1 Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds Instructor: Chen, Ming-Puu Presenter:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Daniel C. Moos, PhD Amanda Miller (Elementary Teacher)
Effects of teaching approaches on learning outcomes: the role of metacognition in developing indicators Network 10 symposium Mirror, Signal, Manoeuvre:
Universal Design for Learning (UDL). UD in Architecture a movement of designing structures with all potential users in mind incorporated access features.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Academic Success Center (313) Self-Regulated Learning and Its Role in Tutoring Jan Collins Eaglin and Laura Woodward Tutoring Institute Academic.
Neag School of Education Using Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Online Courses Anthony R. Artino,
Strategies to Bridge the Hands-on Minds-on Gap Feb 21, 2008 Inquiry Series Michelle Shafer Assistant Director,COSMOS, Bowling Green State University Northwest.
Metacognition Helping students to self-regulate. Definitions  Metacognition - literally “beyond knowing”, knowing what one knows and doesn’t know - promoting.
ILMDA: Intelligent Learning Materials Delivery Agents Goal The ILMDA project is aimed at building an intelligent agent with machine learning capabilities.
Fostering Student Engagement in an Online Unmediated Course Leslie Stebbins T November 2009.
Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework A ́ıda Walqui The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Tutoring and Learning: Keeping in Step David Wood Learning Sciences Research Institute: University of Nottingham.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Presenter: Hsiao-lan Lee Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 09/ 02 / 2008
Taking Charge of Learning
Five Strategies to Promote SRL
1 Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Achievement in an Introduction to Information Systems Course Catherine, S. C. (2002). Self- regulated learning.
1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.
Daniel C. Moos, PhD Caitlin Bonde (‘14). Overview Introduction Introduction to flipped classrooms Theoretical framework to examine learning Prior empirical.
Daniel C. Moos, PhD “I think I can!” Which motivation constructs are predictive of metacognition?
Seeking and providing assistance while learning to use information systems Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: Sep. 16, 2009 Babin, L.M.,
The role of hypermedia in developing different kinds of vocational knowledge Fred Beven Griffith University.
1 Looking at Metacognition from a cultural perspective Minjuan Wang Xiaoyan Pan Associate professor of English, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Daniel Muijs, University of Southampton
Motivation: a construct used to explain the initiation, direction, & intensity of an individual’s behavior in a particular situation Theories of Motivation.
Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-Based Instruction-An Investigation of Motivation Perception 指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Chen, Wan-Yi.
TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Pei-Chi Lu van den Boom, G., Pass, F., van Merrienbore, J.J.G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback.
1 Duschl, R & Osborne, J ”Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education” in Studies in Science Education, 38, Ingeborg.
Computers as Mindtools by David Jonassen Summary by David Jonassen Computers can most effectively support meaningful learning and knowledge construction.
Effects of an Animated Pedagogical Agent with Instructional Strategies in Mutlimedia Learning Yung, H. I. (2009). Effects of an animated pedagogical agent.
Daniel C. Moos, PhD Caitlin Bonde. Overview Introduction Introduction to flipped classrooms Theoretical framework to examine learning Prior empirical.
Nurturing Self-Regulated Learners through Authentic Assessments Seah-Tay Hui Yong.
Winters, F., Greene, J., & Costich, C. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational.
Cognitive Science Overview Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory.
Incorporating Self Regulated Learning Techniques into Learning by Teaching Environments Biswas, G., Leelawong, K. and Belynne, K. The twenty sixth Annual.
Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: March 15,
Situated Cognition & Cognitive Apprenticeships
Developing self-regulated learners: Goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills 指導教授: Chen, Ming-Puu.
Chapter Nine Social Cognitive Theory. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 9-2 Overview The Triadic Reciprocal Causation Model Self-Control,
Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs Adviser: Ming-Puu.
1 Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? 報 告 人:張純瑋 Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents:
Social Cognitive Theory (I)
Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Presenter: Hsiao-lan Lee Professor: Ming-Puu Chen.
Chapter 6: High-Leverage Practice 1: Formative Evaluation.
1 Adolescents' use of Self-Regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia Presenter: Zong-Lin Tsai Advisor:
Teachers that matter Effective teachers Gingerlee Lackey Graduate Student University of Alabama A presentation based on Chapter 3, “The argument: Visible.
Exploring the Effects of Motivated Learning Support in a Problem-based Learning Environment Ming-Puu Chen National Taiwan Normal University Taipei, Taiwan.
Universal Design for Learning Creating Curb Cuts Creating Curb Cuts.
Teachers that matter Effective teachers Gingerlee Lackey Graduate Student University of Alabama A presentation based on chapter 3, “The argument: Visible.
The Effects of Scaffolding on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Skills Brittany Schmitz This symbol in the bottom left hand corner will indicate that.
Chapter 9: Social Cognitive Theory Created by: Leslie De la Fuente.
Learning Analytics isn’t new Ways in which we might build on the long history of adaptive learning systems within contemporary online learning design Professor.
Social Cognitive Theory
Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning Presenter: Hou, Ming-Hsien Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: August 19, 2008 Manlove, S.,
Learning Adaptation Slavi Stoyanov. LA Position Conceptual Design –Operational definition of LD (what is it? Why is it? whom is it for? what do we adapt.
Nan Ding Adaptive Instructional System.
Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia ? Presenter: Hsiao-lan Lee Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date:
Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments Narciss, S., Proske, A. & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in.
Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 12/18/2007
Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? 指導教授:陳明溥 學 生 :王麗君.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
David E. Gesner, MA, NREMT-P
Model Types Instructional Decisions Associated Lesson Plans
WHAT IS LIFE LONG LEARNING IMPORTANCE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING
UDL Guidelines.
Presentation transcript:

1 Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds Instructor: Chen, Ming-Puu Presenter: Tsai, Yu-Ting Azevedo, R., Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379.

Introduction Scaffolding students’ self-regulated learning and metacognition during learning with computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) has become a critical issue that has recently received a tremendous amount attention by researchers from several communities. Traditional CBLEs such as intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to effectively scaffold student’s learning of well-structured tasks such as algebra, based on their ability to dynamically and systematically monitor, adapt, and scaffold a learner’s individual learning (Derry & Lajoie, 1993; Anderson et al., 1995; Shute & Psotka, 1996; Koedinger, 2001; Aleven & Koedinger, 2002). 2

Introduction Recent technological advances and widespread use of open-ended learning environments such as hypermedia, hypertext, collaborative learning environments, and web-based learning environment challenge traditional conceptions of scaffolding posing significant theoretical, conceptual, methodological, educational, and design challenges. (see Hogan & Pressley, 1997; Hannafin et al., 1999; Azevedo, 2003, in press; Pea, 2004; Reiser, 2004; Puntambekar & Hubscher, 2005; Graesser et al., in press; Quintana et al., in press; White & Frekeriksen, in press) 3

Importance of scaffolding metacognitive and self-regulated learning Scaffolding is a critical component in facilitating students’ learning. (see Chi et al., 1994, 2001) Scaffolding involves providing assistance to students on an as- needed basis, fading( 褪除 ) the assistance as learner competence increases (Wood et al., 1976) Scaffolds are tools, strategies, and guides used by human and computer tutors, teachers, and animated pedagogical agents during learning to enable them to develop understandings beyond their immediate grasp. (Graesser et al., 2000; Reiser, 2002) 4

Importance of scaffolding metacognitive and self-regulated learning Several studies have recently provided evidence that when students learn about complex topics with computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) in the absence of scaffolding they show poor ability to regulate their learning, and failure to gain a conceptual understanding of the topic. (Hill & Hannafin, 1997; Greene & Land, 2000; Land & Greene, 2000; Azevedo & Cromley, 2004). Researchers have recently begun to emphasize the importance of embedded conceptual, metacognitive, procedural, and strategic scaffolds in CBLEs. (e.g., Vye et al., 1998; Hannafin et al., 1999; Azevedo, 2000, in press; Lajoie et al., 2000; White et al., 2000; Brush & Saye, 2001; Hadwin & Winne, 2001; Azevedo, 2002; Baylor, 2002; Puntambekar, 2003) 5

Specific issues related to scaffolding self- regulated learning and metacognition Specific issues : (1) What attributes of scaffolding are emphasized? (2) What kind of learning is supported through scaffolding? (3) What or who is the source of scaffolded support? (4) What kinds of scaffolds are effective? (5) How are scaffolding needs diagnosed (6) What are the future directions and challenges to be faced? 6

(1) What attributes of scaffolding are emphasized? Four attributes associated with scaffolding include: diagnosis, calibrated support, fading, and individualization. (Azevedo et al. 2005; Hadwin et al. 2005) The attributes of the scaffolds emphasized in the studies range from adaptive scaffolding based on on-going diagnosis, calibrated to the individual learner which may include some degree of fading to having the student engage in self-diagnosis with no other form of individualized support or fading. (e.g., Choi et al., 2005; Dabbaugh & Kitsantas 2005; Puntambekar & Stylianou 2005) 7 Specific issues

2. What kind of learning is supported through scaffolding? Scaffolding may support a range of instructional targets including: (1) learning domain knowledge e.g., concepts, procedures, etc (2) learning about one’s own learning e.g., metacognition, self regulated learning (3) learning about using the computer-based learning environment e.g., procedures, embedded tools, functionality, etc (4) learning how to adapt to a particular instructional context e.g., engaging in adaptive help-seeking behavior, modifying contextual features to facilitate learning, etc. 8 Specific issues

3. What or who is the source of scaffolded support? Learning support and scaffolding can be provided by the learner (e.g., through questioning), by the static prompts or templates in a CBLE, or by an external human or artificial agent in the learning……? SRL behaviors (planning, monitoring, learning strategies...) Support by human tutor: versus fixed scaffolds (Azevedo et al., 2005) Support student instructor dialogue(prompting, questioning, etc.) (Hadwin et al., 2005) Support by paper based metanavigational scaffold. (Puntambekar and Stylianou, 2005) Support by metacognitive scaffolds, peer feedback, instructor prompting. (Choi et al., 2005), Support through web-based pedagogical tools (WBPT) and distance instructor. (Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2005) 9 Specific issues

4. Diagnosing when to scaffold during learning The studies can be contrasted with respect to: (a) who did the diagnosing? (b) whether the diagnosis is focused on the individual learner, the task, or the studying context / tools? Tutor diagnosed and individualized support. (Azevedo et al., 2005) Instructor diagnosed and individualized scaffolding support Student self-diagnosed & requested support. (Hadwin et al., 2005) Self-diagnosis. (Puntambekar and Stylianou, 2005; Choi et al., 2005) 10 Specific issues

5. What is the mark of successful scaffolding and what kinds of scaffolds are effective? The studies measured the effectiveness of scaffolding in multiple ways. For example, self-report measures of goal setting, task strategies, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, time planning and management, help seeking, usefulness for each web-based tool (Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2005). Adaptive scaffolding was effective for moving students toward more sophisticated mental models, increasing declarative knowledge, & increasing frequency of some SRL strategies. (Azevedo et al., 2005) On-line guidance seems to affect the frequency of questions students generate over time. (Choi et al., 2005) Different WBPTs support different self-regulatory strategies. (Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2005) 11 Specific issues

6. What are the future directions and challenges to be faced in designing computer-based supports for scaffolding self- regulated learning and metacognition ? (1) design specific computer based scaffolds to support different aspects of self-regulated learning. (2) target scaffolds in hypermedia environments to diagnose, support, evaluation planning, monitoring, and strategy use. (3) develop pedagogical agents to diagnose specific problems, calibrate support to the appropriate phase of SRL and the specific problem, and fade or adapt support as students self-regulate their own content learning. (4) build adaptive support based on some hierarchical priority of rules that inform the decisions of what type of metanavigational support should be given to students. 12 Specific issues