September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particle Pollution Mike Papp U.S. EPA 09-06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Bob Kelly, Regional Air Modeler.
Advertisements

Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
PM NAAQS Review Update Joseph Paisie Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA WESTAR Fall Business.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
EPA’s New Fine Particle Standard & Metropolitan Washington Region Sunil Kumar MWAQC, December 18, 2012 MWCOG Item #3.
The Health Effects of Particulate Matter From the 9/11 WTC Attacks
Improving Air Quality in Greenville County, SC Ground Level Ozone (O 3 ) Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM 2.5 ) The Challenge: Air Pollution.
Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards Review Process and Status Tom Moore WESTAR Council Meeting September 29, 2010 Portland, OR.
Recent advances in the understanding of the health impacts of air pollution Frank Kelly King’s College London The case for a national network of low emission.
11111 Beth M. Hassett-Sipple, US EPA/OAQPS EPA/WESTAR Residential Wood Smoke Workshop March 1, 2011 Salt Lake City, UT National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 Standards Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Sai Kung Sector Air Pollution. Geographical characteristics and popultaion Sai Kung District covers area of 12,680 hectares and has a population of: Sai.
Air Quality and Atmospheric Change Resource Concerns United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
The 6 Major Air Pollutants. OZONE  A gas that forms in the atmosphere due to the burning of fossil fuels (gas, diesel, coal, wood).  Can be “good” up.
Laws to Prevent and Reduce Air Pollution Unit 4. Human Input of Pollutants into Troposphere Nitrogen and Sulfur compounds released by burning fossil fuels.
Presentation to Board of Forestry November 29, 2011 Alice Edwards Division of Air Quality Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter Overview
Air Pollution. What is air pollution? The presence of chemicals in the atmosphere in quantities and duration that are harmful to human health and the.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
Particle Pollution: It’s a Serious Concern. PM 2.5 (2.5 µm) PM 10 ( 10µm ) An average grain of table salt is 100 micrometers across (100 µm) What is particle.
Criteria Pollutants Criteria pollutants selected because they are ubiquitous, have multiple sources, and "may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public.
1 June 2007 Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ground-level Ozone General Overview.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Implementation Issues for the Hour PM2.5 Standard EPA / WESTAR Residential Wood Smoke Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah March 1, 2011 Rich Damberg.
Health and Environmental Effects of Air Pollution David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
1 St. Louis Region Air Quality Report EWGCOG Staff Report August 12, 2008.
AIR and Air Pollution Health Effects A. Short-term effects reversible 1. headache 2. nausea 3. irritation to eyes, nose, & throat 4. tightness in chest.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. The Atmosphere: An Introduction to Meteorology, 12 th Lutgens Tarbuck Lectures by: Heather Gallacher, Cleveland.
Air Quality 101 Clean Air Partners New Member Orientation August 29, 2006.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Federal Air Quality Programs and Clean air Act 101 Darrel Harmon, OAR National Tribal Forum June 14-16, 2011 Northern Quest Casino Spokane, WA.
AIR and Air Pollution Atmosphere is made up of: 1. Nitrogen - 78% 2. Oxygen – 21% 3. Argon(.9%), carbon dioxide(.03%) and water vapor(.07%)
What’s the Deal with Emissions Lesson 3. Fuel efficiency affects the environment In the form of emissions –emission: release of a particle or substance.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2013 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality (800)
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
Air Pollution. Air Pollution: Has many effects on public health and the environment. Comes in different forms and from many sources. Ozone and Particulate.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
State Implementation Plans Could Rule Your Life or why NAAQS Are Important Chuck Sams R9 Air Quality Program Manager.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Air Pollution Pollution.  Pollutants entering the home  What we do in our homes and the products we use  How the home is built and maintained Factors.
Comparison of NAAQS RIA and Risk Assessments - Bryan Hubbell.
Particle Pollution: It’s a Serious Concern. So small, you can’t see just one of them … Particle pollution is a complex mixture of extremely small particles.
Nitrogen= 78% Oxygen=21% CO 2 =0.035% Total= %
Why Georgia Needs Gooder: Health Effects of O3 and PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Fine Particles in the Air: Taking Action, Improving Health Presentation at STAPPA/ALAPCO Meeting Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Tom Curran, EPA Office of Air Quality.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary.
Air pollution in Stuttgart ? NO 2 O3O3 PM 10. Stuttgart.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution Overview
EPA Proposed Ground-level Ozone (O 3 ) NAAQS Rich McAllister National Tribal Air Association Policy Advisory Committee Hobbs Straus Dean & Walker.
Air Pollution and Public Health Mike Kolleng American Lung Association.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Butte Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Planning Presentation to: Mat-Su Borough Assembly Meeting COMMISSIONER HARTIG & DENISE KOCH, DIRECTOR, AIR QUALITY.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards ITEP Air Quality Training Kodiak 2015 Bob Morgan Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Ravalli County Air Quality
Air Quality By Danielle Benkert.
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Fine Particulate Matter
Air Pollutants and Their Sources
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Presentation transcript:

September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particle Pollution Mike Papp U.S. EPA 09-06

2 Particulate Matter: What is It? A complex mixture of extremely small particles and liquid droplets

3 Fine Particles Combustion, gases to particles Sulfates/acids Nitrate Ammonium Organics Carbon Metals Water PM Components – Fine and Coarse Sources Coal, oil, gasoline, diesel, wood combustion Transformation of SOx, NOx, organic gases including biogenics High temperature industrial processes (smelters, steel mills) Forest fires Exposure/Lifetime Lifetime days to weeks, regional distribution over urban scale to 1000s of km

4 PM Components – Fine and Coarse (cont.) Inhalable Coarse Particles Crushing, grinding, dust Resuspended dusts (soil, street dust) Coal/oil fly ash Aluminum, silica, iron-oxides Tire and brake wear Inhalable Biological Materials (e.g., from soils, plant fragments) Sources Resuspension of dust tracked onto roads Suspension from disturbed soil (farms, mines, unpaved roads) Construction/demolition Industrial fugitives Biological sources Exposure/Lifetime: Coarse fraction ( μm) lifetime of hours to days, distribution up to 100s km

5 Larger particles (> PM 10 ) deposit in upper respiratory tract Smaller, inhalable particles (≤ PM 10 ) penetrate deep into lungs Both coarse particulate matter and fine particulate matter can penetrate to lower regions of lung Deposited particles may accumulate, react, be cleared or absorbed Particulate Matter

6 Health Effects of Particle Pollution Many scientific studies have linked breathing particle pollution to a series of significant health problems, including –Aggravated asthma –Increases in respiratory symptoms like coughing and difficult or painful breathing –Chronic bronchitis –Decreased lung function –Premature death in people with heart and lung disease

7 Regulating Particle Pollution Clean Air Act requires EPA to set two types of NAAQS for ‘criteria’ air pollutants –Primary standards to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety –Secondary standards to protect public welfare and environment (visibility, wildlife, crops, vegetation, national monuments and buildings)

8 Regulating Particle Pollution (cont.) EPA has set NAAQS for six common air pollutants –Particulate matter- Ground- level ozone (smog) –Carbon monoxide- Lead –Nitrogen dioxide- Sulfur dioxide Law requires EPA to –Review scientific information and standards for each pollutant every five years –Obtain advice from the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) on each review

9 Scientific studies related to health and environmental effects EPA Criteria Document: integrative assessment of scientific studies EPA Staff Paper: analyses and recommendations on standards Scientific peer review of published studies Reviews by CASAC and the public Public hearings and comments on proposal EPA propose s decision on standar ds EPA final decision on standard s Interage ncy review PM NAAQS Review Process – Extensive Peer Review and Public Input Interage ncy review 12/20/20054/17/2006 March,2006 Philadelphia Chicago San Francisco 9/21/2006

10 EPA’s PM Standards: Old and New Previous Standards 2006 Standards Annual24-hourAnnual24-hour PM 2.5 (Fine Particles ) 15 µg/m 3 Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years (established in 1997) 65 µg/m hour average, 98 th percentile, averaged over 3 years (established in 1997) 15 µg/m 3 Annual arithmetic mean, averaged over 3 years 35 µg/m hour average, 98 th percentile, averaged over 3 years PM 10 (Coarse Particles ) 50 µg/m 3 Annual average (established in 1987) 150 µg/m 3 24-hr average, not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a three year period (established in 1987) Revoke d 150 µg/m 3 24-hr average, not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a three year period

11 PM 2.5 – Primary 24-hour Standard EPA has strengthened level of 24-hour PM 2.5 standard from 1997 level of 65 µg/m 3 to 35 µg/m 3. Based on –Significantly expanded body of scientific information –Epidemiologic studies show health effects at and below the levels allowed by the hour standard –Consensus among CASAC panelists to place more emphasis on lowering the 24-hour PM 2.5 standard An area will meet 24-hour standard if average of 98th percentile of 24-hour PM 2.5 concentrations, averaged over three years, is less than or equal to level of standard of 35 µg/m3. Same averaging convention as hour PM 2.5 standard

12 PM 2.5 – Primary Annual Standard EPA has retained level of annual PM 2.5 standard at 15 µg/m 3, based on –Assessment of several expanded, re-analyzed and new epidemiologic studies –Increased confidence in associations between long-term PM 2.5 exposure and serious health effects, including heart and lung-related death EPA tightened conditions for spatial averaging –More than one monitor could be used to determine annual average PM 2.5 levels in an area An area will meet the annual PM2.5 standard when the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to 15 µg/m3.

13 Inhalable Coarse PM – Primary 24- hour Standard EPA has retained existing 24-hour PM 10 standard of 150 µg/m 3 –Evidence inconclusive about whether coarse particles in rural areas harm health An area will meet 24-hour PM 10 standard when 150 µg/m3 level not exceeded more than once per year on average over a three-year period

14 Inhalable Coarse PM – Revoking the Annual Standard EPA revoking annual PM 10 standard Available evidence does not suggest a link between long-term exposure to PM 10 at current ambient levels and health problems Analysis of air quality data shows 24-hour PM 10 standard generally results in annual average PM 10 levels at or below level of former annual standard of 50 µg/m 3

15 Secondary Standards EPA set secondary standards to be identical in all respects to revised primary standards –PM 2.5 EPA revised 24-hour PM 2.5 standard to be 35 µg/m 3 and retained annual PM 2.5 standard at 15 µg/m 3 –PM 10 EPA retained 24-hour PM 10 standard at 150 µg/m 3 and revoked annual PM 10 secondary standard These standards established to protect against visibility impairment and other PM-related welfare effects, including effects on vegetation and ecosystems and materials damage and soiling

16 Benefits and Costs The Clean Air Act prevents EPA from considering costs in setting or revising NAAQS. However, EPA does analyze benefits and costs of implementing standards as required by Executive Order and as a good government practice, to inform Congress and the public of benefits and costs When fully met, the revised 24-hour PM 2.5 standards estimated to yield between $9 billion and $75 billion a year in health and visibility benefits in Estimate based on opinions of outside experts on PM and risk of premature death, along with other benefits information

17 Benefits and Costs (cont.) Results of one key study alone suggest central estimate of benefits of meeting revised 24-hour PM 2.5 standards is $17 billion per year in 2020, though other recent studies suggest benefits may be higher These are in addition to benefits of meeting 1997 standards EPA estimates cost of meeting these revised standards at $5.4 billion per year in 2020

18 Benefits and Costs (cont.) Benefits of meeting revised 24-hour PM 2.5 standards include value of estimated annual reductions of –1,200 to 13,000 premature deaths from heart or lung disease –2,600 cases of chronic bronchitis –5,000 nonfatal heart attacks –1,630 hospital admissions for cardiovascular or respiratory symptoms –1,200 emergency room visits for asthma –7,300 cases of acute bronchitis –97,000 cases of upper and lower respiratory symptoms –51,000 cases of aggravated asthma –350,000 missed school/work days –2 million restricted-activity days when because of particle pollution-related symptoms

19 Implementation Issues 24-hour PM 2.5 Standard EPA intends to designate areas in late 2009–3 years plus 60 days after PM standards published in Federal Register Likely to become effective in early 2010 Annual PM 2.5 Standard and 24-hour PM 10 Standard Soon, EPA intends to address, as necessary, issues such as designations, conformity, and new source review, related to implementation of today’s final rule

20 Milestone1997 PM 2.5 Primary NAAQS 2006 PM 2.5 Primary NAAQS Promulgation of Standard July 1997Sept State Recommendati ons to EPA Feb (based on monitoring data) Dec (based on monitoring data) Final Designations Signature Dec Dec Effective Date of Designations April 2005April 2010 SIPs DueApril 2008April 2013 Attainment Date April 2010 (based on monitoring data) April 2015 (based on monitoring data) Attainment Date with Extension Up to April 2015 April 2020 Expected Timeline for Revised PM 2.5 NAAQS

21 On September 21, 2006 EPA completed review of NAAQS for particle pollution Final rule addresses two categories of particle pollution –Fine particles (PM 2.5 ) [2.5 micrometers in diameter and smaller] –Inhalable coarse particles, (larger than 2.5 micrometers and smaller than 10 micrometers in diameter) In final rule EPA –Revised fine particle standards to better protect public health and visibility –Retained 24-hour PM 10 standard to protect against exposure to inhalable coarse particles For more information go to Summary