Cosmological Weak Lensing With SKA in the Planck era Y. Mellier SKA, IAP, October 27, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The CFHT- Legacy Survey Elisabetta Semboloni Argelander Institut für Astronomie.
Advertisements

Photo-z for LRGs, DES, DUNE and the cross talk with Dark Energy Ofer Lahav, University College London 1. The Dark Energy Survey 2. Photo-z methodology.
1 COSMOS Dark Matter Maps with COSMOS Jason Rhodes (JPL) January 11, 2005 San Diego AAS Meeting For the COSMOS WL team : (Justin Albert, Richard.
Weak Lensing Tomography Sarah Bridle University College London.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
What can we learn from Gravitational Magnification with BigBOSS? Alexie Leauthaud LBNL & BCCP.
Cosmological Information Ue-Li Pen Tingting Lu Olivier Dore.
Å rhus, 4 September 2007 Julien Lesgourgues (LAPTH, Annecy, France)
Cosmic Shear with HST Jason Rhodes, JPL Galaxies and Structures Through Cosmic Times Venice Italy March 27, 2006 with Richard Massey, Catherine Heymans.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Weak Lensing of The Faint Source Correlation Function Eric Morganson KIPAC.
R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST-SNAP complementarity Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France Page 1.
Jason Rhodes, JPL 207 th AAS Meeting, January 10, 2006 Nick Scoville, COSMOS PI COSMOS Lensing Team: Jean-Paul Kneib, Jason Rhodes, Justin Albert, David.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Dark Energy with 3D Cosmic Shear Dark Energy with 3D Cosmic Shear Alan Heavens Institute for Astronomy University of Edinburgh UK with Tom Kitching, Patricia.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
Relating Mass and Light in the COSMOS Field J.E. Taylor, R.J. Massey ( California Institute of Technology), J. Rhodes ( Jet Propulsion Laboratory) & the.
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Ludovic Van Waerbeke Department of Physics and Astronomy University of British Columbia Statistical lensing in COSMOS With: F. Bernardeau (CEA) Y. Mellier.
Weak Gravitational Lensing and Cluster Counts Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay) Collaborators: Jason Rhodes (Caltech) Richard Massey (Cambridge) David Bacon.
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
Impact of intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear Shearing by elliptical galaxy halos –SB + Filipe Abdalla astro-ph/ Intrinsic alignments and photozs.
Cosmic Shear: Potential and Prospects Shear measurement Photometric redshifts Intrinsic alignments Sarah Bridle, UCL (London)
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni Martin Kilbinger Andisheh Mahdavi.
Cosmic shear results from CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni.
Cosmic scaffolding and the growth of structure Richard Massey (CalTech ) with Jason Rhodes (JPL), David Bacon (Edinburgh), Joel Berg é (Saclay), Richard.
XXIIIrd IAP Colloquium, July 2nd 2007, Paris Cosmic shear using Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (Wide) Liping Fu Institut d’Astrophysique.
Intrinsic ellipticity correlation of luminous red galaxies and misalignment with their host dark matter halos The 8 th Sino – German workshop Teppei O.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Testing the Shear Ratio Test: (More) Cosmology from Lensing in the COSMOS Field James Taylor University of Waterloo (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) DUEL Edinburgh,
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
Cosmic shear Henk Hoekstra Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria Current status and prospects.
Berkeley, 16 th – 18 th May 2004Wide-Field Imaging from Space Weak lensing with GEMS Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDS Catherine Heymans Max-Planck-Institute.
Shapelets analysis of weak lensing surveys Joel Bergé (CEA Saclay) with Richard Massey (Caltech) Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay) Joel Bergé (CEA Saclay)
The masses and shapes of dark matter halos from galaxy- galaxy lensing in the CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Mike Hudson Ludo van Waerbeke Yannick Mellier Laura.
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
Tracking quintessence by cosmic shear constraints from VIRMOS-Descart and CFHTLS and future prospects May 2006 workshop PNC – IPNL Lyon In collaboration.
Scalar field quintessence by cosmic shear constraints from VIRMOS-Descart and CFHTLS and future prospects July 2006, Barcelona IRGAC 2006 In collaboration.
HST ACS data LSST: ~40 galaxies per sq.arcmin. LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, LSST will achieve percent level statistical.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
Weak Lensing Alexandre Refregier (CEA/Saclay) Collaborators: Richard Massey (Cambridge), Tzu-Ching Chang (Columbia), David Bacon (Edinburgh), Jason Rhodes.
Hudson IAP July 4 Galaxy- Galaxy Lensing in CFHTLS Hudson (Waterloo) 2/3 Canadian 2/3 French.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Investigating dark matter halos of galaxies from the COMBO-17 survey Martina Kleinheinrich (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg) & Hans-Walter.
Gravitational Lensing
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Probing dark matter halos at redshifts z=[1,3] with lensing magnification L. Van Waerbeke With H. Hildebrandt (Leiden) J. Ford (UBC) M. Milkeraitis (UBC)
Combining Lensing with SNIa and CMB Sampling the Posterior Martin Kilbinger IAP Paris Martin Kilbinger IAP Paris Toronto, 13 June 2008 Upcoming lensing.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
COSMIC MAGNIFICATION the other weak lensing signal Jes Ford UBC graduate student In collaboration with: Ludovic Van Waerbeke COSMOS 2010 Jes Ford Jason.
Measuring Cosmic Shear Sarah Bridle Dept of Physics & Astronomy, UCL What is cosmic shear? Why is it hard to measure? The international competition Overview.
Xi An, May 20, 2014 Measuring the Cosmic Shear in Fourier Space Jun Zhang ( 张骏 ) (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) Collaborators: Eiichiro Komatsu (MPA),
Cosmology with gravitational lensing
STEP: THE SHEAR TESTING PROGRAMME
DEEP LENS SURVEY Long term dual hemisphere campaign
Princeton University & APC
Probing the Dark Universe with Weak Gravitational Lensing
P5: February 22, 2008 Weak Gravitational Lensing
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Chengliang Wei Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Cosmological Weak Lensing With SKA in the Planck era Y. Mellier SKA, IAP, October 27, 2006

~ Gpc Cosmic shear : propagation of light through the cosmic web

Cosmological distortion field projected on the sky

Weak gravitational lensing and cosmology: Light propagation in inhomogeneous universes Bartelmann & Schneider 2001; Erben 2002 ds 2 =c 2 dt 2 - a 2 (t) [dw 2 + f K 2 (w) d  2 ] Distances Power spectrum, growth rate of structure Both depend on the dark matter and dark energy content in the Universe Deflection angle:

Properties of Dark energy in the Planck era: measuring very small effects, DE dominated era at small z (good for WL)

Cosmic shear surveys and dark cosmological models : exploring the power spectrum z=1 z=2

Shapes and Shear: practicing WL PSF anisotropy correction Derived from star shape analysis. Image quality of primary importance for weak lensing =  s +  i + noise + systematics …. Weak lensing regime :  ~ 2  = ‹  S hear ›  + noise Assume sources orientation is isotropic : Mellier 1999 δ ~ 2γ (weak lensing regime) Reliability of results: depends on PSF analysis κ

Bartelmann & Schneider 2001 : theoretical predictions from the gravitational instability scenario I. The shape and amplitude of the signal is in very good agreement with gravitational instability paradigm in a CDM-dominated universe. (Blandford el al 1991, Miralda-Escudé 1991, Kaiser 1992, 1998, Bernardeau et al 1997, Jain & Seljak 1997, Schneider et al 1998) M ap variance Top-Hat Shear variance (predicted) See: Bacon et al 2000 *, 2001 ; Kaiser et al * ; Maoli et al * ; Rhodes et al 2001 * ; Refregier et al 2002 ; van Waerbeke et al * ; van Waerbeke et al. 2001, 2005 ; Wittman et al * ; Hammerle et al * ; Hoekstra et al * ; Brown et al ; Hamana et al * ; Jarvis et al ; Casertano et al 2003 * ; Rhodes et al 2004 ; Massey et al ; Heymans et al 2004 * ; Semboloni et al 2006 ; Hoekstra et al 2005, Hetterscheidt et al 2006, Schrabback et al 2006, Fu et al 2006 Refregier et al 2002 Linear Non-Linear Non_linear Linear Top-Hat Shear variance (observed)

Galaxy ellipticity Galaxy redshift Cosmic shear and dark energy Cosmic shear is a unique way to explore the dark matter power spectrum P(k,z) directly

Galaxy ellipticity Galaxy redshift Power spectrum Bispectrum Decoupling geometry/P(k) Tomography Control systematics Cosmic shear and dark energy Cosmic shear is a unique way to explore the dark matter power spectrum P(k,z) directly

Galaxy ellipticity Galaxy redshift Power spectrum Bispectrum Decoupling geometry/P(k) Tomography Control systematics Dark energy properties Cosmic shear and dark energy Cosmic shear is a unique way to explore the dark matter power spectrum P(k,z) directly

Galaxy ellipticity Galaxy redshift Power spectrum Bispectrum Decoupling geometry/P(k) Tomography Control systematics Dark energy properties Need high image quality Accurate PSF correction Accurate galaxy redshift Large FOV for linear power spectrum Large FOV for cosmic variance Cosmic shear and dark energy Cosmic shear is a unique way to explore the dark matter power spectrum P(k,z) directly

Errors and systematics uncertainties PSF corrections Redshift distribution Clustering Contamination by overlapping galaxies Intrinsic alignement Intrinsic foreground/backgound correlations Sampling variance Non-linear variance Non-linear dark matter power spectrum + cosmic variance (survey size, survey topology, depth)

Exploring DE as function of redshift : still far from getting w a CSLS 5yr Deep+Wide 170/170 deg 2 SNSL 5yr SNLS 5yrs CSLS+SNLS Jarvis, Jain, Bernstein, Dolney 2005

Breaking degeneracies with tomography

Cosmic shear: non-SKA projects Survey Sq. Degrees FiltersDepthDatesStatus CTIO751shallowpublished VIRMOS91moderatepublished COSMOS2 (space)1moderatecomplete DLS (NOAO) 364deepcomplete Subaru30?1?deep 2005? observing CFH Legacy 1705moderate observing RCS2 (CFH) 8303shallow approved VST/KIDS/ VISTA/VIKING moderate ? 50%approved DES (NOAO) 50004moderate ? proposed Pan-STARRS ~10,000?5?moderate ? ~funded LSST15,000?5?deep ? proposed JDEM/SNAP (space) 9deep ? proposed VST/VISTA DUNE 5000? ? moderate 4+5 proposed 20000? (space) 2+1? moderate ? proposed KIDS + CFHTLS Wide + CFHTLS Deep: 3 lens planes

SKA vs. others DUNE: Very Large FOV: deg2 Space: excellent PSF correction No spectro-z Reasonnably good photo-z? 10 9 galaxies 2017? SNAP: Reasonnable FOV: 1000 deg2 Space: excellent PSF correction No spectro-z Good photo-z 5x10 8 galaxies >2015? LSST: Very Large FOV: deg2 Ground: reassonably good PSF correction No-spectro-z Reasonnably good photo-z 5x10 9 galaxies 2014? SKA: Very Large FOV: deg2 Radio: Excellent PSF correction Spectro-z 5x10 9 galaxies >2020?

SNAP cosmic shaer: 300deg 2

Merit factors BUT: this assumes systematics are controled

Intrinsic projected ellipticity distribution of galaxies in the optical/NIR bands σ ε =0.35

Intrinsic projected ellipticity of SKA galaxies What is σ ε for the SKA sample? How does it vary with galaxy type? How does it vary with environment? How does it vary with redshift?

Cosmic shear with SKA Strong points: Very large FOV (linear spectrum, cosmic variance) Excellent sampling of the PSF Excellent sampling of galaxies Very precise N(z) :best for control of systematics (e.g. effects of clustering) Unknown: Intrinsic ellipticity dispersion and its evolution with redshift PSF stability ? Weak point: A bit far as compared to other projects (could be an advantage… it depends on what other projects will find…)