GROUPER: A DYNAMIC CLUSTERING INTERFACE TO WEB SEARCH RESULTS by Oren Zamir and Oren Etzioni Presented by: Duygu Sarıkaya,Ahsen Yergök,Dilek Demirbaş.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Links for Web Page Classification Dou Shen 1 Jian-Tao Sun 2 Qiang Yang 1 Zheng Chen 2 1 Department of Computer Science.
Advertisements

Personalized Navigation in the Semantic Web: An Enhanced Faceted Browser Michal Tvarožek FIIT STU BA.
DQR : A Probabilistic Approach to Diversified Query recommendation Date: 2013/05/20 Author: Ruirui Li, Ben Kao, Bin Bi, Reynold Cheng, Eric Lo Source:
Date: 2012/8/13 Source: Luca Maria Aiello. al(CIKM’11) Advisor: Jia-ling, Koh Speaker: Jiun Jia, Chiou Behavior-driven Clustering of Queries into Topics.
 Grouper: A Dynamic Clustering Interface to Web Search Results Fatih Çalı ş ır Tolga Çekiç Elif Dal Acar Erdinç /9.
Engineering a Set Intersection Algorithm for Information Retrieval Alex Lopez-Ortiz UNB / InterNAP Joint work with Ian Munro and Erik Demaine.
Learning to Cluster Web Search Results SIGIR 04. ABSTRACT Organizing Web search results into clusters facilitates users quick browsing through search.
Databases for the 'Pi of the Sky' experiment Marek Biskup Warsaw University.
Web Document Clustering: A Feasibility Demonstration Hui Han CSE dept. PSU 10/15/01.
Online Clustering of Web Search results
GROUPER: A DYNAMIC CLUSTERING INTERFACE TO WEB SEARCH RESULTS Erdem Sarıgil O ğ uz Yılmaz
Web search results clustering Web search results clustering is a version of document clustering, but… Billions of pages Constantly changing Data mainly.
Mining Query Subtopics from Search Log Data Date : 2012/12/06 Resource : SIGIR’12 Advisor : Dr. Jia-Ling Koh Speaker : I-Chih Chiu.
Easing Semantic Data Publishing and Processing Using Semantic MediaWiki and RDFa Jin Guang Zheng.
Time-dependent Similarity Measure of Queries Using Historical Click- through Data Qiankun Zhao*, Steven C. H. Hoi*, Tie-Yan Liu, et al. Presented by: Tie-Yan.
FACT: A Learning Based Web Query Processing System Hongjun Lu, Yanlei Diao Hong Kong U. of Science & Technology Songting Chen, Zengping Tian Fudan University.
1 Using Scopus for Literature Research. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer- reviewed literature and quality web sources.
J. Chen, O. R. Zaiane and R. Goebel An Unsupervised Approach to Cluster Web Search Results based on Word Sense Communities.
1 MARG-DARSHAK: A Scrapbook on Web Search engines allow the users to enter keywords relating to a topic and retrieve information about internet sites (URLs)
Stuff I’ve Seen: A System for Personal Information Retrieval and Re-use by Seher Acer Elif Demirli Susan Dumais, Edward Cutrell, JJ Cadiz, Gavin Jancke,
Personalized Ontologies for Web Search and Caching Susan Gauch Information and Telecommunications Technology Center Electrical Engineering and Computer.
Database Systems Chapter 1 The Worlds of Database Systems.
Faculty of Informatics and Information Technologies Slovak University of Technology Personalized Navigation in the Semantic Web Michal Tvarožek Mentor:
Tag-based Social Interest Discovery
Query Rewriting Using Monolingual Statistical Machine Translation Stefan Riezler Yi Liu Google 2010 Association for Computational Linguistics.
Search Engines and Information Retrieval Chapter 1.
RuleML-2007, Orlando, Florida1 Towards Knowledge Extraction from Weblogs and Rule-based Semantic Querying Xi Bai, Jigui Sun, Haiyan Che, Jin.
Matjaž Juršič, Vid Podpečan, Nada Lavrač. O VERVIEW B ASIC C ONCEPTS - Clustering - Fuzzy Clustering - Clustering of Documents P ROBLEM D OMAIN - Conference.
Relevance feedback using query-logs Gaurav Pandey Supervisors: Prof. Gerhard Weikum Julia Luxenburger.
1 On Querying Historical Evolving Graph Sequences Chenghui Ren $, Eric Lo *, Ben Kao $, Xinjie Zhu $, Reynold Cheng $ $ The University of Hong Kong $ {chren,
Web Document Clustering By Sang-Cheol Seok. 1.Introduction: Web document clustering? Why ? Two results for the same query ‘amazon’ Google : currently.
ICSE2006 Far East Experience Track Detecting Low Usability Web Pages using Quantitative Data of Users’ Behavior Noboru Nakamichi 1, Makoto Sakai 2, Kazuyuki.
PERSONALIZED SEARCH Ram Nithin Baalay. Personalized Search? Search Engine: A Vital Need Next level of Intelligent Information Retrieval. Retrieval of.
Xiaoying Gao Computer Science Victoria University of Wellington Intelligent Agents COMP 423.
Tag Data and Personalized Information Retrieval 1.
Measuring UML Conceptual Modeling Quality Samira SI-SAID CHERFI* Jacky AKOKA* Isabelle COMYN-WATTIAU* * CEDRIC - CNAM – Paris (France)
UOS 1 Ontology Based Personalized Search Zhang Tao The University of Seoul.
Hao Wu Nov Outline Introduction Related Work Experiment Methods Results Conclusions & Next Steps.
Web Document Clustering: A Feasibility Demonstration Oren Zamir and Oren Etzioni, SIGIR, 1998.
Xiaoying Gao Computer Science Victoria University of Wellington Intelligent Agents COMP 423.
Probabilistic Query Expansion Using Query Logs Hang Cui Tianjin University, China Ji-Rong Wen Microsoft Research Asia, China Jian-Yun Nie University of.
SCATTER/GATHER : A CLUSTER BASED APPROACH FOR BROWSING LARGE DOCUMENT COLLECTIONS GROUPER : A DYNAMIC CLUSTERING INTERFACE TO WEB SEARCH RESULTS MINAL.
Enhancing Cluster Labeling Using Wikipedia David Carmel, Haggai Roitman, Naama Zwerdling IBM Research Lab (SIGIR’09) Date: 11/09/2009 Speaker: Cho, Chin.
WIRED Week 3 Syllabus Update (next week) Readings Overview - Quick Review of Last Week’s IR Models (if time) - Evaluating IR Systems - Understanding Queries.
Faculty of Informatics and Information Technologies Slovak University of Technology Personalized Navigation in the Semantic Web Michal Tvarožek Mentor:
A Statistical Comparison of Tag and Query Logs Mark J. Carman, Robert Gwadera, Fabio Crestani, and Mark Baillie SIGIR 2009 June 4, 2010 Hyunwoo Kim.
21/11/20151Gianluca Demartini Ranking Clusters for Web Search Gianluca Demartini Paul–Alexandru Chirita Ingo Brunkhorst Wolfgang Nejdl L3S Info Lunch Hannover,
Searching the World Wide Web: Meta Crawlers vs. Single Search Engines By: Voris Tejada.
More Than Relevance: High Utility Query Recommendation By Mining Users' Search Behaviors Xiaofei Zhu, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng, Yanyan Lan Institute of.
Measuring the value of search trails in web logs Presentation by Maksym Taran & Scott Breyfogle Research by Ryen White & Jeff Huang.
26/01/20161Gianluca Demartini Ranking Categories for Faceted Search Gianluca Demartini L3S Research Seminars Hannover, 09 June 2006.
Jens Hartmann York Sure Raphael Volz Rudi Studer The OntoWeb Portal.
CS798: Information Retrieval Charlie Clarke Information retrieval is concerned with representing, searching, and manipulating.
Adaptive Faceted Browsing in Job Offers Danielle H. Lee
Combining Systems and Databases: A Search Engine Retrospective By: Rooma Rathore Rohini Prinja Author: Eric A. Brewer.
GENERATING RELEVANT AND DIVERSE QUERY PHRASE SUGGESTIONS USING TOPICAL N-GRAMS ELENA HIRST.
MMM2005The Chinese University of Hong Kong MMM2005 The Chinese University of Hong Kong 1 Video Summarization Using Mutual Reinforcement Principle and Shot.
Document Clustering for Natural Language Dialogue-based IR (Google for the Blind) Antoine Raux IR Seminar and Lab Fall 2003 Initial Presentation.
Instance Discovery and Schema Matching With Applications to Biological Deep Web Data Integration Tantan Liu, Fan Wang, Gagan Agrawal {liut, wangfa,
Clustering (Search Engine Results) CSE 454. © Etzioni & Weld To Do Lecture is short Add k-means Details of ST construction.
Michael T. Cox Computer Science & Engineering Department Wright State University Dayton, OH DAGSI/AFRL #HE-WSU AFOSR #F
Ocasta: Clustering Configuration Settings for Error Recovery Zhen Huang, David Lie Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto.
Global Enterprise Search
Author: Kazunari Sugiyama, etc. (WWW2004)
Mining Query Subtopics from Search Log Data
Type-directed Topic Segmentation of Entity Descriptions
Cumulated Gain-Based Evaluation of IR Techniques
Gizem MISIRLI Gülden OLGUN
Connecting the Dots Between News Article
Preference Based Evaluation Measures for Novelty and Diversity
Presentation transcript:

GROUPER: A DYNAMIC CLUSTERING INTERFACE TO WEB SEARCH RESULTS by Oren Zamir and Oren Etzioni Presented by: Duygu Sarıkaya,Ahsen Yergök,Dilek Demirbaş

OUTLINE  Motivation  Problem Definition  Proposed Solution & Goals  How it Works  User Interface  Easy to Browse Clusters  Design for Speed  Empirical Evolution  Conclusion

PROBLEM DEFINITON  Search engine results are not easy to browse

PROPOSED SOLUTION  GROUPER  An Interface  Dynamic Clustering of Search Results

GOALS  Coherent Clusters  Efficiently Browsable  Speed

U SER I NTERFACE  Grouper’s query interface

A Q UERY R ESULT

R EFINE Q UERY B ASED O N T HIS C LUSTER

MAKING THE CLUSTERS EASY TO BROWSE  Word Overlap  Sub- and Super- Strings  Most-General Phrase with Low Coverage Identifying Redundant Phrases

DESIGN FOR SPEED

EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF GROUPER

C OMPARISON TO A R ANKED L IST D ISPLAY Compared with HuskySearch, but not TREC 1. Number of documents followed 2. Time spent 3. Click distance

TIME SPENT  The average amount of time spent on each document

CONCLUSION  Grouper  Comparison to the logs of HuskySearch  Document clustering system on the Web  Grouper-II