LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland1 Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
Advertisements

JLab High Resolution TDC Hall D Electronics Review (7/03) - Ed Jastrzembski.
Technical Board, 12 July 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr Institute.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and Test Results Hardware status JEM0 Hardware status JEM1 RAL test results.
Workshop on Silicon Detector Systems, April at GSI Darmstadt 1 STAR silicon tracking detectors SVT and SSD.
July 10, 2008 PHENIX RPC review C.Y. Chi 1 RPC Front End Electronics On chamber discriminator  The strips  The CMS discriminator chips  The discriminator.
Uli Schäfer 1 Production and QA issues Design Modules have been designed, with schematic capture and layout, in Mainz (B.Bauss) Cadence design tools, data.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans power Jet Sum R S T U VME CC RM ACE CAN Flash TTC JEM1.0 status JEM1.1 Plans.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Mauro Raggi Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326 Mauro Raggi for the HODO working group Perugia – Firenze 07/09/2005.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
U niversity of S cience and T echnology of C hina Design for Distributed Scheme of WCDA Readout Electronics CAO Zhe University of Science and Technology.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
Oct, 2000CMS Tracker Electronics1 APV25s1 STATUS Testing started beginning September 1 wafer cut, others left for probing 10 chips mounted on test boards.
Proposal of new electronics integrated on the flanges for LAr TPC S. Cento, G. Meng CERN June 2014.
Leo Greiner IPHC testing Sensor and infrastructure testing at LBL. Capabilities and Plan.
LECC 2004 – Boston – September 13 th L.Guiducci – INFN Bologna 1 The Muon Sorter in the CMS Drift Tubes Regional Trigger G.M. Dallavalle, Luigi Guiducci,
Saverio Minutoli INFN Genova 1 1 T1 Electronic status Electronics Cards involved: Anode Front End Card Cathode Front End Card Read-Out Control card VFAT.
Leo Greiner IPHC meeting HFT PIXEL DAQ Prototype Testing.
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
25/05/2010 RD51 Collaboration Meeting Cisbani-Musico-Minutoli / Status JLab Electronics 1 Status of the APV25 electronics for the GEM tracker at JLab Evaristo.
Design & test of SciFi FEB
LNL 1 SLOW CONTROLS FOR CMS DRIFT TUBE CHAMBERS M. Bellato, L. Castellani INFN Sezione di Padova.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
1 Outer Tracker Front-End Layout Distribution of Signals and Bias NIKHEF/HeidelbergOctober 2002.
Leo Greiner IPHC DAQ Readout for the PIXEL detector for the Heavy Flavor Tracker upgrade at STAR.
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting June 8, 2005.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
HBD FEM Overall block diagram Individual building blocks Outlook ¼ detector build.
1 VeLo L1 Read Out Guido Haefeli VeLo Comprehensive Review 27/28 January 2003.
The LHCb Outer Tracker Front End, what does it look like and what is the status Talk for the LHCb Electronics Working Group /TS A Collaboration.
C. Beigbeder Final design Review ECAL/HCAL Frond End  FE board : current prototype  Test results Qualification Clock adjustment Noise analysis  FE board.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade Status of Electronics Design Mikhail Matveev Rice University March 28, 2012.
Leo Greiner PIXEL Hardware meeting HFT PIXEL detector LVDS Data Path Testing.
FED Overview VME-FPGA TTCrx BE-FPGA Event Builder Buffers FPGA Configuration Compact Flash Power DC-DC DAQ Interface 12 Front-End Modules x 8 Double-sided.
Michał Dwużnik, for the SCT collaboration
John Coughlan Tracker Week October FED Status Production Status Acceptance Testing.
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
HBD/TPC Electronics Status Works done to for a)Prototype detector readout b)Understand packing density and heat loading issues c)Address the overall system.
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
PSI - 11 Feb Status of the electronic systems of the MEG Experiment.
09/10/2010 RD51 Collaboration Meeting Cisbani-Musico-Minutoli / Status JLab Electronics 1 Status of the APV25 electronics for the GEM tracker at JLab Evaristo.
Status of the Beetle front-end chip carrier for SRS Lorne Levinson Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel L. Levinson, Weizmann Institute, Nov.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
LECC 2004, BostonA. Vollhardt, Universität Zürich/Switzerland1 LHCb Silicon Tracker electronics: from R&D to preproduction.
M. Adinolfi – University of Oxford – MAPMT Workshop – Imperial College 27 June Status of the PINT chip M. Adinolfi University of Oxford.
J. Ye SMU Joint ATLAS-CMS Opto-electronics working group, April 10-11, 2008 CERN 1 Test Results on LOC1 and Design considerations for LOC2 LOC1 test results:
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
FGT Magnet C Assembly metric tons (59 US tons) -100mm thick steel plates -6.6m high x 3.1m wide x 1m deep (outer dimensions) -5m high x 2.25m wide.
LECC2003: The 96 Chann FED Tester: Greg Iles30 September The 96 channel FED Tester Outline: (1) Background (2) Requirements of the FED Tester (3)
The Data Handling Hybrid Igor Konorov TUM Physics Department E18.
Martin van Beuzekom, Jan Buytaert, Lars Eklund Opto & Power Board (OPB) Summary of the functionality of the opto & power board.
De Remigis The test has been accomplished with an SLVS signal, since that was chosen for the serial communication between the readout and the optical converter.
Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics
SVD FADC SVD-PXD Göttingen, 25 September 2012
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Felix Sefkow CALICE/EUDET electronics meeting CERN, July 12, 2007
RPC Front End Electronics
RPC Front End Electronics
The ATLAS LAr. Calibration board K. Jakobs, U. Schaefer, D. Schroff
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
PHENIX forward trigger review
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Presentation transcript:

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland1 Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland2 Outline  Overview of the Readout Electronics  1st preproduction of Digitizer Board  Evaluation of performance  Integration with LHCb hardware  2nd preproduction  Conclusion

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland3 LHCb Silicon Tracker principle  Two distinct tracking systems based on silicon strip detectors, read out via the BEETLE chip  TT: full acceptance angle covered upstream of magnet  IT: only area of highest track densities around beampipe

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland4 Beetle readout chip  128 channel charge integrator  polyimide readout hybrid carries 3 (IT) or 4 (TT) Beetle chips for sensors of 384 (IT) or 512 (TT) strips See also:  Talk of F. Lehner: Hybrid Design, Procurement and Testing for the LHCb Silicon Tracker

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland5 ST Readout electronics

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland6 Service Box Overview Digitizer Board backplane low-voltage power sensor + readout hybrids Digitizer Board up to 16 hybrids/boards Control Card TTCECS 5m copper cable Optical fibres for physics data

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland7 Digitizer Board characteristics  6 layer PCB, halogen-free, 1.6 mm thickness, symmetric stack  single side mounting, no buried/blind vias  smallest feature size 6 mil, smallest package 0603  5 BGA devices: 1x CS49 (0.8 mm pitch), 3-4x BGA144(1.0 mm pitch)  no JTAG chain, no boundary scan  differential traces have controlled impedance/length  standard commercial connectors  NO tuning points  layout optimized for low-cost, high-yield, easy testing 2 versions: Trigger Tracker (4-chip readout), Inner Tracker (3-chip readout)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland8 1. Preproduction run  17 boards produced and electrically tested in late 2004 (TT version)  after assembly, all BGAs X-rayed: all solder joints ok!  2 bugfixes: wrong reference voltage for line receiver Auto-Sync FPGA: shift register one cycle (25ns) too short  all boards except one immediately working: board #10 had ripped via under BGA (fixed) changes for IT version preproduction (and final production):  changed VCSEL biasing  added QPLL RC-network for improved jitter stability

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland9 Digitizer Board  Power <5 W  Only positive voltages: 2.5 V, 5.0 V

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland10 Beetle signal at ADC  Flat top 15 nsec wide (of 25 nsec max.)  measured with 5m twisted pair cable  plenty of ‘space’ to set ADC sampling point

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland11 Linearity

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland12 Sampling synchronicity I  supply all 16 inputs with ‘synchronous’ testpulse: testpulse generator sourcing 16 LVDS drivers  move sampling time by using TTCrx clock phase shifters (just like in experiment..)  transmit data via GOL+ optical fibres to DACs and scope  record pulseheight of sampled edge vs. programmed delay

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland13 Sampling synchronicity II

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland14 GOL VCSEL connection  VCSEL forward voltage with 2.5V anode voltage results in too low GOL current driver voltage level  only 2.5V and 5V available  reduced to 3.3V by low-impedance divider  blocked at VCSEL with 100nF||100pF

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland15 Eye diagram after 100m  Thanks to Paolo Ciambrone/LHCb Muon

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland16 Auto-sync  Beetle DataValid signal (almost) in parallel to analogue data to frame a triggered event  done via shift register in Actel antifuse FPGA (small version of rad-hard AX54SX32) incl. TMR+ majority voting  Results in at least one IDLE frame per event Beetle analogue output Beetle DataValid Beetle data after digitization DataValid after 200 ns delay

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland17 Radiation qualification  Expected radiation levels for Service Box location for 10 years: TID 15 krad, NIEL 2E12 n/cm2  all commercial devices individually radiation qualified (TID, NIEL and SEE) with proton and neutron irradiation according to LHCb radiation policy  System test: TT Digitizer Board + backplane re-tested in June 2005 with 60 MeV protons to 60 krad (PSI, Switzerland):  analogue test pattern injected  verification of function and performance  no variations in module operation observed

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland18 Full Readout test

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland19 Full Readout test  LHCb-style readout (except LHCb Readout Supervisor + CPU farm)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland20 Control Card  Under development by Universidade de Santiago de Compostela  Provides TTC signals and slow control interface to each Service Box and its associated frontend electronics  First prototype functional (still being tested)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland21 Breaking News: IT version  10 Digitizer Boards (IT version preproduction) were delivered last Wednesday  initial testing confirm out-of-the-box functionality  important step: re-validate eye diagram with new VCSEL bias!

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland22 Next steps  detailed testing of IT prototypes: last design verification  launch production order after:  production+assembly time for all boards: ca weeks  all parts available except for VCSELs (LHCb common order placed, expected in November)  ‘bird-food’ supplied by company, special components by us  start setting up test bench during production: basic functionality test (go-nogo) burn-in test (catch infant mortality)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland23 Conclusion + Outlook  The preseries production for both versions of the ST Digitizer Board has been completed.  Bugfixes and lessons learned in the TT version were successfully included in the IT version.  Required functionality was verified and system compatibility with common LHCb hardware has been shown.  Preseries hardware is used to form teststands for the TT sensor module production (Zuerich) and the IT sensor production (CERN)  Final qualification pending, design will be released for full production in Q4/05.

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland24 SPARE SLIDES

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland25 Digitizer Board input stage  Bandwidth: 1.6 kHz (AC-Coupling) to 170 MHz (AD8129)  Amplifier output range matches ADC input range 3x 1 k  22  39  2.5 V 2x 100 nF 8 bits + - gain: 11 differential signal from Beetle AD8129 TSA0801 gain: 0.22 impedance: 100 Ohm 100 nF 10 k  V cm V ref (ca. 1 V) out Output to GOL serializer

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland26 Clock tree

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland27 TFC distribution  Impedance controlled traces for LVDS signals  TTL traces only used for short (~ 2 cm) for fanning out  equal trace lengths to minimize ch-ch skew

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland28 Service Box: frame  Fully loaded weight: ca. 10 kg  Power disipation: ca. 150 W (70 W into mixed water cooled heatsink)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland29 Service Box cooling  all linear regulators located close to each other  use common copper heatsink (mixed water) to cool all at once  isolate ground slug of regulator package (local ground!)  used for testing: CPU water cooling system: no active cooler, but fan-blown heat-exchanger  Test at full load results in 35 degC case temperature for 25 degC water (=ambient temperature)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland30 IT mounting  Service Boxes outside acceptance  Mounted on common IT station frame  ‘5m copper cables’ no not move  cables from Service Box away from detector move (cable chains)

LECC 2005, HeidelbergA. Vollhardt, EPF Lausanne/Switzerland31 TT mounting  Service Boxes mounted outside acceptance to magnet  ‘5m copper cable’ guided in cable chains to station halves  cables away from Service Box fixed in cable trays