15.07.2008 IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
P. 1Mario Deile – Machine Background Mario Deile Status of the Studies.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
M. Ruspa - FP420 meeting, DESY 18/05/06 1 G4 simulation: where are we? Marta Ruspa on behalf of Alexander Zokhin FP420 Collaboration Meeting DESY 18 th.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Machine induced background in ALFA The ALFA detector elastic scattering and luminosity background generation, rejection and subtraction impact on luminosity.
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
Possible measurements with crystals in NA Test of single crystals for the SPS and LHC beam collimation.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Status of Beam Halo/Gas Simulation A.Stradling(Wisconsin) P. Steinberg(BNL) G. Usai (Chicago) Standard Model Group 6 December 2006 A.Stradling(Wisconsin)
Crystal Collimation at RHIC Raymond Fliller III Brookhaven National Laboratory HALO03, Montauk, NY.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Graham Sellers Simulations of the beamline and detector regions of the LHC and FP420.
accelerator centers worldwide
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Eduardo Nebot del Busto (1) CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2) The University of Liverpool, Department of physics, Liverpool, U. K (3) The Cockcroft Institute,
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
FP420 meeting UTA, 26/03/2007, Marta 1 Detector simulation and machine induced backgrounds: status and plans Marta, Federico FP420 Collaboration Meeting.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
FCC-hh Machine Detector Interface
Beam-Gas Inelastic scattering in CEPC partial double ring
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Background Simulations at Fermilab
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools: –STRUCT for particles tracking around LHC ring; –MARS/IHEP for cascades simulations. Backgrounds at FP420

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 2 Distant BG - protons only; - well-collimated with strong gradient on X; - mostly coincides in time with signal. Local BG - all particles, mostly products of electromagnetic showers; - wide angular distribution; - has a low-E fraction that may overlap several bunch crossings. We do not take into account particles generated in the FP420 setup material. Backgrounds at FP420

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 3 PU – pile-up – minibias protons from IP DGas – protons from distant beam-gas interactions MC – tails of momentum cleaning halo LPU – “late” pile-up (2 nd turn pile-up protons or protons from alien IP) Distant Background at 420 m

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 4 Background to forward detectors: FP420 Point 1 Background to forward detectors: FP420 Point 1 Beam 1 Beam 2 Horizontal distribution of hits at FP420 for the different background sources. Here IP1 – pile-up, IP5 – “alien” IP, MC – momentum cleaning, BG – distant beam- gas.

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 5 Background to forward detectors: FP420 Point 5 Background to forward detectors: FP420 Point 5 Beam 1 Beam 2 Horizontal distribution of hits at FP420 for the different background sources

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 6 Source – DPMJET III Nominal LHC conditions, L = Tracking – STRUCT code (I.Bayshev) Beam-gas beam lifetime = 100 h Momentum cleaning beam lifetime = 200 h MC intensity here was suppressed with factor (equal to the bunch length / bunch spacing ratio, supposing uniform time distribution for MC halo) Number of hits calculated for detector acceptance: -27 mm < x < -dx min -3 mm < y < 3 mm Distant BG Simulations

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 7 Distance dx (in mm) from detector edge to the beam. Normalization: σ inel = 84 mb 27 inelastic interactions per 1 bunch crossing Beam 1Beam 2 10 σ x σ x σ x Detector positioning

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 8 Distant BG in IP1 detectors Beam 1Beam 2 dx>10σ x dx>15σ x dx>20σ x dx>10σ x dx>15σ x dx>20σ x PU DGas MC * LPU Σ Number of hits produced by distant background protons in FP420 detectors per 1 bunch crossing depending on minimal distance from the beam

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 9 Distant BG in IP5 detectors Beam 1Beam 2 dx>10σ x dx>15σ x dx>20σ x dx>10σ x dx>15σ x dx>20σ x PU DGas MC * LPU Σ Number of hits produced by distant background protons in FP420 detectors per 1 bunch crossing depending on minimal distance from the beam

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 10 Showers from B11B dipole magnet, caused by losses of the protons, generated in IP. Showers from the local beam-gas interactions. Secondary particles from first 2 sources, scattered on the machine equipment and tunnel walls, including low-E neutrons and photons from thermal neutrons capture. Local Background at 420 m

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 11 B11B Background -PL/BC – average number of protons, lost on B11B, per 1 bunch crossing; -BC/PL – average number of bunch crossings per 1 proton lost on the B11B dipole. ▼ B11B BG is a rare event, but probably catastrophical for associated bunch crossing registration (and maybe for several subsequent bunch crossings too due to slow low energy tails of cascades) PL / BCBC / PL IP1 Beam IP1 Beam IP5 Beam IP5 Beam

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 12 Background due to losses upstream FP420 Background due to losses upstream FP420

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 13 B11B Background Average multiplicity of background particles crossing the acceptance of detector at 420 m (-27 mm < x < -20 σ x ; -3 mm < y < 3 mm) per one lost proton. Most of the lost protons will be absorbed in B11B (14 m long) without any leakage; therefore average multiplicity for “irradiating losses” will be several times higher. IP1IP5 Beam 1Beam 2Beam 1Beam 2 Protons Neutrons Pions Photons Electrons

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 14 B11B Background Simple estimation of the average number of B11B BG tracks in the 1 st plane of the FP420 detector per one lost proton. Fast charged hadrons (with E > 5 GeV) and electrons (with E > 10 MeV) were counted with 100% efficiency, photons (with E > 1 GeV) were taken into account with 0.75% efficiency (equal to the probability to generate e + e - pair in 1 mm of Si for 1 GeV photon). Again, average multiplicity of hits for “irradiating losses” will be several times higher. IP1IP5 Beam 1Beam 2Beam 1Beam 2 B11B BG Hits

IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 15 To continue with B11B BG multiplicity distribution (together with Manchester); To produce local beam-gas BG distributions; To prepare model of FP420 region (equipment + tunnel) and make simulations of the low-E BG and irradiation levels for FP420 electronics e.t.c.; To prepare algorithm of the background sources mixing for full simulation package. Plans