Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Better GI protection within the WTO framework Stefano Fanti – Managing Director Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma Geneva, 27 May 2004.
Assessment of the EU - Rep. of Korea FTA
Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Protection of knowledge in the shipbuilding industry a follow-up of LeaderSHIP 2015 Rotterdam Workshop 04 February 2010.
Geographical Indications: Prospects for the development of the International Legal Framework Tegan Brink Australian Permanent Mission to the WTO, Geneva,
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June International Registration Burkhart Goebel Partner, Lovells, Madrid Chair of the INTA.
Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
DS 174 – Trademarks & Geographical Indications
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
EU-Canada Trade and Economic Relations – towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) 5 May 2014.
Some aspects of the Doha work program Baku, Azerbaijan February 2015.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
Ato2461 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT Presentation by Adrian Otten Director, Intellectual Property Division, WTO Secretariat Panel Discussion 7.
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
How can trade contribute to growth and jobs? The role of EU trade policy Signe Ratso Director Directorate General of Trade European Commission.
AUSTRALIA’S DOHA ROUND AGENDA. TODAY’S DISCUSSION  briefly, the WTO and Australia  what was decided at Doha  what has happened since Doha  Australia’s.
Annual Exporters Conference 2014
REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES WTO ACCESSION Trade Division September 2014.
Massimiliano Di Pace1 EU TRADE POLICY Eu has exclusive competence on Trade policy (art. 3 TfUe) This means that every decision on this subject cannot be.
Best Practices in Wine Regulation Introduction to the World Wine Trade Group Robert G. Kalik World Wine Trade Group, USA.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
EXAMPLES OF TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE  one of the main TBT issue at the moment is labelling (see Tuna report)  brief overview of marks and rules of.
1 FAO-EBRD Project Tbilisi, Georgia – 27 November 2007 TRIPS - GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS - Wolf R. Meier-Ewert WTO Secretariat.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
External Trade CEJA Conference DG TRADE “Future CAP in a global context”
1 The European Union Trade Policy The European Union Trade Policy May 2009.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.
The Australian wine industry position on Geographical Indications TONY BATTAGLENE DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL & REGULATORY AFFAIRS.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
Chinese–European Investment Regulation: Progress in a Fragmented Area of Law copyright: Bertram Boie Why do Swiss banks complain about.
Regulatory coherence in wine regulation and trade: the example of the World Wine Trade Group Dr. John Barker General Counsel New Zealand Winegrowers.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
Protection of GIs in the EU - WarsawSlide 1 of 18 The Protection of Geographical Indications - The EU system - TAIEX Seminar on the protection.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
…around the World Click to edit Master text styles Protecting Geographical Indications... …around the World Click to edit Master text styles Second.
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
IP Protection under the WTO
2008 EPA negotiations: what are the challenges for African countries?
Community protection of geographical indications :
Click to edit Master text styles
Practices related to geographical indication systems: the european union wipo sct geneva 28 march 2017 Francis FAY Head of Unit ‘Geographical Indications’
Author names here Author association names here
The global alliance of GIs
Click to edit Master text styles
External Trade and Development Policy
Trade perspectives in the wine sector
By Karwan dana Ishik university
TITLE SLIDE GOES HERE Optional subhead.
Click to edit Master text styles
Slide Title Edit Master text styles Second level Third level
ОПШТЕСТВО ТЕМА: МЕСТОТО ВО КОЕ ЖИВЕАМ Скопје
Author names here Author associations here
Author names here Author associations here
Are the present agriculture trade rules fair?
Click to edit Master text styles
Author names here Author associations here
Click to edit Master text styles
Presentation transcript:

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 1/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 1 1/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission TRIPs and Geographical Indications : The Way Forward Parma, June 2005 Protecting Geographical Indications….

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 2 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 2 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 2/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission A round of trade liberalisation to complete the Uruguay Round ( )… WTO Negotiations & GIs …that has been turned into a round of negotiations that is to benefit, in particular, developing countries.  Agricultural support  NAMA (Non-agricultural market access)  Services  Intellectual Property (including GIs) A number of issues on the table (a global round):

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 3 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 3/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission Globalization: also for GIs Geographical Indications: Why? A reality: GI protection did not exist outside Europe before 1996  Agricultural support is changing shape  Incresing competition in the EU market (e.g., wines) If GI products are to be exported, they need to be protected preventively (so investments in publicity et al. are not lost) Recuperating GIs is becoming increasingly difficult (e.g., semi- generics in the US)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 4 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 4 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 4/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 4 Prepared by Antonio Berenguer for the European Commission Protecting Geographical Indications and TRIPs: A solution? A twofold level of protection: A right-holder of a Gi recognised in a WTO member must be able to prevent: Principle of Private Enforcement: WTO members must provide the “legal means to interested parties” to protect GIs (i.e., recognised in their country of origin) (Art and 23.1 TRIPs) but not “to protect” foreign GIs as we do in Europe (i.e., ex officio)  All GIs: Consumer deception (for all GIs)  Wines & Spirits: Use of delocalisers, translations or “style”, “like” and so on. Territorial exceptions for generics, certain prior uses and TMs

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 5 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 5 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 5/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission TRIPs & EU: comparing levels of protection Unfair Competition (allows Parmezan of Australia) Limited IP (forbids “style of Manchego” or translation like “Parmezan”) Full IP (forbids evocations like imitation of shapes “tetilla”) TRIPS European Union

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 6 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 6 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 6/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission GIs on wines and spirits: What does TRIPs say? (Art. 23.1)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 7 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 7 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 7/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission GIs on wines and spirits: What does TRIPs say? (Art. 23.1)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 8 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 8 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 8/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission GIs on wines and spirits: What does TRIPs say? (Art. 23.2)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 9 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 9 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 9/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission GIs on wines and spirits: What does TRIPs say? (Art. 22 – potentially)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 10 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 10 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 10/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission = Italian Ham? = Spanish Ham? WHERE DOES MY HAM COME FROM? = Italian Ham? = Spanish Ham?

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 11 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 11 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 11/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission Isn’t this good enough?

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 12 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 12 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 12/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 12 Protecting Geographical Indications... So: Why is that happening? The rules are not appropriate: What the EU is doing : The extension of the wine regime A multilateral register for GIs (TRIPs) A list of (mis)used GIs (CoA)  Rules are not transparent and require heavy investments  Protection is insufficient (non-wines & spirits, trade dress, etc)  Generics and other exceptions are broadly interpreted …but more importantly: use of the existing rules is insufficient!!!

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 13 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 13 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 13/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission Notification by the US: “BOURBON” Opposition by:Canada;Mexico;Morocco;New Zealand; Effects for “Bourbon”  PM- Will be presumed a GI  AM- E.g., no one will be able to claim that its generic  There will be a need to negotiate with “red” countries a bilateral agreement China. 18 Month Exam

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 14 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 14 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 14/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission TRIPs & EU: comparing levels of protection Unfair Competition (allows Parmezan of Australia) Limited IP (forbids “style of Manchego” or translation like “Parmezan”) Full IP (forbids evocations like imitation of shapes “tetilla”) TRIPS European Union

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 15 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 15 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 15/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 15 Protecting Geographical Indications... The shortcomings of TRIPs: the Exceptions SOLUTION: A limited list of selected, already usurped, trade significant GIs that would be “clawed-back” Prior trademarks may prevent the protection of later in time geographical indications Good Faith uses of GIs prior to 1984 are permitted for wines and spirits Geographical indications that have become generic do not need to be protected

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 16 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 16 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 16/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 16 Protecting Geographical Indications... Why are negotiations not advancing? Many countries do not want anything on GIs: USA, Australia, Canada, Chile, Argentina, etc  Some tactical reasons: wish to extract concessions in Ag. Neg.  Some economic problems: past-uses of EU GIs What are they offering?  A database (web-base) on GIs without any legal effects for wines and spirits and…  …nothing else (discussions but no negotiations on “extension” and denial of negotiations on the list)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 17 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 17 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 17/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 17 Protecting Geographical Indications... The Way Forward: Coherence (I) Role of right-holders…  …ex officio? China situation?  …awareness raising? How about the “sherry” cases? A mutually supportive relationship between trademarks and GIs  …part of a coherent approach to IPR  …based on economic principles and not on the blind applications of legal principles (reputation, domain names, etc)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 18 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 18 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 18/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 18 Protecting Geographical Indications... The Way Forward: Coherence (II) Product specific negotiations: is it the right approach?  …message to developing world? Truly effective?  …tactical games? Is someone thinking product specific? GIs: an independent property right?  …part of a coherent approach to IPR, particularly vis-à-vis third countries?  …an opportunity for everyone -- developed and developing countries alike?

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 19 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 19 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 19/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission 19 Protecting Geographical Indications... The Way Forward: Summary of Ideas A single, product-neutral regime acceptable to all Embodying the right balance between trademarks and GIs With a degree of autonomy to be determined and largely influenced by the outcome of other negotiations With a varying role of right-holders and authorities depending on the calibre of the challenge and in a manner consistent with that given to other IPRs

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 20 Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 20 Protecting Geographical Indications…. Slide 20/17 Prepared by DG TRADE & DG MARKT for the European Commission THANKS! THE END