1 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target EM miniCAL GSI’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Response of the GLAST LAT Calorimeter.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
Francesco Longo University of Trieste and INFN-Trieste After some discussion at Perugia meeting (P.Boinee, R.Rando, R.Giannitrapani, J.Cohen-Tanugi) Analysis.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 6 – 06/02/27 F. Piron & E. Nuss (LPTA) 1 Trending CAL performance and mapping crystals Gamma-ray Large Area.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.
GEANT4 simulations for the Lund R 3 B prototype Douglas Di Julio Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Recon rewriting meeting, May, 11, 2005 In what cases we need external position estimation ? Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop #4, 14 July 2005 David Smith CAL calib at SLAC SVAC1 Stability of the CAL Calibrations Online script “suites”
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
Interactions of pions in the Si-W ECAL prototype Towards a paper Naomi van der Kolk.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
Hadronic Models Problems, Progress and Plans Gunter Folger Geant4 Workshop, Lisbon 2006.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting August 6, 2004 David Smith w. Benoît Lott Muons in photodiodes1 MIPs in your Photodiodes David’s Instr. Ana.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target FRS: FRagment Separator at GSI Darmstadt, Germany One single beam: 58 Ni, with energy varying between.1 and 1.7 GeV/nucleon.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
ICPPA-2015 Moscow Oct ASIC for calorimetric measurements in astrophysical experiment NUCLEON (overview) E. Atkin1, A. Voronin1,2, D. Karmanov2,
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Hisayuki Torii1 RHIC-Phenix 実験のための EMCalorimeter のテスト実験と その性能評価 Outline Introduction Beam test setup Calibration method Position dependence Resolution.
Reconstructing energy from HERD beam test data Zheng QUAN IHEP 3 rd HERD work shop Xi’an, 20 Jan
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Validation of Geant4 (V4.2) for GLAST-LAT -Comparison with Theory, Beam Test Data and EGS4 – S. Ogata, T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima (Hiroshima/SLAC) P. Valtersson,
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Status of PSD simulation in Shine Oleg Petukhov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow NA61 Analysis/Software/Calibration meeting , Warsaw.
Rita Carbone, RICAP 11, Roma 3 26/05/2011 Stand-alone low energy measurements of light nuclei from PAMELA Time-of-Flight system. Rita Carbone INFN Napoli.
Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Jixie’s Analysis Status Jixie Zhang Sep. 22th, 2010.
Straw prototype test beam 2017: first glance at the data
The PSD at Pb-Pb run PSD drawbacks at Ar beam
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
The Lund R3B prototype: In-beam proton tests and simulations
Exclusive w/h production in pp collisions at Ekin=3.5 GeV with HADES
Calibrating the CAL in flight: Galactic Cosmic Ray Calibration
“minimum-ionisation” peak
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
Imaging crystals with TKR
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Presentation transcript:

1 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target EM miniCAL GSI’s Fragment Separator (FRS) Cocktail beam at 1.7 GeV/nucleon

2 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status miniCAL: 8 layers of 3 logs each already used at CERN in august crystals from Kalmar, Saclay, Bordeaux CDEs made at Saclay (same as for EM) electronics: Bordeaux FRS trigger plastic Cocktail beam, 1.7 GeV/nucleon Minical

3 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status EM results Nhit Cocktail beam at 1.7 GeV/nucleon

4 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status This is not a bug: it’s a feature. Z-dependent position

5 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status There is a real bug in the EM trigger! Same number of events in two (FRS & EM) data streams External trigger worked fine. Did it? only about 40% of ions found in the peak in the first layer! Almost 80% for minical. 50% of events

6 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status FRS: calibration in Z, A miniCAL: - energy calibration: protons + charge injection - quenching factors - cross sections for charge-changing reactions EM - correction for non-linearity in EM electronics - energy calibration: - protons for LEX8 - cross calibration with real data for LEX1, HEX8, HEX1 - comparison with Sasha’s coefficients - quenching factors - cross sections for charge-changing reactions simulations (standalone GEANT4 v6.0): ionisation energy deposit for protons & ions Analysis Status (Bordeaux)

7 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Calculated energy deposit (taken from Thierry’ s note) SRIM-G4: 1% difference SRIM-G4: 10% for 1 mm 5% for 20 mm G4 may underestimate  E for protons Carbon Proton

8 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Position: X=6 Y=6 (run 165) blue: G4+broadening (0.65 MeV) black:data LEX8 absolute energy calibration with protons

9 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status HEX8/LEX1 Ratio LEX1 vs HEX8 X Y Cross calibration

10 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Comparison with Sasha’s coefficients Proton gain/muon gain Gain (MeV/channel) Layer

11 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Run 178 R L « X=6 Y=6 » but the alphas hit the Y=8 crystal! XY XY The Alpha run

12 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Protons and  do not hit at the same location. Correcting for this effect, the measured energy deposit for  is 9% (50.0 MeV instead of 45.9 MeV) too high as compared to the G4 predictions. Left vs Right amplitudes p  XY The Alpha run (2)

13 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Peak determination Z=14 Hit multiplicity

14 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Quenching For low Z ions, an « anti-quenching » effect (>20%) is observed.

15 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Quenching (2)

16 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status EM vs minical comparison 2% EM minical

17 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Comparison with calibration values established at CERN with 20 GeV muons Minical calibration coefficients

18 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Longitudinal shower profiles measured at CERN 50 GeV 1.3 X 0 80 GeV 1.3 X GeV 0 X GeV 4 X GeV 8 X 0

19 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Cross sections determination Ionisation peaks: « non-interacting » events

20 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status x: depth  : reaction cross section  : density P survival = exp(-x  ) Z=8 Z=14 Z=20 Z=26 minical Cross sections determination (2)

21 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Measured cross sections

22 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status « Things to be done » list Look into EM trigger problem Investigate effects of cuts Position studies Nuclear reactions studies (we have protons and alphas as well) And there are the great many runs using different conditions we have not looked at.

23 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status

24 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status FRS ion identification

25 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Non-linearity manifests the quenching effect! MiniCAL results Cocktail beam at 1.7 GeV/nucleon

26 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status MiniCAL absolute-energy calibration

27 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status EM results Cocktail beam at 1.7 GeV/nucleon

28 GLAST LAT Project CalSoft Face-to-Face Meeting April 15 – 16, 2004 Benoît Lott GSI Analysis Status Hit distribution