Circular Flow—Invisible Hand—Law of Markets Cantillon—Circular Flow Quesnay—Tableau Economique Smith—Invisible Hand Jean-Baptiste Say—Law of Markets Centrality of entrepreneur Oversupply in one market  shortage in another Malthus—Gluts  deficient effective demand Sismondi—production outstrips demand  gluts Factor immobility inhibits price clearing Regulate … constrain unfettered capitalism Marx—Crises: Disproportion/Realization/Liquidation Mill—Say’s Law holds if money is viewed as a commodity Walras—General Equilibrium Keynes—deficient effective demand Arrow-Debreu—Conditions of market clearing

The Circle of James Mill ( ) Jeremy Bentham( ) – utilitarianism –“Greatest good for the greatest number” Calculus of pleasure and pain –Daniel Bernoulli … St. Petersburg Paradox (1738) »Diminishing marginal utility of income Everyone’s happiness counts equally  Robin Hood principle –Roles for State Employer of last resort Redistribute wealth … but maintain incentives –Panopticon: an ideal prison Thomas Robert Malthus David Ricardo John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873) –Prodigy/philosopher/East India Co. administrator Learned age 3/Read 8 … the Illiad for fun Studied Ricardo & 13/Edited father’s & Bentham’s 19 Stayed with Say on trip to France/Nervous ~20 Philosophical Radical: civil liberties; women’s rights… »MP, opinion-maker: “Saint of rationalism”

Synthesis and Refinement of Classical Economics: Nassau Senior/John Stuart Mill Major/Dominant Texts A. Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776 David Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy & Taxation, 1817 Nassau Senior, Outline of the Science of Political Economy, 1836 John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy, 1848 Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, 1898 Paul Samuelson, Economics, 1948 Popular Principles of Economics Texts Campbell McConnellGregory Mankiw George Leland BachWm. McEachern James Gwartney Wm. Baumol and Alan Blinder Roger Arnold Bradley Shiller Wm. Boyes and Michael Melvin Glenn Hubbard and Patrick O’Brien

Synthesis and Refinement of Classical Economics: Nassau Senior/John Stuart Mill Nassau Senior, Outline of the Science of Political Economy, 1836 Wealth = scarce goods & services that have utility (supply) (demand) Bridge from Classical economics to Neo-classical economics? Not quite. Four postulates: 1.People want as much wealth as possible at as little sacrifice as possible  Services have value/Demand affects value 2.Population limited by “moral or physical evil” or fear of lacking subsistence –Means of subsistence increase faster than population owing to accumulation of capital … the Malthusian devil is tamed 3.Productivity may be increased by accumulating capital (= “abstinence”) –Abstinence (on margin) as factor of production  Profit/Interest Profit as well as wages enter value: Labor theory of value –Productivity of “waiting”…roundabout production Increasing returns in manufacturing 4.Diminishing returns in agriculture

John Stuart Mill’s Concerns Malthusian Specter Division of Labor  Drudgery/Ignorance Inequality Monopoly Emancipate women! –Contraceptive rights –Property rights –Voting rights If the principle of equality and liberty is true, we ought to act as if we believe it and not ordain that to be born a girl instead of a boy…shall decide a person’s position throughout life. Educate/Participate Producer Co-ops Limit inheritance Public utilities

John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy, 1848 Synthesis of Classical Economics Economic man  self-interest as motive force Invisible hand  harmony through competition Minimal government …but still a role Discern economic laws Say’s Law: Saving is spending Law of Population Iron Law of Wages Law of Diminishing Returns in agriculture (“most significant proposition”) Law of Comparative Advantage Mill: Competition  Efficient Production …but Political Redistribution can enhance utility Natural science  production. But Institutions  distribution Wiggle room in “wage-fund”  union bargaining not futile »Anticipation of Welfare State Harriet Taylor’s contribution(?) »"when two persons have their thoughts and speculations completely in common it is of little consequence in respect of the question of originality, which of them holds the pen."

Mill’s Idealism: A Sample … [W]e (Mill & Taylor) dreaded the ignorance, selfishness and brutality of the mass; but our ideal of ultimate improvement went far beyond Democracy and would class us [as] Socialists…[W]e looked forward to a time when society will no longer be divided into the idle and the industrious; when the rule that they who do not work shall not eat will be applied not to paupers only, but impartially to all; when the division of the produce of labor, instead of depending …on the accident of birth, will be made…on an acknowledged principle of justice; and when it will no longer … be impossible for human beings to exert themselves strenuously in procuring benefits which are not to be exclusively their own, but to be shared with the society they belong to. …We saw clearly that to render any such social transformation possible or desirable, an equivalent change of character must take place both in the uncultivated herd who now compose the laboring masses, and in the immense majority of their employers…Education, habit, and the cultivation of the sentiments will make a common man dig or weave for his country, as readily as fight for his country. It is only by slow degrees…that men in general can be brought up to this point…The deep-rooted selfishness which forms the general character of the existing society, is so deeply rooted, only because the whole course of existing institutions tends to foster it. John Stuart Mill, Autobiography, 1873

Principles in Mill’s Principles text …happily, there is nothing in the laws of value which remains for the present or any future writer to clear up; the theory of the subject is complete. Operation of Supply and Demand Value (price) adjusts to clear the market Short-run / long-run distinction…P Long-Run = Cost “Productive labor”  Capital/ Saving employs “productive labor”  Say Economies of scale  monopoly Role for public utilities Free trade  losers as well as winners Division of gains from trade … reciprocal demand Tariffs and terms-of-trade  strategic trade theory Defense of infant industry protection Socialism  indolence Competition  efficiency … but then redistribute Technology can benefit all  positive steady state Agricultural technology must overtake diminishing returns Role for government guidance  progress InstitutionsHuman drives + Institutions  Economic Outcomes InstitutionsInstitutions are subject to political intervention

More from Mill’s Principles Analytics –Non-competing groups (limited mobility) and wages –Joint products and theory of value –Opportunity cost of land  cost of production entering value –Economics of the firm – economies of scale –Supply and demand with numerical examples –Say’s Law elucidated (treat money as commodity) Applications –Peasant proprietorship championed  sand into fertile soil –Co-operative socialism (producer co-ops) –Flat income tax Exemption for low income Progressive rates penalize enterprise –Wage fund as limit on wage share Weakened in later editions  Labor unions can be effective