Crisis Action Planning & the Commander’s Estimate Process 23 February 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the Troop Leading Procedures
Advertisements

VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE NCO ACADEMY
Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Course of Action Analysis
Course of Action Development
Joint Operation Planning Process:
Adaptive Planning & Execution
WELCOME TO INNG EMERGENCY OPERATIONS LIAISON OFFICER OVERVIEW
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES FM 7-8
MISSION ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Maj Tom Woods
Commander’s Intent & Guidance Deployable Joint Task Force Augmentation Cell (DJTFAC) Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Major Paul Zavislak.
Course of Action Development
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
Crisis Action Planning Commander’s Guidance and Intent
Operations Security (OPSEC) Introduction  Standard  Application  Objectives  Regulations and Guidance  OPSEC Definition  Indicators.
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 7 – Prepare Operations Plan (OPLAN) / Operations Order (OPORD) & Assess UNCLASSIFIED.
Joint Special Operations University
The Military Decision Making Process
Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1: Air Warfare
Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Course of Action Development UNCLASSIFIED CTF Training.
Multinational Force Staff Estimates
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
USSOUTHCOM J35 Organization and Functions
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
Mission Analysis “COMBINED” TASK FORCE TRAINING
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Military Decision Making Process – Multinational (MDMP-M)
Crisis Action Planning Process پروسه پلان گذاری عملکرد بحران Situation Development Crisis Assessment COA Development COA Selection Execution Planning Execution.
1 The Military Decision- Making Process (MDMP). 2 MDMPAgenda MDMP Agenda 1. Module 1: MDMP Overview/Receipt of Mission/Mission Analysis PE # 1 – Cdr’s.
Military Decision-Making Process
THE MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS (MDMP)
Prepare and Issue the Coalition / Combined Task Force OPORD Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Purpose References Discuss the process of preparing.
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Analysis.
Unit 4: Operational Phases and Implementation. Unit 4 Objectives  Explain the four phases of continuity and relate their application to the continuity.
Crisis Action Planning
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
Implementing Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 4.1 Unit 4: Implementing Multiagency Coordination.
COMMANDER’S INTENT & GUIDANCE
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Campaign Planning Process Step 5 – Linking Planning to Execution
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Framework for Effective Multinational OPs Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) MNF SOP WORKSHOP JTF to CTF Transition Guide (Annex)
Module 4: Planning Concepts. July 2009Recovery Analysis Objectives At the end of this module you will be able to:  Distinguish among various planning.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
THIRD FLEET COMTHIRDFLT Crisis Planning & HA/DR Exercise Strong Angel THIRD FLEET HA/DR Team COMTHIRDFLT COMTHIRDFLT.
Operations Study Guide. Categories OF Orders ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: Covers normal administrative operations in garrison or in the field. They include general,
Staff (Running) Estimate
Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.
Course of Action (COA) Comparison
Multinational Force Course of Action Development
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
MDMP-M Steps 6: Plans and Orders Development
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team Course of Action Analysis
Campaign Planning Process Step 4 – Campaign Formulation
Course of Action Analysis
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Maj Kelly Lawson
Religious Inputs/Outputs
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURE
Course of Action Development
MDMP-M Steps 6: Plans and Orders Development
Presentation transcript:

Crisis Action Planning & the Commander’s Estimate Process 23 February 2001

PurposePurpose To present MPAT doctrine for crisis action planning and the Commander’s Estimate

JP 3-0 Doctrine for Joint Operations JP JTF Planning Guidance & Procedures CJCSM Joint Operation Planning & Execution System (JOPES), Volume I (Planning Policies & Procedures) CJCSM JOPES, Volume II (Planning Formats & Guidance) JP 3-0 Doctrine for Joint Operations JP JTF Planning Guidance & Procedures CJCSM Joint Operation Planning & Execution System (JOPES), Volume I (Planning Policies & Procedures) CJCSM JOPES, Volume II (Planning Formats & Guidance) ReferencesReferences

u Six phase process u Key Documents – Warning & Alert Orders – Commander’s Estimate u Requires Concurrent and Collaborative Planning u Six phase process u Key Documents – Warning & Alert Orders – Commander’s Estimate u Requires Concurrent and Collaborative Planning Key Points Develop a Military Course of Action Crisis Action Planning (CAP) Procedures:

u Threat to national interest u Develops rapidly u May require military response u Threat to national interest u Develops rapidly u May require military response What is a Crisis?

u Over 70 crisis events in past 10 years u No OPLANs apply u Over 70 crisis events in past 10 years u No OPLANs apply Why CAP?

u Rapid exchange of information u Analysis of situations affecting possible COAs u Development of feasible COAs u Decisionmaking process to select best COAs u Coordination of plans and orders to implement decisions made u Rapid exchange of information u Analysis of situations affecting possible COAs u Development of feasible COAs u Decisionmaking process to select best COAs u Coordination of plans and orders to implement decisions made CAP Process Features

Crisis Action Planning Process STRAT. CDR/NCA Level ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessmentIVCOASelectionIVCOASelection VI Execution VI Execution CTF Level CAPcrisis action planning COAcourse of action CAPcrisis action planning COAcourse of action Deployment Employment Transition Redeployment PlanningPlanning Execution IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopmentVExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning Form JTF HQ Form JTF HQCAPCAP

SITUATIONDEVELOPMENTSITUATIONDEVELOPMENTCRISISASSESSMENTCRISISASSESSMENTCOADEVELOPMENTCOADEVELOPMENTCOASELECTIONCOASELECTIONEXECUTIONPLANNINGEXECUTIONPLANNINGEXECUTIONEXECUTION IIIIIIIIIIIIIVIVVVVIVI CTFOPERATIONALCTFOPERATIONAL CTF HQ FORMATION FORMATION EXECUTE ORDER EXECUTE ORDER ALERT/PLANNING ORDER ALERT/PLANNING ORDER AugmentationAugmentation WARNING ORDER CAT/OPTCAT/OPT COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE WARNING ORDER CJTF’s OPORD CJTF’s OPORD HIGHCON/NCA’s ASSESSMENT HIGHCON/NCA’s ASSESSMENT COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE CINC’s OPORD CINC’s OPORD CAP Process

Phase I: Situation Development CRISIS STRAT CDR’S ASSESSMENT Nature of the Crisis Forces Available Major Constraints Action Being Taken COAs Being Considered Nature of the Crisis Forces Available Major Constraints Action Being Taken COAs Being Considered NCA STRAT COM

CTF Tasks in CAP, Phase I ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process

Phase II: Crisis Assessment CTF WARNORD National Interests National Objectives Crisis Determination National Interests National Objectives Crisis Determination WARNORD STRAT COM NCA

ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies CTF Tasks in CAP, Phase II

Warning Order Guidance and InstructionsGuidance and Instructions SituationSituation C2 RelationshipsC2 Relationships Mission, Objective, and AssumptionsMission, Objective, and Assumptions Allocate Forces and Trans AssetsAllocate Forces and Trans Assets SituationSituation C2 RelationshipsC2 Relationships Mission, Objective, and AssumptionsMission, Objective, and Assumptions Allocate Forces and Trans AssetsAllocate Forces and Trans Assets

Phase III: COA Development NCA COMMANDER’SESTIMATE COMMANDER’SESTIMATE WARNORDWARNORD ACTIVATION / WARNING ORDER CTF STRAT CDR

ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessmentIIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment Form CTF HQ Form STRAT CDR’S WARNORD WARNORD If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR (CTF components may be activated for planning) CTF WARNORD to CTF components CTF WARNORD to CTF components Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR (CTF components may be activated for planning) CTF WARNORD to CTF components CTF WARNORD to CTF components Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Conduct Commander’s Estimate process CTF Tasks in CAP, Phase III

CAP & The Commander’s Estimate Process CRISISCRISIS ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopment IICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessment IV Course of ActionSelectionIV ActionSelection VExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning WarningOrderWarningOrder PlanningOrderPlanningOrder AlertOrderAlertOrder ExecuteOrderExecuteOrder OPORD&TPFDDOPORD&TPFDD VIExecutionVIExecution AND/ORAND/ORI Mission Analysis/ Restated Mission I Mission Analysis/ Restated Mission II Course of Action DevelopmentII DevelopmentIII Analysis of Opposing Courses of Action III Analysis of Opposing Courses of Action IV Comparison of Own Courses of Action IV Comparison of Own Courses of Action V Commander’ s Decision III Course of Action Development Commander’s Estimate Process

Commander’s Estimate The Commander’s Estimate submitted by the supported commander in response to a STRAT CDR’S Warning Order, provides the STRAT CDR with time-sensitive information for consideration by the NCA in meeting a crisis situation. Essentially, it reflects the supported commander’s analysis of the various COAs that may be used to accomplish the mission and contains recommendations as to the best COA.

Commander’s Estimate COA Recommendation Remarks MissionMission Situation and Courses of Action (COA)Situation and Courses of Action (COA) Analysis of Opposing COAsAnalysis of Opposing COAs Comparison of own COAsComparison of own COAs MissionMission Situation and Courses of Action (COA)Situation and Courses of Action (COA) Analysis of Opposing COAsAnalysis of Opposing COAs Comparison of own COAsComparison of own COAs

Paragraph 1: Mission Statement CTF Commander’s Restated Mission Statement List Essential Tasks List Essential Tasks CTF Commander’s Restated Mission Statement List Essential Tasks List Essential Tasks

Paragraph 2: Situation and Courses of Action 3 Subparagraphs (A) Considerations Affecting the Possible COAs (B) Crisis/Threat Analysis (C) Own COAs 3 Subparagraphs (A) Considerations Affecting the Possible COAs (B) Crisis/Threat Analysis (C) Own COAs Include Only Minimum Information Necessary to Support the Recommendation The STRAT CDR is Primarily Concerned With the Results, Not the Analysis

Considerations Affecting Possible COAs AssumptionsAssumptions Factors that effect Crisis Weather Terrain Medical Conditions NGO/PVO Support Logistics Time/Space Factors Characteristics of the Combined Opns Area Topography Hydrography WX/Climate Transportation Telecommunications Politics, Economics, etc.

Threat/Crisis Factors These factors are those events that could occur and, if they do occur, will affect the accomplishment of the mission... These factors are those events that could occur and, if they do occur, will affect the accomplishment of the mission... Development of Threat/Crisis Factors Key What events can occur that will worsen the crisis?What events can occur that will worsen the crisis? Would these materially affect mission accomplishment?Would these materially affect mission accomplishment? Development of Threat/Crisis Factors Key What events can occur that will worsen the crisis?What events can occur that will worsen the crisis? Would these materially affect mission accomplishment?Would these materially affect mission accomplishment?

Own COAs u Normally limited to two or three COAs u Forces required u Force provider u Destination u Required delivery dates u Coordinated deployment estimate u Employment estimate u Strategic lift requirements, if appropriate u Normally limited to two or three COAs u Forces required u Force provider u Destination u Required delivery dates u Coordinated deployment estimate u Employment estimate u Strategic lift requirements, if appropriate Suitable, Feasible, Acceptable, & Distinguishable

Paragraph 3: Analysis of Opposing COAs Paragraph 3 describes in some detail the results of wargaming COAs during Crisis Action Planning. Description should illustrate that the commander considered the most significant and influential factors, events, and consequences. MDCOAMDCOAMPCOAMPCOA

u Normally the supporting tools (decision matrix) used in the analysis are not included in the final document u For the submission to the STRAT CDR, include only the final statement of conclusions u Advantages and disadvantages if significant in assisting the STRAT CDR in arriving at a decision u Normally the supporting tools (decision matrix) used in the analysis are not included in the final document u For the submission to the STRAT CDR, include only the final statement of conclusions u Advantages and disadvantages if significant in assisting the STRAT CDR in arriving at a decision Paragraph 4: Comparison of Own COAs Comparison Criteria

May give the rationale used by the commander in the decision process Supported Commander’s recommended COA Paragraph 5: Recommended COA

Miscellaneous comments that bear directly on the operation planning Paragraph 6: Remarks Forces required for a COA that are not yet officially apportioned Caveats to COAs if strategic or operational situation changes – Intervention of a third party – Impact of a major disaster (volcano, flood, hurricane, etc.) – Impending refugee problem Recommended changes to ROE Forces required for a COA that are not yet officially apportioned Caveats to COAs if strategic or operational situation changes – Intervention of a third party – Impact of a major disaster (volcano, flood, hurricane, etc.) – Impending refugee problem Recommended changes to ROE

Commander’s Estimate Lessons Learned u Don’t parrot the STRAT CDR’s Mission in the Mission Paragraph – Tailor to operational level mission – Use to clarify and narrow the mission u Avoid a complete historical discussion of the problem in Paragraph 2 – Concentrate on recent or unfolding events – Don’t forget political or societal events that affect the mission – Highlight approaching trigger events that would dramatically alter or accelerate events u Don’t parrot the STRAT CDR’s Mission in the Mission Paragraph – Tailor to operational level mission – Use to clarify and narrow the mission u Avoid a complete historical discussion of the problem in Paragraph 2 – Concentrate on recent or unfolding events – Don’t forget political or societal events that affect the mission – Highlight approaching trigger events that would dramatically alter or accelerate events

Lessons Learned (Cont.) u Keep COAs at operational level – Avoid tactical details; work at component and major force level – Omit detail not critical to the general concept u Give each COA a short, descriptive name – Massive force option, air option, low vis option u Don’t forget the end state and conflict termination u Keep COAs at operational level – Avoid tactical details; work at component and major force level – Omit detail not critical to the general concept u Give each COA a short, descriptive name – Massive force option, air option, low vis option u Don’t forget the end state and conflict termination

Phase IV: COA Selection CRISIS ACTION PROCEDURES Begins: Recommended COA presented to the NCA Ends: NCA Decision in a Planning or Alert Order CTF ACTIONS Staff Prepares Plan Staff Prepares Plan Force Preparation Force Preparation Deployability Posture Reports Deployability Posture Reports React to NCA/STRAT CDR Modifications and Changes React to NCA/STRAT CDR Modifications and Changes Refine Estimates and Resolves Identified Shortfalls Refine Estimates and Resolves Identified Shortfalls Major Focus of Activity is NCA

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessmentIVCOASelectionIVCOASelectionIIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopment Form CTF HQ Form STRAT CDR’s WARNORD WARNORD If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR (CTF components may be activated for planning) CTF WARNORD to CTF components CTF WARNORD to CTF components Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR (CTF components may be activated for planning) CTF WARNORD to CTF components CTF WARNORD to CTF components Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Prep for execution planning Prep for execution planning CTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF componentsCTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF components Prep for execution planning Prep for execution planning CTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF componentsCTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF components STRAT CDR’s PLANORD &/or ALERTORD STRAT CDR’s PLANORD &/or ALERTORD CTF Tasks in CAP, Phase IV

CRISIS ACTION PROCEDURES CTF ACTIONS Begins: Receipt of Planning or Alert Order Ends: Decision to Execute (Execution Order) Begins: Receipt of Planning or Alert Order Ends: Decision to Execute (Execution Order) Identify and Assign Tasks to Units Identify and Assign Tasks to Units Converts COA into OPORD Converts COA into OPORD TPFDD Updated TPFDD Updated Units May Begin Deployment Units May Begin Deployment Service Reporting Service Reporting Review Force Support Requirements Review Force Support Requirements Resolve Shortfalls and Limitations Resolve Shortfalls and Limitations Complete country clearances Complete country clearances Identify and Assign Tasks to Units Identify and Assign Tasks to Units Converts COA into OPORD Converts COA into OPORD TPFDD Updated TPFDD Updated Units May Begin Deployment Units May Begin Deployment Service Reporting Service Reporting Review Force Support Requirements Review Force Support Requirements Resolve Shortfalls and Limitations Resolve Shortfalls and Limitations Complete country clearances Complete country clearances Phase V: Execution Planning

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessmentIVCOASelectionIVCOASelectionIIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopmentVExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning Form CTF HQ Form STRAT CDR’s WARNORD WARNORD If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Prep to participate in the CAP process Prep to participate in the CAP process If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies If CTF established, monitor situation If CTF established, monitor situation Review existing plans & area studies Review existing plans & area studies Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR (CTF components may be activated for planning) CTF WARNORD to CTF components CTF WARNORD to CTF components Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR Commence participation in the CAP process as directed by STRAT CDR (CTF components may be activated for planning) CTF WARNORD to CTF components CTF WARNORD to CTF components Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Conduct Commander’s Estimate process Prep for execution planning Prep for execution planning CTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF componentsCTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF components Prep for execution planning Prep for execution planning CTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF componentsCTF PLANORD &/or ALERTORD to CTF components Develop OPORD Develop OPORD Develop TPFDD reqtsDevelop TPFDD reqts Validate TPFDD reqts to STRAT CDR Validate TPFDD reqts to STRAT CDR Monitor TPFDD build Monitor TPFDD build Issue OPORDIssue OPORD Develop OPORD Develop OPORD Develop TPFDD reqtsDevelop TPFDD reqts Validate TPFDD reqts to STRAT CDR Validate TPFDD reqts to STRAT CDR Monitor TPFDD build Monitor TPFDD build Issue OPORDIssue OPORD STRAT CDR’s PLANORD &/or ALERTORD STRAT CDR’s PLANORD &/or ALERTORD STRAT CDR’s OPORD OPORD JTF Tasks in CAP, Phase V

CRISIS ACTION PROCEDURES CTF ACTIONS Begins: NCA Decision to execute OPORD Ends: Crisis Resolved Begins: NCA Decision to execute OPORD Ends: Crisis Resolved NCA Publishes Execute Order, STRAT CDR Transmits to CTF NCA Publishes Execute Order, STRAT CDR Transmits to CTF CTF Executes OPORD CTF Executes OPORD TPFDD Maintained TPFDD Maintained Evaluate Reception & Onward Movement Capabilities Evaluate Reception & Onward Movement Capabilities Continuous Reporting Continuous Reporting NCA Publishes Execute Order, STRAT CDR Transmits to CTF NCA Publishes Execute Order, STRAT CDR Transmits to CTF CTF Executes OPORD CTF Executes OPORD TPFDD Maintained TPFDD Maintained Evaluate Reception & Onward Movement Capabilities Evaluate Reception & Onward Movement Capabilities Continuous Reporting Continuous Reporting Phase VI: Execution

Crisis Action Planning Process NCA/STRAT CDR Level ISituationDevelopmentISituationDevelopmentIICrisisAssessmentIICrisisAssessmentIVCOASelectionIVCOASelection VI Execution VI Execution CTF Level CAPcrisis action planning COAcourse of action CAPcrisis action planning COAcourse of action Deployment Employment Transition Redeployment PlanningPlanning Execution IIICOADevelopmentIIICOADevelopmentVExecutionPlanningVExecutionPlanning Form JTF HQ Form JTF HQCAPCAP

u By definition, an environment of rapidly changing events – Planning time varying from hours to months u CAP intended to be flexible – Six phases “conducted sequentially, concurrently, compressed, or eliminated altogether” CAP Flexibility

CAP Orders in Recent Operations CAP Orders in Recent Operations WARNORDPLORDALORDDEPORDEXORD PROVIDE RELIEF (Somalia)XXX PROVIDE COMFORT (N. Iraq)XXXX PROVIDE HOPE (Russia)XX PROVIDE PROMISE (Yugo)XXXX ABLE SENTRY (Macedonia)XX Haiti Advisory Group (Haiti)XX VIGILANT WARRIOR (Iraq)XX UPHOLD DEMOCRACY (Haiti) XX XXX DESERT STRIKE (Iraq) XX X

Questions?