Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DAViNCI 1 M.Shao, B. M.Levine, G. Vasisht, C. Zhai, J. Sandhu JPL, B. F. Lane, Draper Labs, R. Woodruff, G. Vasudevan, Lockheed-Martin, R. Samuele, Northop.
Advertisements

Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
Observation of beam halo with corona graph
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Error budget for the PRIMA conceptual design review Bob Tubbs, Richard Mathar, Murakawa Koji, Rudolf Le Poole, Jeff Meisner and Eric Bakker Leiden University.
CHARA AO WFS Design JDM (+LS,MJI) 2012Sep06 v0.1 1.
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Anthony Boccaletti Observatoire de Paris LESIA. Several instruments dedicated to Exoplanet detection and characterization with High Contrast Imaging since.
LBT AGW units Design Review Mar.2001 General Concept Performance specifications and goals The off-axis unit The mechanical support structure The control.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
Amplitude Control: Closing the Loop in a Zero Path Length Difference Michelson Interferometer Michael G. Littman, Michael Carr , Laurent Pueyo, Jeremy.
Recent & planned high-contrast work on the WCS and P3K Gene Serabyn Nov. 12, 2007.
NGAO Instrumentation Cost Drivers and Cost Savings September 2008 Sean Adkins.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 31 st March 2010.
Phase and Amplitude Control Ability using Spatial Light Modulators and Zero Path Length Difference Michelson Interferometer Michael G. Littman, Michael.
Technologies for Precise Distance and Angular Measurements In Space M. Shao JPL.
An Optimized Pupil Coronagraph: A New Way To Observe Extrasolar Planets This work was performed for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
THALES RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FRANCE This document and any data included are the property of THALES. They cannot be reproduced, disclosed or used without.
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
14 Sep 1998R D Ekers - Synth Image Workshop: INTRODUCTION 1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Introduction R. D. Ekers 14 Sep 1998.
Lyot coronagraphs with band-limited masks Brian Kern (JPL) (supported by all of TPF-C work to date)
Surface Contouring by phase-shifting real-time holography using photorefractive sillenite crystals M.R.R. Gesualdi,D.Soga, M.Muramatsu Optics and Laser.
Cophasing activities at Onera
Blue Dot Team « Multi aperture imaging ». BDT sept MAI techniques High accuracy visibility measurement Differential interferometry Nulling.
Spectral Analysis of atmospheres by nulling interferometry Marc OLLIVIER Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale - Orsay.
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
1 A. Boccaletti Pasadena, Sept th Imaging EGPs with JWST/MIRI and VLT/SPHERE valuable experiences for TPF-C A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz D. Rouan + coronagraphic.
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
Optical diagnostics for beam halo (I) Coronagraph (II) OTR halo monitor for J-PARC T. Mitsuhashi, KEK.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
1 1 st Light AO 4 LBT Pyramid WFS Adaptive Secondary MMT Unit.
High Contrast Imaging with Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing and PIAA for Subaru Telescopes Olivier Guyon Basile Gallet
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
March 2004 Charles A. DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 15: Introduction to Array Detectors Profs.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology JPL Coronagraph Workshop Sept , 2006 –
Olivier ABSIL Université de Liège * Pathways Towards Habitable Planets Barcelona, 14/09/2009.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
The Self-Coherent Camera: a focal plane wavefront sensor for EPICS
24 September 2001ATNF Imaging Workshop1 The Sydney University Stellar Interferometer (SUSI) John Davis School of Physics University of Sydney 24 September.
Page 1 Lecture 16 Extreme Adaptive Optics: Exoplanets and Protoplanetary Disks Claire Max AY 289 March 7, 2016 Based in part on slides from Bruce Macintosh.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
DAViNCI 1 M. Shao, B. M. Levine, G. Vasisht (JPL), B. F. Lane (Draper Labs), M. Clampin, R. Lyon (NASA/GSFC), V. Tolls (CfA), R. Woodruff, G. Vasudevan.
CCD Calibrations Eliminating noise and other sources of error.
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
VERTICAL SCANNING INTERFEROMETRY VSI
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Focal Plane Instrumentation at Big Bear Solar Observatory
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Eliminating noise and other sources of error
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Extended Scene Shack-Hartmann
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Instrument Considerations
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
LSST Photometric Calibration
Observational Astronomy
He Sun Advisor: N. Jeremy Kasdin Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Presentation transcript:

Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06

Depth of Dark Hole vs Starlight Suppression scattered light 3~4 /D implies ~10 -7 suppression of starlight 10 7 Star image without a coronagraph Star image suppressed by 10 7 Top level error budget OPD leak 4e-8 Amp leak 3e-8 Pol&color 3e-8 Total 1e-7 Blue means per sub aperture control 2/3 of residual starlight is random, spread over 1000 airy spots

Wavefront Sensing Principles 1) need to sense the wavefront “AFTER” the coronagraph. This reduces the accuracy needed from the wavefront sensor. If the E field after the coronagraph is measured to 10%, the next iteration of the WFS servo can improve the null by 100:1. –Low accuracy in a post coronagraph WFS means more iterations to converge (from1e-3), but doesn’t affect convergence. –Low accuracy in a pre-coronagraph WFS means you never get to 1e-7 (1e-10/airy spot) Inside an optical fiber there are only 2 quantities –Amplitude –Phase –In 2 polarizations, over ~20% bandpass

Nuller Architecture for Planet Imaging Telescope Pupil Nuller #1 Nuller #2 Fiber Array Calibration Wavefront Sensor Spectrometer Science Camera Dark output Bright output

Simplified Nuller/WFS Nulling interferometer has bright and dark output –Dark output (star suppressed) goes through a fiber array. –DM in 1 arm of nulling interferometer –DM at a pupil –Pupil relayed to fiber/lenslet array (input) Nulling Coronagraph Phase-Shifting Mirror C C D Beamsplitter Sampling Beamsplitter S c i e n c e A r r a y S c i e n c e C a m e r a Spatial filter Fiber/lenslet array DM (segmented) –Output of fiber array (new pupil) relayed to WFS CCD Wavefront sensing (amp and phase) sensed at pupil, corrected at pupil. We had looked at 3 other options

Measuring Amp, Phase Look at just the nuller first Science camera At image plane WFS camera at Pupil plane For now 1 pixel/fiber shutters DM Dither mirror

Measuring Amp, Phase Look at just the nuller first Science camera At image plane WFS camera at Pupil plane For now 1 pixel/fiber shutters DM Dither mirror

Measuring Amp, Phase Look at just the nuller first Science camera At image plane WFS camera at Pupil plane For now 1 pixel/fiber shutters DM Dither mirror Intensity mismatch leakage (  I) 2 /8 < 3x10 -8  I N ~4.2x10 6 photons for each of 1000 fibers

Measuring Amp, Phase Look at just the nuller first Science camera At image plane WFS camera at Pupil plane For now 1 pixel/fiber shutters DM Dither mirror For =550nm Leak = (  ) 2 /4 < 4e-8  < 4x10 -4 radians ~ 35 pm

OPD Dither 3 points A C In this example, dither is +/- 1nm. The null is 0.1 nm off. B is at 3.3x10-7 (10x too large) Offset ~ (A-C)*0.1nm/(P*1.3x10 -5 ) –P is flux at peak Systematic errors –Dither stroke error becomes a gain error. 1.1nm stroke would make a 0.1nm error signal => 0.11nm Photon noise  x = (sqrt(A+C)/P)*(0.1nm/1.3e-5) Total # ‘detected’ photons = 4x10 6 =>  x = 31pm B 5 mag star => 20% => 2.9x10 9 phot/sec into 8*3.5m telescope Need total of 8x10 9 photons to sense amp, phi If QE, coatings are all 100%, need 3 sec. In practice 6~10sec?

Deep W.L. Null 1.5x10 -9 /airy spot Max light into single mode fiber ~10nm (650nm 20%bw) Light attenuated (~3000x) to 3 picowatts for deep w.l. null experiment. Control update could be as high as a few hz. Average null over 60 sec ~1.5x10 -9 /airy spot Deep WL null Dark count ~78 p/s 3 picowatts thermal whitelight bulb -> fiber atten by ~3000x

Bright Ref Beam Telescope Pupil Nuller #1 Nuller #2 Fiber Array Calibration Wavefront Sensor Spectrometer Science Camera Dark output Bright output 4 ways of using a bright ref beam. Purpose (advantages) and requirements on the ref beam Combine in pupil –detect in pupil –Detect in image Combine ref (pupil) with image (~Giv’on) Combine ref (image) with pupil

Why Pupil / Pupil WFS? Combine in pupil –detect in pupil –Detect in image Combine ref (pupil) with image (~Giv’on) Combine ref (image) with pupil Pupil plane interferometry Pupil detection Speckle smearing with. Very high dynamic range detector needed. Complex processing to go from image to pupil DM actuation, with unknown noise prop. Ref pupil with speckle image Combine flat wavefront with converging wavefront. (limited bandwidth) Speckle smearing with. Ref image with speck pupil. Very high dynamic range detector needed. Combine flat wavefront with converging wavefront..

Bright Reference, Heterodyne Gain A post coronagraph WFS is looking at the residual starlight after almost all the starlight has been removed. At this point other noise sources will dominate over photon noise. –Residual starlight 1e-7 (of the star) (from which the servo error signal is derived)(but in 1 out of 1000 fibers) –Local and Exo-zodi (into A*   ) Because the fiber is single mode, the local/exo-zodi per fiber is = image plane in 1 airy spot Airy spot gets more background –CCD read noise –CCD dark current If a bright ref beam is interfered with a faint signal the Visibility is –Vis=2*sqrt(A*B)/(A+B) –If A =10 6 B= 1, the fringe signal is –Because the fringe singal has grown, it now dwarfs the noise from the CCD and zodi. –The fringe Vis of the Bright ref + faint residual starlight is used in place of the intensity of the faint residual starlight.

Background Noise Residual starlight of 5mag star 30 mag/airy spot Local 45deg 1.4* 22 mag/sqas Exozodi (of a solar system 45deg 2.8*22mag/sqas Airy spot (50% lyot aperture) 1.22* /5.3m 4.2*Zodi ~ 27.6 mag/airy spot ~ 10x brighter than residual starlight The bright reference is only used to improve SNR, the phase of the ref wavefront does not bias the result. –There is no need for a high quality 0.001, ref wavefront.