What’s new in Water Treatment? Coagulants and Filter Aids Sticky Particles vs. Sticky Media Coagulants and Filter Aids Sticky Particles vs. Sticky Media.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drinking Water Treatment – Chapter 25 Class Objectives Be able to define the possible components of a water treatment train and their functions Be able.
Advertisements

CalARP - Examination of Chemical Processes: Drinking Water Treatment
Often water is prescreened, treated with ozone, or pre-chlorinated before entering the coagulation basin (depending on the quality of the water). Coagulation.
Zelienople Water Department Sources and Treatment.
Membrane Processes Chapter 15. Resources and Materials: Students should review and utilize the following on-line resources:
CE 370 Filtration.
Treatment
Coagulation and Flocculation at Water Treatment Plants
City of Oshkosh Water System. Public Works Utility Division Water Filtration Plant Water Distribution System Wastewater Collection System Pumping Stations.
FILTRATION AND BACKWASHING
TENNYSON BEN-KALIO A CHE 120 PROF. WAN JIN JANHG.
Chlorine Disinfection of Drinking Water California Unified Program 8 th Annual Training Conference February 8, 2006 Presented by: Paul G. Beswick Metropolitan.
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Calcite Contactors for Corrosion Control
WELCOME TO THE KENNEBEC WATER DISTRICT FILTRATION PLANT.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Filtration Theory.
Dissolved Air Flotation Introduction Dissolved air flotation Dissolved air flotation (DAF) is a process for the removal of particles/flocs by making the.
Slow Sand Filtration ä The Slow Sand Filter Mystery ä Major Events in Slow Sand Filtration History ä Research at Cornell ä Particle Removal Mechanisms.
Requirements to produce high quality water Stephen Stanley, Ph.D., P.Eng. EPCOR Water Services.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Code No. (PE389) Lec. 5 and 6.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering What’s New in Water Treatment? How well could filters remove Particles? Coagulants.
CHAPTER 28 Wastewater Treatment, Water Purification, and Waterborne Microbial Diseases.
Water Treatment Processes. Why do we need to treat our drinking water?  Industrial runoff  Agricultural runoff  Road runoff  Residential runoff.
Applied Environmental Microbiology 43 Copyright © McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Tertiary Filtration.
Processing, distribution and use of water.
Effective Project Planning, Community Capacity Building, & Partnership Development in Indian Country LT Bradley Sherer Environmental Engineer Indian Health.
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
Dr. Joel J. Ducoste, North Carolina State University, 1 Importance of water “Water is life” Looking at water, you might think that it's the most simple.
AIU Day 4. Water, Water, Everywhere!! Water Treatment in SW Pennsylvania.
Treatment of Fresh Water Lec. 1. قال تعالى : ” وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاء كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ أَفَلا يُؤْمِنُونَ “ سورة الأنبياء 30.
Water in the Community: From Lake Ontario to us Thursday, March 25 th.
Water Treatment: Introduction Suzette R. Burckhard, PhD, PE Civil and Environmental Engineering South Dakota State University Engineering the Future 2014.
SEWER MINING.
Day 5 – Water Purification Water purification is important for providing clean, drinkable water for communities. There are many different things to consider.
All About Sanitary Surveys David Edmunds Environmental Program Specialist ADEC Drinking Water Program Sustained Compliance: What It Means to Public Water.
Drinking Water Quality and Health
WATER TECHNOLOGIES FOR RURAL TEXAS OFFICE OF RURAL COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Cryptosporidium: Technologies for Disinfection, Particulate Removal & By-Product Management.
Water Treatment Steps Aeraton Coagulation Sedimentation Filtration
Waste Treatment, Physical
Date: Monday, May 11 th 2015 Topic: Water Purification Objective: To recognize the stages of it.
Water and Wastewater Treatment
Water Quality Of Ground water and Surface water. Physical Characteristics Color Odor Taste Temperature Turbidity: cloudiness or haziness.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 5.4 The Waterworks. At the Waterworks When reservoirs or rivers are the source of drinking water, the water must be treated to remove.
Chapter 6 Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration
What Is In This Chapter? Water Treatment Overview
Safe, Clean and Drinkable
Water Treatment. Water Sources and Water Treatment Drinking water should be essentially free of disease-causing microbes, but often this is not the case.
Chemical Engineering Department Government Engineering College Bhuj Prepared by: Kumar Satyam Guided By: Prof. Sejal J. Solanki Chemical.
Water Filtration Plant Improvements Project Summary
Amherst , MA, Drinking Water System Atkins Water Treatment Plant
welcome to the Kennebec water district filtration plant
Water Testing APES.
CHAP. 2.2 – WATER TO DRINK.
What’s New in Water Treatment?
Water Testing APES.
Flocculation Prepared by Dr. Amal A. Aly.
Warm Up p65 Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? Municipalities (towns) get drinking water from which two sources?
Lecture 6: Wastewater treatment
Drinking-water Treatment
Water Treatment.
Types of Water Treatment Processes
Warm Up p65 Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? Municipalities (towns) get drinking water from which two sources?
Requirements to produce high quality water
Three choices: Surface water Groundwater
What’s New in Water Treatment?
Treatment – Sediment Filters
Water Treatment.
________________________________________________________________
Acceptability aspects: Taste, odour and appearance  Water should be free of tastes and odours that would be objectionable to the majority of consumers.
Presentation transcript:

What’s new in Water Treatment? Coagulants and Filter Aids Sticky Particles vs. Sticky Media Coagulants and Filter Aids Sticky Particles vs. Sticky Media

Particle Capture Efficiency ä Sand filters are inefficient capturers of particles ä Particles come into contact with filter media surfaces many times, yet it is common for filters to only remove 90% - 99% of the particles. ä Failure to capture more particles is due to ineffective attachment (not limited by transport) ä Sand filters are inefficient capturers of particles ä Particles come into contact with filter media surfaces many times, yet it is common for filters to only remove 90% - 99% of the particles. ä Failure to capture more particles is due to ineffective attachment (not limited by transport)

Techniques to Increase Particle Attachment Efficiency ä Make the particles stickier ä The technique used in conventional water treatment plants ä Control coagulant dose and other coagulant aids (cationic polymers) ä Make the filter media stickier ä potato starch? ä Make the particles stickier ä The technique used in conventional water treatment plants ä Control coagulant dose and other coagulant aids (cationic polymers) ä Make the filter media stickier ä potato starch?

Sticky Media vs. Sticky Particles ä Sticky Media ä Potentially treat filter media at the beginning of each filter run ä No need to add coagulants to water for low turbidity waters ä Filter will capture particles much more efficiently ä Sticky Media ä Potentially treat filter media at the beginning of each filter run ä No need to add coagulants to water for low turbidity waters ä Filter will capture particles much more efficiently ä ä Sticky Particles ä Easier to add coagulant to water than to coat the filter media

How can we make filter media sticky? Why do slow sand filters work? ä Slow sand filters don’t use any coagulants, yet their performance improves with time ä Their improved performance is due to natural particulate matter that is captured by the filter ä What is it about this particulate matter that makes the filters work better? ä Slow sand filters don’t use any coagulants, yet their performance improves with time ä Their improved performance is due to natural particulate matter that is captured by the filter ä What is it about this particulate matter that makes the filters work better?

Role of Natural Particulates in SSF ä Could be removal by straining  But we are removing particles 1  m in diameter!  To remove such small particles by straining the pores would have to be close to 1  m and the head loss would be excessive ä Removal must be by attachment to the sticky particles! ä Could be removal by straining  But we are removing particles 1  m in diameter!  To remove such small particles by straining the pores would have to be close to 1  m and the head loss would be excessive ä Removal must be by attachment to the sticky particles!

Particle Removal by Size

Research project in CEE 453 in 2000 ä Successfully extracted a coagulant from Cayuga Lake Seston using 1.0 N HCl ä The CLSE fed filters removed up to % of the influent coliforms!!!! ä Analysis of the CLSE ä Nonvolatile solids were 44% of the TSS ä Volatile solids were 56% of the TSS ä Aluminum was dominant metal ä Successfully extracted a coagulant from Cayuga Lake Seston using 1.0 N HCl ä The CLSE fed filters removed up to % of the influent coliforms!!!! ä Analysis of the CLSE ä Nonvolatile solids were 44% of the TSS ä Volatile solids were 56% of the TSS ä Aluminum was dominant metal

E. coli removal as a function of time and CLSE application rate Horizontal bars indicate when CLSE feed was operational for each filter.

Head loss produced by CLSE

What do we know about this Polymer? ä Soluble at very low ( 13) pH ä Forms flocs readily at neutral pH ä Contains protein (amino acids) ä In acid solution amino acids are protonated and exist as cations ä In basic solution amino acids are deprotonated and exist as anions ä Soluble at very low ( 13) pH ä Forms flocs readily at neutral pH ä Contains protein (amino acids) ä In acid solution amino acids are protonated and exist as cations ä In basic solution amino acids are deprotonated and exist as anions

Future Work ä Identify the amino acids ä Develop a better source of the protein coagulant (synthetic, bacteria culture, algae culture?) ä Develop application techniques to optimize filter performance ä How can we coat all of the media? ä Will the media remain sticky through a backwash? ä Will it be possible to remove particles from the media with a normal backwash? ä What are the best ways to use this new coagulant? ä Identify the amino acids ä Develop a better source of the protein coagulant (synthetic, bacteria culture, algae culture?) ä Develop application techniques to optimize filter performance ä How can we coat all of the media? ä Will the media remain sticky through a backwash? ä Will it be possible to remove particles from the media with a normal backwash? ä What are the best ways to use this new coagulant?

Polymer in a void between glass beads

Polymer on and bridging between glass beads

Polymer Bridge between Glass Beads

Dissolved Air Flotation ä Shown to be more effective at removing Cryptosporidium than conventional sedimentation ä DAF clarification performed better than lamella sedimentation and consistently resulted in lower turbidity levels and particle counts. ä Journal AWWA - Giardia and Cryptosporidium Removals by Clarification and Filtration Under Challenge Conditions Vol No. 12 ä Shown to be more effective at removing Cryptosporidium than conventional sedimentation ä DAF clarification performed better than lamella sedimentation and consistently resulted in lower turbidity levels and particle counts. ä Journal AWWA - Giardia and Cryptosporidium Removals by Clarification and Filtration Under Challenge Conditions Vol No. 12

Waterborne disease outbreaks caused by distribution system deficiencies ä Distribution system contamination has resulted in a significant number of waterborne disease outbreaks in the United States. A review of the 113 distribution-associated outbreaks reported over the past 30 years finds 498 hospitalizations and nine deaths. Since 1996, distribution system deficiencies have caused 45% of all outbreaks reported in community water systems. Most distribution-associated outbreaks were attributable to chemical and microbial contamination from cross-connections and backsiphonage. ä Preventing contamination of the distribution system is key to reducing the risk of waterborne disease outbreaks. Important preventive steps include maintaining adequate water pressure throughout the system; identifying and replacing older, leaking water mains; maintaining a chlorine residual and routinely monitoring the residual; adopting cross-connection control programs; inspecting storage facilities on a routine basis; adequately disinfecting after system repairs; and increasing corrosion control efforts. ä An aging water system infrastructure renders the United States even more vulnerable to the risk of waterborne disease outbreaks. More regulations may be required to prevent these outbreaks unless water suppliers take action to reduce distribution system contamination and sufficient funds are allocated for system maintenance, repair, and replacement. ä Distribution system contamination has resulted in a significant number of waterborne disease outbreaks in the United States. A review of the 113 distribution-associated outbreaks reported over the past 30 years finds 498 hospitalizations and nine deaths. Since 1996, distribution system deficiencies have caused 45% of all outbreaks reported in community water systems. Most distribution-associated outbreaks were attributable to chemical and microbial contamination from cross-connections and backsiphonage. ä Preventing contamination of the distribution system is key to reducing the risk of waterborne disease outbreaks. Important preventive steps include maintaining adequate water pressure throughout the system; identifying and replacing older, leaking water mains; maintaining a chlorine residual and routinely monitoring the residual; adopting cross-connection control programs; inspecting storage facilities on a routine basis; adequately disinfecting after system repairs; and increasing corrosion control efforts. ä An aging water system infrastructure renders the United States even more vulnerable to the risk of waterborne disease outbreaks. More regulations may be required to prevent these outbreaks unless water suppliers take action to reduce distribution system contamination and sufficient funds are allocated for system maintenance, repair, and replacement. Gunther F. Craun and Rebecca L. Calderon JOURNAL AWWA September 2001 Vol. 93, No. 9 pp. 64–75