Workshop on OSS with TT perspectives Meeting of the TT Network Board and Steering Committee Friday 10 December 2010 Bernard DENIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Free/Open Source Software for Librarians Eric Goldhagen
Advertisements

Free Beer and Free Speech Thomas Krichel
ITU WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ISSUES Session 5: Software copyright issues Dirk Weiler, Chairman of ETSI General Assembly.
Open Source Software Development & Commercialisation Developing Lifelong Learner Record Systems and ePortfolios in FE and HE: Planning for, and Coping.
Platinum Sponsors Gold Sponsors Navigating the Open Source Legal Waters Presenter: Jeff Strauss August 14, 2013.
Cluster Meeting, 9 th February 2006 Legal issues in Open Source Software (OSS) Dr Zoe Kardasiadou (CIEEL)
Is Free Software Really Free? Dan Or-Hof, Adv. Or-Hof Tech & IP Law
FINNA and Open Source Software
The Importance of Open Source Software Networking 2002 Washington, D.C. April 18, 2002 Carol A. Kunze Napa, California.
Promotion of an ICT dialogue between Europe and Latin America IPR in FP7 projects: How to protect your (research) work Dr. Margaretha Mazura, EMF Project.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A STRATEGIC TOOL Alison Campbell OBE PhD RTTP Belgrade 30 October 2012.
Provided by OSS Watch Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 England & Wales licence
CWG2 on Tools, guidelines and procedures Licensing Adriana Telesca on behalf of the CWG2 December, 5 th 2014.
Jul The New Geant4 License J. Perl The New Geant4 License Makes clear the user’s wide- ranging freedom to use, extend or redistribute Geant4, even.
IACT 901 Module 10 1 Plan Delivery. IACT 901 Module 10 2 Elements of IS & IT Plans Delivered Comprise Overall IS/IT vision Applications development plan.
SciX: WP 1. WP1 tasks Literature study Current and future web business models and payment systems Formal process model (as is) Repository and e-journal.
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Open Source Software and IP February 10, 2012.
Configuration Management
This slide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License. Some rights reserved.Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
1 EPICS EPICS Licensing BESSY, May 2002 Andrew Johnson.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
STATUS UPDATE EM SUBCOMMITTEE Friedrich Roth, EM subcommittee chairman SEG 2012, Las Vegas Technical Standards Committee meeting.
1 Patent Rights & Open Source Software Roger G. Brooks April 29,
Introduction to Open Source Imed Hammouda, adjunct professor Tampere University of Technology
Contract Models for Virtual Teaching Helsinki University Porthania III 24 October 2001 Kristiina Harenko Attorneys at Law Borenius & Kemppinen Oy.
Institutional Engagement: open source software use in UK universities and colleges Randy Metcalfe © University of Oxford This document is licensed under.
Open Source Technologies and the ATkit E.A. Draffan Seb Skuse Magnus White ECS Accessibility.
Relationships July 9, Producers and Consumers SERI - Relationships Session 1.
University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs.
Andrew McNab - License issues - 10 Apr 2002 License issues for EU DataGrid (on behalf of Anders Wannanen) Andrew McNab, University of Manchester
Perspectives for Understanding Open Source Software Kasper Edwards Technical University of Denmark Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management.
Distribution in Open Source Martin von Haller Groenbaek partner, Bender von Haller Dragsted ITECHLAW ASIA 2010 Bangalore, 5 February 2010.
ESRIN Earth Observation Program Ground Segment Department 26/09/2015 CEOS-WGISS-40 - Olivier BaroisSlide 1 Open Source Practices.
Science, research and development European Commission IDARI Project Meeting Tartu, June 2005 Martin Greimel Scientific Officer Directorate-E ‘Biotechnology,
Enhancement Package Innovations Gabe Rodriguez - Halliburton Stefan Kneis – SAP Marco Valencia - SAP.
Software Licences HSF Recommendations John Harvey / CERN 24 June 2015
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
11/24/2015Dr. SASTRY-PROJ SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Dr. M V S PERI SASTRY. B.E,Ph.D.
Proprietary vs. Free/Open Source Software
Participation in OS projects: Commercial and Individual motivation.
1 Cooperation in development of Open Source Software MSIS meeting in Oslo May 2009 Rune Gløersen IT Director Statistics Norway.
Legal issues of open source licenses Matthias Van hoogenbemt ICRI – K.U.Leuven - IBBT.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
NDSR Boston webinar: Provide module Presenter: Nancy Y McGovern December 2015.
Follow-Up on the Crystal Clear Collaboration Agreement H. Hillemanns May, 22 nd 2007.
3rd Helix Nebula Workshop on Interoperability among e-Infrastructures and Commercial Clouds Carmela ASERO, EGI.eu 17 September 2013, Madrid
Chapter 3: Understanding Software Licensing
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation CERN KT Training N.Ziogas KT in CERN Two software cases N.Ziogas, KT.
The Cascadoss Project is financed by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme Evaluating FOSS4G for Environemntal Applications, International.
Open Source Software Practices
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Industrial Research and Open Source – Reasons and
Open Source software Licensing
Provided by OSS Watch Open source licensing The licence is what determines whether software is open source The licence must be approved.
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Rosetta Developers Conference August 10, 2004 Leavenworth, WA
Copyleft and dual licensing for publicly funded software
INPE, São José dos Campos (SP), Brazil
MOZILLA LICENSE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
APACHE LICENSE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
CSPA Common Statistical Production Architecture Description of the Business aspects of the architecture: business models for sharing software Carlo Vaccari.
CSPA Common Statistical Production Architecture Description of the Business aspects of the architecture: business models for sharing software Carlo Vaccari.
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on OSS with TT perspectives Meeting of the TT Network Board and Steering Committee Friday 10 December 2010 Bernard DENIS

Outline Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools OSS workshop with TT perspective

Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools

Workshop content and contributors OSS Policies OSS in academia Experience, needs and expectations Industry experience in using OSS OSS licenses Doing business with OSS WIPO, INRIA, CERN CERN/BE, GEANT, GEANT4, ROOT, IN2P3, GSI Morgan Stanley, NTNU, Ernst & Young, Blumbach & Zinngrebe, DLA Piper Blumbach & Zinngrebe, DLA Piper, OSS watch OSS workshop with TT perspective

Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools

Necessary measures - general Efficient and centralized governance: Decision making (including the license scheme) Maintain coherence Democratic versus dictatorship OSS workshop with TT perspective

Necessary measures - general Anticipate the end at the start How the software will be used and disseminated Need to maintain a clear legal status Ownership Nature (first, derived, composed) Contract affecting the status of SW SW audit at the beginning and during the project OSS workshop with TT perspective

Necessary measures - general Raise awareness on: IPR license ownership issue (employment contract, collaboration agreements, …) Make legal advise available (as opposed to opinion) OSS workshop with TT perspective

Necessary measures - general Good development practices: Track and record external code integrated Identify all contributors Strict “header” (copyright statement) management (in-house and external software) Encourage modular software Common development environment (e.g. Forge) OSS workshop with TT perspective

Necessary measures - TT Need a clear transfer scheme/strategy on the case by case basis Clear legal status Proper packaging Need for quality Support for user should be available OSS workshop with TT perspective

Necessary measures Have a OSS policy but keep it simple! OSS workshop with TT perspective

Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools

Choosing a license - options Making software available using permissive license (BSD) Free but no so free (integration and maintain it yourself) “as-is” but also quality Developer-oriented Do not contain patent provisions (except Apache) OSS workshop with TT perspective

Choosing a license - options Making software available using a non- permissive license (copyleft) (GPL) Feedback, bug fixes, comment, translation (reciprocity) Quality (reputation) Not-industry friendly(?) OSS workshop with TT perspective

Choosing a license - options Making software available under semi- permissive license (LGPL): Many user from industry providing interesting feedbacks (but rarely code contribution) User oriented/quality OSS workshop with TT perspective

Choosing a license - options Use existing license Choosing the type of license when collaborating on software development At the beginning, when the transfer scheme is clear At the end, depending on the code included Note: the legal issues have an impact on the technical issues e.g. there is an architectural impact of using GPL software OSS workshop with TT perspective

Choosing a license - limitations Can you start with OSS and then impose restrictions? Depends on the license If GPL no further restrictions a can be imposed. GPL license does not allow the modification of the license itself. Under OSS it is not possible to limit the purpose of use of a software. It is however possible to have a non-commercial license with limits on the use based on a OSS license (except GPL) Note: when the sofwtare is out, there is no way to step back OSS workshop with TT perspective

Choosing a license - liability Can you be liable for OSS used for medical applications? Yes, you may be liable because the license exclusion clause may not be valid in the EU. GPLv3 allows to amend the license on this specific point (use exclusion of EUPL) This risk should not be a reason not to do OSS. For medical applications, you should use a good liability clause (no more OSS!) OSS workshop with TT perspective

Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools

Industry perspective and commercialisation options Commercialisation options: Using different license fee depending on the user (academic or commercial) Dual license (difficulty when many contributors) Software as a Service (SaaS) Use of GPL SW for internal purpose Multi-licensing business (user segmentation) Open-core licensing OSS workshop with TT perspective

Motivations Possibility to have high quality software and collaboration with a community of motivated developers Learning effect and reputation gain in the developers’ community Lower costs and faster time to market Note: Importance of active and supportive community (permissive license) OSS workshop with TT perspective Industry perspective and commercialisation options

Other issues/comments: “GPL is a challenge… “ <> “No GPL here!” Different of OSS adoption level: from open innovation up to community building Legal uncertainty, many stories around OSS workshop with TT perspective Industry perspective and commercialisation options

OSS workshop with TT perspective Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools

Financing maintenance and support Goodwill of developers Provide remunerated service Generate interest by releasing early to attract funding Create a foundation/trust for long term and big projects (also used to manage the copyright issues, licensing and marketing) OSS workshop with TT perspective

Workshop content and contributors Necessary measures Choosing a license Industry perspective and commercialization options Financing maintenance and support Available tools

Free software directory and tools Tool to analyse source and reprots its licensing OSS workshop with TT perspective

Concluding remark Permissive Non-permissive (open) (viral) OSS workshop with TT perspective Industry-friendly Truly-open BSD, Apache, CeCILL LGPLGPL, EUPL

OSS workshop with TT perspective Thank you!