CIC ILL Directors Meeting, October 22, 2015 That’s Just Gross: A Macro-style Look at CIC’s Collection Sharing Activity Dennis Massie Program Officer, OCLC Research
What numbers of borrows and loans has each institution executed in each of the various resource sharing venues in the past 5 years? What factors determine the requesting method or model used for each request? How is all this changing over time? How will it most likely change in the future? OCLC/CIC ILL Study
What numbers of borrows and loans has each institution executed in each of the various resource sharing venues in the past 5 years? What factors determine the requesting method or model used for each request? How is all this changing over time? How will it most likely change in the future? OCLC/CIC ILL Study
What numbers of borrows and loans has each institution executed in each of the various resource sharing venues in the past 5 years? What factors determine the requesting method or model used for each request? How is all this changing over time? How will it most likely change in the future? OCLC/CIC ILL Study
THAT OTHER ILL DATA STUDY
#1:Total sharing activity is going up.
#2: Circ-to-Circ is where BD growth is.
#3. BD Growth is due to new players.
9 APPARENTLY TREND-LIKE SUBSTANCES RELATING TO CIC COLLECTION-SHARING ACTIVITY
#9:Total sharing activity is going down.
#8:On OCLC, Sharing Ret’s up, Non’s down.
#7: RapidILL up & down, Docline down.
#6: Other Consortial Borrowing: Down-ish.
#5: Free online, POD of non-returnables up.
#4: International lending of Non-ret’s is big.
#3: Non-UBorrow CIC OCLC traffic down.
#2: UBorrow borrowing & lending patterns are very, very different.
67%-33%
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb UBorrow Universe
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb UBorrow Universe
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb UBorrow Universe
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg. 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows
Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows #1: Mediated or Unmediated as a predominant borrowing method within UBorrow seems to have no correlation with relative borrowing volume.
Interview each CIC ILL unit (or selected ones) Chart OCLC ILL interactions in detail as new members joined CIC Look at fill rates Isolate returnables and non-returnables Overlay other variables on sharing data Repeat study with the Go8? Report out Next steps/further study
SM Together we make breakthroughs possible. Thanks! Comments? Questions? Dennis Massie Program Officer, OCLC Research CIC ILL Directors Meeting