WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

RH Requirement for BART  §308 (e) contains BART requirements for regional haze visibility impairment…. The State must submit an implementation plan containing.
Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014.
FLM ISSUES AROUND THE COUNTRY EPA REGION 4 AIR QUALITY MODELERS WORKSHOP.
Development and Application of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios to Account for PM2.5 Secondary Formation in Georgia James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia.
Template Use of Photochemical Grid Models to Assess Single-Source Impacts Ralph Morris, Tanarit Sakulyanontvittaya, Darren Wilton and Lynsey Parker ENVIRON.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS CLASS I AIR QUALITY ANALYSES.
FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AQRV WORKGROUP (FLAG): CONSTRUCTING A CONSISTENT PROCESS.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
FLAG Deposition Subgroup Report Ellen Porter Air Quality Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Spatial Variability of Seasonal PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios in Georgia James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2014.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
WESTAR Oil & Gas Conference October 2008 Mark Smith.
© 2004 Zephyr Environmental Corporation Air Quality Impacts Analysis Presented to: American Public Power Association APPA New Generation Meeting: Anticipating.
Pinal County Air Quality Workshop Casa Grande – January 14, 2014 Kale Walch & Anu Jain – Permit Engineers.
PERMITTING ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS Jim Linville & Erik Hendrickson Air Permits Division.
September 12, SW Colorado PSD Increment Study Southwest Colorado Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO 2 ) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increment.
North Dakota’s Approach to a Periodic Review to Determine the Status of Consumption of PSD Class I Sulfur Dioxide Increments WESTAR Fall Technical Conference,
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) NSR Program
1 Regional NEPA Analysis of NOx Emissions from Potential Oil & Gas Development Scott F. Archer USDI - Bureau of Land Management March.
Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in NM WRAP Ozone and NOx in the West November 11, 2009.
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Proof-of-Concept Evaluation of Use of Photochemical Grid Model Source Apportionment Techniques for Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
BART Control Analysis WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
New Source Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD): Refinement of Increment Modeling Procedures Proposal Jessica Montañez.
1 Colorado BART APCD. 2 Class 1 Areas National Parks and Wilderness Areas 12 in Colorado 4 National Parks 8 Wilderness Areas.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
FLMs, PSD Increment, and AQRVs: the Oregon experience WESTAR Fall Technical Conference Seattle September 2003 Philip Allen, Oregon DEQ.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation WESTAR Conference on BART Guidelines and Trading September 1, 2005 Tom Moore -
Simulations of RGM air emissions from 30 power plants + 16 other large RGM sources in the 4-state region Simulations with HYSPLIT-Hg for Oct-2004 through.
Status of BART Analyses Implementation Workgroup Meeting April 17, 2007.
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
GRIC Case Study Permit Review Dan Blair, Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
How Tribes Use Models Part 1 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Miscellaneous Stuff William Harnett WESTAR Spring Meeting April 3, 2007.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
EPA Region 10 Cumulative Effects Analysis Methodology Development Rob Wilson and Herman Wong WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 16, 2003.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
John Bunyak National Park Service
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Technical Coordinator Report
Presentation transcript:

WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service

FLMs’ PSD permit review includes: Increment/Air Quality Analyses Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis Air Quality Related Values (AQRV) Analysis

EPA CLASS I SIGNIFICANT LEVELS Federal Reg. July 23, 1996 SO2 3-hr = 1.0 ug/m 3, 24-hr = 0.2 ug/m 3, Annual = 0.1 ug/m 3 PM10 24-hr = 0.3 ug/m 3, Annual = 0.2 ug/m 3 NO2 Annual = 0.1 ug/m 3 EXCEEDING THESE VALUES TRIGGERS A CUMULATIVE INCREMENT ANALYSIS OR ANY IMPACT IS SIGNIFICANT AND TRIGGERS A CUMULATIVE INCREMENT ANALYSIS

EMISSION RATES & SOURCES New Source(s)- usually same emissions for new facility as Class II analysis Cumulative Class I increment analysis for pollutant & averaging time > EPA Class I SIL –All major/large sources up to 300 km from Class I area –Minor sources < 50km from Class I area- not same minor source inventory as Class II –Emissions=State’s permit limit for averaging time--usually short term limits

CALMET METEOROLOGICAL DATA How many years (1yr vs. 3yrs vs. 5yrs) –1 year is no longer allowed –3 years with MM data is acceptable –5 years of NWS data is acceptable CALMET/MM prognostic data (MM4-1990, MM5-1992, MM5-1996) x80 km MM4 data from NCDC x80 km MM5 data from NPS/FWS in MM4 format x36 km MM5 data with MM5 parameters; available from contractor New Extractor by NPS fixes problem with 1990 MM4 CALMET settings must stay fixed for the different years CALMET GRID CELLS 2km to 4km in size

CALPUFF Guidance in IWAQM 2 & FLAG Receptor Grid- NPS fixed receptors for its Class I areas CALPUFF settings must stay fixed for the different years For short term increments and visible haze, need to model short term State emission limits. Pounds per hour Pounds per MMBtu Annual increments and acid deposition can use annual TPY emission limits

EMISSIONS -VISIBILITY New Sources emit: SO2, SO4, NOx, EC, PMC, PMF, SOA Visibility impacts from: SO4, NO3, EC, PMC, PMF, SOA Cumulative Visibility Analyses –Recommended in FLAG –Same sources & distances as increment cumulative + their emissions of visibility impacting pollutants –i.e., if cumulative SO2 increment analysis; then need SO4, NOx, PM, etc. from all sources

VISIBILITY ISSUES H 2 SO 4 (sulfuric acid mist) forms (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 which contributes visibility impairment so H 2 SO 4 needs to be explicitly modeled from: Coal fired power plants Oil fired turbines, engines, boilers Natural gas fired turbines, engines, boilers See NPS web site for speciation of PM emissions from gas fired turbines

ACID DEPOSITION SULFUR, NITROGEN TOTAL DEPOSITION = DRY + WET Report total deposition in the form of total S and N (include the N in (NH 4 ) for (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and (NH 4 )NO 3 Thresholds: EAST = S or N = 0.01 (Kg/ha/Yr) Thresholds: WEST = S or N = (Kg/ha/Yr) Analysis techniques not defined in FLAG Add new source’s impact to monitored values, no cumulative source analysis required Need to post process using Postutil to combine N species and S species

FLM INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT: b. html