© 2006 Concentrics Research LLC Switch Challenges and Suggested Solutions 9.25.06 Julie L. Aker President & CEO Concentrics Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Outline for: A User-Based Systems Approach to the Evaluation, Selection, and Institutionalization of Safer Medical Devices.
Advertisements

ICF & HIPAA waivers Human Subject Protection Office UConn Health Center Monika Haugstetter, MHA, RN, MSN & HSPO/IRB Staff.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Expanded Access Programs for Drugs and Biologics _________________________________________________________ Richard Klein Office of Health and Constituent.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
What Needs HSC Review? Staying compliant with Federal research regulations.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
CDRH Review Practice for Over-the-Counter in Vitro Diagnostic Tests
1 Alvimopan RiskMAP Joyce Weaver, Pharm.D., BCPS Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology.
Midwest AIDS Training & Education Center Health Care Education & Training, Inc. HIV/AIDS Case-Finding In Family Planning Clinics.
Advertising Sales Training Cindy Ramsey St. Petersburg Times.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Intervention Studies Principles of Epidemiology Lecture 10 Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Committee Questions Design, Statistical Considerations and Study Conduct 1. There are no clear guidelines regarding the number of people that should be.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Summary: Biological Therapeutics for Rare Plasma Protein Disorders Workshop July 21, 2005 Mark Weinstein, Ph.D. Office of Blood Research and Review CBER,
DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENATIONS.
Consumer behavior studies1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR STUDIES STATISTICAL ISSUES Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr. Boston University Harvard Clinical Research Institute.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Best reference starting point for student newbies grity/irb/upload/IW-Preparing-an-IRB- Submission-FINAL.pdf.
Behavioral Studies Supporting Rx-to-OTC Switches Saul Shiffman, Ph.D. Professor, Psychology, Psychiatry & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh.
Industry Recommendations on Evaluating OTC Consumer Behavior Douglas Ws. Bierer, Ph.D. Consumer Healthcare Products Association.
SELECT Label Comprehension Studies Mevacor™ Daily Capt. Laura Shay, RN, MS, C-ANP Division of Nonprescription Clinical Evaluation Center for Drug Evaluation.
Consent for Research Study A study using 18 F-Fluoride for prostate cancer patients currently enrolled in Dr. Febbo’s “Genomic Guided Therapy” study A.
Medication Therapy Management Programs in Community Pharmacy Community Pharmacy October 17, 2006 Kurt A. Proctor, Ph.D., RPh Chief Operating Officer Community.
AA-3-1 Carola P. Friedman, MD, FACC Executive Medical Director Worldwide Consumer Medicines 7asdf.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Prilosec1 ® 20 mg Tablets Rx to OTC Switch Daiva Shetty, M.D. Division of Over-the-Counter Drug Products (HFD-560) Food and Drug Administration 1.
How to Start An Industry Sponsored Clinical Trial
CTMB Guidelines (Rev. October 2006) Section 5: Conducting the Quality Assurance Audit.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
© 2009 Concentrics Research LLC Consumer Comprehension & Outcomes Research Risk Communication Advisory Committee Julie L. Aker President & CEO Concentrics.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Efsa LEARNING PROGRAMME Module 4 - Session 4.5a Sampling.
1 DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS.
Subject Screening, Recruitment, and Retention
Avenues of Consent Options available under 45 CFR (d) &
Pivotal Label Comprehension Study Mevacor™ OTC Capt. Laura Shay, RN, MS, C-ANP Division of Over-the-Counter Drug Products Center for Drug Evaluation and.
1 Joint NDAC/EMDAC Meeting January 13, 2005 Mevacor TM Daily 20 mg Tablets Rx-to-OTC Switch Daiva Shetty, M.D. Division of Over-the-Counter Drug Products.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
Teach-back Method for Patient Education Tracy Grant Viterbo University.
Requirements to run clinical trials: Research fee calculation, patient consent Kyoung Hwa Ha.
MTN-025/HOPE Decliner Population Procedures. Who are the Decliner Population? Former ASPIRE participants who decline or express no interest in joining.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Risk Communication in Medicines
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Human Subject Research
Informed Consent (SBER)
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

© 2006 Concentrics Research LLC Switch Challenges and Suggested Solutions Julie L. Aker President & CEO Concentrics Research

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 2 Overview Current Switch research –Context –Goals –Similarities and Differences 4 Common Challenges 4 Solutions for Consideration

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 3 Context of Consumer Research In clinical research, we are understanding how the drug reacts physiologically in the person. In consumer research, we are understanding how the person reacts behaviorally with the drug.

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 4 Goals of Consumer Research Label Comprehension (Focus=label) Communicates product use, directions, warnings. Self-Selection (Focus=consumer judgment) Judgment about whether it is appropriate to use the drug based on: –The product label –Consumer’s medical history. Actual Use (Focus=consumer behavior) Safety in an unsupervised OTC environment and –Self-selection and compliance with label Obtain a health benefit that exceeds the risk. CHPA Roundtable, February 2005

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 5 Consumer Studies are Rigorous Phase IV rarely used Yes Minimal Yes Based on Self- Selection and risk Minimal Yes Minimal, except special pops Yes Actual Use N/A Yes N/A 1-day interview No Yes Minimal Confidentiality Minimal, except special pops Yes N/A Yes Label Comp Phase IV Yes Clinical TrialStudy Procedures Post-approval studies Collect drug Collect paperwork Follow-up visits/procedures Diary or usage data collected Use drug/device at home Enroll subjects Medical History or procedures Informed Consent Screen subjects Select Sites IRB Protocol

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 6 Actual Use Trials Simulate “real-life” There must be a balance between simulating the “real-life” experience and gathering useful data. YesNo Protocol, Informed Consent, data collection, drug and diary collection Yes Decision: Will I choose to comply with the label? Yes Decision: Do I want to use it? Yes Decision: Do I want to purchase it? Yes Decision: Is it right for me? Yes Read label/evaluate Product in context of studyProductMotivation to seek the product No Advertising/ Friends/Family (Product)Awareness & Education Actual UseReal-LifeStudy Procedures

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 7 4 Common Challenges 1.Lack of consensus on what to measure or how to judge success. 2.Evaluating self-selection (right/wrong vs. risk of the response or behavior). 3.Balancing the need for naturalistic approaches with the need to collect useful data. 4.Minimal use of post-approval research to answer long-term questions.

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 8 Solution1: Judging “Success” Simplify and Target: –Label messaging needs to be simplified, consumer- friendly, not overly technical. –Agree on targeted and reasonable success criteria upfront with the agency. Incorporate Learnings into iterative testing –Adjust the label and program based on learnings –Re-test –Re-evaluate Evaluate from a risk perspective –Evaluate research results based on risk, not on 100%

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 9 Solution 2: Evaluating Self-Selection “Ask a doctor or pharmacist” is an acceptable and reasonable self-selection response: –Infers caution by consumers –Currently, less information in a study, than in the “real- world” –Very common in new categories Two common reasons for incorrect self-selection: –Comprehension (did not see/understand) –Over-ride (previous experience, strong motivation) Need to understand: –How many got it incorrect? –WHY did they get it incorrect? –What is the risk of their getting it incorrect? –Do the benefits exceed the risks?

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 10 Solution 3: Balancing Controlled vs. Uncontrolled “Naturalistic” is in eye of the beholder –There is a limit to what can reasonably be incorporated into a study. –The true naturalistic setting is “at home” when the consumer is unsupervised. Goal of Actual Use Studies –Safety in the OTC environment –Benefit outweighs risk Design Considerations –Recruiting and/or enrollment should incorporate intended advertising and education messages –Some structure is needed to assure collection of useful data Follow-up phone calls (minimal) Scheduled final visit

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 11 Solution 4: Shift Long-term Endpoints to Phase IV Cannot incorporate/learn everything in actual use trial Limitations to “naturalistic” study designs Long-term trends/patterns of use should be measured in post-approval trials. –Similar to Rx research

© 2003 Concentrics Research LLC 12 SUMMARY Research goals and endpoints: –Simplify, target and agree on reasonable research expectations upfront with a focus on risk. Self-Selection: –“Ask a doctor, pharmacist, healthcare provider” is an acceptable response in self-selection. –Understanding the reasons (“the whys”) behind incorrect responses/behaviors and the associated risk is the key. Actual Use: –Set realistic expectations for what is “naturalistic.” –The key naturalistic element in an actual use study is the consumer’s “use at home unsupervised.” Post-approval research: –Shift long-term endpoints to post-approval.

© 2006 Concentrics Research LLC Concentrics Research