Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
New Hampshire Estuaries Project September 30, 2005 Estuarine Nutrient Criteria Presentation to New Hampshire Estuaries Project Technical Advisory Committee.
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
EDUCATION SERVICE UPDATE
Nutrient Criteria for New Hampshire’s Estuaries Background Information Phil Trowbridge NH DES / NHEP September 30, 2005.
Nutrient Criteria Development for New Hampshire’s Estuaries P. Trowbridge, P.E. December 7, 2007.
Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.
US EPA Update Advisory Committee on Water Information Michael Shapiro, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA Office of Water.
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
Get out your ISN, colored pencils, scissors, and a glue stick and open to page 24 in your ISN. 13 Colonies Mapping.
Florida Numerical Nutrient Criteria Southwest Florida Water Resources Conference Scott I. McClelland Vice President November 20, 2009.
Corporate Wetlands Restoration Partnership Capitol Hill Oceans Week Sally Yozell Battelle.
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
U S Environmental Protection Agency
Step Therapy State Legislation Update AK HI CA AZ NV OR MT MN NE SD ND ID WY OK KS CO UT TX NM SC FL GAALMS LA AR MO IA VA NC TN IN KY IL MI.
MA, GA, NY, NH, VA, NC, PA, RI, DE, MD, SC, CT, NJ Tuesday 09/08
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Top 3 European countries? 1.England/Britain 2.France 3.Spain.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
CIE 274 Civil and Environmental Systems
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 384 sessions with 11,279 participants
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Representation -Congress
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent Change in Average Nongroup Premium Following Implementation of a State Individual Mandate, 2019 WA –15.1% NH: –13.7% ME –10.7% MT –11.1% ND –15.4%
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WA –16.9% NH: –18.8% ME –14.1% MT –23.7% ND –22.0% VT: –12.6% OR
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Primary elections.
Start-Up Activity Map Monday
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Presentation transcript:

Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009

Current Water Quality Regulations Narrative nutrient criteria for estuarine waters: “None in such concentrations that would impair any usages specifically assigned to said Class, or cause undesirable or nuisance aquatic species associated with cultural eutrophication.”

EPA National Strategy for Development of Regional Nutrient Criteria 1998 – EPA National Strategy to promote state adoption of nutrient water quality standards to better protect aquatic life and human health –EPA technical guidance for estuarine numeric nutrient criteria published. DEM has since completed projects related to nutrient criteria development in freshwaters; that work is continuing with limited EPA funding.

National Progress to Date EPA survey of state nutrient criteria – 2008 Report from EPA Office of Inspector General 8/09 Insufficient progress –No state has met EPA’s goal for nutrient criteria development –Cost is significant obstacle for states –States also lack tools to implement standard

Status of Estuarine Criteria Development in States as of eligible states # adopted one or more parameter for entire waterbody type: 3 ( NC, OR, HI) # adopted one or more parameter for selected waters: 7 ( CA, DE, MD, MA, NJ, SC, VA) No numeric criteria: 14

New England As of 2008, in New England – only MA had set nitrogen criteria for selected waters June 2009 – NH issued numeric criteria for Great Bay Estuary Where is RI in the process? Beginning to plan an approach …

Parameters Used CA – TN, N, TP, Clarity* DE – N, P, Clarity HI – TN, N, TP, Chl-a, Clarity* MD- Clarity MA – N NH – TN, Chl-a, Clarity NJ – Clarity* NC – Chl-a, Clarity* OR – Chl-a SC – Clarity VA – Chl-a, Clarity* in place in 1998

Next Steps Review current activities by other states and assess options ( NBEP/DEM-OWR) Explore with EPA- AED options for developing criteria for coastal ponds (DEM-OWR)