1 NAESB Standards Request R04016 Summary of Strawman Proposal of The New Jersey Companies January 24-25, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perspectives on Demand Response Rick Sergel President & CEO, NERC Demand Response Town Meeting June 2, 2008.
Advertisements

NAESB WEQ/WGQ Business Practices Subcommittee Jan
© 2004 Dominion Dominion Proposal January 24, 2005.
NiSource Presentation of Work Paper on Request to Create a Standard Energy Day January 2005.
NAESB Strawman January 24-25, Problem Statement Enough generators must have fuel to meet peak load New England Cold Snap crisis heightened interest.
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Market Interface Committee Report to the WECC Board of Directors December 6-7, 2007 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Chapter 9 Market Power in the Electric and Natural Gas Industries.
ACC Workshop Regarding Notice of Inquiry on Natural Gas Infrastructure September 10, 2003.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Highlights of the 2004 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor May.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
Regional Transmission Organizations: The Future of Transmission? Dave Edwards 4/17/2004.
Bringing about beneficial change... POLICY DIALOGUE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN CHINA Presentation by Patricia Leahy, Director, UK National Audit Office.
IEEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW Utility and Other Energy Company Business Case Issues Related to Microgrids and Distributed Generation.
A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of U.S. Electricity Markets W.M. Warwick July 2000 Revised May 2002.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Connecticut Energy Advisory Board Conference Hartford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President, Market Operations.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
Andy Meyers Bonneville Power Administration NAESB Gas Electric Harmonization ISAS April 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
Nominations and Scheduling Questar Gas Company Annual Account Management Customer Meeting Will Schwarzenbach Director, Gas Supply.
The Continuing Evolution of U.S. Electricity Markets
NOI on Arizona Natural Gas Infrastructure Strawman Proposal and Workshop Comments of Sempra Energy Global Enterprises September 25, 2003.
July 15, 2007 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board NARUC Summer Session 2007 NAESB Update to NARUC.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Future Efficiencies in The Electricity Distribution Sector presented by Don MacKinnon, President February 17, 2004.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force Preliminary Conclusions and Actions.
NGEIR Technical Conference Presentation May 16, 2006.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
George A. Godding, Jr. Director, Management and Communications Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Comments are the speakers and do not necessarily.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Bulk Power Transmission System
Overview of NER and its Future Business Direction Presentation to Standing Committee on Minerals and Energy Parliament 09 May 2001.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (IVGTF) & Emerging Issues Mark Lauby Manager, Reliability Assessments
Transmission Planning Informational Workshop Montpelier, VT September 19, 2005 Allocating the Cost of New Transmission in New England Stephen J. Rourke.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (IVGTF) Mark Lauby Manager, Reliability Assessments
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
Medium-term TEC Trading ARODG Seminars Glasgow & London February 2007.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
1 The regulators’ view on the Central West REM: Emphasis on the completion of existing initiatives Presentation for the Mini-Forum 20 June 2006.
M. Novak/NFGDNAESB Energy Day Mtgs. 1/24-25/051 R04016 – Energy Day Problem Statement Develop a standard energy day that would: –Apply to both the electric.
Craig Williams Market Interface Manager August 21, 2014 ISAS, Portland, OR.
Wholesale Electricity Markets: Opportunities and Challenges Howard HaasUSAEE October 27, 2015.
NAESB Gas-Electric Harmonization Forum Jerry Dempsey Senior Vice President Sheldan Perry Manager of Gas Systems Houston, TX February 18 and 19, 2016.
NAESB GEH Forum Dan Buckner Director of Fuels Origination and Strategic Development.
Market Implications and Considerations for Enhanced Scheduling Flexibility: Facts Observations Problems Solutions February 2016 Greg Lander– President.
Regional System Operator Issues Analysis Ron Lehr Western Clean Energy Advocates January 7, 2016.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
2015 NARUC Winter Meeting Nick Wagner – Iowa Utilities Board 1.
North America Energy Standards Board Craig L. Williams, Specialist Ld./Sr. ISAS Meeting April 20, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING.
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
Aligning the Gas and Electric Markets: EDF Solutions
Richard J. Kruse December 1, 2004
Energy Day Strawman Proposal
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
MIC Committee Discussion
Gas-Electric Coordination Can New Services Bridge the Divide?
Cold Snap Task Force Update
Transmission As Enabler
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Vice President, Markets Development
MOD_03_19 Amended application of the Market Back Up Price if an Imbalance Price(s) fail to calculate Energia.
MIC Committee Discussion
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

1 NAESB Standards Request R04016 Summary of Strawman Proposal of The New Jersey Companies January 24-25, 2005

2 Introduction R04016 joint sponsors seek development of a standard energy day for both the gas and electric industries set on a midnight to midnight central time model. Intent is to facilitate the coordination of scheduling between electric generation and natural gas deliveries.

3 Recommended Principles of The New Jersey Companies 1. Maintain status quo for the North American natural gas and regional electric days. 2. Pursue enhanced communication standards under NAESB standard development R Develop an electric business practice standard to ensure electric industry prices can accurately reflect natural gas pricing.

4 Electric Market Considerations Existing Electric Day accommodates: – Regional differences – Peak and Off-Peak product definitions – Arbitrage New England ISO analysis of 2004 Cold Snap recommends better coordination of gas and electric operations and markets. – Provides no support for a standard energy day

5 Electric Market Considerations cont. Starting and ending points of Electric Day and Gas Day are essentially irrelevant to the functioning of the industries. Focus instead on when, relative to the gas nomination deadline, a generator is notified that it has been selected in the day ahead market.

6 Electric Market Considerations cont. The disconnect in regional electric closing times is intentional, encourages arbitrage, and aids market efficiency. ISONE Market Monitor determined that energy markets worked efficiently to allocate natural gas during the 2004 Cold Snap.

7 Electric Market Considerations cont. Ensure that wholesale electricity prices can reflect the price of gas at all relevant times. Using R04021, formalize timely communications among: – Natural gas suppliers – Pipeline system operators – Electric generators – Electric transmission system operators

8 Natural Gas Market Considerations Current Gas Day model has served the gas industry admirably for years. NAESB should focus on matters better lending themselves to standardization. Retain what works well absent a compelling case for change.

9 Nat. Gas Market Considerations cont. Stakeholders have made good-faith commitments that might now be stranded in favor of costly, uncalled-for restructuring. – Increased personnel and operating costs incurred with no commensurate benefits. – Cost allocations have not been addressed. – Generators should acquire a portfolio of gas services to support their needs. The current model simply works!

10 Nat. Gas Market Considerations cont. An energy day starting outside of normal business hours would prevent normal daytime personnel from fully using pipeline flexibility, and would also contribute to increased system imbalances. – Start of any Gas Day must follow at least 3 hours of a normal business day

11 Nat. Gas Market Considerations cont. Forcing industries as different as gas and electric to operate on timelines that fail to recognize their operational differences could create system stresses and inefficiencies that could harm reliability. Market liquidity could be harmed through energy day consequences on: – Capacity release – Electric and gas trading

12 Summary The New Jersey Companies support the coordination of the gas and electric industries whenever possible. Creating a uniform energy day does not appear to be a goal consistent with the unique requirements of the electric or gas industries. Recommend adoption of the following three principles:

13 Recommended Principles of The New Jersey Companies 1. Maintain status quo for the North American natural gas and regional electric days. 2. Pursue enhanced communication standards under NAESB standard development R Develop an electric business practice standard to ensure electric industry prices can accurately reflect natural gas pricing.