repeat until meet convergence condition

Results Varying cost coefficient of translocat ion A=1 A=20 A=100

Results Varying ratio of intrinsic growth rates, with low cost of translocation s=1.2 s=0.7 s=0.2

Results As before but increasing importance of maximizing reserve pop by final time s=1.2 s=0.7 s=0.2

Conclusions High cost can prevent moving enough individuals to the target population so that it is above its threshold for population growth Low cost can lead to an “over-augmenting” of the target population. Augmenting a population above its carrying capacity results in wasted resources. The combination of a low cost of translocation and a low intrinsic growth rate for the reserve population could lead to the reserve population falling below its threshold for population growth by the final time. This can be counteracted by increasing the importance of having a large reserve population by the final time, i.e. increase the B value

Future Augmentation Modeling Discrete Time Augmentation usually occurs as a single or a few translocations of individuals We are working on creating a discrete time version of this model to compare with these continuous time results Linearity of the control in the cost term Model presented uses a control which is quadratic in the cost term Can be interpreted as “as augmentation rate (u(t)) increases, the rate of increase of the cost increases” instead of