Threatened and Endangered Species Issues on the Kennebec River, Maine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding and resolving conflicts between winter flounder and dredging Thomas M. Grothues Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University.
Advertisements

Removal of the Marvel Slab reopens section of the Cahaba River Photos Courtesy of Paul Freeman, The Nature Conservancy BEFORE (October 15, 2004) AFTER.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Post-Hurricane Ivan Emergency Habitat Restoration Larry E. Parson – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District Linda S. Lillycrop - U.S. Army Corps.
So Goes the Nation? Salmon Recovery in the Pacific Northwest Glenn Vanselow Pacific Northwest Waterways Association National Waterways Conference Portland,
South Atlantic Regional Biological Assessment Update on Status of Re-initation of Consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act Terri Jordan.
2015 ND COUNTY ENGINEERS & HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENTS CONVENTION.
Turtles Lessons Learned and the Gulf Regional Biological Opinion Bob Prince Chief, Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice South Atlantic Division.
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Company Shelton, Washington
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
USDA Forest Service Agency Mission and Habitat Management
May 20, 2015 NOAA Fisheries – Upcoming Fisheries Management and Protected Resources Actions in 2010.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Conservation of Endangered Species. The first federal policy for the protection of endangered species was the Endangered Species Preservation Act, passed.
1 Update on the Ongoing ESA Section 7 Consultation and DEIS Development for the Southeast Shrimp Fishery Louisiana Shrimp Task Force November 29, 2011.
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
NAD/SAD REGIONAL DREDGING MEETING/WEDA WILMINGTON DISTRICT
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act—Supporting the Mission through Proactive Conservation Planning.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
Overview of the Impact of Research and Monitoring in the Columbia River Basin Rob Clapp Gary Rule Blane Bellerud Ritchie Graves.
October FY08-FY12 Dredging Schedule New York District 1st Qtr FY08 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr FY09FY10 1st Qtr 2nd.
Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Major Rehabilitation.
Pacific Coast Groundfish Bycatch Management for Protected Species Implementing NOAA Fisheries’ Biological Opinion West Coast Region Alison Agness 1, Steve.
NEWS _menacehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/climate_09_jellyfish _menace
Cape Fear River Fisheries Restoration: An Economic Engine October 31, 2013 Dawn York, Coastal Scientist October 31, 2013 Dawn York, Coastal Scientist.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District Channels & Harbors Project Presentation for 2012 WEDA Midwest.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Permitting Lessons Learned: How to Make the Most of Your Agency Partnerships October 15, 2008 Marla Harrison, Environmental Manager.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
JACKSONVILLE ODMDS DESIGNATION M. Rau, J. Seitz, C. Smith, N. Lombardero – ANAMAR Environmental Consulting, Inc. Chris McArthur – USEPA Region 4 P. Griffin,
OP-Navigation.ppt1 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
COL Tony Francis / SFIM-AEC-CO / / DSN / of RJUNE2005 Partnerships for Protection Col. Tony R.
CALENDAR ITEM 101 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) S A N F R A N C I S C O B A Y A N D D E L T A S A N D M I N I N G P R O J E C T STATE CLEARINGHOUSE.
SEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCT FY07FY06FY08 Page 1 of 3 FY07 Dredging Schedule New York District Mechanical Dredge Maintenance Dredging Newark.
NEWS _menacehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/climate_09_jellyfish _menace
Valerie A. Cappola, Ph.D. Kenneth M. Levitt USACE New England District.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Dredge Fleet Scheduling Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis Kenneth Ned Mitchell, PhD ERDC Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Dr. Heather L. Nachtmann.
C HARLOTTE C OUNTY B EACHES & S HORES A DVISORY C OMMITTEE J ANUARY 7, 2016 C HARLOTTE C OUNTY E ROSION C ONTROL P ROJECT U PDATE.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Arch Rapids Fish Passage Cape Fear River Lock and Dam No.1 Bladen County, NC US Army Corps of Engineers.
NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance by the Army Corps, SCWA, and.
Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging
In-Delta Storage Program. Background and historyBackground and history Evolution of the fish screensEvolution of the fish screens Proposed Re-engineered.
How Do We Address Mitigation for Maintenance Dredge Permitting? A Case Study Dredging 2012, San Diego, CA October 22-25, 2012 Randi Wexler, Principal October.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Pear River Navigation Canal Project Authorized by congress in Included channelization of the W. Pearl River, construction of 3 low head sills, an.
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Low Water Operations Russell Errett Water Control St. Louis District November 29 th, 2012.
Russian River Estuary Management.
U.S. sea scallop Placopecten magellanicus
2016 FHWA National Hydraulic Engineers Conference
Endangered Species Act
Building a Fishway for Sturgeon
In-Delta Storage Program
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration
The Endangered Species Act-1988 Amendment
Endangered Species Act of 1973
In-Delta Storage Program
Presentation transcript:

Threatened and Endangered Species Issues on the Kennebec River, Maine Acipenser brevirostrum Photo: Nancy Haley, NOAA Atlantic sturgeon photo courtesy of Robert Michelson http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/stories/2012/01/31_atlantic_sturgeon.html http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/ Threatened and Endangered Species Issues on the Kennebec River, Maine Obstacles to Dredging due to the Presence of Shortnose Sturgeon, Atlantic Salmon and Atlantic Sturgeon Kenneth M. Levitt Valerie A. Cappola Ph.D. USACE New England District Troy R. Bennett / The Times Record Bangor Daily News, September 1, 2011

Kennebec River Federal Navigation Channel Phippsburg to Bath (approximately 13 miles) Maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bath Iron Works depends on channel to move Navy vessels Extremely dynamic and subject to unpredictable shoaling Authorized to Depth of 27 Feet M.L.L.W. Active from Phippsburg to approximately 13 miles upstream to Bath Maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bath Iron Works depends on channel to move Navy vessels Area is extremely dynamic and subject to unpredictable shoaling

Doubling Point, approximately 12 miles upstream from mouth of river Two reaches where shoaling has historically occurred: Doubling Point, approximately 12 miles upstream from mouth of river Popham Beach, where river joins Atlantic Ocean Two reaches where shoaling has historically occurred: Doubling Point, approximately 12 miles upstream from mouth of river Popham Beach, where river joins Atlantic Ocean

Kennebec River Provides Habitat for Three Federally Listed Fish Species 1. Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) http://www.stewart.army.mil/dpw/fish/STURGEON_facts.htm a. Originally Listed as Federally Endangered in March 1967 by the U.S. Dept of Interior b. Anadromous/ “freshwater amphidromous” in Kennebec River– Spawns upstream in freshwater in Kennebec River. Adults inhabit lower esturarine regions of river and have been shown to migrate along the coast to Penobscot River. Adults spawn in freshwater but regularly enter saltwater habitats during their life (Kieffer and Kynard 1993 as cited in NOAA, 1998) although will spend time in freshwater. b. Over-winters in areas of Kennebec River upstream from Doubling point (Merrymeeting Bay, shown by red arrow). Recent Kennebec River population estimates indicate that population has increased since the 1990s. Spawning areas have been found in the Androscoggin River below the Brunswick Dam (not shown on map), and in the Kennebec River near Gardiner (marked by red arrow), and now upstream below Lockwood Dam in Waterville (since the removal of the Edwards Dam in Augusta).

Gulf of Maine DPS of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) (Salmo salar) Photo: William Hartley, USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov a. Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment (DPS). First Listed as Endangered in 2000, with the addition of the upper Kennebec River and Penobscot River stocks in 2009. b. Anadromous – Spawns upstream in freshwater in Kennebec River. Young will live in the river for several years before smolting (a physiological change where the fish becomes able to live in salt water) and migrating downstream to mature in marine environment Adults migrate out towards Greenland before returning to spawn in freshwater natal streams (often migrating upstream over one hundred miles, not including their oceanic migrations). Lower Kennebec River has fish that spawn in both the Androscogin River and Kennebec River. Will begin to migrate upstream in May through July and spawn in the fall. Smolts will migrate downstream in the spring. Post spawning adults will down-migrate in the later fall. Spawning areas located upstream near Augusta, and with the removal of the Edwards Dam have been able to move further upstream.

Gulf of Maine DPS of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) Atlantic sturgeon photo courtesy of Robert Michelson http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/stories/2012/01/31_atlantic_sturgeon.html Photo: USFWS a. Gulf of Maine DPS proposed for listing as Threatened in October 2010, with final listing in February 2012. Also New York Bight and Chesapeake Bay DPS listed as Endangered. Although not listed at the time of dredging, it still needed to be addressed in the Section 7 Consultation because it was proposed. b. Anadromous –Spawns upstream in freshwater reaches of the Kennebec River but spend most of their adult life in the marine environment. After hatching larvae move downstream to estuary where they transition to juveniles, and will remain for months or years before moving to open ocean as sub-adults. At sea, adults make long range migrations but will return to their natal rivers to spawn (ASSRT, 2007). Have been shown to move between the Kennebec River and the Penobscot River. Have also been found in Saco River, south of the Kennebec (not shown on map). Spawning migrations occur from May – July in more northern areas (Maine/Canada). Kennebec River is one of the few rivers in Maine where spawning has historically occurred and still believed to occur for this species. d. Spawning areas believed to have been near Gardiner, and since the removal of the Edwards Dam in Augusta fish have been found further upstream on Kennebec River (ASSRT, 2007).

November 1 to April 30 of any year All three species will move throughout the Kennebec River to access various habitats during their life cycles, passing through the areas that are periodically dredged Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (required) Biological Opinion (BO) established dredge windows, reasonable and prudent measures and incidental take statements (for SNS) November 1 to April 30 of any year Dredging outside the windows - In 2003 dredged in October to move the Navy destroyer the U.S.S. Chafee Resulted in 5 Incidental takes of SNS 1. Numerous Studies conducted by and for the federal and state resource agencies have shown that all three of these species will seasonally move throughout the Kennebec river to access various habitats (i.e. spawning, overwintering, or foraging) 2. All three species will be required to pass through the areas that are periodically shoaled and dredged at some point during their life cycles 3. Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act has been required for past dredging events. Resulted in their issuance of a Biological Opinion (BO) establishing dredge windows, reasonable and prudent measures and incidental take statements to avoid jeopardy (for shortnose sturgeon) 4. The most recent dredging window established for shortnose sturgeon ranged from November 1, to April 30 of any year 5. The dynamic and unpredictable nature of the shoaling in the Kennebec River has necessitated dredging of the river outside of these dredging windows (at times) in order to ensure the passage of Navy vessels through the channel to meet critical deployment schedules. In 2003 the channel was dredged during October (outside of the window) in order to move the Navy destroyer the U.S.S. Chafee. 6. This dredging resulted in the incidental take of 5 endangered shortnose sturgeon. A BO prepared as a result of an expedited Section 7 Consultation determined that these takes did not jeopardize the continued existence of the species.

Biological Opinion Determined that 5 incidental takes of shortnose sturgeon did not jeopardize their continued existence in the Kennebec River 1. A total of 5 takes from hopper dredge Padre Island, 3 lethal. Less injuries occurred when inflow screens were removed. Take number 1 above was first lethal take. Most injuries appeared to be from retention at inflow screen.

Shoaling in late 2010 and early 2011 Dredging would need to occur to move the U.S.S. Spruance Scheduled for departure on September 1, 2011 Would need to be dredged in August (outside of window) Shoaling occurred again during late 2010 and early 2011 . It was determined that dredging would need to occur prior to the departure of a newly constructed Navy destroyer, the U.S.S. Spruance Scheduled for departure from Bath Iron Works on September 1, 2011 Due to the time required to secure funding and permits, the dredging would need to occur in August, 2011 (outside of the previously established dredging window for shortnose sturgeon)

Shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon acoustic telemetry data Shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon sampling and acoustic tracking data (collected and compiled by the State of Maine) indicated that both of these species concentrated just downstream from the proposed dredging area to forage during the late summer, with movement of individual fish through the area of active dredging expected during that time (upstream and downstream). Fish were collected and surgically implanted with sonic tags that transmit high frequency sound waves specific to that tag/fish. Acoustic receivers are set-up at designated locations along the study reach of the river Location of fish is determined relative to where and when the signal is received Map on left is study area of Kennebec River showing river kilometers and locations of acoustic receivers Graphs on right show locations of acoustically tagged Atlantic sturgeon (top) and shortnose sturgeon (bottom), as detected at specific receivers. Y axis is location (river kilometer) and X axis is time of year (month). Red mark on Y axis is river kilometer 16 (below Doubling Point). Yellow highlights on X axis are months – July, August and September Data points indicate signal at specific acoustic receiver. Receiver at river kilometer 16 (shown on map as lower red line) is downstream from Doubling Point and receiver at river kilometer 21 (shown on map as upper red line) is upstream from Doubling Point (Bath). (Doubling point is blue line on map) Can see from top graph (Atlantic sturgeon) that there is movement between river kilometer 16 (below Doubling Point) to river kilometer 48 (above Doubling Point) and then back down again between August and September. Can also see at least one shortnose sturgeon (bottom graph) moved from river kilometer 16 to river kilometer 21 between June and October (orange line), as well as movement of another fish between these two areas during late July/early August (light blue line). Also, sampling net data showed concentration of both shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon in area just downstream from Doubling Point during late August and September time frame (just downstream of Doubling Point) Map and data compiled by: Gail Wippelhauser Marine Resources Scientist Maine Department of Marine Resources #172 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 Phone: 207-624-6349 Fax: 207-624-6501 email: gail.wippelhauser@maine.gov (Used with permission)  

1. Turtle deflectors on the dragarm A total 27 takes of shortnose sturgeon could occur without jeopardy (NMFS BO) Assumption that sturgeon would be in the area of active dredging and likely be entrained in the dragarms. Also very low probability of contacting Atlantic salmon Provided reasonable and prudent measures and equipment specifications to avoid/minimize contact with endangered species that included: 1. Turtle deflectors on the dragarm 2. Methods to maintain the dragarm in contact with the substrate during dredging 3. Removing the grates and screens from the dragarms and outflow pipe(s) 4. Endangered Species Observers NMFS provided a BO determining that a total 27 takes of shortnose sturgeon could occur without jeopardizing the continued existence of the species. 2. This was based upon the assumption that sturgeon would be in the area of active dredging and likely be entrained in the dragarms of the dredge. They also determined that there would be very low probability of contacting Atlantic salmon. 3. Provided reasonable and prudent measures as well as equipment specifications to avoid or minimize contact with endangered species that included: 1. Turtle deflectors on the dragarm 2. Methods to maintain the dragarm in contact with the substrate during dredging (to avoid contact with the species) 3. Removing the grates and screens from the dragarms and inflow pipe(s) to reduce trauma from entrainment 4. Endangered Species Observer to monitor for sturgeon and other species 4. Dragarms were to be in contact with the substrate and suction would be throttled down prior to moving dragarm off of substrate, and would not be restarted until dragarm was back in contact with the substrate.

Developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Turtle Deflectors Developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Prevents turtles from becoming entrained. Can also be used for sturgeon Were installed on the dredge, Atchafalaya in 2011 Turtle Deflectors Developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Allows the dragarm to move forward while preventing the turtles from becoming entrained by moving them out of the way Can also be used for sturgeon Were installed on the dredge, Atchafalaya for dredging Kennebec River in 2011 http://www.theartofdredging.com/turtle.htm

Grates and screens initially removed from dragarms and Grates and screens initially removed from dragarms and inflows of dredge Atchafalaya Later replaced Grates and screens initially removed from dragarms and inflows of dredge Atchafalaya to minimize potential trauma to sturgeon Later replaced to ensure that sturgeon were not being missed

Dredging began on August 1, 2011 Public opposition lead to legal action against the USACE, the State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and NMFS Injunction against the USACE denied in federal court. Also revised BO was issued by NMFS (due to legal challenge) Dredging began on August 1, 2011 No evidence of shortnose or Atlantic sturgeon takes observed after 12 days with minimal entrainment of any other fish (i.e. several flounder were observed) Grates were re-installed. No indication of sturgeon entrainment after approximately 2 more days of dredging Public opposition to the dredging project occurred during this time based upon the perceived potential adverse impacts of the dredging and the disposal of dredged material on water quality, fish and shellfish and their habitat, including endangered species, leading to legal action against the USACE, the State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and NMFS An injunction against the USACE requesting that the dredging be modified was denied in Federal Court. In addition, a revised BO was issued by NMFS (in response to a legal challenge) Dredging began on August 1, 2011 After nearly 12 days of dredging, no evidence of shortnose or Atlantic sturgeon takes were observed; with only minimal entrainment of any other fish species (i.e. several flounder were observed) In order to determine if entrainment of sturgeon was being missed, the grates were re-installed on the inflow, with subsequent re- installation of the grating on the drag arms However continued dredging for approximately 2 more days showed no indication of any sturgeon entrainment, with very little evidence of any fish entrainment

They were reasonably expected to be in the dredging areas Assumed that the implementation of the reasonable and prudent measures may have helped to avoid contact with the endangered shortnose and threatened Atlantic sturgeon They were reasonably expected to be in the dredging areas Dredging completed successfully (with no takes) The U.S.S. Spruance departed on schedule on September 1, 2011 1. Therefore, it is assumed that the effective implementation of the reasonable and prudent measures for the operation of the dredge may have helped to avoid contact with the endangered shortnose and threatened Atlantic sturgeon. 2. They were reasonably expected to be in the dredging areas (although also possible that they were not in the area) 3. Could also be due to them not actually being in the area of active dredging even though they were reasonably expected to be there Dredging was completed successfully with no observed endangered species takes The U.S.S. Spruance departed on schedule on September 1, 2011 Troy R. Bennett / The Times Record Bangor Daily News, September 1, 2011