Cameron University Library Library Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report 2007-2008 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building the Foundation of an Information Literacy Program
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
Pre and Post Assessments A quick and easy way to assess your Student Learning Outcomes.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
March 2007 ULS Information Literacy and Assessment of Learning Program.
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
QEP Presentation 1 Attorney Wesley Bishop Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs (Faculty Affairs, TRIO, and QEP) Pamela E. Wanga, Ph.D. Associate.
Service to Leadership Freshmen Orientation Assessment Service to Leadership Professional Development Training August 14, 2012 Agriculture Research Complex.
Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills 2012 HBCU Library Alliance Leadership Institute Presented By: Violene Williams, MLIS Reference Librarian James Herbert.
Determining the Validity and Reliability of Key Assessments and Other Questions Regarding Key Assessments.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP): SAILS QEP Director Sarah Thomason Adjunct Faculty Workshop August 28, 2010.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Farmingdale State University of NY1 Information Management A Value-added Process Our goal is to illustrate a value-added process to assess Information.
Computing & Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Information Technology CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Quality Enhancement Plan Students Achieving Improved Learning Strategies Quality Enhancement Plan Students Achieving Improved Learning Strategies.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
Making a difference? Measuring the impact of an information literacy programme Ann Craig
Blazing Trails: On the Path to Information Literacy: lighting the path to collections through collaboration Brena Smith and Alison Armstrong, UCLA Library.
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
Bettina Matysiak PIDP 3104November Introduction  What are “application cards”?  an informal assessment technique which allows instructors to.
Department of Music School of Liberal Arts B.M.Ed In music CIP Code (681) 1 Program Quality Improvement Report
Increasing Student Success Achieving the Dream Progress Report June 10, 2009.
Evidence Based Teaching Strategy: Applied to Student Orientation
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Department Name and School or Service Division Example Department of History School of Liberal Arts Example Office/department of Student Development Division.
Education Department M. Ed. in Reading CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Fall 2010.
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
Deborah Gentry, Instructional Development Center Randi Sutter, Library 14 th Annual Illinois Community College Assessment Fair.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Science (CS) CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Assessing Credit –bearing Information Literacy Class using ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards Wenli Gao Instructional Services Librarian Morrisville.
Instruction & Assessment Plan, Melissa Bowles-Terry April 4, 2011.
Department of Education
Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology Bachelor of Science Technology CIP Code Program Quality Improvement Report.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
CAMERON UNIVERSITY LIBRARY LIBRARY SERVICES Fall 2009Program Quality Improvement Report
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
Updating Curriculum to Support Learning Davidson County Community College May, 2011.
Assessment of Information Literacy Presented by Touro College Libraries Sara Tabaei, Information Literacy Director Bashe Simon, Director of Touro Libraries.
Information Literacy: Assessing Your Instruction Texas Library Association District 10 Fall Workshop October 15, 2005 Michelle Millet Information Literacy.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
Learning Assessment Loop Closing Activity in the Biology Department Vivian Navas Biology Department Assessment Coordinator May 2006.
Welcome to Del Mar College. How have you changed the lives of your student learners?
Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.
Department of Theatre Arts School of Liberal Arts B.A. in Theatre Arts Local Code: 170 CIP Code : Fall Program Quality Improvement Report.
Ma Lei Hsieh Instruction Librarian Rider University Patricia H. Dawson Science Librarian Rider University VALE User.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Information Seeking Behavior and Information Literacy Among Business Majors Casey Long Business Liaison Librarian University Library Georgia State University,
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
How do you use library instruction?. Library Instruction That Improves Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement 2016 Innovations Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
As Good As It Gets…For Now:
Assessment Workshop Design Program Portfolio & Presentation / ART- 230
Greg Miller Iowa State University
Cameron University Library
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/19/18
Presentation transcript:

Cameron University Library Library Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Learning Outcomes Students will demonstrate skills and knowledge as they relate to the  Location  Mastery  Application  Synthesis of scholarly information. Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Alignment of Learning Outcomes Library faculty provide students access to quality educational opportunities in a student centered environment by: 1.Using a variety of teaching methods, including experiential learning, group work, active learning and problem centered learning, to reach students. 2.Preparing students for lifelong learning by teaching skills which help them to know where to look for the best information and how to evaluate what they find. Library faculty provide learning opportunities consistent with a university of choice by: 1.Providing an Information Literacy program, based on the Association of College and University Libraries Standards. 2.Providing cultural experiences through lectures, exhibits and workshops. Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Student Achievement 1.Changes to course exercise formats helped students complete exercises more quickly and required less intervention from the library instructor. 2.Pre and Post test data show: a)Spring semester students demonstrated a higher level of information literacy skills preparedness than students in the Fall semester. b)172 students participated in the Composition I pre and post tests. c)Students showed an average of 10.4% improvement after instruction. Average post test score was 81% e) Blackboard students scored an average of 88% on a similar information literacy test for Composition I. f) Bibliographic review of Works Cited indicates an average of 45% out of 100% of periodical resources and 55% of 100% of Internet sources cited were authorit ative. 3.Library faculty improved the course materials by using instructional design techniques and by ensuring that consistent terminology was used. Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Assessment Data: Basic Library Skills Tests Basic Library Skills TestFall 2005Spring 2006Fall 2006Spring 2007Fall 2007Spring 2008 Pre-Test61.13%66.42%69.00%65.93%71.90%82.41% Post-test81.79%74.34%80.42%76.04%70.75%92.08% Classes Students Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Bibliographic Review Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Assessment Data: Blackboard Library Test Blackboard Library Test Summer 2007 StudentsFall 2007StudentsSpring 2008 StudentsSummer 2008 Students Comp I Library Test Class Average 96.49% %884.62% %15 Comp II Library Test Class Average % %17 CJ Reporting Class Average 87%27 Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Assessment Activity Matrix Academic Program:Information Literacy Academic Department:Cameron Library Headcount of Students Participating in Measurement Date Measurement Administered Faculty Member(s) Administering Measurement Faculty Member(s) Recording Measurement Data Faculty Member(s) Analyzing Measurement Data Date Faculty Meeting Discussing Measurement Results Faculty members document recommendations to improve student learning based on the data and the data analysis. 14 9/5/08,9/7/08Barbara Pickthorn/BaileyBarbara Pickthorn 12/2/ /5/07,9/7/07Barbara Pickthorn/BaileyBarbara Pickthorn 14 9/19/07,9/21/07B. Pickthorn/ClevengerBarbara Pickthorn 10 10/22/,10/24/07Cathy Blackman/HodgsonCathy BlackmanBarbara Pickthorn 11 10/31, 11/2/07Barbara Pickthorn/YoungerBarbara Pickthorn 18 10/31, 11/2/07Barbara Pickthorn/YoungerBarbara Pickthorn 22 10/31, 11/2/07Barbara Pickthorn/YoungerBarbara Pickthorn 5 11/10, 11/12/07Cathy Blackman/GodwinCathy BlackmanBarbara Pickthorn 11 2/6, 2/8/08Barbara Pickthorn/KingsleyBarbara Pickthorn 10 2/18, 2/20/08Barbara Pickthorn/YoungerBarbara Pickthorn 162/20, 2/22/08Barbara Pickthorn/YoungerBarbara Pickthorn 122/27, 3/29/08Jeanne Gaunce/ThomlinsonBarbara Pickthorn 63/3, 3/5/08Jeanne Gaunce/HodgsonBarbara Pickthorn 123/3, 3/5/08Jeanne Gaunce/HodgsonBarbara Pickthorn 15 Summer 08Kim Smith/ParkKim Smith 17 Summer 08Kim Smith/ParkKim SmithBarbara Pickthorn 27 Spring 08Wanda Donica/DudashKaren Dudash 71 Fall 07, Spring 08Miller, J. DennisBarbara Pickthorn Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Analysis of Evidence of Student Learning 1.Historic data demonstrates improvement in student learning: a)Multi-year analysis shows an average improvement of 10% from pre test to post test. b)Comparison to Oklahoma Regional institution norms is anecdotal, indicating that students have difficulty with the same concepts indicated by testing at Cameron. c) Comparison to national norms is not available. 2.Cameron participated in standardized test program called Sails. Library faculty will be analyzing and comparing outcomes from that test with local testing. Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Documenting Shared Responsibility 1.Evidence of faculty member participation completed: a)Faculty member participation document b)Assessment Activity Matrix c)Department Faculty meeting minutes on assessment 2.Discuss the role of each faculty member in the assessment process. Developing program outcomes is done by the Library Faculty. Administering assessment measurements is done by the class instructor. Recording assessment results is done by the class instructor. Analysis of assessment results done is by the Department Chair. Developing action plan to improve student learning is done by the Library Director and the Chair of the Department with input from the Library Faculty. Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report

Review of Effectiveness of Assessment Process 1.Evidence to demonstrate the assessment process is providing quality information. 2.Discuss any changes in the program assessment process that will improve reliability or validity of the assessment measurements. 3.Discuss PQIR Action Plan priorities based on improving student learning. Fall 2008 Program Quality Improvement Report