Warm and Cold Ion Linac: Comparison and Optimization March 30, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Juliette PLOUIN – CEA/SaclayCARE’08, 3 December /21 Superconducting Cavity activities within HIPPI CARE ‘08 CERN, 2-5 December 2008 Juliette PLOUIN.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Part2: Cavities and Structures Modes in resonant cavity From a cavity to an accelerator Examples of structures JUAS 2015 Linacs-JB.Lallement - JUAS
Eurisol driver: heavy ion capabilities A. Pisent, M. Comunian, A. Facco, E. Fagotti, (INFN-LNL) R. Garoby (CERN), P. Pierini (INFN-MI)
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
ATLAS Intensity and Efficiency Upgrade ATLAS USERS MEETING Speaker: Mike Kelly Physics Division May 15, 2014.
Technical aspects of the ATLAS efficiency & intensity upgrade Peter N. Ostroumov ATLAS Users Workshop, August 8-9, 2009.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Activities of Superconducting RF Accelerators at Nanjing University Sun An Proton Linear Accelerator Institute Institute of Energy Sciences, Nanjing University.
Parameters of 2 nd SPL feasibility study A.M.Lombardi (reporting for the working group)
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
RF Cavity Design with Superfish
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
J. Alessi RF Structures EBIS Project Technical Review 1/27/05 RF Structures J. Alessi Some general thoughts on what our approach will be.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Development of The Klystrons for J-PARC Project
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Overview and Status of the Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program Giorgio Apollinari for Bob Webber.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
September 13, 2007 J. Alessi EBIS Project and EBIS as an ionizer for polarized He-3 ? Jim Alessi Work of E. Beebe, A. Pikin, A. Zelenski, A. Kponou, …
Concept Preliminary Estimations A. Kolomiets Charge to mass ratio1/61/8 Input energy (MeV/u) Output energy (MeV/u)2.5(3.5) Beam.
ESS AD RETREAT 5 th December 2011, Lund “A walk down the Linac” SPOKES Sébastien Bousson IPN Orsay.
A. FaccoEURISOL DS Orsay, 3 Feb 2005 Task 7 Proton Accelerator “The objective of the Proton Accelerator Task is the design a 5 mA CW, 1 GeV proton linac.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Linac Design: Single-Spoke Cavities.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
A. FaccoEURISOL DS Task 7GANIL, 30 Nov 2005 EURISOL DS 2° Meeting Task 7 - Primary Accelerator GANIL, November 30, 2005 Summary of the Task 7 status New.
Advances in Proton Linac Design and Simulations P.N. Ostroumov January 13, 2012 Proton accelerators for science and innovation Workshop – January 2012.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
Bunch Shape Monitor for HINS Wai-Ming Tam Project X Collaboration Meeting September 11, 2009.
HIE ISOLDE Linac Short Technical Description W. Venturini Delsolaro Material from: L. Alberty, J. Bauche, Y. Leclerq, R. Mompo, D. Valuch, D. Voulot, P.
SC Activities at IAP Frankfurt
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
WP5 Elliptical cavities
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
Physics design on the main linac
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
LINAC AG • IAP • Goethe Universität Frankfurt
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Acceleration of RIB using linacs
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Challenges, Progress and Plans of SRF CH-Structures
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Update on MEIC Activities at ANL
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

Warm and Cold Ion Linac: Comparison and Optimization March 30, 2015

P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 2 Content  Economics of NC and SC linacs  Peak and accelerating fields in NC and SC structures  Review of pulsed ion Linacs  Main difference between NC and SC structures in application to multi-ion linacs  High-performance QWRs and HWRs  Cost-efficient design of the SC section: reduce number of cavities and cryomodules  Lorentz detuning and its compensation  Conclusion March 30, 2015

MEIC Requires an Multi-Ion Linac March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 3

What Do We Know about NC and SC Linacs?  Linac cost includes 3 major components –Accelerating structure –RF system –Cryoplant and helium distribution system (SC linac) –Everything else (building, vacuum, water cooling, controls, diagnostics,…)  Normal Conducting Pulsed Linac –The most expensive component is the RF system –High power (many MWs) RF systems are cost efficient –Multi-gap, long accelerating structures are cost efficient –Accelerating gradients are limited by breakdowns which is known as Kilpatrick limit  Superconducting Pulsed Linac –Accelerating structure is very expensive –Cryoplant is considerable cost –RF is low-cost especially for low power linacs March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 4

Peak Fields in Accelerating Cavities  Normal conducting structures made from copper  Kilpatrick limit was introduced in 1950s, empirical formula  In modern pulsed structures, electric field exceeds Kilpatrick limit by a factor of ~2  Superconducting structures  Peak magnetic field is limited by quench, theoretical value is ~200 mT at 2K  Peak electric field is limited by the surface quality. ~120 MV/m can be achieved  Peak fields can not be measured  These ratios are known from the simulations of the resonator design  E ACC can be obtained experimentally from the stored energy  E PEAK can reach ~60-70 MV/m in pulsed oepration 5 March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting Accelerating gradients are limited by peak fields

Autophasing, Synchronous Phase in Multi-gap Standing Wave Structure 6  = 0, maximum acceleration  =-30 , stable acceleration Q is ion charge, A is ion mass number LcLc March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting

Acceleration of Ion Beams  Due to limited extraction voltage in ion sources, RF acceleration is applied at very low velocities  To have practical length of the acceleration period, the RF frequency must be low  Transverse dimensions of accelerating structures are large,  RFQ is the first accelerating structure after the ion source  IH type structures are popular right after the RFQ  Alvarez structure is used at GSI after the IH structure March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 7

8 RF Linacs CW NC*SC Pulsed NCSC ATLAS ISAC-II INFN SARAF SPIRAL-2 FRIB Project X EURISOL RAON ADS projects ISAC-I RIKEN inj. LEDA RFQ SARAF RFQ ATLAS RFQ Protons, H  Synchrotron Injectors (FNAL, KEK, CERN, IHEP….) MMF (Moscow) SNS LANSCE Heavy Ions Synch. Injectors at GSI LEIR - CERN BNL injector Carbon therapy synchrotrons SNS CERN SPL ESS *Low-energy, several MeV/u Heavy-ions March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting

CW Linac: NC or SC ?  Required wall plug power to create accelerating field  Typical example: 1 GeV CW linac  Superconducting CW linac is much more economic than NC  Both pulsed or CW SC linacs require NC front end –Multi-gap cavities are cost efficient due to fast change of velocity  ~0.3 to 10 MeV/u depending on q/A and duty factor March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 9

Low Duty Cycle Pulsed Linacs, Normal Conducting  For injection into synchrotrons we need higher  and  to control space charge in the ring  For acceleration of ions we need A/Q times higher total voltages compared to protons to reach the same velocity –Acceleration of ions with low Q and high A requires much more voltage then for protons  For pulsed linacs it is cost efficient to have multi-gap accelerating structure and pulsed high-power RF system, several MW pulsed power  GSI Linac, UNILAC – 11.4 MeV/u –RFQ (36 MHz), Q/A  4/238 –Alvarez (108 MHz), Q/A  28/238  Linac-3, CERN MeV/u, Q/A  27/208 –RFQ (100 MHz), IH structure (3 tanks), 100 MHz, 200 MHz  New BNL injector, 2 MeV/u, Q/A  1/6 –RFQ, IH structure (1 tank), 100 MHz March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 10

11 Drift Tube Linac (DTL) for Protons March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting  Protons, f=200 MHz, resonator diameter is ~1 meter  From 0.75 to 200 MeV/u

J-PARC DTL  F=325 MHz, H-minus, 3 MeV to 50 MeV 12 March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting

GSI Linac  IH structure, 36 MHzAlvarez, 108 MHz up to 1.4 MeV/u up to 11.4 MeV/u March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 13

P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 14 Normal Conducting IH structure  U. Ratzinger (Frankfurt) Group has built it for the BNL EBIS injector project Courtesy of J. Alessi (BNL) March 30, 2015

Room Temperature Linac at BNL  RFQ and IH structure  P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 15 IH-structure 4-rod RFQ EBIS March 30, 2015

Fixed Velocity and Variable Velocity Structures β /2 Beam β OPT /2 Normal Conducting Normal or Super Conducting P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 16 March 30, 2015

Front End of Multi-Ion Linac  For low duty cycle linac, NC front end up to ~5 MeV/u is cost effective  The cost of pulsed RFQ and IH structure is low: much less than the cost of CW structures  For this section of NC linac, the main cost is in RF system  Much more cost-effective than SC structure due to large range of velocity change –Multi-gap SC structure – high cost –Or many short SC cavities are required - expensive March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 17

Linac for MEIC: from Proton to Lead  For heavy ions we need  Assume, we need 100 MeV/u for lead ions  Higher energy for light ions is preferable to control space charge in the ring (light ion beams are more vulnerable to space charge)  In low duty cycle linac NC front end is more cost-effective, ~5 MeV/u  For protons we need effective voltage  For lead ions we need effective voltage  March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 18

Options  NC pulsed Linac for lead ions up to 100 MeV/u –We need 417 MV total voltage –If linac is based on long multi-gap cavities it can be used for protons too The phase velocity is given by the geometry of the linac Lower the voltage and power to maintain synchronous motion of light particles Protons will gain total voltage 115 MV and can be accelerated up to 100 MeV –If linac is based on 2-3 gap cavities like SC linac Protons can be accelerated to higher energies, ~280 MeV Peak fields are limited by breakdown voltage (Kilpatrick limit), this volatge is lower for low frequencies Factor of 5 larger number of cavities as compared to SC option will be necessary  SC pulsed Linac –Provides higher accelerating voltage per cavity than NC structures About factor of 4 higher accelerating voltages per cavity than for NC cavity –Number of 2-gap cavities is 107 to accelerate lead ions from 5 MeV/u to 100 MeV/u –Provides 100 MeV/u lead ions and 280 MeV/u protons March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 19

P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 20 Basic Parameters of the Linac  Linac layout Normal conducting Superconducting Ion species H to Pb Ion species for the reference design 208 Pb Kinetic energy of H & Pb ionsMeV/u280 & 100 Maximum pulse current Light ions (A/q  3) Heavy ions (A/q>3) mA Pulse repetition rateHzup to 10 Pulse length Light ions (A/q  3) Heavy ions (A/q>3) ms Maximum beam pulsed powerkW680 Fundamental frequencyMHz115 Total lengthm110 March 30, 2015

Focusing  Focusing with SC solenoids is cost-efficient  Return coils are used to minimize fringe fields, no iron or mu-metal shielding is required March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 21 9-Tesla SC solenoids in helium vessel ATLAS Cryomodule 6-Tesla SC solenoids in helium vessel PXIE Cryomodule

Quarter Wave Resonators  This data for CW mode, even higher fields are possible for pulsed mode March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 22

HWR, Very High E PEAK was Demonstrated March 30, 2015 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 23

Cryomodule Assembly P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting ,  OPT = ,  OPT =0.077 March 30, 2015

Design evolution of the injector linac: Cost Reduction E PEAK, MV/m B PEAK, mT Cavity types# of Cavities/Cryos Linac length, m QWR, HWR, Spoke119/ /4090QWR,HWR122/ QWR,HWR109/13~ QWR,HWR96/12~100 P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 25  Number and type of SC cavities is reduced since 2010 design  Footprint is reduced significantly  Based on SRF technology development for ATLAS facility March 30, 2015

Lorentz Detuning  Lorentz force detuning coefficient –72 MHz QWR: -1.6 Hz/(MV/m) 2 –170 MHz HWR: -1.5 Hz/(MV/m) 2  Simplest method is to provide high RF power in overcoupled mode like SNS –Expensive way, high power is not required for EIC injector  Piezoelectric tuner is a common way to compensate for Lorentz detuning in pulsed SC cavities  There is also issue for LLRF to provide stable phase-locked operation P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 26 March 30, 2015

P.N. Ostroumov, Warm and Cold Ion Linacs Collaboration Meeting 27 Summary  SC Linac is the best option for acceleration of multi-ion beams –Protons – 280 MeV –Lead ions -100 MeV/u  Performance of SC cavities is being improved every year – Cost of a SC linac is stable in “cost of living” dollars  Multi-gap NC Linac for 100 MeV/u lead ions requires 417 MV effective voltage –Protons can reach to 100 MeV only  NC linac composed from 2-gap (or 3-gap) cavities requires large cavity count, ~500 cavities –This results in very high cost of both cavities and RF system March 30, 2015