IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Incentives and BSC Managerial Accounting David Fender.
Advertisements

Chapter 13: Organizational Innovation and Change
HR SCORECARD Presented By ADEEL TARIQ MOBASHIR ALI.
Performance Measures What you measure is what you get Performance measures strongly affect the behavior of managers and employees Tailor your performance.
System Office Performance Management
Balanced Scorecard MBA © Rajiv D. Banker Do not reproduce without permission MBA.
Human Resource Management Lecture-25. Career (cont..)
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
Building Performance Excellence in Health Care James R. Evans Professor of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management College of Business University.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
What is Strategy? (Part Two). Key Concepts Managerial Cognition Business Model Stakeholders The Balanced Scorecard.
External Factor : Environment / Intangibles Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: L0074/Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi 2 Tahun: 2008.
The Balanced Scorecard. Developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton. Introduced in the early 1990s. Motivated in part by Wall Street’s focus on quarterly.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Performance Management and Strategic Planning: Overview
1 How LRW Faculty can Contribute to Their Law School’s Assessment Plan David Thomson (University of Denver) Sophie Sparrow (University of New Hampshire)
System Office Performance Management
Performance Management Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Chapter 2 The Managerial Role. Copyright © 2006 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Purpose and Overview Purpose –To understand roles of.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Assessing and Managing the Benefits of Enterprise Systems Mike Mazza BUS-550.
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 4 Performance Methodology: The Balanced Scorecard.
Identity & Purpose Desired State Vision 2012 Target Achievements Projection into the external environment Key Successful factors / Value Drivers / Internal.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
By Assoc. Prof. Teay Shawyun, Ph.D. Strategic Development of Quality Management System within the SPMS (Strategic Performance Management System)
Measuring for Performance: The Balanced Scorecard
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
The Adapted Balanced Scorecard. Kaplan’s Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard Framework to Nonprofit Organizations Financial Perspective If we succeed,
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Example of Maryland Performance Management Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Fall 2008.
Logistics and supply chain strategy planning
TRANSFORMING CAPABILITY SUPPORT MATERIALS LEADING VISION CREATION Balanced Scorecard Introduction The balanced scorecard can be used for translating a.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
TEST With Johan Beeckmans
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
NHS Education for Scotland Defining A Quality Improvement Framework For A Coordinated Service Model Workshop 27 th May 2003 Dr Ann Wales NHS Scotland Library.
The Balanced Score Card
“Look, who is the most successful in attracting and holding good people? The nonprofits. The satisfaction has to be greater than in business because there.
Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign & Innovation University of Maryland, University College.
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 Performance Management and Strategic Planning: Overview  Definition and Purposes.
GEF Evaluation Office. Two overarching objectives:  Promote accountability for the achievement of GEF objectives through the assessment of results, effectiveness,
Measuring Results of Improvement Actions Márcio Rodrigues, Tallin, 13/01/2015.
Does Your Academic Program Make a Difference? Knowing What Your Students Learned Rosslyn M. Smith (moderator) Katherine A. Austin Valerie Osland Paton.
Building Effective Staff Development to Support Employer Engagement Jane Timlin & Renata Eyres The University of Salford.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Internal Auditing Effectiveness
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC SECRETARIES OF KENYA Board and Strategic Leadership Seminar Venue: Sarova Panafric Hotel Session: Strategic Leadership Role.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Balanced Scorecard Process Writing Outcome Objectives and Measures.
Building evaluation in the Department of Immigration and Citizenship
The Balanced Scorecard
Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Associate Prof. Hanan Eltobgy
Assessing the Internal Environment of the Firm
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Contents A GENERIC IT BALANCED SCORECARD
Is there another way besides accreditation?
OE Project Alliance Meeting
Contents IT BALANCED SCORECARD AND BUSINESS BALANCED SCORECARD
The Balanced Scorecard
Introduction to Quality
Assessment of Service Outcomes
Balanced Scorecard Process Writing Outcome Objectives and Measures
Presentation transcript:

IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007

2 Definition of Institutional Effectiveness Institutional Effectiveness reflects the capacity of an organization to sustain adaptive processes to achieve its mission. An effective institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative services, assesses outcomes attainment, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.

3 Presentation Outcome Expected Outcome of Presentation: Participants will be motivated to create improvement initiatives to increase constituent satisfaction and consider the use of the Blackboard Outcomes System™ as a means of achieving enhanced institutional effectiveness.

4 Why take action? Improvement is our business Lead by example Listen to Stakeholders for improvements Share successes with colleagues across campus.

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard5 Impact of Technology Technology employees need to become leaders contributing to improved quality, reduced costs and decreased cycle time. Breakthroughs in performance require major change, and that includes changes in the measurement and management systems used by an organization. Technology leads the way in offering customized services in a student-diverse learning environment without the high cost for high variety and low-volume operations.

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard6 Impact of Technology With technology, institutions operate with greater integration of processes cutting across functional areas. Cross-Functions: Institutions can now combine the expertise of specialized functions with the benefits of speed, efficiency and quality of integrated business processes. Linking Faculty and Staff with Students: Information technology enables institutions to supply, produce and deliver processes that meet variable student needs and expectations. Consider the improvements in controlling student expenses, increasing quality, and faster response time in meeting student needs. Technology demands innovation for survival. Institutions must anticipate future student needs.

Criteria for Performance Excellence, NIST7 IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Performance Excellence is the goal. Performance Excellence refers to an integrated approach to organizational performance management that results in: 1.Delivery of ever-improving value to students, contributing to organizational success 2.Improvement of overall organizational effectiveness and capabilities, and 3.Organizational and personal learning

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard8 IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Outcomes Assessment is the key managerial process to achieve Performance Excellence. The Outcomes Assessment Process provides strategic feedback and institutional learning.

9 Articulating Goals, Processes and Outcomes Goal - Description of purpose or intent Process - Means by which the goal will be achieved Outcome - Results expected from achievement of the goal

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard10 Outcomes Assessment Outcomes Assessment provides a means of making organizational learning visible through clearly articulated goals, identification of specific outcomes, and actual results found. The identification of gaps between intended and actual results provides a basis for taking action in the next cycle of improvement.

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard11 Who do you serve? Identify your key services. Define your audiences. How do you know what each audience needs from you? How do you know what each audience expect? How will you find out?

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard12 Define Success After defining functions, answer these questions: What must be achieved to assert that the service is being successfully delivered? How will you measure your success? What data needs to be collected to evaluate success? How will you make changes to improve your success?

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard13 The Research Process What action will be taken to meet our defined success factors aligned with client needs and expectations? What is your expected Outcome (Results)? How will you measure your results? What is your target goal? How will you collect and store your data? How will your data be monitored, evaluated and reported?

14 What shall we measure? –Quantity – Amount or Number Time Cost Counts Rates Ratios –Quality – Conformance to Requirements Knowledge Skills Competencies Behavior Processes Fitness for Use Satisfaction

Kaplan & Norton, The Balanced Scorecard15 Cycles of Improvement

16 Blackboard Outcomes System™

17 Blackboard Outcomes System™

18

19 IT Leading the Way to Success Comments and Questions