Evaluating Credible Sources Primary Source:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Google and Beyond… Hatch Library Bay Path College / Spring 2010.
Advertisements

1 WEB SITE EVALUATION ENGLISH 115 Hudson Valley Community College Marvin Library Learning Commons.
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Web Evaluation. World Wide Web  Terminology Internet Internet Web pages Web pages Browsers Browsers Search Engines Search Engines.
ETT 229 Fall 2004 Web Evaluation Intro to Web Design.
Beyond GoogleGoogle Research Quality Web Searching, Part 2 Joe Barker jbarker at library.berkeley.edu John Kupersmith jkupersm at library.berkeley.edu.
Evaluating Search Results Fundamentals of Research Capital Community College Spring Semester 2013.
Evaluating Internet Sites Primary Source:
Evaluating Websites Using the 5 W’s. What is the Internet? The internet is a vast source of information from around the WORLD. REMEMBER : You can’t always.
Information Lecture 2 – Evaluating Information Sources CSC Introduction to Computers and Their Applications.
RESEARCH Checking Reliable Sources. Why do I need to check if a website is reliable? Unlike most traditional written information, no one has to approve.
Evaluating Web Sources West Fargo School District.
Reliable Sources Six questions to ask to determine the trustworthiness of an internet source.
Have You Evaluated??? Is that site good enough to cite???
EVALUATION OF INTERNET RESOURCES FOR HISTORY Or Being a history detective on the web! By Michelle Ward Okanagan College Library
English 115 Web Site Evaluation Hudson Valley Community College Marvin Library Learning Commons 1.
Advanced Higher History Research Skills. Research steps Clearly define your selected topic Clearly define your selected topic Identify appropriate keywords.
EVALUATING SOURCES Finding Credible Websites. Online Research Strategies  The internet is a BIG place full of a ton of information. Some of it will be.
Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask Internet/Evaluate.html.
Web Site Evaluation (or “What Makes a Good the Kenmore East High School Library Media Center.
How to be a critical internet user Laramie/Lederle Collaboration Effort March 28, 2006.
Introduction to electronic resources management Unit 1.4: E-resource evaluation tips.
Evaluating Websites Do you trust everyone to tell you the truth? Osama bin Laden, Terrorist Was one of FBI’s 10 Most Wanted Fugitives Reward:
Evaluating Websites… The truth is out there - but so is the lie..
EVALUATING WEB PAGES Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask.
CRITICAL EVALUATION Why Evaluate What You Find on the Web? Anyone can put up a Web page about anything for pennies in minutes Many pages not kept up-to-date.
EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.
LESSON 2.11: CREDIBLE WEB SOURCES Unit 2: Nutrition & Fitness.
Annotated Bibliographies
Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet Adapted from the Purdue University Writing Lab by Dr. K.
Evaluating Websites Do you trust everyone to tell you the truth? Osama bin Laden, Terrorist Was one of FBI’s 10 Most Wanted Fugitives Reward:
 Think about your favorite movie.  Think, specifically, about why you thought it was good. › What did you look for? › What made it your favorite? 
Judging WebPages Anyone can post anything on the world wide web. Not all the information on a web page may be factual. There are many things to consider.
Web Research Guide Evaluating Websites Mrs. Roesler September 2012.
Lesson 6, Unit 3 Using the Internet for Research Based on the Plan Ahead educational materials made available by Gap Inc. at and.
Evaluating Web Pages Techniques to apply and questions to ask.
Databases vs the Internet. QUESTION: What is the main difference between using library databases and search engines? ANSWER: Databases are NOT the Internet.
1 NAME_________________________________ LIBRARY ORIENTATION--DAY EIGHT CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SOURCES “All researchers, students as well as professional.
John Kupersmith jkupersm [at] library.berkeley.edu A “Know Your Library” Workshop Teaching Library, University of California, Berkeley Spring 2008 Research-quality.
Information Literacy How to evaluate information found on the World Wide Web.
  There are five basic criteria to consider. 1.Authority 2.Reliability 3.Currency 4.Scope 5.Relevance  information is taken from
The Big 6 Model for Effective Research While Researching specific topics and how they work you will be using the Big 6 Model for Effective Research to.
EVALUATING WEB SITES AND SOURCES. Knowledge is Empowerment Today’s objective is to learn how to be critical with each resource you use in your literature.
Beyond GoogleGoogle Research Quality Web Searching, Part 2 Joe Barker jbarker at library.berkeley.edu John Kupersmith jkupersm at library.berkeley.edu.
Is that site good enough to cite?
Introduction to Research
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Conducting Credible Internet Research: C.A.R.S.
Looking for information?
Introduction to electronic resources management
Are my Sources Reliable?
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
E-resource evaluation tips
SWBAT understand how to evaluate sources
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Research: Lessons 2 & 3 I can determine the credibility of a source.
How do you know if a website is good enough to cite?
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
How to write anything properly BEFORE you start writing!
Is that site good enough to cite?
HMMMMMM….. So Many Resources, So Little Time! By: Mrs. Papiano.
Area: ABS Unit: Scientific Method and Research Lesson #4
Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Introduction to Research
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Website Credibility Things to consider when researching a topic on the internet. Tips from the UC Berkeley Library.
Conducting Credible Internet Research: C.A.R.S.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Credible Sources Primary Source:

What can the URL tell you? What is the domain type?.gov,.mil,.edu., org..us/.uk/.de? --Country codes no longer tightly controlled. --.org no longer just for not-for-profits Who is the sponsor/publisher of the page? Is there a publisher?? -- Generally found between and the first / … lib.berkeley.edu (UC Berkeley Library) e.g Reputable publications will have a copyright or permission to reproduce, usually at the bottom of the page. No publisher? Is it somebody’s personal page? --No publisher domain  what are the author’s credentials? e.g. Ralph Schuster: 38 years old; IT Manager in Frankfurt, Germany

Scan the Page for More Information Look for “About Us,” “Background,” etc. Can’t find anything? Shorten the URL: Delete the characters stopping before each / (leave the slash) e.g.  Who Wrote the Page? --Who is responsible for the page? A Person? Organization? Agency? Institution? What are the author’s credentials? --Is the page written by a self-proclaimed expert, or does ( s)he have credentials? --Is it an extreme view, possibly distorted or exaggerated? When was it written? Is it current?

Look for Indicators of Quality Look for footnotes --In scholarly or research work, the author will cite the sources she uses in her work. If sources aren’t cited, it’s likely not reliable – and may just be an opinion! -- Where did the author get his information? Scholarly journals? Books? Or, websites with no publisher who edits the page or checks references? Look for “related links,” or “additional sites” --If the link doesn’t work, it doesn’t strengthen the credibility. Anyone can create a website – reputable organizations will maintain them. --Do the links contain information with opposing viewpoints or are they all biased? Always look for bias! -- Are they simply links within the site?

A Few, Final Questions to Ask … WHY was the page put on the web? -- To inform or explain --or to persuade? -- To share – or to sell, or entice? -- Was it meant to be funny, or a parody? -- Could it be a joke, or a hoax? Are YOU being objective? -- Are you looking at sources that only support what you want to prove?

Reliable, or NOT? Google “Mankato MN:

Unreliable! Mankato.us (click on link on Mankato pg) Hijacked by Sheikh Yarbouti Incorrect information  Not 165 degree water  Not 70 degrees in winter Not updated recently Google “Mankato MN– real website for city is

Reliable, or NOT? org/facts.html

Unreliable! DHMO (click link on DHMO page) Has a.org url, but not reliable Would a US Dept have a store? The US Environmental Assessment Center does not exist. If you break down the "substance" into simpler terms, DHMO is water –Repeated reference to DHMO being a COMPONENT of other substances: atomic component p.1, causative component p.3., component of acid rain p.3, etc; used as a solvent and coolant, by elite athletes, spray on fired retardant, etc. p.4. … and on an on.

Reliable, or NOT?

Unreliable! Molossia.org (click on link on Molossia pg) Domain type:.org Publisher/Sponsor: Republic of Molossia Mary Lane?? (Dayton, NV) East Germany is not a nation. Hasn’t been since late 80s. You can’t have a “micro-nation” in the United States Why was it put on the web? A hoax?? --No, its likely in the name of fun family located in Nevada, with an enclave in California

Exercise #1 Do a search on Morgellon's Disease. a. Write the bibliographic information for ONE of the sources that you feel is credible and explain why. b. Write the bibliographic information for ONE of the sources that you feel is not credible and explain why. For both a & b cite specific criteria from either the Powerpoint or the UCBerkeley link on evaluating sources. Be specific.

Exercise #2 1. Go to 2. Type in “A Brief Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism” 3. Click on the site with the shared name. a. What is the name of the journal? b. Who is the sponsor of the site? c. Cite the article as a source in MLA format 4. Briefly summarize the author’s position on the Holocaust a. Who is the author of the article? b. What are the author’s credentials? c. What sources does the author cite? d. What else can you find out about either the author or the site? 6. Determine if this is a Reliable Source Cite specific criteria from either this Powerpoint or the UC Berkeley link on evaluating sources. BE SPECIFIC.