By Jixuan Jiang, MA Urban Planning Candidate Instructor: Leo F. Estrada TA:Nic Jay Aulston, Madeline Brozen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. HERT, M.G. WAGNER, L. MYERS, J. LEVINE*, T. HECK, Y. RHEE HEALTH, NUTRITION, AND EXERCISE SCIENCES, NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, FARGO, ND, *FAMILY.
Advertisements

Richmond Journey-To-Work Transit Factoring Analysis: A Multivariate Regression Approach Xueming (Jimmy) Chen, Ph.D I-Shian (Ivan) Suen, Ph.D Virginia Commonwealth.
Where is Low Income Housing Tax Credit housing being developed in Los Angeles County? C.J. Gabbe UP 206A Midterm Presentation November 1, 2012.
Identifying Food Deserts & Food Imbalance Areas in Sacramento County
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Potential Sites for Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego Katie Lemmon UP 206 A Final Project March 14, 2011.
BEN ANDERSON PROJECT MANAGER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE CENTER FOR HAZARDS RESEARCH AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT Using Dasymetric Mapping.
“2014 WORLD BANK CONFERENCE ON LAND AND POVERTY” Washington DC, March 24-27, 2014 PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICE AVAILABILITY: A REDEFINITION OF URBAN LANDSCAPE.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
Examining Potential Demand of Public Transit for Commuting Trips Xiaobai Yao Department of Geography University of Georgia, USA 5 July 2006.
Suburban Food Deserts: Islands of Food Insecurity in Seas of Affluence A Case Study of Butler County, Ohio 2010 Ohio GIS Conference September 15-17, 2010.
OSG Analysis on the Gloucester County Rail Line Study State Planning Commission December 3, 2008.
Neighborhood Walkability and Bikeability Andrew Rundle, Dr.P.H. Associate Professor of Epidemiology Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University.
Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.
Identifying Successful Transit Oriented Developments in Los Angeles By: Lupita Ibarra Introduction to GIS Midterm Project February 8, 2011.
Squeezing more out of existing data sources: Small Area Estimation of Welfare Indicators Berk Özler The World Bank Development Research Group, Poverty.
HUMA HUSAIN UP206A – WINTER 2011 FINAL PROJECT Childcare in LA County.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Estimating Commuter Rail Station- Level Ridership Using American Community Survey Journey to Work.
GOING NOWHERE FAST? Roy Samaan 14 March 2011 UP 206 A Effects of Service Reduction on Transit Quality.
Urban Planning 206A Prof. Leo Estrada By Pedro E. Nava Fresno County & The San Joaquin Valley: Agricultural Production, Unemployment, & Educational Attainment.
An assessment of Metro’s Westside Subway Extension Presented by: Tamanna Rahman PP 224A Winter 2012 Midterm.
Mary Buchanan, Project Manager New Haven, Connecticut DATAHAVEN Data for Community Action Income Inequality and Change in Connecticut’s.
Potential Sites for Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego Katie Lemmon UP 206 A Midterm Project February 8, 2011.
1 DSCI 3023 Linear Regression Outline Linear Regression Analysis –Linear trend line –Regression analysis Least squares method –Model Significance Correlation.
UP206A Final Presentation Feng Zhu, Mar/19/2012 Study of Transit Corridors Based on Goldline in LA.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
A Spatial Analysis of Orange Line Rider Demographics November 1, 2012By Tamar Sarkisian.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Using ArcView to Create a Transit Need Index John Babcock GRG394 Final Presentation.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
Transit Service Quality and Transit Use: TBOT, Task 5.
By Lu Instructor: Leo F. Estrada TA:Nic Jay Aulston&: Peter Capone-Newton.
A greenway network for a more sustainable Auckland Talking and Walking Sustainability Auckland 21 – 23 February 2007 Patrícia Vasconcelos.
GIS Methods: Applications to HIV and Family Planning Livia Montana UNC-Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project.
RURAL TRANSIT PLANNING Shilpa Panicker – ADOT Jorge Luna – MAG Deron Lozano – Valley Metro Scott Miller – HDR Engineering.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation for Vulnerability.
Accessibility and Feasibility of Recreational and Fitness Facilities in Ames GIS-CRP 551 Final Project Yang Bai.
Environmental Justice of Open Space Amenities in Baltimore, Maryland Christopher Boone School of Human Evolution and Social Change Global Institute of.
Transit-Oriented Development in Los Angeles County By Jennifer Tolentino Fall 2010.
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN OMAHA KRISTEN FIGUEIRA UP206A.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
Operational Analysis of the LCT Fixed Route System Summary of Findings.
Today’s Schedule – 10/30 Ch. 11 & 12.2 Quiz Finish Daily Show Clip
June 6-7, th European EMME/2 Users' Group Conference Madrid Measuring the quality of public transit system Tapani Särkkä/Matrex Oy Mervi Vatanen/Helsinki.
Technical Details of Network Assessment Methodology: Concentration Estimation Uncertainty Area of Station Sampling Zone Population in Station Sampling.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
CRENSHAW CORRIDOR ANALYSIS By: Ivan Gonzalez. Background - - Expo Line scheduled to open in Opportunities exist for transportation projects to.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
How to Allocate Continuation Education to Reduce Unemployment in LA City  UP 206A Introduction to GIS  Instructor: Professor Leo F. Estrada  TAs: Nic.
Examining Potential Demand For Public Transit --A Case Study of City of Long Beach Presented to UP206, Dec 2010 By Jixuan Jiang, Master in UPlanning.
Mid-term Prepared by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
AGENDA PROJECT OVERVIEW PAST AND PRESENT YOUR VALUES FOR TRANSIT NETWORK CONCEPTS.
Downtown LA as Large- Scale TOD?. STUDY AREA Study Area.
Copyright 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc.
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Emerging and developing economies: measures of development
Statewide Mode Choice Models for Tennessee
The Location Relationship Between Low-Income Households and Transit Stations in LA Zhaosen Wang February 13,2012.
College of Humanities and Development China Agricultural University
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Mapping Our World.
Image: Raygun.
Can Public Transit Affect Private Vehicle Use?
Does Crime take the Metro?
Presentation transcript:

by Jixuan Jiang, MA Urban Planning Candidate Instructor: Leo F. Estrada TA:Nic Jay Aulston, Madeline Brozen

 For transit dependent residents, who are 1) too young, 2) too old, or 3) cannot afford personal automobile, they need the convenient access to public transit for the purpose of commute.

 Planning Focus: the Demand and Supply Assessment of Public Transit Service  Case: City of Long Beach  Data Source: Census 2000, FactFinder, Long Beach Transit, Metro, OCTA, and FY10 City of Long Beach Ridership Checker Program.  Methods: Transit Dependency Index (TDI) as a Demand Analysis Tool), Walkable Distance Coverage as a Supply Analysis Tool.

Finding 1: 84% Area of City of Long Beach is covered within the walkable distance buffer zone of all existing public transit service. * Walkable Distance=10 mins * average walking speeds (which is 2.5 – 3 mph)= 0.25 mi

Correlation No_Car_PopPoverty Percent65+_Pec18-_Per No_Car_Pop Percentage Pearson Correlation ** **.080 Significance (Double) N Poverty Percentage Pearson Correlation.554 ** **.474 ** Significance (Double).000 N _Percentage Pearson Correlation ** ** ** Significance (Double) N _Percentage Pearson Correlation ** ** 1 Significance (Double) N233 **. Significant at.01 Level TDI =0.38*%[zero_car_hholds] *%[ 65+_yrs] *[< 15_yrs]}.

Beyond looking at the old, the young, the poor, and the no_car population, the index Transit Dependent is utilized to evaluate the transit needs of the area. TDI =w no_car %[zero_car_hholds] + w income %[ 65+_yrs] + w 15 [< 15_yrs]}. Considering the correlation among these variables, the adopted TDI calculation formula is adjusted with harmonic weights of the correlation to eliminate the potential overlap of variable set. The harmonic weight is defined as: Weight i =(1/correlation i )/(Σ1/correlation i )

Finding 2: TDI indicates the transit service demand inequality. The highest Transit Demand appears in downtown area. The TDI analysis could serve as a quantitative identification for the “hottest” public transit needs for the purpose of equality service planning.

By Adding XY Data (Longitude, Latitude) of each stop, we can see the stops serving as the supply of public transit. The size of points varies by Daily Ridership at a typical weekday service.

Finding 3: Buffering the stop shapefile with the 0.25mile walking distance, we see 74.48% area of City of Long Beach is covered by the walking distance supply buffer by using calculating the geometry. Adding the TDI map we discover the high rank TDI areas are all within the supply buffer.

Finding 3: Linking the ridership data (which is another source of potential demand information) with current service supply (stops and routes), we can use this supply information for the purpose of improving the current service by adjusting/adding at the place with high demand.