By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We will tackle accelerator physics the way we tackle most problems in classical physics – ie, with 18 th and 19 th century mathematics!
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Syllabus and slides Lecture 1: Overview and history of Particle accelerators (EW) Lecture 2: Beam optics I (transverse) (EW) Lecture 3: Beam optics II.
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Transverse dynamics Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory x : the horizontal plane y : the vertical plane Erik.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Lecture 5: Beam optics and imperfections
Accelerating Polarized Protons Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory PHNIX Focus, Feb. 24,
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Basic Mathematics Rende Steerenberg BE/OP CERN Accelerator School Basic Accelerator Science & Technology at CERN 3 – 7 February 2014 – Chavannes de Bogis.
Quadrupole Transverse Beam Optics Chris Rogers 2 June 05.
Lecture 3 - E. Wilson - 22 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
Tuesday, 02 September 2008FFAG08, Manchester Stephan I. Tzenov1 Modeling the EMMA Lattice Stephan I. Tzenov and Bruno D. Muratori STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
HST 2009 Introduction to AcceleratorsD. Brandt 1 The LHC: Physics without mathematics ! D. Brandt, CERN.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Linear Imperfections equations of motion with imperfections: smooth approximation orbit correction for the un-coupled case transfer matrices with coupling:
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Accelerator Fundamentals Brief history of accelerator Accelerator building blocks Transverse beam dynamics coordinate system Mei Bai BND School, Sept.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Appendix A: A digression on mathematical methods in beam optics Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Accelerator Physics & Diagnostics, H.Wiedemann, DITANET, March 6 – 11, 2011, Stockholm, Sweden Accelerator Physics for Diagnostics Helmut Wiedemann Stanford.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Contents:  Overview of the Lectures  A Brief History on Particle Accelerators  The Mathematics we Need  Overview of the CERN Accelerator Complex 
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Lecture 3 Transverse Optics II
Accelerator Laboratory OPTICS BASICS S. Guiducci.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Lecture 2 Transverse Optics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 27 January 20161/23 HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I) Motivations: nonlinear magnetic multipoles Phenomenology.
Contents:  Lattices and TWISS Parameters  Tune Calculations and Corrections  Dispersion  Momentum Compaction  Chromaticity  Sextupole Magnets 
Damping rings, Linear Collider School Linear beam dynamics overview Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU Accelerator and Beam Physics group Beams Department CERN.
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Lecture 8 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
AXEL-2017 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
HT Lecture on Nonlinear beam dynamics (I)
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Review of Accelerator Physics Concepts
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

by Verena Kain CERN BE-OP

In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories in the transverse plane –Linear beam optics, strong focusing

Usually use only magnetic fields for transverse control What is the equivalent E field of B = 1 T? –Ultra-relativistic:  To guide the particles we use magnetic fields from electro-magnets. Lorentz Force Equivalent electric field!!:

Vertical magnetic field to bend in the horizontal plane Dipole electro-magnets: h

Circular accelerator: Lorentz Force = Centrifugal Force Useful formula: Example for the LHC –p 7 TeV/c –8.3 T Beam rigidity

Length of dipole magnet and field define total bending angle of magnet: Circular accelerator: total bending angle:= 2  How many dipole magnets do we need in the LHC? Dipole length = 15 m Field 8.3 T   ds

Define design trajectory with dipole magnets Trajectories of particles in beam will deviate from design trajectory  Focusing –Particles should feel restoring force when deviating from design trajectory horizontally or vertically Design trajectory

Requirement: Lorentz force increases as a function of distance from design trajectory E.g. in the horizontal plane We want a magnetic field that  Quadrupole magnet Gradient of quadrupoleNormalized gradient, focusing strength

Instead of adding a quadrupole field component to our dipoles  Separate function for increased flexibility  Optimize magnets according to their job: bending, focusing  Add between the dipole magnets separate quadrupole magnets

Length = 3.2 m Gradient = 223 T/m Peak field 6.83 T Total number in LHC: 392

And now a bit of theory to see how we can calculate trajectories through dipoles and quadrupoles. Taylor series expansion of B field: Normalize and keep only terms linear in x ✗✗

Use different coordinate system: Frenet-Serret rotating frame The ideal particle stays on “design” trajectory. (x=0, y=0) And: x,y <<  The design particle has momentum p 0 = m 0  v.   …. relative momentum offset of a particle

A particle is described with 6 coordinates:

All we have to do now is to write in the Frenet-Serret frame, develop with x,y << , and keeping only terms linear in x or y for magnetic field after a bit of maths: the equations of motion Assuming there are no vertical bends, Quadrupole field changes sign between x and y

Let’s write it slightly differently: horizontal plane: vertical plane: Solution can be found with ansatz Insert ansatz in equation  For K > 0: focusing Equation of the harmonic oscillator with spring constant K

a 1 and a 2 through boundary conditions: Horizontal focusing quadrupole, K > 0: Use matrix formalism: TRANSFER MATRIX

Solution of equation of motion with K < 0: New ansatz is: And the transfer matrix

Uncoupled motion in x and y Focusing quadrupole, K >0: Defocusing quadrupole, K< 0: Drift space: length of drift space L ….horizontal plane ….vertical plane

Design orbit with dipole magnets and alternating gradient lattice.

We had… Around the accelerator K will not be constant, but will depend on s Where  restoring force ≠ const, K(s) depends on the position s  K(s+L) = K(s) periodic function, where L is the “lattice period” General solution of Hill’s equation: Hill’s equation

Solution of Hill’s Equation is a quasi harmonic oscillation (betatron oscillation): amplitude and phase depend on the position s in the ring. The beta function is a periodic function determined by the focusing properties of the lattice: i.e. quadrupoles The “phase advance” of the oscillation between the point 0 and point s in the lattice. integration constants: determined by initial conditions

Definition: Let’s assume for s(0) = s 0,  (0) = 0. Defines  from x 0 and x’ 0,  0 and  0. Can compute the single particle trajectories between two locations if we know  at these positions!

The number of oscillations per turn is called “tune” The tune is an important parameter for the stability of motion over many turns. It has to be chosen appropriately, measured and corrected. Measure beam position at one location turn by turn Beam position will change with With FFT get frequency of oscillation: tune

The choice of phase advance per cell or tune and hence the focusing properties of the lattice have important implications. Misalignment of quadrupoles or dipole field errors create orbit perturbations The perturbation at one location has an effect around the whole machine  diverges for Q = N, where N is integer.

Quadrupoles can have gradient errors  avoid half-integer tunes Higher order field errors… In the end avoid simple fractional tunes where Q = n/m with n,m small integers. Choose a stable working area in the tune diagram. Qx Qy

With: One can solve for  is a constant of motion: Courant-Snyder invariant  is parametric representation of an ellipse in the xx’space: phase-space  Shape and orientation of ellipse are given by  and  : the Twiss parameters

The area of the ellipse is constant (Liouville): The area of the ellipse is an intrinsic property of the beam and cannot be changed by the focusing properties.

Typically particles in accelerator have Gaussian particle distribution in position and angle. Transverse profile measurement and Gauss fit x' x Define beam emittance  as ellipse with area in phase-space that contains 68.3 % of all particles. Such that x

Liouville’s Theorem from Hamiltonian Mechanics: canonical variables q, p e.g. q = position = x p = momentum =  mv = mc  x The theorem: We use x’:  The beam emittance shrinks during acceleration!!

Alternating gradient focusing. F=focusing O=nothing (or bend, RF structure,…) D=defocusing A FoDo lattice consists of FoDo cells: This is what the beta functions look like in a FoDo cell Focal length of quadrupole: Stability criterion for FoDo: …don’t focus too strong!

An example…  x,  y

The LHC consists of 8 arcs. Each arc consists of 23(+2) FODO cells. The regular FODO cell has the following characteristics: Phase advance: 90° Maximum beta: 180 m FODO The beam size changes along the cell! Maximum horizontal beam size in the focusing quadrupoles Maximum vertical beam size in the defocusing quadrupoles

The emittance at LHC injection energy 450 GeV:  = 7.3 nm At 7 TeV:  = 0.5 nm Normalized emittance:  * = 3.5  m Normalized emittance preserved during acceleration. And for the beam sizes: At the location with the maximum beta function (  max = 180 m):  450GeV = 1.1 mm  7TeV = 300  m Aperture requirement: a > 10  Vertical plane: 19 mm ~ GeV ~ 47 mm ~ 38 mm

Need aperture margin for imperfections: e.g. orbit Horizontal and vertical trajectory around the ring during commissioning. Corrected orbit peak ~ 4 mm.

 We will have a look at longitudinal motion  Imperfections  Injection, Extraction