HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013-2014 Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PORTFOLIO.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Professional Development and Appraisal System. Rules To Know From Commissioner’s Rules Chapter 150.AA Subchapter  Each teacher must be appraised.
Teacher Evaluation Model
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Office of School Support
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Preparation & Development of Professional Portfolio Workshop: Danielson A Presenter: Mrs. Shirley J. Delgado M. A.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
SESSION 4 COLLECTING EVIDENCE OF LEARNER PERFORMANCE CAT AND IT.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
TIMBERLANE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ACTION PLANS Timberlane Regional Middle School Timberlane Regional High School Timberlane Regional Music Department.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Human Capital Accountability
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Forum 1 Setting IPDP Goals Fall 2018 Name of School.
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Individualized support Regular and tailored feedback Successful Students Appraisal and Development System Purpose 2

DNADNA(LOCAL)DNADNA(REGULATION)Board Approved Calendar Local Policy 3

Appraisal and Development Process Self-Reflection Reflect on performance, student progress, and professional goals Self-Reflection Reflect on performance, student progress, and professional goals Individualized Development Learning activities informed by the development plan: IPDP or PPA Individualized Development Learning activities informed by the development plan: IPDP or PPA Conferences Collaborative meetings between teacher and appraiser Conferences Collaborative meetings between teacher and appraiser Observation and Feedback Observations and walkthroughs followed by formal and/or informal feedback on teaching practice (continuous mentoring and coaching) Observation and Feedback Observations and walkthroughs followed by formal and/or informal feedback on teaching practice (continuous mentoring and coaching) Appraisal and Development Process 4

Appraisal and Development System Performance Criteria Areas Professional Expectations Teacher’s efforts to meet objective, measurable standards of professionalism Instructional Practice Teacher’s skills and knowledge that help promote student learning Student Performance Teacher’s impact on student learning Student Performance Professional Expectations 5

Professional Expectations Professional Expectations reflect a teacher’s efforts to meet objective, measurable standards of professionalism. 6 Appraisers use multiple sources of evidence. Potential areas include, but are not limited to: Classroom Observations Walkthroughs Student Work Products Student Grade Books Teacher’s Discipline File School Attendance Records Tutoring Logs Review of Lesson/Unit/Annual Planning Communications with Colleagues Communications with Parents or Guardians Peer Feedback Interactions with the Teacher Outside of the Classroom Professional Development Artifacts Sign-in sheets, agendas, and minutes from PLC and team meetings

Professional Expectations Criteria The Professional Expectations criteria reflect a core set of objective, measurable professional expectations for teachers. Professional Expectations Criteria Professionalism PR-1Complies with policies and procedures at school PR-2Treats colleagues with respect throughout all aspects of work PR-3Complies with teacher attendance policies PR-4Dresses professionally according to school policy PR-5Collaborates with colleagues PR-6Implements school rules PR-7Communicates with parents throughout the year PR-8Seeks feedback in order to improve performance PR-9Participates in professional development and applies learning 7

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 Teacher engages in a pattern of not meeting professional expectations (e.g., behavior is either incomplete or absent). Teacher does not independently meet professional expectations and requires individualized support or guidance. Teacher meets professional expectations. Teacher goes above and beyond professional expectations. Professional Expectations Levels 8

Instructional Practice Instructional Practice reflects the teacher’s skills and knowledge that help promote student learning. Appraisers will use multiple sources of evidence. Potential areas include, but are not limited to: Classroom observations/walkthroughs Planning documents Daily interactions with the teacher Reviews of certain documents (e.g., lesson plans, classroom management plans, grade books, portfolio of student work, etc). 9

Instructional Practice Criteria The Instructional Practice rubric reflects the standards skills and knowledge that help drive student learning in the classroom. Instructional Practice Criteria Planning PL-1Develops student learning goals PL-2Collects, tracks, and uses student data to drive instruction PL-3Designs effective lesson plans, units, and assessments Instruction I-1Facilitates organized, student-centered, objective-driven lessons I-2Checks for student understanding and responds to student misunderstanding I-3Differentiates instruction for student needs by employing a variety of instructional strategies I-4Engages students in work that develops higher-level thinking skills I-5Maximizes instructional time I-6Communicates content and concepts to students I-7Promotes high academic expectations for students I-8Students actively participating in lesson activities I-9Sets and implements discipline management procedures I-10Builds a positive and respectful classroom environment 10

Performance Levels 11

Student Performance Student Performance reflects a teacher’s measurable impact on student learning. Appraisers use multiple sources of evidence. Value-added Growth (e.g., EVAAS) Comparative Growth Students’ progress (Required) District-Wide Assessments Pre-Approved Assessments Student Attainment (PreK LA Only) Students’ progress (Appraiser Approved) Assessments Work Products Tasks 12

Student Performance Measures Student Performance Value-Added Comparative Growth Student Progress: Required if Available District-Wide Assessments Pre-Approved Assessments Student Attainment (PreK LA Only) Student Progress: Appraiser-Approved Assessments Work Products Tasks 13

Instructional Practice Appraiser will provide teacher a final Instructional Practice rating at the End of Year Conference. Student Performance Appraiser will provide teacher a final rating on Student Performance, once all data are available Professional Expectations Appraiser will provide teacher a final Professional Expectations rating at the End of Year Conference Summative Appraisal Rating and Calculating Summative Ratings 14

Teachers will receive their Summative Appraisal Rating once all their Student Performance data are available. Student Performance data for the school year will be available during fall 2013 because Value-Added data may not become available until that time. o For this reason, teachers with Value-Added data will receive their Summative Appraisal Rating during fall Summative Ratings 15

16 No work on the Student Performance tool should be done prior to September 9, Additional information will be provided at that time to begin the process for the Student Performance Component Student Performance Component

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun Appraisal and Development Timeline Conduct at least two formal 10-minute walkthroughs with written feedback. Conduct at least two formal 30-minute observations with written feedback. A face-to-face feedback session may be conducted at the request of either the appraiser or the teacher. The appraisal period begins 15 instructional days after the update or initial training and ends on 5/29. Conduct at least two formal 10-minute walkthroughs with written feedback. Conduct at least two formal 30-minute observations with written feedback. A face-to-face feedback session may be conducted at the request of either the appraiser or the teacher. The appraisal period begins 15 instructional days after the update or initial training and ends on 5/29. Create Development Plan (IPDP or PPA) by 10/25 Amend, revise and review throughout the year, as necessary Create Development Plan (IPDP or PPA) by 10/25 Amend, revise and review throughout the year, as necessary Goal-Setting Conference Annual Summative Ratings 10/25 10/31 Measures Worksheets Completed and Acknowledged Goals Worksheets/Assessments Completed Measures Worksheets Completed and Acknowledged Goals Worksheets/Assessments Completed Completed 9/23 Acknowledged 10/7 Year long Courses 10/25 Single Semester (A) 9/24 Single Semester (B) 2/7 Appraisal Training 9/16 Fall Staff Review 11/4-11 Spring Check In 2/3-10 Progress Conference 1/24 End of Year Conference Submit to teacher 3/14 Conference 4/4 Students’ Progress EOY Assessments 5/30 17 Pending

Questions??? Questions regarding the appraisal process or system may be addressed to: Human Capital Accountability