Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman.  Baby Boomer Exodus  New Generation of Teachers  Concerns about classroom management  Concerns about the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploring and Assessing New Teacher Induction Program Models
Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
Mentoring August 25, What is the difference between mentoring and coaching?
Induction in Effective Schools Fostering quality teaching.
New Teacher Induction Academy Data Collection November 30, 2011
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
By Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D.. Experience is the best teacher?
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
PATHWAYS MENTORING WORKSHOP Dr. Jane Zenger Dr. Quantina Haggwood September 9, 2009.
New Teacher Mentoring Programs Presented by: Shannon Butler, Suzanne Brown, Brandy Day, Giovanni Hines, Scott Holland and Ann Marie Nelin EPPL 643 Spring.
“Induction and Mentoring: Making It Work” 2nd Annual New Teacher Induction/Mentoring Conference 2007 Points of Pride.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
NEW TEACHER INDUCTION By Amber Keller Dr. Massingill December 5, 2013.
 Superintendent appoints a Project Director   Project Director pairs a trained, certified mentor with novice teacher according to: ◦ Same Building.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Promoting Reflective Teaching in Adult ESL through Peer Mentoring.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
CPD- Continuous Professional Development & GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL STAFF.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Illini Central Induction-Mentoring Program Teacher Turn Over Rates.
Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman. How many years of teaching experience do you have? 1. Pre-service over.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
TEACHER INDUCTION PROGRAM MENTOR TRAINING August 21, 2009.
Office of Service Quality
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Peer Assistance and Review Program Volusia County Schools “ I couldn’t have done it without you!”
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Network Rounds Oviatt Elementary School Norwalk School District April 10, 2015.
Advanced Classroom Technology State funding for implementing technology Professional development for 21 st Century Classrooms One-to-One Mobile Devices.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Joshua Miller Blytheville Middle School 7 th Grade Math Student Engagement.
TEAM Teacher Education and Mentoring Program. What is the TEAM Program? Legislation passed in October 2009 has established a Teacher Education and Mentoring.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
MTT Standard 5, Competency 9 Final Assessment Click to begin.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Reflections of: Mentor-Inductee-Coordinator
District Mentoring Plan
University Supervisors
Partnership for Practice
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
New Teacher Induction Model
Making All Teachers Better Teachers for Students with Disabilities
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
The Meriden Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman

 Baby Boomer Exodus  New Generation of Teachers  Concerns about classroom management  Concerns about the pedagogical skills leaving

 New teacher’s fear and isolation needs to be addressed  Mentor is a friendly, familiar face in the sea of new acquaintances  “Relationships is all there is”

 Program design is based on research  Evertson & Smithey, statistical evidence for mentor training  Charlotte Danielson, Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching  Podsen & Denmark, Coaching & Mentoring First-Year & Student Teachers  Harry Wong, The First Days of School

Does your program assign mentors with inductees? 1. Yes 2. No

 Purposeful Pairing is a Great Theory  Compatible Personality Type  Same Grade Level  Close Proximity

 Induction Day  Induction Manual  Answer common questions (pay check, how to get a sub.)  Introduce to induction-mentoring program  Harry Wong’s First Days of School

Do you have an Induction Day(s) as part of your program? 1. Yes 2. No

 Induction Day Should be Away from the School Building  Induction Day Needs to be Interactive  More the Merrier! More There, More Input!

 Mentor Training Day  Review of training  Opportunity to discuss what learned  Research  Emphasis on classroom observation  Planning for Induction Day

Does your program include mentor training? 1. No 2. Training is at least one day per school year 3. Training is twice per school year 4. Formal training based upon a text/manual which includes multiple days throughout school year

 Mentor Training Has Benefits  Awareness of their role  Awareness of how to navigate  Raises level of professional talk  Raises level of expectations for professional development

 Monthly Mentor Training Meetings  Podsen & Denmark’s Coaching & Mentoring First-Year & Student Teachers  Power point and/or video of a lesson or cognitive coaching session

 Monthly Meetings: M-I-C Group (Mentors-Inductees-Coordinator)  Inspirational  Discuss a monthly topic from Charlotte Danielson’s Framework  Coordinator’s power point or special speaker from within the district, and group discussion

 Next month’s mentoring packet is handed out  New monthly topic (Danielson)  Planning Guide with individualized inductee goal  Observation requirement with checklists  Article Discussion  Reading assignment for the mentors (Podsen & Denmark)  Treats

 Monthly Meetings: M-I-C Trio (Mentor-Inductee-Coordinator)  Coordinator meets with mentor pair to answer questions and offer support

 Weekly Meetings: M-I pair (Mentor- Inductee)  Offer support to inductee ▪ Answer questions about the school, district, policies, etc. ▪ Act as a sounding board (may vent)  Monthly Packet

 Monthly packet  Planning guide (individualized goal setting)  Article discussion  Observation discussion

What type of meetings are required of your inductees? 1. None 2. Only with mentor, based upon inductee request 3. Required mentor- inductee meetings 4. Required M-I meetings and M-I-C meetings 5. Required M-I meetings, M-I-C meetings, and M-I- C group meetings

 At Times, Teachers Feel Overwhelmed from so Many Meetings  Teachers Benefit from the Meetings

 Classroom observation taught in stages to inductees and mentors  Leads to cognitive coaching, peer coaching, and action research  Induction Manual contains Observation Guide based upon Podsen & Denmark’s work

What type of classroom observations are required by your program? 1. None 2. Mentor informal observation 3. Mentor and inductee informal observation 4. Mentor formal observation (cognitive coaching) 5. Mentor and inductee formal observation (cognitive coaching)

 At Times, Teachers Feel Overwhelmed with Commitments to do Classroom Observation  Teachers Benefit from Classroom Observations (observing and being observed)

 Second school district in IL to receive ISBE approval for an induction-mentoring program  UIS  Presentations  INTC  KDP Connect  Website  Research

 Mentoring is a form of professional development and it ties directly into all of the other professional development initiatives at our school.

 5 Essentials : Survey of Learning Conditions  Illinois Shared Learning Environment  Common Core and cohesive curriculum  Local Assessment System  Stem Programs of Study and Individual Learning Plans  Performance Evaluation Reform Act  Mentoring and induction for new teachers and new principals

 This survey is used to provide a detailed look at the inner workings of a school from an organized perspective. The survey is like taking an X-ray of a school to identify strengths and weaknesses.  The five indicators on the survey are :  Effective Leaders  Collaborative Teachers  Involved Families  Supportive Environments  Ambitious Instruction

 Mentoring programs provide an opportunity for veteran teachers to help novice teachers with creating unit plans to cover common core standards.  Mentoring and induction programs provide a chance for mentors and inductees to observe in classrooms to gain knowledge about instruction and curriculum across grade levels.  Mentoring and induction programs provide an opportunity to provide feedback to one another about instruction that takes place in classrooms.

 The Mentoring and Induction Program provides detailed information on teaching based on the competencies from Charolette Danielson’s “Enhancing Professional Practice A Framework for Teaching”  New teacher evaluation is based on Charolette Danielson’s framework

 Multitude of education initiatives – Administrators cannot implement it all alone  Teacher buy-in  Teachers viewed as credible sources

 Challenges and Victories  Prisoner, vacationer, learner  Administrator’s support  Funding

Do you perceive that there are prisoners, vacationers, and learners amongst your inductee pool? 1. Yes 2. Some school years 3. No

How supportive do you feel your administrators are toward your mentoring-induction program? 1. Opposed 2. Indifferent 3. Some 4. Interested 5. Interested & involved

 Did you learn anything from your challenges and victories?  Reflecting on challenges and victories builds support for new growth.

 Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman