Pro Bono Innovation Fund Informational Webinar on 2016 Application Process Friday, February 5, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

2012 TIG CYCLE INFORMATIONAL WEBINAR David Bonebrake, Jane Ribadeneyra Legal Services Corporation.
TIG 2012 INFORMATION SESSION David Bonebrake, Glenn Rawdon, Jane Ribadeneyra Legal Services Corporation.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
House Price
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Populations included in States’ SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Presentation transcript:

Pro Bono Innovation Fund Informational Webinar on 2016 Application Process Friday, February 5, 2016

Informational Webinar on Application Process Mytrang Nguyen Program Counsel, Pro Bono Innovation Alla Polyakova Program Analyst, Pro Bono Innovation Fund and Disaster Grants Meredith Horton Program Counsel, Pro Bono Innovation, Disaster Recovery and Relief, and Veterans Grant Administration

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) 2016 Pro Bono Innovation Fund Application Process LOI deadline March 28th Invitations to apply issued April 25th Full application deadline July 18 th Funding decisions announced End of August

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) Requests and Available Funding

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) Applications/LOIs and Awards

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) The Basics Key Goals Address gaps in the delivery of legal services to low-income people. Engage more lawyers and other volunteers in pro bono service. Develop and implement new, innovative, and replicable strategies that address persistent challenges in pro bono delivery systems.

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) The Basics Eligibility Applicants must be current LSC grantees. Activities that are LSC-eligible are allowable. Compensated private attorney involvement is not eligible for Pro Bono Innovation Fund support. Project Timeframe Either 18 or 24 month projects. FY16 projects will begin on October 1, 2016.

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) The Basics Alignment with Pro Bono Innovation Fund goals without specific areas of interest. FY15 median funding $257,000. Personnel costs approximately 85% of grants. Over 30 partners and organizations receiving subgrants or contracts (23% of grants). Partners are bar-sponsored volunteer lawyer programs, statewide organizations, health care providers, technology providers, and law schools.

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) The Basics Review Process We use staff and external pro bono experts to review and score all LOIs and full applications. LOIs had 4 separate reviewers. Full applications had 5 separate reviewers. Our scoring rubric and criteria is published in our 2015 Pro Bono Innovation Fund Application Instructions.

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding **NEW for 2016** Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding 2 months (2016) vs. 1 month (2015) Develop full application (by invitation) 3+ months (2016) vs. 1 ½ months (2015)

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) Why more time? Encourage submission of more than one project idea. Speak with other pro bono experts and Pro Bono Innovation Fund grantees. Time to vet your ideas with volunteers, law firms, the private bar. (Our criteria require a strong indication of volunteer demand for project.)

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) 2016 Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding What do applicants submit for the LOI? The LOI submission is a brief 3 page concept note about your proposed project. It outlines the project, key staff and partners, and a cost estimate.

(59.8% Tip: The three parts of the LOI are also the three core sections of a full Pro Bono Innovation Fund application. See LSC’s 2015 Pro Bono Innovation Fund Application Instructions for detailed questions on each section. ) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) 2016 Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding Pro Bono Innovation Fund LOI has three parts: 1.Project Description 2.Project Staff, Organizational Capacity, Project Partners 3.Budget and Timeline

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) 2015 Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding Project Description  Problem statement: what is the client need, what is the challenge in your pro bono program/system, provide solid rationale.  Goals, objectives, activities: what are you proposing to do, is there a well-defined and thoughtful role for the volunteer, are the benefits to clients clear.  Volunteer demand: evidence of volunteer interest in supporting project.  Impact and evaluation: what is the change or improvement, how will this be captured, does the project have measurable outcomes. Tip: This section is the substance of your project. Do your best to cover the key information and demonstrate a well-developed idea. The “volunteer demand” question is where past applications have fallen short.

2015 Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding Project Staff, Organizational Capacity, and Project Partners  Identify the project team. Include the title, role and experiences of key staff.  List the project partners that you plan to involve, note their level of commitment or involvement with the project if you have it.  Management buy-in and support: what is/will be the role of your management in design and implementation. Tip: For your proposed project to be successful, the right stakeholders and staff should be involved in its development and implementation. Are they, in fact, involved and listed in this section?

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) 2015 Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding Estimated Budget

2015 Letter of Intent to Apply for Funding Budget and Timeline Entire 18 month or a 24 month project. Provide your best thinking in the preliminary budget estimate. Try to capture all of the costs with estimates only. Does the project design, staffing and outcomes match budget estimate. Tip: Your estimated project budget tells a story. What does your estimated budget say? How and where are you leveraging Pro Bono Innovation Fund dollars and your own (cash or in- kind) dollars?

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%)

First two grant making cycles … $6,175,000 for 26 different projects in 19 states.

First two grant making cycles … Projects that advance organization’s strategic priorities.

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) First two grant making cycles … Projects that engage volunteers in continuum of service (and show that clients will receive a continuum of services).

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) First two grant making cycles … Projects that address remote delivery and hard to reach clients.

First two grant making cycles … Projects that use technology to create efficiencies in the pro bono delivery system.

Next Steps  LSC will post this webinar on our website later this week.  LSC Grants is live for applicants to begin their Pro Bono Innovation Fund LOI submissions TODAY.  Deadline March 28, 2016, 5:00 PM (ET)

(59.8%) (57.7%) (56.4%) (56.7%) Contact information Pro Bono Innovation Fund Team mailbox for general questions: Mytrang if you are in AK, AS, AZ, CA, CO, CT, GU, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, MA, ME, MI, MN, MP, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OR, PA, RI, SD, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY: Meredith if you are in AL, AR, DC, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MO, MS, NC, PR, SC, TN, VA, VI: Alla for information on LSC Grants and online application submissions:

Thank you! (t.g.i.f from p.b.i.f)