Nextef results CLIC09, Oct. 12-16 T. Higo (KEK). Contents Quadrant high gradient test status – Initial processing and power limit – VAC characteristics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
CERN-KEK X-band collaboration 3 Dec T. Higo on behalf of X-band group of KEK.
Report from KEK High gradient study results from Nextef (+ other related activities) LCWS2011, Granada Sep. 27, 2011 T. Higo.
Status of KEK production July 11, 2008 at SLAC KEK T. Higo et al., Accelerator div. T. Takatomi et al., Mech. Eng. Center.
X-band Structures Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen, Christopher Nantista 9-Feb-11.
High gradient features from Nextef on recent CLIC prototype structures US-HG workshop, SLAC 9 February 2011 T. Higo representing X-band group of KEK.
T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G GHz measurements versus simulations A.Grudiev CERN
Dark current measurement at KEK M. Gerbaux, S. Döbert, T. Higo, S. Matsumoto, K. Yokoyama.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
Report from Nextef IWLC10, Genève, Oct. 20 T. Higo (KEK)
Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
High-gradient Experiments with Narrow Waveguides Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Noboru Kudo, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda, Mitsuo Akemoto,
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
201 MHz and 805 MHz Cavity Developments in MUCOOL Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Nufact 2002 Workshop, London,
Results from Nextef Observations in high gradient tests of CLIC Prototype Structures and associated study activities CLIC2013, CERN 29 January, 2013 T.
KEK activities on CLIC X-band Accelerating Structures Tsinghua Univ., March 24 T. Higo (KEK)
R&D status and future strategy in KEK X-band area May 16, 2011 T. Higo (KEK)
Update of KEK X-band Research Activity March 3, 2009 Shuji Matsumoto Accelerator Laboratory, KEK 2009/3/31US High Gradient Workshop.
Particle-in-Cell Modeling of Rf Breakdown in Accelerating Structures and Waveguides Valery Dolgashev, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Breakdown physics.
日米協力 US/Japan cooperation Research of High Gradient Acceleration Technology for Future Accelerators progress report New proposal 7.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
CLIC Workshop – CERN, October / 17 DC breakdown experiments for CLIC CERN, TS-MME Antoine Descoeudres, Trond Ramsvik, Sergio Calatroni, Mauro Taborelli.
EuCARD is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 under Grant Agreement no Reach of NC and SC Technologies, 50 …
X-band high gradient activities at KEK May 13-15, nd Collaboration meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program T. Higo, KEK.
Engineering perspectives on quadrants (1/2) Experience on our first quad (Higo) (2/2) Perspective on quad (Higashi) CLIC09, Oct T. Higo (KEK)
Recent High-gradient test result at KEK Linear Collider Workshop 2012 Arlington, Texas (WebEx) 25 October, 2012 Toshi Higo and X-band group of KEK.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Performance of CLIC prototype accelerator structures tested at Nextef CLIC February 2014 Toshiyasu Higo (KEK)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
High Power Test of Mizuno - Ohtsuka Dry Load S. Matsumoto and T. Higo Report made on
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Recent high-gradient results, rf testing, places and plans Steffen Döbert, CLIC Workshop, Test facilities High gradient results Future testing.
Summary of progress towards CLIC goals and next steps for structure testing 6 th X-band collaboration workshop, April 18 th- 20 th 2012 Steffen Döbert,
A Study of RF breakdown of Narrow Wave Guide Shuji Matsumoto Kazue Yokoyama Toshi Higo Accelerator Lab., KEK 2016/1/41SLAC Workshop 8-10 July 2009.
KEK workshopWalter Wuensch18 April 2012 Status and objectives of the CLIC X-band and high- gradient activity.
1 Al Moretti, APC, Fermilab MAP- Winter Meeting February 28 - March 4, 2011 TJNAF Newport News, VA.
High gradient study at KEK CLIC08, Oct , 2008 T. Higo.
Status report from KEK Feb. 26, 2010 T. Higo, S. Matsumoto T. Takatomi, Y. Higashi and X-band group.
TD18 High Power Test Results Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen May 3, 2010.
CLIC09 WG4 RF Structure1 Engineering Perspectives on Quadrants (2) CLIC09 Workshop KEK Y.Higashi.
Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
Nextef results & status International Workshop on Breakdown Science and High Gradient Technology KEK, Japan 18 April 2012 Toshi Higo.
Narrow waveguide experiments Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Noboru Kudo, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda, Mitsuo Akemoto, Mitsuhiro Yoshida,
Detuning of T18 after high power test Jiaru Shi
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
Discussion on critical issues for testing: breakdown identification, preparation for test, processing protocol, etc. 4 th Annual X-band Structure Collaboration.
Some information from Nextef For poster session in IWLC T. Higo.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Nextef status and expansion plans Shuji Matsumoto for KEK Nextef Group /5/51 4th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
High Power Crab Cavity Testing Ben Woolley HG2016 Argonne National Lab. 8 th June 2016.
KEK test area plans Shuji Matsumoto Accelerator Lab., KEK.
325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Cavity Coupler status. T. Khabiboulline Power Coupler design for Superconducting Spoke cavities. Originally.
Test Accelerating Structures Designs, Objectives and Critical Issues
High power test results of X-band deflecting cavity
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
SPARC RF gun status by P. Musumeci Review committee
Summary of the test structure design
Shuji Matsumoto Accelerator Lab., KEK
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
A Study of RF breakdown of Narrow Wave Guide
Progress in the design of a damped an
T24 results and comparison to the preceding studies on CLIC prototype structures May 17, 2011 T. Higo (KEK)
5th X-Band Structure Collaboration Meeting
T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 processing summary
Field-Emission mapping measurement on Copper Surface
Presentation transcript:

Nextef results CLIC09, Oct T. Higo (KEK)

Contents Quadrant high gradient test status – Initial processing and power limit – VAC characteristics with Q-mass – Dark current – BD position – Light emission Change in T18 by high gradient processing – RF – Optical inspection Nextef plan 2009/10/12-162CLIC09 Higo

Quad #5 status and near future plan 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo3

42009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

2009/10/12-165CLIC09 Higo

Target = 15MW Red=power (arbitrary unit) Blue = Chamber vacuum [Pa] Higher target So-called 10MW run So-called 9MW run 2009/10/12-166CLIC09 Higo

Higher target So-called 10MW run So-called 9MW run Gradient limit at 50ns 2009/10/ Hard limit at 19MW, 59MV/m, 50ns CLIC09 Higo

Run11 with higher target at 113ns 8 Hard limit at 14MW for 113ns pulse Powers at breakdown with 113ns pulse width for 60 hours 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

ACC-IN pulse at hard limit Tp(ns) Power (MW) Ea (MV/m) Sqrt(Tp)*Power Limit at similar pulse heating temperature, but more precise comparison is needed /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Vacuum characteristics Vacuum total pressure – Base pressure at <10 -6 Pa – Typically processing below Pa – Increases every time at few to 5MW range if after RF-OFF for more than several hours Mass spectrum – M=2, 28 and 44 increase with RF-ON, but not M=18 Especially when reaching power limit – M=2 becomes dominant residual gas after an hour or so run – M=27 and 28 change in a similar manner as time, indicating hydrocarbon-origin surface contamination 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

First and Second QMA observations. Check QMA vacuum. QMA-Acc Chamber valve closed. Large Peak at M=18 (Water). Need more Q mass baking All peaks are lowered. After Q mass baked (200deg, 2.5days) /10/ CLIC09 Higo

First QMA observation with RF OFF. QMA- ACC Chamber valve opened. Peak at M=2 (H2) largest. Water (18) becomes moderate. Others are M=28 (CO) and 44(CO2) /10/ CLIC09 Higo

QMS (1) :RF Power and gases Pressure of H 2 dominated. Pressure of water is inactive RF Power into Acc ACC Chamber CCG 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

BD Acc Chamber CCG Power Acc In QMS (2): Cu and Zr No signal of Cu(M=63) nor Zr (M=89). 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Breakdown pulse analysis 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Timing distribution for change> /10/ CLIC09 Higo

T18 structure Function F[z] 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo Use time difference Rs(rise)-Tr(fall) to calculate BD position. Function F(z) is calculated from design vg(z).

Pick up large Rs, Tr change with 50ns Sampling cut at 448 Cut at 1000 or 2000 for timing analysis from next page. 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Breakdown cell distribution > events were analyzed out of 1919 INTLK. 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo 50ns higher target run

Breakdown cell distribution > events were analyzed out of 1919 INTLK. 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo 50ns higher target run Mostly downstream half. Simply increasing toward output end. Indication of BD following some field gradient.

BD position of run11 113ns, MW ns higher target run It is evident that there is difference than 50ns. Not increasing toward output side. Need to check the peak at cell#0. Need to check those outside structure cell region. 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Quad dark current much larger than T18 (Note: Power is just the value in the control program panel. Read 12MW as 19MW, though relative comparison between quad and T18_disk is OK without this.) T18 Quad 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Spectrum peak at very low energy 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo T18_Disk Peaks at 8MeV/c and 4MeV/c with 108MV/m Present quad Peak at 1.2MeV/c with 19MW  59MV/m

Possible cause of high dark current Field enhancement due to round chamfer Simulation of field enhancement – 1.4 ~ 1.6 at radius – with gap<radius/5, step<radius/2.5 Only a few tool passes – to shape 50 micron radius – with radius tool of 2mm If three passed  tangential discontinuity by about 30 degree Can be relaxed by such as EP in future 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Electric field enhancement in a shallow channel with round chamfer Gap (micron)Bump (micron)Emax / Enominal Calculation done by T. Abe by CST MS. Waveguide field. 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Other monitors for quad 2009/10/12-16 FC-Mid FC-UP FC-DN Qmass PM Mirror + camera PM AM Quad Camera 26CLIC09 Higo

Light emission observed by usual camera From side window – Can see several cells near center of structure – Found some BD events with a light emission from a particular cell View from upstream beam axis – Found a light emission – Pattern interpretation is not straightforward – Some event showed bright spot smaller than cell size Need better optical setup – Time gating, wider view, space resolution, etc. 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Possible future program for quad #5 NEG installation in progress in this week Further run – Longer pulse run at 173ns – Evolution of dark current Finish high gradient and -- – RF check – Mechanical check – Optical inspection – SEM at CERN? Further treatment? – EP ? Further high gradient test – Improved optical inspection – Change in dark current – Possibly higher field? These become good lessons for us to understand breakdown phenomena. 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo28

Change in T18 through high gradient test? 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Whole history of processing of T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

RF check setup /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Input match not changed /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Bead pull raw data on Sep /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Bead pull amplitude plot 11422MHz Input side Output side /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo Correspond to ripple of +-4% in Ea at output end. Which was not before test.

Output match some change Speculation: Reflection changed around 11424MHz by  =0.05 level?? Can be source of field staggering /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Bead pull feeding from output side Input side Output side /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Phase advance per cell Condition at 22.7degC in Nitrogen Bead pull result: MHz  120deg/cell delF 22.7  30C -1.38MHz delF N2  VAC delF string  no string +0.2MHz Total delF = 1.94MHz The structure now shows 120deg/cell at MHz Changed by 1.1MHz through high gradient test!?!? Should confirm carefully with SLAC tuning result /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

View direction 45deg View area 60deg  4.1mm Focus within 5mm to infinity 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

79 60.9 717 /10/ CLIC09 Higo

Optical inspection upstream 60.3mm Input coupler to cylindrical TM01 line 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo Up  WG direct. Beam axis Insertion 98.0mm for observing Iris #2. This is the best we can now, only the forward iris at an enough distance. Iris #1 March Iris Iris #2 Match cell

Optical inspection upstream and middle Insertion 82.7mm Iris #1 at match cell Insertion 98.0mm Iris #2 at first regular cell 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo 161.9mm Iris # mm Iris #10

Optical inspection downstream end 243.2mm Iris #18 Upside iris of last regular cell 252.2mm Iris #19 Down side iris of last regular cell 261.3mm Last regular cell iris # /10/ CLIC09 Higo

Optical inspection result and future No significant variation was observed – Comparing input to output but Need to inspect with better resolution – Change to straight bore scope? – Adjust focal plane? – Should be improved 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo43

T18_Disk_#2 after high gradient test tentative conclusion RF evaluated after high gradient test. – Input matching was kept. – Output matching changed by  =0.05 level. – Average frequency increased by 1.1MHz. – Field ripple±4.4% near output end. Some change in RF performance was observed. – Need to compare carefully with SLAC data /10/12-16CLIC09 Higo

Summary and next plan Quad – Similar performance as quads tested at SLAC – More test in a few weeks – Inspection and think about the further test T18 – Measurable change was observed – We need to remind this Next plan – TD18 is top priority – Then T24_Disk, TD24_Disk before CDR – followed by T18_Disk#4, …… 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo45

Nextef Planning revised as of CLIC TD18_Quad #5 NWG Cu-005 Component, etc. tests or serving shield-B A B KT-1 C-band Structure Test PC test and system construction Nextef  B construction? PC test TD24_Disk #? X-band studies PPM6b Load, WGValve Construction to shield-B ???? T24_Disk #? TD18_Disk #3T18_Disk #4 ?? 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Nextef Configuration KT-1 X-band KT-2 C-band Nextef X-band A B 2009/10/ CLIC09 Higo

Conclusion Nextef will run fully dedicated for the feasibility study of CLIC 100MV/m Nextef will boost peak power and high power stability by introducing pulse compression system We try to construct a test area in addition to Nextef for key studies 2009/10/12-16CLIC09 Higo48