Office of Service Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
PORTFOLIO.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from and Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
School Improvement Plan (SIP) Accreditation Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #1: PURPOSE AND DIRECTION Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Presented by Dr. Jonathan Leff Parent iZone Meeting, 11/12/2015.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
The School Effectiveness Framework
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Office of Service Quality Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #5: USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement

IMPORTANCE OF ACCREDITATION • Accreditation lays the groundwork for success for schools and students. • Accreditation insures a rigorous, sound curriculum based on quality standards, a range of student activities and support services. • Accreditation focuses on increasing student achievement through a safe and enriching learning environment. • Accreditation requires that qualified teachers work to improve their methods and focus on student learning.

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS Standard 1: Purpose and Direction The system maintains and communicates at all levels of the organization a purpose and direction for continuous improvement. Standard 2: Governance and Leadership The system operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness. Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning The system’s curriculum, instructional design and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning. Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems The system has resources and provides services in all schools that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement The system implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.

AdvancEd Standard #5: USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT The system implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.

INDICATORS FOR STANDARD #5: USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Indicator 5.1 - The school establishes and maintains a clearly defined and comprehensive student assessment system.. Indicator 5.2 - Professional and support staff continuously collect, analyze, and apply learning from a range of data sources, including comparison and trend data about student learning, instruction, program evaluation, and organizational conditions. Indicator 5.3 - Professional and support staff are trained in the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data. Indicator 5.4 - The school engages in a continuous process to determine verifiable improvement in student learning, including readiness for and success at the next level. Indicator 5.5 - Leadership monitors and communicates comprehensive information about student learning, conditions that support student learning, and the achievement of school improvement goals to stakeholders.

EXAMPLES OF EVIDENCE FOR STANDARD #5 USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT: PRACTICES • The degree to which staff has analyzed results in the context of services provided and improvement plan interventions and strategies • A broad range of involvement by stakeholder groups in the design, management, and implementation of the school’s improvement plan • Alignment of the school’s improvement goals with needs identified in the profile and supported by data analysis • Professional development activities that are aligned with the school’s improvement plan • Indication that individual professional staff development plans are related to the goals of the school’s improvement plan • Reports from staff regarding the impact of professional development activities upon their ability to implement the school’s improvement strategies • Reported/observed changes in staff behaviors as a result of professional development activities delivered in support of the school’s improvement plan • A variety of baseline and interval data to describe progress toward the goals • The extent to which the improvement agenda has been widely discussed among stakeholders • A variety of communication techniques used to inform stakeholders regarding the school’s improvement efforts and successes

EXAMPLES OF EVIDENCE FOR STANDARD #5 USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT: PRACTICES • A continuous review process to ensure ongoing monitoring and adjustment of the improvement plan • A rigorous data analysis process to evaluate the degree of success in goal attainment • Success demonstrated in reaching goals of the school’s improvement plan • Evaluation of student learning and organizational effectiveness using a variety of assessments. • The degree to which the school has a school-wide focus on assessment and ongoing analysis and use of data • Efforts by the school to determine gaps between achievement goals and improvement expectations • A variety of ways to provide training on data analysis for individuals and groups of staff • Reports by staff about how data analysis, including analysis of assessment results, has been used to assist them in improving services to stakeholders or has altered services within the school • A school-wide process of ongoing data analysis and use of data to improve services and organizational effectiveness • Disaggregation of assessment data to reflect relevant groups in the school • A variety of ways that assessment data are communicated throughout the school • A variety of assessments that are directed both toward student achievement and organizational effectiveness • The inclusion of data analysis topic in the agenda of professional development activities • A comparative analysis of assessment data among similar schools  

EXAMPLES OF EVIDENCE FOR STANDARD #5 USING RESULTS FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT: ARTIFACTS • Description of the school’s improvement process • School profile information • School’s improvement plan that focuses on student learning and organizational effectiveness • A plan that includes components that provide specific goals, a set of appropriate assessments, a set of interventions expected to cause growth to occur, and a plan for ensuring that the staff have the skills to implement the plan • Student performance and achievement data in the school • Agendas/minutes of meetings regarding improvement activities and results • Professional development plans • Evaluation data on impact of interventions • Communications to stakeholders regarding improvement activities and results • Description of staff induction and professional development expectations • Professional development plan and/or opportunities • Data regarding staff retention and recruitment • Written process describing how facilities are regularly inspected and maintained and data demonstrating the quality of these processes • Agendas/minutes of staff meetings • Stakeholder perceptions  

The BEST Blueprint & AdvancED Accreditation Standards Correlation 1. Purpose and Direction: The BEST Blueprint maintains and communicates at all levels of the organization a purpose and direction for continuous improvement that commits to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning. 2. Governance and Leadership: The BEST Blueprint is a part of a system of governance and leadership that promotes and supports student performance and system effectiveness. 3. Teaching and Assessing for Learning: The BEST Blueprint supports the district’s practices for curriculum, instructional design, and assessment, ensuring teacher effectiveness and student learning across all grades and courses. 4. Resources and Support Systems: The BEST Blueprint leverages BCPS resources and provides services in all schools to support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. 5. Using Results for Continuous Improvement: The BEST Blueprint supports the district’s comprehensive assessment process that generates a wide range of data about student learning and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.  

Office of Service Quality THANK YOU! Veda Hudge, Director Office of Service Quality 754-321-3850