Repository Registries Agenda 11.30Welcome & State of the Discussion Is it all one – is it all different? Peter & Herman and commenters 12.10Actions to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VOEvent Working Group First meeting of VOEvent WG at an IVOA Interop Small but intensely interested group Much accomplished in the short time since the.
Advertisements

Meta Data Larry, Stirling md on data access – data types, domain meta-data discovery Scott, Ohio State – caBIG md driven architecture semantic md Alexander.
S&I Framework Testing HL7 V2 Lab Results Interface and RI Pilot Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology June 23 rd, 2011 Contact:
Advanced Metadata Usage Daan Broeder TLA - MPI for Psycholinguistics / CLARIN Metadata in Context, APA/CLARIN Workshop, September 2010 Nijmegen.
Repositories, Federations, APIs, Policies - wrap up - Peter Wittenburg these slides are just a personal summary of major points they do not represent per.
Breakout Session 5: Collaboration Between DPs and SPs Protocol simple, providing a service more difficult… …because of lack of networking among DPs and.
The current state of Metadata - as far as we understand it - Peter Wittenburg The Language Archive - Max Planck Institute CLARIN Research Infrastructure.
Long-term Archive Service Requirements draft-ietf-ltans-reqs-00.txt.
RDA Data Foundation and Terminology (DFT) IG: Introduction Prepared for RDA Plenary San Diego, March 9, 2015 Gary Berg-Cross, Raphael Ritz, Co-Chairs DFT.
Method of Converting Resource definitions into XSD Group Name: WG3 (PRO) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting Date:
W w w. i l u m i n a – d l i b. o r g iLumina: A Digital Library of Educational Resources for Science & Mathematics National Science Digital Library All-Projects.
DATA FOUNDATION TERMINOLOGY WG 4 th Plenary Update THE PLUM GOALS This model together with the derived terminology can be used Across communities and stakeholders.
Metadata Harvesting The Hague, 13 & 14 January 2009 Julie Verleyen Scientific Coordinator, Europeana Office EuropeanaLocal Knowledge Sharing Workshop.
Data Fabric IG Use Case Analysis. 2 Data Fabric Analysis how to come to essential components & services? Analyze Data Practices.
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands Why should we invest in DWF? Peter Wittenburg CLARIN Research.
Getting Involved in the Research Data Alliance Stefanie Kethers
Materials Science Registry Will propose RDA Materials Science WG Define minimum/modest metadata extensions to Dublin Core to enable resource discovery.
CLARIN Metadata Infrastructure Component Metadata and intermediate solutions Daan Broeder Claus Zinn Dieter van Uytvanck - Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Data Fabric IG Introduction. 2  about 50 interviews & about 75 community interactions  Data Management and Processing is too time consuming and costly.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Security Activities at OGF24 Security Area Meeting.
Adoption of RDA-DFT Terminology and Data Model to the Description and Structuring of Atmospheric Data Aaron Addison, Rudolf Husar, Cynthia Hudson-Vitale.
RDA Data Foundation and Terminology (DFT) WG: Overview  Prepared for Collab Chairs Meeting, NIST, Nov 13-14, 2014  Gary Berg-Cross, Raphael Ritz, Peter.
A Data Category Registry- and Component- based Metadata Framework Daan Broeder et al. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics LREC 2010.
Repository Registries Agenda State of the discussion Actions to be taken for Collection Registry Building a WG on Repository Registries Integrating the.
Hydro DWG at the RDA Plenary: BoF and Aligning HDWG work with WMO expectations and timeline Sylvain, Tony, Silvano, Ilya.
Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting Higher and Further Education Rachel Bruce Programme Manager, JISC Executive Collection.
Integrating Access to Digital Content Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Visual Resources Association 23 rd Annual Conference Miami.
The Language Archive – Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands TLA/MPI requirements for a Semantic Registry.
Extending the MDR for Semantic Web November 20, 2008 SC32/WG32 Interim Meeting Vilamoura, Portugal - Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology -
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Plenary and WGs Meetings Jeju, Korea, June 25, 2009 Jeong-Dong Kim, Doo-Kwon Baik, Dongwon Jeong {kjd4u,
Hydro DWG at the RDA Plenary BoF - Improve sharing of water resource data globally 24 September BREAKOUT :30-15:00.
Sources of inspiration Discussions in DFT Use Cases Discussions in DF Use Cases „Paris“ Document Comments on „PARIS“ document Urgently need “Basic and.
Cracow Grid Workshop, October 15-17, 2007 Polish Grid Polish NGI Contribution to EGI Resource Provisioning Function Automatized Direct Communication Tomasz.
1 Interactions between the Marine Data Harmonization IG and Data Citation WG.
Discussion of Data Fabric Terms & Preparation for RDA P7 Virtual Meeting Monday, January 25, 2016 Organized by Gary Berg-Cross (DFT-IG) and Peter Wittenburg.
Data Foundation IG DF Organizing Chairs: Gary Berg-Cross & Peter Wittenburg.
VIVA Special Collections Committee GRANT MEETING January 26, 2007 METADATA: The Who, What, Why, Where, and When Bob Vay George Mason University.
Adoption of RDA-DFT Terminology and Data Model to the Description and Structuring of Atmospheric Data Aaron Addison, Rudolf Husar, Cynthia Hudson-Vitale.
1 Annotation Framework March Terminology CV - abbreviation for controlled vocabulary CRS - Community Review System (a collection within DLESE)
Preservation e-Infrastructure IG Description: help ensure preservation of needed data succeeds Goals: foster worldwide collaboration; ensure consistency.
© CDISC 2015 Paul Houston CDISC Europe Foundation Head of European Operations 1 CTR 2 Protocol Representation Implementation Model Clinical Trial Registration.
Data Fabric IG From Testing to Recommendations Beth Plale.
A service Oriented Architecture & Web Service Technology.
Global Water Information Interest Group meeting RDA 7 th Plenary, 1 st March 2016, Tokyo Global Water Information Interest Group Welcome to the inaugural.
Data Foundations And Terminology (DFT) IG Virtual Meeting July 6 th 2016 Co-Chairs DFT IG :Gary Berg-Cross & Raphael Ritz P8 Sessions DFT IG Breakout Session.
JOINT SESSION IG Domain Repositories, IG Agriculture Data, WG BioSharing Registry, IG Materials Data, WG Wheat Data RDA P6, Paris,
1 This slide indicated the continuous cycle of creating raw data or derived data based on collections of existing data. Identify components that could.
Intentions and Goals Comparison of core documents from DFIG and Publishing Workflow IG show that there is much overlap despite different starting points.
Towards a pan-European Collaborative Data Infrastructure
Overview of WGs, IGs and BoFs
RDA to Deliver Why? What? When? How?.
RDA US Science workshop Arlington VA, Aug 2014 Cees de Laat with many slides from Ed Seidel/Rob Pennington.
Materials Resource Registries Working Group Co-chairs: Laura M
Short to Medium Term Priority issues for EGI, EMI, anD others
Data Foundations And Terminology (DFT) IG
Toward FAIR Semantic Resources
Interlinking standards, repositories and policies
Data Fabric Interest Group Plenary 9 Core Session Barcelona
Maggie, Carlo, Peter, Rebecca (GEDE discussions)
Agenda Welcome and overview (Peter)
BR&R Biomedical Research & Regulation
University of Edinburgh
Brief WG/IG reporting Tobias Weigel on behalf of co-chairs
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Joint DFIG – Broker Meeting The DFIG view Peter Wittenburg
IG Physical Samples and Collections in the Research Data Ecosystem
EUDAT Site and Service Registry
Bird of Feather Session
Working Group: DFT - some use cases - Peter Wittenburg, Raphael Ritz
Presentation transcript:

Repository Registries Agenda 11.30Welcome & State of the Discussion Is it all one – is it all different? Peter & Herman and commenters 12.10Actions to be taken for Collection RegistryBob and others 12.20Towards a WG on Repository RegistriesOpen Discussion -Looking into existing schemas -Integrating the approaches -Making re3data schema an RDA recommendation -Analyze various federation approaches and specify schema 12.45Next StepsPeter & Herman 13.00End

State of the Discussion Short History: P3 BoF Linking re3data and DataBib P5 BoFWhat is needed – a start Contributions: re3data, gocdb, eudat, Biomed Regs (no further info on Biomed regs yet) VM:agreement on classification and way to go lots of open questions Docs, Schemas from CLARIN, Karmela P6 SessionSummarizing and Actions

Where are we? Curation responsibility Lots of mapping and curation That‘s what many people do. Collection MD records are just as other MD records What is special? Different MD? But there is an urgent need! Here we have two activities: Re3data type Federation type

Where are we? highly granular MD Collection MD Repository MD Federation MD Schema -based Granu- larity Harves- ting Hetero- geneity RDA YDOOAI-PMHhighMD groups Y and NO Collec- tion OAI-PMHhigh MD groups Dom Rep Light- weight Quick view ?- Re3data be a standard Heavy weight Incl. services ?high To be harmonized Open questions: What to be done for Collection Registry? What to do to harmonize Federation MD? Where do we need to distinguish?

Repository Registries - Classification TypeDescriptionIn RDA Metadata Registries Registries that aggregate metadata records from MD providers (which are often data repositories) MD groups Collection Registries Registries that indicate what kinds of collections repositories have; Collections are part of MD Domain Reps? Clinical Trial Registries? Special registry where to find appropriate clinical trials; kind of collection registry Karmela Biomed Registries Special registry about where to find useful biomed information – seems to be a kind of coll registry Biomed Reg IG Trustful Rep RegRe3data registry to quickly find trustful repositories Make it standard Federation Registries Registries to help automating operations in large federations WG to come Other registries out there There are different types of registries out there, do we need to look at them? If so who

Collection Registries To be taken care of by Bob

Joint Approach Large Federation Trustful Repository Trustful Repository Trustful Repository GocDB+ Schema other Schema re3data Schema Re3data service exposing GocDB+ service harvesting extracting harvesting extracting Overlap in schemas to be used. Make two schemas recommendations.

Large Federations FederationReg type EUDATAbout 50 nodesGocDB DataONE?? EGI GridHundreds of nodesGocDB World Climate Modelling Centers?? CLARINAbout 20 nodesown DNC/iRODS?own ? Need to identify them to participate in further elaborations. WG needs to take an active role and time 

Relations Simplified interaction: 1: harvest federation type metadata 2: request all reps that offer metadata (probably of certain type) 3: return list incl. port specs etc. 4: request metadata records 5: return all metadata records Trustful Repository GocDB+ Schema Metadata Service Rep Registry Service

Re3Data Schema descriptive Controlled vocabulary aspects usable for humans to find suitable repositories

GOCDB Schema

Next Steps Let‘s setup a ‚simple‘ RDA Collection Registry WG to Quickly specify the Collection Registry Specify first partners and responsibilities Develop and Implement Simple Software Discuss with NDS and EUDAT about service Chairs: Bob & Herman/SJT Let‘s setup a Repository Registries WG to Define re3data schema as RDA recommendation study various federation use cases identify overlap in schemas define federation schema as RDA recommendation (GocDB seems to be a candidate to start from) define exposure protocols and perhaps some mappings Chairs: Peter/Johannes & ?