Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) Update April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Ancillary Services (AS) Workshop
Advertisements

Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes for 2015 Sandip Sharma Bill Blevins Dan Woodfin.
“Rethinking” Ancillary Services in ERCOT and Efforts to Incorporate “Loads In SCED” ERCOT Staff Operator Training Seminar Spring 2014.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
1 Ancillary Services Requirements for Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis FAS/SIRS Meeting September 21, 2015.
Future Ancillary Services (NPRR 667) Update March 26, 2015 TAC meeting 1.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
NPRR 097 DSR and Small Capacity / Low Operating Level Issues for Compliance Monitoring.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
Overview of Revised Ancillary Services (AS) Framework Proposal
Report to TAC August In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG (No report) DSWG (No report) MCWG MCWG MWG (No report)
ERCOT Public 1 Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services Operational Issues.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
Photovoltaic and Storage Integration Workshop “Operational Issues” Kenneth Ragsdale October 15, 2012 ERCOT.
Future Ancillary Service Team (FAST) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Workshop #2 ERCOT Staff August 25,
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
PDCWG Report to ROS David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy.
SAWG Update to WMS April 6 th, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
Operations Report Kent Saathoff System Operations ERCOT.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Emergency Interruptible Load Task Force Report to TAC November 3, 2006.
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
PDCWG Report to ROS Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy.
ERCOT Public 1 Overview of ERCOT Concept Paper on Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services & Multi-Interval Real-Time Market.
SAWG Update to WMS September 2 nd, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
QSE Managers Working Group Report to WMS, April 8, 2011 S. Looney, Luminant.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
NPRRs NPRR649 Lost Opportunity Payments for HDL Manual Overrides. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes two options for a lost opportunity.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Synchronous Inertial Response
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
June 26 and July 31, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott August 5, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Preliminary Report on ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 12th, 2013.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) PDCWG April 26, 2013.
April 13, 2007 Regional Planning Group Meeting Wind Impact/Integration Analysis Warren Lasher Regional Planning.
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis Overview Julia Matevosyan February 1, 2016 FAS Workshop.
1 EEA Workshop 3 April 2, /3/2015For the purpose of discussion only.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
ERCOT Public 1 Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Workshop ERCOT Staff July 25, 2014.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
NSRS in Nodal Proposal for Deployment & Recall Procedures ERCOT ROS 10/12-13/2006 By: S.Niemeyer R.Jones R.Wheeler B.Green J.Dumas P.Breitzman.
Appeal of PRS Rejection of NPRR 667
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy
Overview of New Control Room Desk
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
Presentation transcript:

Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) Update April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting 1

Recap 1)Original Concept Paper provided )Concept Paper version 1.1 provided and incorporated written comments and info received at the October 2013 Workshop. 3)Weekly work sessions began in January (13 meetings so far in 2014) 4)7 Working Documents have been prepared. (See the next slide for list of Working Documents) 5)A preliminary PFR and FFR assessment was performed and discussed. 6)At this time, no decision points for TAC. TAC

List of Working Documents 1)Synchronous Inertial Response (SIR)** 2)Fast Frequency Reserve (FFR) 3)Primary Frequency Reserve (PFR) 4)Regulating Reserve (RR) 5)Contingency Reserve (CR) 6)Supplemental Reserve (SR) 7)Procurement and Pricing of the Proposed Future Set of Ancillary Services ** Still in progress TAC

Next Steps 1)“Black-line” the Working Documents and ask for written comments. (Send to TAC, ROS and WMS exploders and give 10 days) 2)Once the written comments are received --- categorize them and discuss at a FAST Work Session. (Late May) 3)Revise Working Documents as appropriate 4)Draft NPRR based on “final” Working Documents (The target is to post the draft NPRR by the end of June 2014) 5)Review the draft NPRR (with no number) at a FAST Work Session 6)Revise the draft NPRR as necessary and post with a number and have the NPRR proceed as normal. 7)Impact Analysis to be performed after the NPRR language is reviewed by PRS TAC

Questions Not Yet Addressed 1)What services can be provided through the DC-ties? 2)Should there be “AS Deliverability Zones”? 3)Should there be a Real-Time Market with energy and AS co-optimization? 4)How should AS obligations be determined? 5)Several questions on Synthetic/Emulated Inertia. TAC

Appendix Additional information is provided in the following Appendix. May be best to attend the FAST Workshop in May to get more details. TAC

Fast Frequency Response (FFR) A response from a resource that is automatically self-deployed and provides a full response within 30 cycles after frequency meets or drops below a preset threshold. FFR may also be manually deployed and full response must be provided within 10 minutes. FFR Resources based on their sustainability and ability to restore may participate in sub-group FFR1 or FFR2. A resource providing FFR1 must be able to sustain a full response for maximum of 10 minutes and should fully restore within 10 minutes of receiving ERCOT’s recall instruction or continuous 10 minutes of deployment, whichever comes first. A resource providing FFR2 must be able to sustain a full response until ERCOT issues a recall instruction or the resource no longer has a responsibility to provide the service, whichever comes first. The resource must be able to fully restore its FFR2 responsibility within 90 minutes after receiving ERCOT’s recall instruction. 1)Combination of PFR and FFR must be sufficient to avoid Under Frequency Load Shed for instantaneous loss of 2750 MW 2)For FFR, there are two subgroups (FFR1 and FFR2) that have different trigger points, duration requirements and reset requirements. 3)Resources providing FFR have the potential to receive manual deployments. 4)A QSE shall fully restore its FFR1 responsibility within 10 minutes after receiving ERCOT’s recall instruction. A QSE shall fully restore its FFR2 responsibility within 90 minutes after receiving ERCOT’s recall instruction. Parameters/concepts in red are still open for debate. TAC

Primary Frequency Response (PFR) The immediate proportional increase or decrease in real power output provided by a Resource and the natural real power dampening response provided by Load in response to system frequency deviations. This response is in the direction that stabilizes frequency. 1)Combination of PFR and FFR must be sufficient to avoid Under Frequency Load Shed for instantaneous loss of 2750 MW 2)Performance will be measured using the BAL-TRE-001 Regional Standard 3)Performance will set the limit on how much individual Resource can provide PFR Service 4)PFR to be a market that is cleared and the PFR MWs are reserved. 5)ERCOT will require that Resources connected to the ERCOT Transmission System and capable of providing PFR governor actions as part of their inherent design to have their governor control systems in operation at all times when they are online. 6)It was also recommended that Resources that are without any PFR responsibility can widen their Governor Dead-band up to HZ. 7)There will not be any compensation for providing governor response outside of DAM or RT Market award. 8)ERCOT may only require specific PFR performance criteria from those Resources that are providing PFR Service as the result of QSE self- arrangement or a DAM or RT Market award. TAC

Regulating Reserve Service (RR) An Ancillary Service that consists of either Regulation Down Service (Reg-Down) or Regulation Up Service (Reg-Up). 1)Regulation is made up of “Conventional” Regulation and Fast Responding Regulation ---- similar to today. Future method to deliver instructions will remain similar to today’s approach (with QSE instructions and participation factors). 2)The idea of SCED execution every 3 minutes should be examined to reduce the effect of net load variability on regulation procurement. 3)Pay for Performance likely but details to be provided after initial draft of NPRR. 4)Need for tighter performance metric 5)Resource limits to be established per practice 6)Single Generation Resource be not allowed to carry more than 25% of total regulation requirement for that particular hour 7)Resources shall be limited to provide Regulation Service up to the amount successfully tested during the qualification test 8)Criteria for determining maximum allowed FRRS participation, to be part of the AS Methodology document. TAC

Contingency Reserve (CR) An Ancillary Service provided by Generation Resources that can be synchronized and ramped to a specified output level within 10 minutes and Load Resources that can provide demand response within 10 minutes, and that can sustain the specified response (CR responsibility) for at least one hour. CR1 – Contingency Reserve provided by Resources available for deployment in SCED, e.g. Generation Resources and Controllable Load Resources (CLR); CR2 – Contingency Reserve provided by Resources not available for deployment in SCED, e.g. non-controllable “blocky” Load Resources; 1)For CR, there are two subgroups (CR1 and CR2). CR1 is provided by Resources that can be dispatched by SCED and CR2 is provided by blocky Load Resources 2)Manual deployment of CR may be needed during scarcity hours and severe weather events to resolve capacity insufficiency. 3)Contingency Reserve is needed to restore frequency within defined limits following a large generator trip event and restore the Fast Frequency Response (FFR) and Primary Frequency Response (PFR). 4)Once recalled, Resource providing CR2 should be capable of restoring its CR2 responsibility, within 180 minutes for it to be qualified as CR2. 5)NERC Standard BAL Disturbance Control Standard (DCS) requires ERCOT to carry enough reserve to recover its Area Control Error (ACE) to pre-disturbance level within 15 minutes, after a Reportable Disturbance. TAC

Supplemental Reserve (SR) An Ancillary Service that is provided through use of Off-Line Generation Resources that can be synchronized and ramped to a specified output level within 30 minutes, or Load Resources that can provide demand response within 30 minutes, and that can sustain the specified response for at least one hour. Supplemental Reserve (SR) Service is provided by using: I.Generation Resources (SR1) that are Off-Line and capable of: a.Being synchronized and ramped to a specified output level within 30 minutes; and b.Running at a specified output level for at least one hour; or II.Controllable Load Resources (SR1) qualified for Dispatch by Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) and capable of: a.Ramping to an ERCOT-instructed consumption level within 30 minutes; and b.Consuming at the ERCOT-instructed level for at least one hour. III.Non-Controllable Load Resources (SR2) which are manually deployed and are capable of: a.Delivering their demand response within 30 minutes; and b.Sustaining the response for at least one hour. c.Once recalled, Resource providing SR2 should be capable of restoring its SR2 responsibility, within 180 minutes for it to be qualified as SR2. 1)SR service is the reserve that will be used to compensate for net load forecast error, abnormal number of unit unavailability and/or net load ramps. 2)ERCOT may also procure additional SR capacity in anticipation of severe weather conditions. 3)While ERCOT believes that SR Service may not ultimately be required in the long term, it may be needed during the transition. ERCOT also believes there is a value in defining the product and creating a placeholder within the ERCOT applications. TAC

Other “Key Decisions” Expecting ERCOT RATF (Resource Adequacy Task Force) to develop appropriate approaches to mitigate the impact of Reliability Deployments on RT market prices. MCPC’s for FFR (FFR1 & FFR2), CR2, SR2 should reflect opportunity costs for energy and other ancillary services. EEA triggers and deployments will need to be reviewed TAC